Pages

Public Display of Affection

You can tell a lot about a culture by its tolerance for PDA. Last September, a married couple was arrested in Delhi for kissing near a train station and were put on trial for obscenity, a sentence which could have put them both in jail for 3 months (in separate cells of course). There was some controversy over the accuracy of the police reports, with the couple denying that they were in fact kissing while snapping pics of themselves with their mobile. Fortunately, the presiding Judge S Muralidhar had some sense and dismissed the sentence, saying that even if police reports were accurate “it is inconceivable how… an expression of love by a young married couple would attract an offence of obscenity and trigger the coercive process of law”. Of course if they had been unmarried, it would have been a different story entirely.

I was personally quite embarrassed by the Richard Gere – Shilpa Shetty incident a couple of years ago. It was not the kiss that embarrassed me, although it looked quite strange (Shilpa really didn’t seem to enjoy being kissed by an old man). Rather, what bothered me was the Indian response, which betrayed our country’s continued backwardness regarding all things sexual. I just don’t get it. Why are we so afraid of sex that we won’t even allow two people to enjoy their time together by showing a bit of affection? I think it’s sick that we are still so repressed that we restrict freedom in this manner. I can already anticipate two of the comments that some of you will give, so here are my arguments against them:

  1. your argument: kissing in public will ‘excite animal instincts’ of men.
    • my rebuttal: anywhere you go in india you will find the walls of dhabas and chai stands plastered with erotic bollywood posters. watching a bollywood movie is also a public affair. bottom line, there is plenty of voluntary public consumption of soft-porn across india, so i don’t think a loving kiss between two people is going to add much to the fray.
  2. your argument: they can do whatever they want in private, but why must they do it in public?
    • my rebuttal: there are no parks or beaches or other such romantic places to enjoy love in private. denying people the right to enjoy their love is a crime, in my opinion.

Just for fun, I collected a few photos of “public displays of affection” from around the world. Can you guess which couple is from which country? Here are a few options (not all will be used): Brazil, France, Italy, India, Morocco, Russia, Sweden, US

italy1

nj_gay

mumbai

paris

brazil

sweden

follow Prerna on twitter at twitter.com/prernagupta

This entry was posted on Saturday, March 28th, 2009 at 4:05 pm and is filed under Love, Sexuality, morality. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

483 Responses to “Public Display of Affection”

good work keep it up………… infact keep it up m wid u????
Actually the people who r against it are actually those who r animals they themselves i think get animal instinct by seeing such things…. and ha afcrse the so called senior citizens … i meaan wat the heck … abhi unke zamaney ka gana hi lelo “khullam khulla pyar karenge hum dono” they like listening to the song bt they mind ppeople who r in love ….. i dont get them….
anyways guyz and gals three cheerz for the mantra….
“khulam khulam pyar karenge hum dono”………
anyways cheerz…….

Lol, i really liked this topic. PDA, in itself, isnt obscene. It is the way many do it that makes it obscene. Most of the times, it comes out as animal passion, which everyone prefers to be in private, rather than waves of love. That said, the Indian society is largely still conservative, and the obscenity of it is in the minds of the person who looks. So it really is shocking to see a PDA the way it happens, anywhere in India. It is unnecessary to say here that most of us are hypocrites when it comes to matters of sex and PDA.

I liked the analogy with movie posters. Some of them are so erotically overdone that they leave you disgusted. I have to agree with you that that is one of the worst hypocritical forms of Indian mindset.

They are morons(read police) who are out to just make money of this law loophole and out there to trouble the new generation.
Public affection of love can never be obscene.However some limit everyone understands and how can kissing be considered obscene.I wish people around us wake up and understands and start accepting the reality soon that the world is changing and young generation is going global with all means of communication and seeing freedom to express one’s affection and feelings across the globe and same suppressed in his/her own country(INDIA) will only create hard feelings for ones own people.
Accept the change.There is no vulgarity involved.

couldn’t agree more , if i ponder over this topic , i think the generation gap is also major reason behind it…i am sure younger generation of today would be more acceptable of PDA than our old generation … gap has increased more because younger generation has more exposure to global culture through media and internet .

and about reason of animal instinct, i have very contrary view on it..i think by more open to PDA , person would n;t hve lesssuppressed feeling abt it . and cases of unwanted would decrease

Well … yes this really unfortunate but if you see the deep root cause of the given problem i.e its because of the frustration of all people who were never able to do such thing in public because of their family constraints so they won’t want anyone else also not to do the same thing i.e if they can’t enjoy then why the hell the other should enjoy!!! …. There is a simple philosophy i.e if a person himself/herself isn’t happy then he can’t see other people around him happy either !

Dear Prerna,

I absolutely agree to your opinion, your article is easily comprehensible. Infact, it is a hypocritical sight of indian law to illegalize showing affection in the public. When 2 people love each other, why shouldn´t they have the freedom to express it? Is there an exact definition written in the Code of law? I would like to know it.
What about personality rights? Do people feel bothered when they face a happy couple kissing each other? And if so, isn´t it possible to just change the view, you have at least a field of vision, a radius of 180 degrees, incase you aren´t a chameleon.
It looks absurd in my eyes when people make a drama of a simple kiss or a hug, these wonderful acts of affection show the difference between a human and an animal.
The reason that girls need to be cared for doesn´t count either. Humans do have basical needs and desires, romance doesn´t happen behind closed doors or curtains. It happens at most romantic places, nature and environment are the best inspiring locations at all.

Not the kiss itself is the issue, the way of false interpretation leads to conflict.

And again, this strange way of interpretation is just a sanction to rule a folk!

I would initiate a DAY OF KISSES IN PUBLIC. All people who would like to join should feel free and kiss their loved one on this day on the streets…I´m sure the cops and also law would be unable to cope with the amount of “delicts!”

You people are the folk! Not any minority of policiticians!

LIBERATE YOURSELF!

Thank you for this great view!
Kind regards,
Naddu

In this matter the indian government can be compared with the Taliban.

Democracy is the government of the people, by the people, for the people.

Greetings,
Naddu

kushagra Wrote:

i really like your way of thinking and your initiative of hitting at the social and moral issues plaguing our society(especially the indian one)………….i hope you continue the good work which you are doing and i wish you all the best in such endeavours.

Correction: basic needs* :-) The subject does stir me a lot!!!

Thanx,
Naddu

Gangadhar Divatar Wrote:

Dear Prerana

You might be explorng one side of the event over PDA.
May be because of our culture we are not in position to adopt all those western activities pertaining to PDA. Yes on the part what you have narrated might be justified while the following points i am waiting for your responce

1. The PDA between two matured people may be justified, but what if they provocate the youth especially unmatured like school/college students don’t they follow the same. You can justify such activities for a responsible couples who know what they are doing, but what about those innocent ????
2. And one more thing about the Bollywood posters publisized all corners of india, may be the metroculture people can dare to stare them, but as a person from rural india i am still sure that nobody (if not 100% at least 95%) dares to stare those pictures nor they do get a chance to imitate the things.
3. The PDA justified by you does it differentiate the human from animals. A cultured Human being has facility to expose his affection or sex in privacy rather not showing in public like DOGS (may be i am rude but like b identified like a human)
4. Ans the most it affects by provocating the millions of innocents and nobody none of the parents would like to the irresponsible PDA with unmatured youth.

Prerana, I am not competative in english to putforth many of my points, but anything on the society should be decided after thinking twise. I mean to say think from all dimensions with all pro’s and con’s before declaring the verdict.

hey Prerna,
That is a very daring attempt to show the face of young India… Keep it up girl, as a matter of fact, i come from a small tow, but I am very liberal, my family tries to ‘hold me to the ground’ but i don’t think any one can stop people like us in today’s India. With more than 60% of the population under the age of 30, India is one of the youngest countries in the world, n having liberal rules will only help the new India progress at a faster pace…

Cool, different topic

1) Richard Gere and Shilpa Kiss : Whole world enjoyed it. It is called Staged Publicity( for both Richard and Silpa, Both had career in trouble before Kiss).

2.Delhi Railway Kiss: Love does not mean “Souting Slogans I love you”. I come across each day when a couple is waiting some one to notice them so that they can display Kiss.

When TOM CRUISE Jumped on couch to dispay his love, that was most disgusting act. Whole world made fun of it.

An Inferiority complex & self dejection drives people to “OVER” display their love in public place. Having a lovely kiss in public is wonderful but making it a DRAMA is bad.(Then it become Staged Show).

@Prerna

Wait: 1. Indian court accept the case.
2. It gave verdit in favor of couple.

(India is a great democracy. It looks like disorganised but IT WORKS AS A PERFECT DEMOCRACY)

Lighter side of Life(Don;t take it seriusly):

Those PICS on this article seems favoring Homosexuality. Out of six

Three kisses of same sex(es).

One kiss where guy is forcing him self on a girl. I don;t count it as kiss.

Only two Pics where a girl is kissing a male.
(INTERESTING ? )

Hi Aussie,

one of my indian friends is lawyer, I have asked him for the special law that restricts people in matters of affections. I´m still waiting for his response.
I hope he´ll make me clever, he meant he would only want to tell me when I promise to commit the offence with him… lol

Have a great day!
Naddu

I liked the Lawyer and his conditions, They are always winner, no mater who win or lose.
Aussie

I wish to commit such an offence and face court(if verdit is assured in my favor)

Another Question Naddu

Where did the Indian doctor complleted his law degree ?.: For your personal reference:In India, People study law when they have failed few times in year 12th and could not score decent any subject (Yes there are decent and qualified lawyer too, but those are exceptions).

IN INDIA, YOU CAN PEE IN PUBLIC BUT CANNOT KISS IN PUBLIC
Such is the rotten state of Indian civilization. That one can pee in public. But kissing in public is an offence. Sometimes i feel so ashamed to be an Indian. That i just want to bury myself in the ground.
And repression excites the ‘animal instinct of men’ and not kissing or any other expression of love.Rape is from repression .Not from expression. Countries where there is a culture of public display of affection, like Italy. also report the lowest cases of molestations and sexual assaults on woman.
Open sex and open kissing are two of the pillars of a free, modern and educated society.Lets pursue them.take care.love ankur.

hi,

Well my answers is in points of ur rebuttal :-

rebuttal 1)

Since u live in USA u cannot imagine the literacy level of villages and other interiors of India.I know u will become violent by reading thins but its true.
Soft Bollywood posters are appealing but people cant act on it. . .But if u do some act they will take it as a free treat and then rape and gang rape cases will increase.The litracy and awareness level is too low in interior.I am not talking about metros ( Delhi mumbai) or semi metros(Ahemdabad etc). . .I am talking about UP and other places…

rebuttal 2)
This point is baseless.IF you think that “love is allowed in public places “. Then public is allowed to involve in in your love session.
Go read the definition of “public places”.There is no rule in “having sex/love in public place”.You can always celebrate but point is ” its a public place ” and pepole can involve in it.Then u cant file any case.

remember the mumbai rape case of girl at the beach. . .that was not taken by court at any level.Not because of politics but because of “public place”.

Cultural belief also say that that ” girls pride lie first in her body then in any thing else” Wether u r hindu or muslim. . . .
And if u wanna follow totally open culture like ” lea jay ” aka ” leha Joshi ”

Sure go ahead make ur life like that u have freedom. thats it

I will be more happy.

Why Do We Kiss?

Just think of being in front of a warm cracking fire with you partner in your hands, with a kiss and a cuddle. But have you ever thought about why people kiss? It could be a greeting or a sign of affection, but we all kiss.

Origin of the kiss

The strangest theory on the history of the kiss that I have heard finds its roots in the age of the cave man. It is thought that in primitive times that a mother pre-chewed the food for her baby and transferred it ‘in a kiss’. Although this could never be proved, it would explain why the kiss is a sign of affection, between mother and child and later, adults.

The second theory that I found was that the kiss was reflected in the Ziller Valley of Central Europe, where the exchange of pre-chewed tobacco between a male and a female was common. The young man would let a tip of the piece of tobacco, or spruce resin, etc rest between his closed teeth and invite the girl to grasp it with her teeth — which of course obliged her to press her mouth firmly on that of the young man — and pull it out. If a girl accepted the wad of pre-chewed tobacco, it meant she returned the boy’s love.

The third theory that I found was from a religious or sacred origin. There have been examples from around the world, as early as 2000 BC, which show that people could have brought their faces together to symbolise spiritual union. Even in the Indians culture, it was believed that the exhaled breath was part of the soul, and by two people bringing their mouths together, showed the joining of their souls. (Another variation on this believed that kissing evolved from the smelling of a companion’s face as an act of greeting.)

Kiss through history

Even without fully knowing where the kiss came from, it is well known that the kiss has been with us for a long time.

In the sixth century in France, dancing was one way to display affection, and every dance was ended in a kiss.
Apparently, Russia was the first to incorporate the kiss into the marriage ceremony, where a promise was sealed with a kiss.
The Romans kissed to greet each other. One Roman emperor showed a persons importance by what part of his body they were allowed to kiss, from the cheek to the foot.
In 16th century England, the clove-studded apple originated. An apple was prepared by piercing it with as many cloves as the fruit could hold and then a maid carried the apple through the fair until she spied a lad she thought worth kissing. She would offer him the apple, and once he’d selected and chewed one of the cloves, they would share a kiss. After that, the apple passed into the man’s possession, and he would venture off in search of another lass to continue the game with.
At one stage it was even thought that people found kissing pleasurable because when the two lips met during kissing, an electric current was generated.
A kiss is a kiss

Now days, kisses range from small pecks on the cheeks as a greeting, to the use of the lips and tongue as a sign of passion. It is that action that causes hormones to be released into the blood stream when two people embrace, inducing a sense of euphoria that you feed (or feel?) in the sweetness of your lovers mouth.

It’s a kiss that brings every fibre of your being alive, turns your stomach over and sends Goosebumps up your spine. It’s a kiss that forgives your misdemeanours and smiles at your mistakes. Ingrid Bergman puts it together in that “a kiss is a lovely trick designed by nature to stop speech when words become superfluous”.

vishnu kasara Wrote:

DEAR PRERNA,

YOUR VIEWS ARE GOOD & I AM ALSO A STRONG SUPPORTER OF GENDER EQUILITY.

KEEP DOING GOOD JOB.

REGARDS,

VISHNU

raman jetly Wrote:

Good thoughts.

Would suggest to analyze the fact from both ends

Regards
raman

nzube chukwu Wrote:

my dear hypocrisy of the highest order is perpetually distortin the minds of so many ppl and the still fail to admit it i live in the middle east and u kno the rest of the story yet u see these kettles callin pots black savourin the delight of a pretty woman dressed in thongs and net doin the belly dancin well i guess the law is made for some people by some people

s.pal singh Wrote:

Prerna

Kissing is not a jurm

Regards

TO MAYANK, TO ALL NICE MALE READERS!

In 30 years observations, Jane Goodall never saw one rape among the chimpanzees, our closest primate cousins. Though it’s not possible to draw firm conclusions about human behaviour from animals, Goodall’s findings, and many other recent studies, get us questioning the old myths we have about rape. One of the most persistent myths about rape is that male biology and primitive male sex urges drive men to rape. But current information indicates that rape is more a learned act of sexual violence that comes out of social beliefs that men have a right to dominate and control women. The fact that rape is learned means that we can work to change the underlying beliefs and eliminate rape from our communities.

98% of rapists are male. Though boys and men are sometimes victims of rape, even in these cases the rapists are almost always male. Some people believe that the reason most all rapists are male is because woman aren’t physically capable of rape. But if you think about it, women are equally capable as men of using a weapon to order another person to have sex against their will. Yet it’s extremely rare for women to do so. One reason most all rapists are male is because in male dominated societies males are taught in many ways that they are entitled to dominate women. Females aren’t taught they are entitled to dominate men.

Name three things that can be done to prevent rape.

The interesting thing about the answers people give to this question is that most responses will be an admonition to females about how females should alter their behaviour to prevent rape. People will answer things like, “Never go out alone at night.” “Stay alert.” “Don’t linger on the streets.” “Don’t tease guys sexually.” “Always lock your windows and doors.” “Always park where there is good lighting.” “Always communicate clearly and assertively that you don’t want sex.” “Carry a whistle.”

Very few of the answers will pertain to how male behaviour should be changed despite some very obvious facts: Rape won’t stop until male behaviour changes. Restricting girls’ freedom is unfair. Restricting girls’ freedom never has and never will stop rape. Almost every one of the suggestions above are based on false assumptions about rape, and, in reality, do very little to protect girls from rape. Finally, constantly telling girls what they should do to prevent rape sends the harmful message that females, and not males, are responsible if they get raped.

So try that question again. Name three things that can be done to prevent rape.

There are many, many things that can be done to prevent rape. Here are three:

A. Protest all degrading and discriminatory treatment of women and girls.
B. Make sure there is equality between boys and girls in the home and school. If, for example, girls have to do more housework than boys, it sends a message that girls are supposed to serve boys, and as the boys get older they think girls should serve them sexually too. Girls and boys must be treated equally.
C. Integrate male dominated institutions at the top. When women hold half the power, rape and rapists will no longer be condoned.

True or False. Police and other authorities take rape very seriously.

True and False. Some police and authorities take rape very seriously, but way too many continue to protect rapists and ignore the victims and the crime. In the year 2000 In New York City, TV news video showed police ignoring women’s pleas for help when the sexual assaults were occurring right in front of the officers’ eyes. In Philadelphia, journalists discovered, and Philadelphia Police finally admitted, that the department had recently dumped upwards of four thousand rape cases. In northern California, the press revealed that Catholic bishops for decades have covered up priests’ sexual assaults of children and parishioners in their care. Though there have been some improvements in the last ten years, officials of male dominated institutions, like police, district attorneys, school principals, church leaders, and company managers, continue to have a strong tendency to protect the rapist and sacrifice the victim. This is one of the main reasons rape continues to exist.

What percent of rape victims do not report to police?

Rape is the most under-reported serious crime. Police and rape crisis groups agree that probably no more than 20% of all rapes are reported. And even when rape is reported, it has a lower conviction rate than robbery. Most rape victims don’t report the rape because they fear that they will be blamed for the rape, that the rape won’t be taken seriously, or that she will be stigmatized by the rape. Unfortunately, unless a rape victim gets good support from friends and proper response from authorities, it’s still true that many rape victims will be ostracized, blamed, and treated with disregard.

Is a kiss and a hug in a public a threat for a male dominated society?

Greetings,
Naddu

I was so surprised at how it made me feel when i couldnt even kiss or hug or hold my parnters hand in front of his friends. Being the fact that im an australian and used to public display of affection. I mean they Knew we were together, we sleep in the same bed so whats wrong with a lil hand holding. Its very prudent…even while they are hiding there lil undesired romance from the world, doesnt mean that i had to.
They made it sound as though men have no self control….why do u think that is??? becuz it has been made taboo to touch a woman unless she is bound to you by marraige!! Even the simplest innocent touch could be taken in a different way and all hell breaks loose. People want what they cant have, men and women alike. We all have carnal desire, but we also have the control to hold it back.

Well Prerna i strongly agree with you. Ppl here dont understand the difference between freindship,love and sex. They think if a boy and gal are together they are lovers and others things comes in… The generation gap does has a great affect in INDIA. But i think every one has to give importance to his culture also… Richard Gere followed his foreign culture being a foreigner. But being Indian and you are following foreign tradition in INDIA sometimes feels awkward… For dat im not saying its wrong. It depends on the place and the society where u live.. hope u understand…..

Tulsi harsh Wrote:

HI, PRERNA, indians are always tols to supress SEX, since centuries,so,evolutionary they are OBSSED for it,you know, it’s an HYPOCRITIC ART, to hide all our UGLYNESS,beneath silvery shining IDEALS,in pvt,no any other communit/ynationality can beat indians for there INCEST psychology,…………….tulsi(an ill-fated INDIAN)

Shashi Sharma Wrote:

DEAR PRERNA,

THANKS FOR A REALLY INTERESTING BOG.

I think we have to leave people to take a decisions on how they want to display there love. Every one in India is free to make decisions. I think some other group (e.g. Sene) is not allowed to make decisions on our behalf. I want to make point here that spread the knowledge about what is decent and what is not and then let people make decisions about it as it is there life and they have freedom to leave it as they want.

TO MAYANK,
It is not the villagers. But its your literacy level that is low. You are ignorant and unaware. Your literacy and awareness level is too low. There are tribes in Jharkhan. Where women dont cover their tops. There is no system of marriage. And there is open-sex. Rape and pornography r things that those people never heard of.
Almost every study on the subject agrees that availability of prostitutes, pornographic material gives a vent to the male sex energy. This decreases sexual crimes against a woman. Dont give ur crap about public places. That public should be involved in it. What a big fool u r. Such fools can only happen in India

TO ALL THE FOOLS,
India never had a culture of Public Display Of Affection. Instances of people displaying their affection in public is rare. But the greatest display of public affection and couples kissing in public happens in mumbai.And Mumbai also has the lowest sexual crime rate against woman. So public display of affection is inversely proportional to crime against woman. More open sex and more open kisses. And woman will be safer.

ANY WOMAN WHO CALLS HIS HUSBAND A HUSBAND SUPPORTS RAPE
The word husband comes from the word ‘husbandry’. Husbandry means farming. Implied in the word is the idea that the woman is the land of the man. Which he can till and use. The word is derogratory. And it supports the idea of rape. I think that rape started only when people started getting married. Married woman therefore act hypocritically when they talk of rape.

Ankur honey;

how have you been you fearnaught?

The definition of the “word” husband is following:
WORD HISTORY: The English word husband, even though it is a basic kinship term, is not a native English word. It comes ultimately from the Old Norse word hsbndi, meaning “master of a house,” which was borrowed into Old English as hsbnda. The second element in hsbndi, bndi, means “a man who has land and stock” and comes from the Old Norse verb ba, meaning “to live, dwell, have a household.” The master of the house was usually a spouse as well, of course, and it would seem that the main modern sense of husband arises from this overlap. When the Norsemen settled in Anglo-Saxon England, they would often take Anglo-Saxon women as their wives; it was then natural to refer to the husband using the Norse word for the concept, and to refer to the wife with her Anglo-Saxon (Old English) designation, wf, “woman, wife” (Modern English wife). Interestingly, Old English did have a feminine word related to Old Norse hsbndi that meant “mistress of a house,” namely, hsbonde. Had this word survived into Modern English, it would have sounded identical to husband—surely leading to ambiguities.

By the way, marriage isn´t related to rape and if so, then it´s an abnormal action (violent/frustrated) and behaviour of the male gender, happens especially in those countries in which women aren´t appreciated equally,a married or single status doesn´t play a role here.

Greetings,
Naddu

Naddu

Thanks for the information. I thought Husband means “Some one who cook food, clean the house & cars, does lawn mowing and drop the BIN at 5 AM for garbe to pick it up”.

Did I miss some thing ?

@ ANKUR

Boss: You cooked up the definition & meaning of Husband.

@Tulsi

I dont agree with you. Hypocrat’s are everywhere, every culture. So called pseudo educated(baked ideas), hypocrates, wife and HUSBAND basher are in each culture.

2. Why do feel ill fated Indian. Make your life worth. There are Millions who are worse off than you.

@Mayank

I agree with you 100%. Those who have not seen “Real India” do make wrong claims. Bombay, Delhi or Gurgaon is not real India. Almost 69% population still lives in villages. Yes lots of educated people lives and work in Rural India but still masses have same traditional attitude. Female is a subject of Sex and Discrimination. Kissing is not acceptable.

Those who beat their chest of freedom about kissing in public places, try Kissing in Gulf Countries(or even in PAK) and I am sure people will reward you on the spot. If you and still alive, court will reward a jail.

OBEY THE LAW OF THE LAND and WHY NOT. IF ONE GOES TO A NUDE BEACH, HE “MUST WALK NUDE”. IF ONE GOES TO “ISLAMIC COURTRY” OBEY THEIR RULE. I DONT SEE ANY THING WRONG IN THAT.

Diversity is a beautiful.

@Naddu
Your educative article about rape:

1) Yes gang rapes happens and they happen every country. There is a most notorious case in Australia where Few Young Lebaneses boys gave a girl ride home and gang rapped her(Court did gave verdict in girls favor and they are serving 37 years each in Jail).

Yes in some cultures girls are treated as subject and kids obey those rule. IT IS WORST THINGS ONE CAN FEEL.

“People who suffer low self esteem and depression take their frsutration on EASY pray”. Basically mentally sick people do such acts.

WE ARE BORN TO A FEMALE. SLEEPING IN “MUMS” ARM IS AND WILL ALWAYS REMAIN THE MOST COMFORTING THING IN ANY ONE’S LIFE.

@Naddu

OUR KIDS DO WHAT WE “DO”, NOT WHAT WE PREACH.

Dear Aussie,

I wish our kids would do what we do,
I know they don´t always do what we wish them to,
all that is left to us is live the good and right way
and preach over and over again the same, every day.

Dear friends,

I got confirmed what I already assumed, there´s no passage written in the Code of Indian Law that a kiss is illegal in public.
Obscene behaviour in public is prohibited, I got told it is a matter of interpretation. The police tends to define obscenity in public, they book a case in a haste, but ultimately it is quashed. You can say the police has unlimited power to book a person for anything.
When the matter comes before court, they get strictures from court and sometimes the officer is suspended for his misdemeanour. I think it´s a bad performance of the executive authority in India. They are too incompetent to know the Law, further they aren´t paid well.

This is a first hand account.

Greetings,
Naddu

Thanks Naddu

It is true our kids do what we do. Preaching generally don’t help when our own acts does not match our actions.

My dad is a perfect gentleman(I can proudly say most respected & highly educated gentleman) SO AM I.

(Ha Ha Ha self praise, but true).

jagdish lal Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
It is not a crime to kiss by a couple in public. Whereas our country is going behind due to this. As I have seen in some of countries in World like China which has a maximum population in the World and they does not stop like wise things in these countries. Sex is free in all these countries. If in our country we allow to free sex, crime must be lower than this.. In these days maximum crime in India is due to sex, for the sex or by the sex. So, you have taken a extreme step and if you need my held then you can write me again, I can take your step in my committee, which is known as National Human Rights Committee and I am the Presidnet of the same. I have attended so many meetings in international level of Human rights in India, austrlai, Newzeland, China, Hongkong etc.etc.
So, you have choose a nice topic and I am always with you. Jagdish..

ms verma Wrote:

The antiquated notions about what is right and what is wrong on public display of love except explicit certain things are not applicable to the changed modern times. Only little informed self-proclaimed moralists indulge in naive acts of sneering at such insignificant acts. A uniform world morality is emerging and no power on earth can stop this progress of bringing diverse human societies closer. Koka Pandit’s India never was and never will be a puritanic country and it shouldn’t be.
M. S. Verma

Akshar Bhavsar Wrote:

hello ther,
i felt very happy that you have turned vegetarien ,i hav studied throughly in gujrati medium so ther`ll be some spelling mistakes in my replies so understand tht & neglect

well do eat egg?? that is also non,veg.

its like someone eating unborn babychild snatched from her mother`s stomach…

we must not make our stomach a graveyard.

i liked this topic but pink chaddi,public display of affection are useless topics to discuess.
it`s all the media who populerize it because they dont have any news that help inspire people.

you are smart & intelligent , so you may use your skills to publish topics that makes smile,points new attitude & way. you have chance & recongition you can do it.

for eg pink chaddi(i feel shame writing this two words,how funny & nonsense)
1st and foremost i`m confused whether to cry or laugh on our media.that they are so poor that they have no more news to boradcast???
media shuld negelct the incident tht few ppls enterd the club & hited couples & same to tht girl who introduced this idea.. how silly they are.

i dont know how i`m getting mails of Girl`s talk ,i`m male..well whatsoever…
you have potential to do something that is very positive & inspiring
i hope you`ll do it at ur best…

gurpreet k. maitra Wrote:

Hi
If want to stop , stop violence n love . Love n smile r the only feelings should not be hidden.thry r harmless .

pradeep gupta Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
Since we two belong to two different cultures and values for life, it seems sometimes too difficult to respond your blog rationally. Display of affection is again one thing and projecting erotic behaviour is something different. can you please tell me if kissing a small kid is same as kissing a hottie hugging her. This is not just the affection but lust. I hope you are getting me. You have writen in your write up that even Shilpa Shetty was not at all ready to be kissed like that means this was all one sided. she fell prey to Richard Gere and found it difficult to cope with. However she managed the show with her sheer dignity. Watching erotic movies or the busines of soft porn is not similar to this, for which people pay. But watching a couple kissing each other in public costs nothing to these spectators and of course allows a lot of unnecessary argument over the issues. While advocating the US culture please don’t criticise Indian culture. There people make lovers from among their blood relatives and even marry, which has, scientifically been proven wrong. We strongly believe that emotion is something not to exhibit or display in public else there will be no barrier between the public and private life.
Regards.
Pradeep

Vivek Sahasrabudhe Wrote:

Very True

Vivek

mohandas T.P Wrote:

Depends upon the country and the view of people about the attitude of young guys
As far as Indian culture is concerned, it is not nice
This is my opinion.
Your wordings I like very much
Mohandas

@pradeep gupta — part of my point in including the pics of PDA from all over the world is to show that showing affection in public is not simply an “American” thing to do. it is a human thing to do. love is the most basic of human needs, and to restrict it causes serious problems. you say that Indian culture likes to hide emotions in public, but what about “eve teasing”? the jerks who eve tease women are not hiding their emotions. in fact, eve teasing is an expression of repressed sexual desire, which i believe would be significantly mitigated if Indian society were more open to things like public kissing.

please don’t misunderstand me. i am not trying to criticize Indian culture. i think Indian culture is beautiful. but i don’t think sexual repression should be a part of our culture, bc it is detrimental to our society and will ultimately stifle all which is great in our culture. again, i’ll remind you that the greatest ancient text on sex comes from our culture. sex is a part of indian culture and should be expressed more freely. it is time for us to grow up.

jitendra jitanshu Wrote:

yes im agree with u
we also published editorial on this issue
thankx again
urs
jjitanshu

CONCLUSION:

Ankur and Prerna need to get together. The word SEX never ends in their discussions.

(I am not a match maker).

Hello there, I’m Indonesian, a bit same culture with India. In my ops, grow up is adult. Adult is mature. self control is mature. expressions, excitement, if controlless, is just a kid things. I’m not hypcrt, I love kissing. But not in public area. Prerna, what are the culture, .. norms, means to you? Did what happened on the couple made you think that India culture need to be grow up? Here, I’w with you Pradeep. Hey you both have the same Gupta, is that a family name?

sinc,

alex

@Alex — yes I do think restricting freedoms like this is wrong. the fact that someone can tell me that i cannot even kiss my lover when i’m waiting for a train is absolutely ridiculous. how is kissing in public harming anyone at all? who the hell are you to encroach on my freedom like that? the government does not own my time and has no right to tell me when i can or cannot express my love. it is completely outrageous.

p.s. no pradeep and I are not related. Gupta is a very common last name in india :)

To fear love is to fear life, and those who fear life are already three parts dead.

A private life doesn´t end when you close the door of your house and enter the streets.
What means public? Who defines public?
Everyone of us is a part of public. We are a part of our living space, so why should a private life end when you change the location? Do we leave our authenticity when we leave our house?
People eat and sleep on the streets, they do anything they usually do at home as well, why is a kiss or a hug suddenly a private matter? It is not private, it is one condition of a complete life!
Love and affection happens even too seldom on the streets, people are too busy, time is too short for a hug or a kiss… I´m not sure if anyone would perceive a kissing couple at all in the hectic of a daily life.

To me, a kissing or hugging couple is an enchanting and lovely sight!

Greetings,
Naddu

@Naddu

Why are we arguing. Kissing is exciting when in two are in love. But MAKE SURE “HE/SHE HAD NOT EATEN “GARLIC” or FISH.

dr george pradhan,mb,ind Wrote:

prerna, 1.Public Displays of Affection item has values diff for each time, mores, tribes,cultures. India has a notorious double standard when it comes to these dilicate bold matters. We find fault if a fem drops her sari sowing one brest. but dont mind many regional dresses with top and bottom without a chunni drape. 2.Gere kiss w shilpa is a common posture in the Salsa dance. 3. half the human mind is saintly and half otherwise.Till 1940 many areas in india were topless.many dances body movements and mudras are sex set to music.My submission is that moral policing by us and our uniformed keepers of decency shd be directed by simple sense of the era and area.

KUDOS GIRL !! we all r definitely of the same opinion … PDA is something a personal choice & NOT PUBLIC at all !!!!!! way to go Young India !!

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ Prerna – I must say you have a highly patronising view of bollywood films. Please read the comment number 187 in your (absolutely idiotic, I might add) article about “Why did it take a westerner to make a good bollywood film” – first of all, the title is itself patronising, as I have mentioned in my comments, there have been any number of bollywood films greater than Slumdog and just because they have not won the Oscars is in no way a means of concluding that they are not good films. So stop making idiotic trash comments like “watching a bollywood movie is also a public affair.” in relation to talking about “erotic” or “sensual” stuff and “exciting animal instincts of men”. You are implying that watching a Bollywood film is like watching a “soft porn” movie and I can assure you, that being the case, watching Hollywood films is then a XXX affair and even far beyond!!! Making such unfair and wrong statements serves no purpose – Prerna, you seem to just take Bollywood as some sort of punching bag and criticise it at every opportunity! AGAIN, I SUGGEST YOU READ MY COMMENTS ON THAT SLUMDOG TRASH WRITE UP OF YOURS, COMMENT NUMBER 187 AND YOU WILL REALISE WHAT I AM SAYING!!! As far as this topic is concerned, I fully agree with AUSSIE – try kissing in Gulf countries (or even that failed state, “Porkistan”), you will get your just desserts – obeying the law of the land is paramount. Are all you Americans like this – you just try and push and shove your way into everything and alwyas want to have it your way, entirely disregarding all principles of propriety!!! Get a life, I say! And Prerna, one final point, I have gone through your profile and achievements, and while I am impressed with the fact that you are so educated and (apparently) “civilised”, I suggest you stop taking pot shots at India and bollywood sitting 1,000s of miles away in the US – in any case, we don’t need no lessons from you guys, the US is in DEEP SHIT!!!! Your useless leaders are gonne print dollars till they run out of resources to do so and the value of your currency will collapse and so will your economy, from all accounts!!! (I MUST SAY I WOULD NEVER WANT THAT TO HAPPEN, JUST TO CLARIFY!!!) So we really don’t need no American and pseudo-Indian telling us what to do and how to do it!

@ Tulsi – If you consider yourself an “ill-fated Indian”, it in no way reflects on India, but on YOU – it shows what a pathetic kind of a person you are. If you are so dissatisfied with your lot, why don’t you simply get out of the country and live somewhere else?!!? We can do without people like you!!!

@ Harit!

We don’t need no education
We don’t need no thought control
No dark sarcasm in the classroom
Teachers leave them kids alone
Hey teacher leave them kids alone
All in all it’s just another brick in the wall
All in all you’re just another brick in the wall

@Aussie,

why would I ensure he has not eaten garlic or fish? I like it, I would rather care if he has brushed his teeth before kissing me incase we haven´t dined together ;) lol

now I´m feeling tempted to read the comment number 187…I hope the number is registered and I don´t need to start counting…. ha ha

Dear Prerna, please number the comments that the readers are able to keep track!

warm greetings,
Naddu

HARIT WROTE : “AND ONE LAST THING – SM IS NOT AN INDIAN/BOLLYWOOD FILM!!

ABSOLUTELY!!! ABSOLUTELY!!!

Why do people use abbreviations all the time, I find it wonderful what they create!

SM may refer to:

Automobiles
Citroën SM, an automobile
Spec Miata, a class of racing car
Places
SM postcode area, in London, England
San Marino, a sovereign nation located within the borders of Italy
Military
Soldier’s Medal, a military award of the United States Army
Organizations and businesses
SM Entertainment, a South Korean talent agency
SM Prime Holdings, a Philippine retail operator
Savoia-Marchetti, an Italian aircraft company
St. Mary’s Railroad, reporting mark SM
Swedline Express, IATA airline code SM
Science
Samarium, a chemical element, symbol Sm
Standard Model, a quantum field theory
Silty sand, in the Unified Soil Classification System
Sm, a type of spiral irregular galaxy, see Magellanic spiral
Technology
SmartMedia, a flash memory card standard
Security Module – a device providing security functions, e.g. encryption
Secure Messaging
.sm, San Marino top-level Internet domain
SM (plotting), supermongo – an interactive plotting software
SM (computer) — is an abbreviation for ‘System of Machines’. It’s the name of DEC’s PDP and VAX compatible computers developed in USSR. (Russian: ‘СМ’ — ‘Система Машин’)
Other uses
Sailor Moon, a Japanese media franchise
Sadomasochism, gratification in the infliction of pain or humiliation on another person
Service mark (℠), an unofficial trademark used for services rather than products
Space Marines, a fictional army in Warhammer 40k, a tabletop battle game.
Spesmilo, a unit of currency abbreviated Sm

Stephen Malkmus, lead singer of now-defunct Pavement
Master of Science, or Scientiæ magister, an academic postgraduate degree
Sailor Mercury
Sailor Mars
Specialist Mathematics, an advanced mathematical subject offered in Australian schools for years 11 and 12
Scarlet Monastery, an instance dungeon in the MMORPG World of Warcraft.

Thank you for this inspiring abbreviation Harit!

Dear Prerna,

don´t take Harit´s emotional outburst personally.

A man can fail many times, but he isn’t a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.

Harit Shah Wrote:

Looks like Naddu is in the mood for joking!

Harit Shah Wrote:

and Naddu, it is not an emotional outburst against Prerna and it is not menat to be personal. I was writing my view points on how I see things here on this very interesting website and I would commend Prerna for having cretaed it with her team. So knock it off, Naddu.

THANKS AUSSIE ,THANKS.
thanks for floating the idea of my and prerna getting together. I often dream of it. But its a pipe-dream. A rich stanford graduate like Prerna who wallows with the hunks of California may find little attraction in a penni-less rebel like me!

OPEN INVITATION TO ALL THE SUPPORTERS OF PDA:
i hereby cordially invite you all supporters of PDA to come to India and practically show PDA as exactly as shown in the accompanied pictures with this topic, on the streets of India(urban and rural.
then you will see the PDA (Public Display of Affection) towards your act.
don’t waste your time in just discussing and discussing this here.
THIS IS SECURED AND COMPACT PLACE. PLEASE COME OUT ON THE STREETS TO SUPPORT YOUR VIEWS.
Thanks and regards
Rahul
Supporter of PDA(Private Display of Affection)

DEAR AUSSIE,
Your agreeing with a fool like mayank dismays me. U are confusing diversity with sectarianism. Burqas and other forms of clothing to veil oneself are a form of cultural pollution. Like Air-pollution. Aussie do u carry placards on the roads of Australia demanding that air-pollution be allowed besides clean-air. Because of diversity.Because u love diversity.
When u dont understand the meaning of diversity. Diversity comes only when there is full freedom for the individual to express himself. As a result there are millions of unique individuals. That is diversity. Having different groups with uniform practises is sectarianism and not diversity.India therefore is a sectarian country. Not a diverse one. Aussie i like u. Therefore i m telling u the above words. These words are originally mine. Excerpts from my upcoming novel.. That will be released around December..And yeah getting fucked by seven different australian girls
on the seven days of the week is the definition of diversity. Therefore practise diversity. take care.love ankur.

TO NADDU,
How r u honey? Sorry for the delay in my responses. My exams r due to start in April. Besides its election time in India. And a great new leader called Varun gandhi has risen up. A lot of my energy is devoted there.
As always i found your ‘a history of kiss’ and a ‘history of rape’ original, informative and interesting.
Naddu, i think the idea of rape arises from the idea of the man as the master of woman. This is ugly because it reduces woman to an object.Rape is the peak of that process of objectification. I personally think that unless woman start the reverse process, things wont come to an end. So women should start raping men. Rape the men at knife point and gun-point. Women should necessarily keep guns for the purpose of raping men. And they should call their husbands anything but not husband. The world should be banned .Or replaced by your female equivalent ‘hsbandi’. But better still to denote the male spouse by the word ‘dog’.
A million rapes r taking place every night in the form of marital rape. Write something on it. So that u become the medium of a ”million mutinies” by woman against these ”million rapes”.
Till then i m waiting for some woman to rape me at gun-point.love and lust.ankur.

BOLLYWOOD STAR AKSHAY KUMAR IS READING PRERNA’S BLOG
Yeaterday in the India Fashion Week bollywood superstar Akshay kumar broke new grounds in Public display of affection. While on ramp he made his wife Twinkle open the button of his jeans with her hands. I think this is the most beautiful form of public display of affection. He probably must have been impelled to do that after reading Prerna’s piece on PDA. Jai ho akshay!jai ho prerna!

Prerna,

Looks like even Delhi is so much in backwardness like Chennai(matter of fact, entire Tamil Nadu). There, couple, I mean, married couple, can’t even go hand in hand or hand on shoulder. Stupid Tamilians object such act. Bullshit people, can’t use rotten words, but I mean them :)

Thanks.

Vikas Kaushik Wrote:

I agreed with you ,but as per our indian culture,its not acepted.pic,at any places,is seperate things,but,how can we acepts same openly.you please think if urs sister,or daughter is there,can u?

No offense to but all we do here is just talk..my question WHEN DO WE DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT..?????

Abdul Rauf Khan Wrote:

Dear P.Gupta

I understand your frustration over the issue. It is loobvious that the kind of movies are produced by bollywood the same is being depicted by the people. Neither I am in favour nor I have any thing to support the incident for the victims. But it is for sure, there always double standard of measuring every incurring case. Hence, the modesty is every considered as decent. Hope we follow.

Regards
Abdul Rauf Khan

highmount_1@hotmail.com Wrote:

kiss any pat of the world is nothing wonder why india is so funny

avishek sanghvi Wrote:

I do not agree with you. Love is something which is private, between two people and it should be done privately only. Why should one go on public display. If there are no parks , that doesn’t mean that ppl will start loving on the middle of a road. In India, where 60% of the population is below poverty line, where a entire family stays in a single room house , so what should they do. Make love in parks bcz there is no place at home. That’s not the solution. That’s not the way you do or in that case any civilised society will do. The fact is that we are just running after the western culture blindly without bothering abt their implications. Free Sex, Pre Marital Sex, PDA, Live IN relationships, where all this leading us to. Look there is no harm indulging in sex with the consent of your partner but then it should be done in private places.

rgds
abhi

starmedia-shakil Wrote:

Prerna

I think a forum is required besides the learned judges to determine what should and should not be decided by the learned judges as I think this was a waste of the precious time of the court.Secondly if the couple was trying to show their love for each other in public this will teach them a lesson ,as they will know now that they should not enact this in public and if they do then they should not have been married because if you are not married seldom does this happen that you are caught for such an act in public.

Then again the question arises how rich and famous these two were because even a blasphemy against the second most religious book for every Indian after his religious guide gos unnoticed if You are one of the powerful CEOS of one of the political parties or even a new entrant like the recent example from what we are reading these days where you can practically escape every act for which you and me may not see the daylight speaking against other religions ,beliefs,borders,and……….

Let me tell you something the youth in this country is sleeping or how else can the guys who are already hanging almost in the graves can raise and guide mass hysteria again and again and play the same cards and fool the people of this country.

My solution is to advise these two to refrain from such mistake until they are adopted by an even though small in size a political group where then a sane explanation will be ready to defend them.

SD

sabir hussain Wrote:

Hi,
am impressed .the topic u got is interresting and u wrote all abt is good.

vaibhav garg Wrote:

nice matter to read
thanx

rajesh arcot arunachalam Wrote:

I fully agree with you, every human being on earth should have their own freedom to live and do whatever they want to do it is upto an individual will and wish to excute an action as per his/her conscious, in this case of kissing if a person feels so embrassed by viewing a couple kissing in public place then he should not see the couple or close his/her eyes, and leave them alone and not make a fuss about it.

I fully agree that every human can feel free do to whatever they want to do.

Regards,

RAJESH.

I would like to add a line more to the comment I wrote yesterday. Not everybody that constitutes a unit of the so called public can objectively witness a couple kissing openly in India as quite a large number of people, even the so called riff-raff, are sex-hungry and the kiss can provoke them to indulge in something unsavoury. Your commentators seem to miss this aspect, MS Prerna. This is just another perspective of the issue.

Prof. M. S. Verma

malik nisar Wrote:

Hi Prerna
i appreciate your ways of exposing our hypocritic attitude.
it is commondable and deserves a thought.
keep going
kindest regards
Nisar

Lokesh Shah Wrote:

Thanks Prena

@Naddu

I eat garlic all the time. When I wrote that she MUST not have eaten Garlic or Fish, I MEANT HER MOUTH “MUST” NOT BE STINKING.

Dear Deepi

Please don’t use abusive language towards any race. Mater of fact Tamils are rated as second most educated and high calibre people of India. Also they are original owner of the land(India).

@Naddu — i really like your idea of A DAY OF KISSES IN PUBLIC. perhaps we should suggest this to the Pink Chaddi ladies for their next stunt :) although unfortunately i’m sure this would provoke a violent reaction by Ram Sene…

Dear Prerna

I read your writeup. i agree with your points.
in India only sex is a big issue. sex is a divine thing.
if any one gets safe oppertunity to have sex they can have it is their choice. Although iam married if if i get
a chance to have sex with any of my female contacts i love to do. and females slso now a days wants to enjoy more with more than one partner.
with love
narayan

frank ebenezer Wrote:

Arguing about if PDA is an offence is subjective and many facts of the situation have to be considered. If commenting in general or formulating a policy to discriminate or not will depend on our society’s acceptance of the culutural exvhanges with others and its influence or adaptation by us and as well as them.
An ideal case would be that of an open society interacting at different levels with other societies and cultures and to very naturally adapt to different practices that individuals are comfortable to and that it is naturally acceepted by the society they live in .

Not treated as a foriegn influence which is taboo to our culture. So, I guess we have a long way to go and ofcourse as these new situations happen around us we will read more about mad reactions.

With referance to the fact that our society accepts soft porn in terms of posters adult movies played at public theaters etc and the non availability of parks to allow individuals of the freedom of PAD, I quite agree that subject of sex soft to hard is a common subject at different levels of our society.But it is also a fact that whoever goes to Goa men or women do not voluntarily or naturally get into biknis or beach wear but quite enjoy the sight of foriegners basking in the sun half nude or the scantiest of clothes on them. It is not a common sight for our society so we gape at them. While for them it would be abnormal not to be in beach wear on a beach. So we still have to go a long way.

In my own city there are lot parks where couples of all ages get very romantic behind rocks and bushes etc but you also have human monkeys preying on them and so very eager to relish a live scene.

This is the crux of it “Live scene”. Be it a lady in very exposing clothes.a couple PAD,
fashion shows and others which have a display of more skin than covered, are all so welcome to individuals in our society be it a male or female, it generates a level of curiosity which rides tham till the live scene is over !!

The after math is a rainbow of reactions, the intensity of criticism varies as the colours of it

BALAKRISHNAN MN Wrote:

Hi,
You are thinking aloud, good. It sunds as if there is no distinction of dos and donts in your perception. I think, as the vedic literature popouded good path should be chosen for lifestyle going by the accredited persons of the time. Ofcourse time will condition all the theories but the crux understandale by the higher brains will remain intact.
The expresion of sexual love making, you will agree, is contageouis and can turn vulnearable.The cross section of the public have not only civilized and harmless people like you and I. In the hands of people like Billa it can arouse atacks to snatch away the lady from husbend by force. They may trail these people to fulfil their insticts disregardig all laws! I had an experience while staying in a high class hotel at Bangalore when I was very young . A sexy couple was staying adjecent; can’t say wher h/w or just friends. Morning while peeping out for some services I found they kissing with passion in the corridor while they are at the door steps of their own room. Is it not indiscipline? Sex is not something to be codemed, I agree. But should be enjoyed with out hurting the public comprisin father-son-daughter etc. We re born ot of the sexual interaction of or parents. But we seldom drag thi subject for open discussion with them; never venture learning sex business from them. Though procreation is possible by sexual act which animals are also doing by sheer instict. But sex for human is much more, it is ultimately a spiritual union of two souls and the initialization and perverted acts of passion later become less importent.
All the being starving sex will maturbate and it is an axium, a unversal truth, but reasonable privacy should be attached with it by huma beings having regard to the society they live in. I won’t justify verything taking an American Role Model.
Thanks,

jacob john Wrote:

Dear Prerna.
Kissing public might be offeence.But if it is shown in movies???? is that not an offence??
in public u can see ones and in movies u can see the same as much u want.

u also see nude picture.if any one walk nude on road will be put to shame and v talk about indian culture.but that if is shown in movies….. nothing will happen.not only that v hail them for their acting etc.

jacob

Naveed Iqbal Wrote:

Interesting !

Naveed

Vigilante Man Wrote:

i personally dont see anything wrong with public displays of affection….if i had a girlfriend/wife…i wouldnt be embarressed by kissing or hugging her in public…theres nothing wrong with expressing your love to someone no matter where you both are…and if someone has a problem with it….they can turn away.

jaffri jaffri Wrote:

i agree with u everybody has his own life and privacy.

rachavelpula raju Wrote:

All valid points

mahavir agrawal Wrote:

nice

Waqas Shaikh Wrote:

Prema,

A married couple kissing near a train station is an expression of love but bollywood
film scenes are vulgar. Sub-Continent society has a lot of hypocracy when it comes to
sex. I know every guy there wants to have sex but if a girl does, it is bad.

Economics form social institutions. Sub-Continent was ruled by Great Britain for
200 years and did not allow the society to express their feelings. Our rulers (Nawabs)
had slave mentality and they treated their own people with contempt. However,
the time is changing. We are independent for 62 years and more people are getting
education. Despite disparity between rich and poor sub-continent is on the rise and
I am confident that within next two decades we will see a big economical and cultural
changes. These changes will definetly be positive.

Best Regards,

Waqas

mohammad syed husain Wrote:

Richard Gere / Shilpa Shetty
I saw the video only once and realized that the kiss was rather prolonged, and a tinge of lust was clearly evident in the male. He wouldn’t let go. This public display in India was justifiably offensive to whoever objected in my opinion. Maybe its sour grapes on my part.

jyothy maya chary Wrote:

thanks for sharing the good views of yours…………….

vishy chauhan Wrote:

Dear prerna,
I fully agree with you. The fact never changes by hiding anything. love between two persons remains same even if it is played in private or public. we are unable to erase the facts but only thing we do is nothing else than hypocracy.
To hide what is, is nothing but hypocracy and we are hypocrate by birth and that is the reason we are rigid and backward.
In histry many had ruled india but we are same as we were, we have never accepted anything from anybody not only that we never bother to give a thought to others principles, whether other is right or wrong. we have closed our eyes and ears and that is the reason we are still backward and will remain backward.
I personally fully support your views. I firmly believe BRAHMCHARYA is nothing but insulting GOD’s gift and it is none but the VIKRUTI and not the normal one.
May God bless you…..
vishy

Dear Prerna,

thank you for your approval. Infact, I believe with appropriate soft actions people can achieve more than with words. A revolution made with love isn´t crime and will not provoke resentment. The more young couples join in, the better.

LETS INITIATE A “DAY OF KISSES IN PUBLIC” IN INDIA!!!

LOVE REVOLUTION!

This is an appeal to all young indians to fight for their personality rights! Don´t be devoting to any tradition that causes personal frustrations and limitates your freedom.
Only with actions you all will be able to force a change, don´t leave success to a destiny!

JAI LOVE!

Dear Prerna this yet another intersting blog about such an intersting subject. Hats off to you for this.
There is absolutely no offence or obscenity in kissing by married couples while they are in a public place like Railway stations , Airports etc at the time of departures or seprations for a longer periods. The so called moral officers ( Police) are only creating problem for the common man and woman and if you pay them their ‘mamool’ bribe they will let you do anything anywhere whter you are married or not.
The few pictures you have posted are good I can say one is from India and that too from Mumbai Marine Drive. Execellent post , keep writing such public interst and debatable post.
regards,
Mohamed.

@ Mohammad Syed Husain

Do you really believe Shilpa Shetty didn´t enjoy the kiss of Richard Gere? Had you not also enjoyed getting kissed by Shilpa Shetty? By the way, the scene was more a show act and not a real kiss. I couldn´t figure out any ting of lust in it. Incidentally, the whole matter happened on the occasion of an Anti-Aids Campaign, the purpose of the kiss was to show that a kiss doesn´t cause Aids, because a kiss isn´t sex! Or do you have sex when you kiss your child, your daughter or your son? Do you kiss them at all? When you kiss your wife or friend, do you feel always lust?

Had she not liked it she could have easily slapped his cheeks or kicked his bum. We women know how to defend ourselves when a kiss is unwanted…and at all, a man would not kiss a woman wouldn´t she agree. I have never ever observed this in the public.

You can procceed on the assumption that all kisses that happen in the public are wanted from both genders. If you feel disturbed by it, close your eyes and just wish it was you.

Thank you.
Warm greetings,
Naddu

DEAR PRERNA,

I`M CONVINCED THAT A “DAY OF KISSES IN PUBLIC” WOULD CAUSE A GREAT MEDIA INTEREST.

A BATTLE FOUGHT WITH LOVE AND KISSES IS THE SPIRIT OF THE TIME!

YES WE CAN…. I PROMISE I WILL COME ACROSS 5,5 MILLION MILES TO INDIA TO SUPPORT MY INDIAN FRIENDS ON THIS DAY.

LETS GO!
Naddu

WE NEED AN APPROPRIATE DATE, THEN SPREAD THE MESSAGE AND ANNOUNCE IT ALL OVER!

WONDERFUL!

Dear NADDU

I wish SILPA Kissed me. We all enjoy 15 minutes fame.

Sunil Pal Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
I support your view. Actually sex is between two ears and not between two legs.Unfortunately most of us think the other way.

Regards,
Pal

TO VIKAS KAUSHIK,
I am an indian. And i dont mind if my sister, daughter or wife shows public display of affection. I would mind if they dont do it. I would doubt their feminity. So keep ur crap to yourself. Dont thrust u bullshit on the people of India.take care.love ankur

TO RAHUL AND OTHER SUPPORTERS OF PRIVATE DISPALY OF AFFECTION.
Dear Rahul,
Come to Khan Market in Delhi on Friday and Saturday evenings. You will find me displaying my public display of affection with some girl. I have been doing that for the last two years. And no supporter of private display of affection like u has dared to do anything to me . Because if they do i break their teeth. So open invitation to u. Come u supporter of private display of affection. And i will make a public display of ur teeth. take care.love ankur.

SINGAPORE AND PDA
Singapore is a developed country. It has one of the best infrastructure in the world. The per capita income is high. And the citizens enjoy the highest standards of living. In the United Nations Happiness Index which measures the happiness of the citizens of a country based on the response of its citizens; Singapore ranked at the bottom of the index. Below some developing countries. The citizens of Singapore attributed this to sexually prutan attitude of the government. They are not allowed to kiss in public, besides complete ban on pornography. So important is therefore an open and liberal attitude towards PDA,PORNOGRAPHY And sex for the happiness of the citizens of a state.

TO NADDU,
The idea of a day of kisses is welcome. Acts of violence and encroachment of somebody’s privacy cannot be justified on the grounds of public or private spaces. But i was looking forward to ur response to marital rape. How would u justify the million rapes of married women everynight by their dogs. Ahhhhh. Sorry i mean husbands for u .take care.love ankur.

THE ARGUEMENT OF PRIVATE VS PUBLIC SPACES IS BULLSHIT,
cHAIN snatching is common in India. Should the police tell a woman whose chain has been snatched that she was wearing it in public space. SO the thief was justified in snatching it. If something happens amidst a crowd, does it mean that the crowd is justified in doing anything with it. Is it a jungle. Where smaller animals would have to live in hiding in their private spaces. take care.love ankur

I completely agree with what you say. Democracy allows one to do anything. Yes But in a controlled manner. When you are in Rome do as the romans do. So you follow the rules and traditions of the country.

You are contending about the number of public places alloted for kissing. Well there are none officially. N there should be none. There is something called the HOUSE or HOME SWEET HOME. which is very private. One can display your love there. One does not have to display love on the highstreets and parks. There are many places in the metro cities in India yes an ocassional kiss is not so great. Yes but you want to create a kissing record that certianly objectionable in public. As the tradition goes do it but dont do it in public. Be it dirty politic, drugs, women,kissing or sex.
The whole thing is that IF YOU WANNA DO IT. DO IT BUT NOT IN PUBLIC.

@ankur
Dear ankur,
if i get a chance i will definitely come to Khan Market in Delhi on Friday and Saturday evenings and watch your live and free show of PDA with some girl.
and dear, why should i or other members of PUBLIC object you?
it’s your PRIVATE matter which you chose to display it in PUBLIC, do whatever you feel like doing with that girl in full PUBLIC VIEW, people will enjoy it, if they like the show.
and ankur dear last but not least thing, you can’t dare to object public at large for watching your PDA, i am sure you are not doing that otherwise PEOPLE will make a public display of ur teeth. take care.love Rahul.

Few Questions:

> What is this ’sexual backwardness’? Is that something akin to economic backwardness, or social backwardness? If not, then lets not create terms which have no meaning or material impact on people’s life. Specifically because you are trying to prove a point. Please remember, when we use a term ‘Backward’, it has a negative impact on society/individual. And as far as I can see we are sexually very healthy and active society and thats the reason that we have such huge population. So, please refrain from using a term loosely

> Couple of other reasons and arguments that you provided in favour of PDA
– Why are we afraid of sex?
– Restriction of Sexual freedom
– Denying people the right to enjoy their love is a crime

Well, “People to have sex on street” also fits the above reasoning and should be allowed going by the same standards that you mentioned, as they fit in perfectly. So, should we be ok with “People having Sex on street”? If not, then we have to think if the above line of reasoning or argument are right or not.

And let me challenge you more on it with a more concrete example. There was an incident on a plane travelling between SA and London, where a businessman started having sex with his model Girl friend on plane, in front of other passengers and was booked for it. Now does that mean that the law was backward? Based on what you have mentioned, law was backward and theirs was an expression of sexual freedom. Right? I think ‘Wrong’. So what the reason that this happens.

The reason is that society has standards, which protects one person from offending the other person. If this line is breached, there are repercussions. If your argument is that society/people should not be bothered with what you/other people do, then re consider the plane example. Will you not be bothered if you see such an incident on your next seat? Will you not look down upon it and report it? If you will not be, then all is fine and you are not a hypocrite. If you are not fine and will be offended, then you are hypocrite. Because then you are trying to judge people by your standards, while you expect no one else to judge you by their standards. And these standards/ tolerance level is different across different society and culture.

Learn to understand them before blindly criticizing them. You can’t impose your standards on society and expect them to follow, as these standards are set by majority, not minority like us (And thats the twist- I am a minority like yourself, however with much more tolerence and understanding of standards which are set). And remember these standards are not all bad. They are very beneficial to us in daily life. If they were not set then you might have witnessed

- Girls being eve teased openly without any fear
- Elders and weak being laughed upon etc.

Just because west follow a different standard set by their society, doesn’t mean that standard is good. Indian soiety is moving at a different pace as is its economy.

Final comment: What does sexual freedom like you described, gets you? Are you richer? increases ur standard of living? I guess not. And if your arguement is that freedom is the end goal, then again go back to the plane example to bring contextlic will ‘excite animal instincts’ of men.
* my rebuttal: anywhere you go in india you will find the walls of dhabas and chai stands plastered with erotic bollywood posters. watching a bollywood movie is also a public affair. bottom line, there is plenty of voluntary public consumption of soft-porn across india, so i don’t think a loving kiss between two people is going to add much to the fray.
2. your argument: they can do whatever they want in private, but why must they do it in public?
* my rebuttal: there are no parks or beaches or other such romantic places to enjoy love in private. denying people the right to enjoy their love is a crime, in my opinion.

Just for fun, I collected a few photos of “public displays of affection” from around the world. Can you guess which couple is from which country? Here are a few options (not all will be used): Brazil, France, Italy, India, Morocco, Russia, Sweden, US

Few Questions:

> What is this ’sexual backwardness’? Is that something akin to economic backwardness, or social backwardness? If not, then lets not create terms which have no meaning or material impact on people’s life. Specifically because you are trying to prove a point. Please remember, when we use a term ‘Backward’, it has a negative impact on society/individual. And as far as I can see we are sexually very healthy and active society and thats the reason that we have such huge population. So, please refrain from using a term loosely

> Couple of other reasons and arguments that you provided in favour of PDA
– Why are we afraid of sex?
– Restriction of Sexual freedom
– Denying people the right to enjoy their love is a crime

Well, “People to have sex on street” also fits the above reasoning and should be allowed going by the same standards that you mentioned, as they fit in perfectly. So, should we be ok with “People having Sex on street”? If not, then we have to think if the above line of reasoning or argument are right or not.

And let me challenge you more on it with a more concrete example. There was an incident on a plane travelling between SA and London, where a businessman started having sex with his model Girl friend on plane, in front of other passengers and was booked for it. Now does that mean that the law was backward? Based on what you have mentioned, law was backward and theirs was an expression of sexual freedom. Right? I think ‘Wrong’. So what the reason that this happens.

The reason is that society has standards, which protects one person from offending the other person. If this line is breached, there are repercussions. If your argument is that society/people should not be bothered with what you/other people do, then re consider the plane example. Will you not be bothered if you see such an incident on your next seat? Will you not look down upon it and report it? If you will not be, then all is fine and you are not a hypocrite. If you are not fine and will be offended, then you are hypocrite. Because then you are trying to judge people by your standards, while you expect no one else to judge you by their standards. And these standards/ tolerance level is different across different society and culture.

Learn to understand them before blindly criticizing them. You can’t impose your standards on society and expect them to follow, as these standards are set by majority, not minority like us (And thats the twist- I am a minority like yourself, however with much more tolerence and understanding of standards which are set). And remember these standards are not all bad. They are very beneficial to us in daily life. If they were not set then you might have witnessed

- Girls being eve teased openly without any fear
- Elders and weak being laughed upon etc.

Just because west follow a different standard set by their society, doesn’t mean that standard is good. Indian soiety is moving at a different pace as is its economy.

Final comment: What does sexual freedom like you described, gets you? Are you richer? increases ur standard of living? I guess not. And if your arguement is that freedom is the end goal, then again go back to the plane example to bring context

Dear Prerna, about your PDA,I have my observation that couple found loving each other in public have their own difficulties. In Mumbai many families leave togather in single room and have no privacy to express their love in presence of their family members and they have no choice but to express their love in corner of public places. There is no obscene if passing by public mind their own business leaving couple enjoy.

We should differentiate between a simple kiss and a hug, or holding hands in the public, and having sex in the public.
A kiss is an enchanting gesture and not an invitation for sex, when young couples do it in public it has nothing to do with sexual intercourse. Normally, a human has a natural sense of shame.
Practising intercourse in public is a nuisance all over Europe as well.
A freedom to express an emotion, or love, is a standard in any free, democratic society, it´s a human foundation!

EMOTIONS, AFFECTIONS, DESIRE, LOVE AND FREE EXPRESSION ARE OPPOSITIONS OF THE STILL EXISTING CONCEPT OF ARRANGED WEDDINGS IN INDIA.

I believe this is one of the main reasons why young people continue ignoring their feelings, for the sake of their families, their parents.

@ Ashu
Have you ever been in love and kissed the boy of your desire???
I doubt, may be your family has told you to not touch a boy before marriage, a kiss may cause pregnancy, or would be a shame for your family. What if you lose virginity before marriage, does it reduce your market value?
Ashu, have you ever been abroad and seen with your own eyes what people do on the streets?
If not, I ask you to not judge blindly and I would also ask you understand that people without manners live in every country, not only in Europe.
I know there happened another incident, 2 indian businessmen were involved. It happened during a departure of an Air India flight starting from Frankfurt in 2007. Before taking off, the 2 went on the rampage, while the airhostess tried to moderate them, they got violent and touched her immoraly.
How could it happen at all. Haven´t these guys learned how to behave, what about their indian moral standards? The situation before a start is certainly not sexually inviting or tempting. What have their indian mothers taught them? I wonder really.
When India has so high moral levels, how come that especially men don´t keep them, neither in their own country nor in countries abroad?

DO ONLY GIRLS NEED TO KEEP TRADITIONS AND MORAL STANDARDS???

I exactly tell you what sexual freedom gets a woman… HAPPINESS, SELF-CONFIDENCE, A FEELING OF POWER …AND MOST IMPORTANT….YOU HAVE THE POSSIBILITY TO CHOSE THE MAN OF YOUR LIKING!!!

Greetings,
Naddu

Abhishek SInha Wrote:

Unexpected topic got raised…Well all I can say is that It all depends on “PERSONAL CENSORSHIP”..Every individual has his or her own “LIMITS” …I wd refrain frm the
“INDIAN TRADITION” and oll…lot been said abt it)…well I cn understand @ times “DESPONDENCY” can lead AN INDIVIDUAL 2 DO “FEW THINGS” WIDOUT GIVING A HECK ABT D SURROUNDINGS…wELL ,I hv no complains abt nething…
But just dat some activities can lead to “DISCOMFITURE” for oders(especially wen dey r wid d family)…Few things are “IMPROMPTU”(understood)..but yaar jageh dekhke karo na…kisne roka hain?? U hv “DEDICATED” gardens…”COUPLE” of “COUPLE” seats @ multiplexes..(which is always dark…)!!! Lol…in case u don’t have “UR HOUSE AVAILABLE” during the “emergency”…my SYMPAThies are dere wid u….but the good thing iz dat u have friends who always come 2 d rescue @ critical times…I have a reasonable spacious house..in case any friends need it 4 “special purpose”..i am just a call away…cheers!!!

@ Moderator: can v hv some discussions on IPL(imminent political lethargy)?
I think u r quite upto date with current affaus…I wd love to hear what the people out here hv 2 say abt this…
Thnx in advance…

Its not the kissing it what the kissing can lead too. How many times have we heard the preaching of tolerance, which i agree to but to much tolerance and liberalism destroys cultures.

Take a look at the UK, there is no direction here because every sexual perversion can be justified. One kiss is harmless but this does lead to promiscuity when one relaxes laws,and the flood gates will be opened.

@Naddu — i sent Ms. Nisha Susan an email about your idea of A Day of Kissing in Public to get her thoughts on how we might approach such a demonstration. let’s see if we can make this happen! we should make sure to avoid violence at any cost, however, so we will need to be careful in how we approach it.

anuradha Wrote:

But PDA makes people around uncomfortable……see if you are in such a country where people are open minded and their culture allows the openess for expressing love their is no harm in doing that………but in a country like India where people are really bothered by seeing this display of affection in public its better to keep affection for private at the end of the day I would suggest to people to adorn the culture of the country they are living “Jaisa des waisa bhes”!

Somanchi Raman Vishwanath Wrote:

Dear Mam
I have been watching your two mails which were quite intresting and also debative.
Nice to have some new ideas coming out of the Indian girls but to what extent these ideas will penetrate is to be asked ? also the Thinking and Attitude has to change .

Good and Best of Luck
Do keep in touch.
Regards
Vishwanath

girdhari sharma Wrote:

Hi Prerana

Went through your blog. Its interesting that you have raised a serious issue. I would like to complement you for your views with which i agree in entirity. I think exchange of kiss is just a matter of showing affection to ones beloved and it should not be treated as a case of obscenity.

ratna raju Wrote:

Good to know that there r senible people who think of love as affection, not a synonym for ’sex’, still in my country. Good Prerna…. continue spreading the message

daniel balamagaji Wrote:

Hi Prerna,
The way i”m visioning the social life in India is like animal that are cage, but i will tell u that all this law were given by some certain persons which base the law on their own interest.
It seem to me that is time for the Indians to carry on with a issue that will protect their sexual and reproductive life. I mean there is a right for sex and which India is a menber of the International Institute for human right, so why are the people of India being denied their sexual right?
I will state here clearly that those who give the law to the Indians are only frustrating the common man of the country because they have every where to go and do their immorality then pretended to be law abiders. In conclusion, nemesies will take them one after the other, for things shall not go well with them in a nearer future because i felt for Indians who are living as if they were not govern by own people.
Daniel B Magaji.

Anil Garg Wrote:

Hello Prerna ji,

Once again a nice thought to ponder from you depicting existing multiple social standards/norms and different personal perspectives. Now about Public display of affection.

I have been traveling since 1979 various countries exposing me to various cultures and social setups and kissing had been one of the gestures to communicate yr affection. This also communicates the relation you have with the person u are kissing and is done differently for different relation and forms of affection. Different places of planting a kiss depicts as to whether it is affection or sex. Public display of sexual affection is termed to be obscene otherwise it is all fine by so called social norms.

Now is the difference of cultural traditions in every society in existence. So we follow the norms and called decent break the norms called indecent and unfit for that social setup. In view of this the view on this point cannot be generalized. Have to evaluated in terms of cultures, traditions, societies and so on.

We are often acclaimed to be Social Animals. The difference is we do not behave as animals and follow the social norms. Animals also show their affection as well as sex in public.

To me as human beings we have right display our affection for each other but some type of affection are very personal or out of a very personal emotions for each other like Act of love. So what we have for each other need to be displayed in public out of two reasons. One being that we want someone to know and make him/her feel jealous while the other we are afraid of dispossessing the relation. A fear in our mind somewhere let the public know it and scare other of the consequences. Sharing a personal moment of possessiveness with public has a element of fear and lacks the truth in relation a sort of hypocrisy about relation. May be such relation do not take you far.

Kiss on lips is not affection alone it is beyond affection a sense of very personal feeling of possessiveness and tantamount to sex in preface.

Anil Garg

Hi Ankur,

I don´t know how many women experience rape in their married life. For myself I can assure I never had to and never will. I know about a case related to my daughter´s classmate. Her mother was hurt (not raped but defeated) by her dad as he drank too often beyond measure.
They live a seperate life now.
The woman and her 3 children got provided with all moral support that is required in this matter.

Greetings,
Naddu

dear prerna…..this is ur 2nd very impressive mail coming to me…sex in public…..but to what limit….i have seen people enjoying full sex in lonely places…when in india we have to act as per our culture…

regards shukla

shiv narain upadhyay Wrote:

Very nice

Thanks

Shiv

Josh Kumar Wrote:

gud article keep it up
i really apriciate u

Roshan Kant Wrote:

Dear Mrs.Prena Gupta,

I completely agree with your statement. If the police had to file against a couple in Delhi then they should first bann bollywood movies. As you rightly said there is no bollwood movie nowadays without a lovamaking scene.

Roshan.

Ravi Mahalingam Wrote:

Dear Prema,
I read with interest your reference to the case booked by a court against a couple for kissing in a public place. You had also justified the same because Bollywood movies have such scenes or dhaba posters are obscene or Prono films are available in plenty in India.

You had indicated that we in India are backward in sex related matters, which is objectionable. This is a country that gave Kamasutra to the world. We know that certain aspects of Sex is a reflection of DIVINITY. We are cultured enough to close with a curtain at the time of decorating the Statues(Vigraha) of Gods and Godesses. The sanctity behind this is very simple. Divinity and Obscenity differs by a thin film of barrior. If the sexual art is performed in a private place, both the minds would relish and bring reverence to the relationship. Sex performed in a public place attracts the mind of all those present and the two performing the act shall not relish. The diverted concentration bring a guilty feeling and Divinity disappears.

If you feel that giving more respect to SEX as an act of purity and divinity is backwardness, then, I feel that you should learn more to understand SEX and it’s Divinity.

With Best Wishes,
M.Ravichandran.

Patrick Valentine Nnamdi Ejeteh Wrote:

fantastic write up Prerna, i totally support u.

nitin bhatia Wrote:

nice thoughts
please carry on

vijay jagdish upadhye Wrote:

Dear Prerana,
I agree with your opinion. Really our mentality is so spoiled that we are not taking any things in right direction. Publicly if someone is doing so, considered to be crime but in close house in close relations, party nights so many sexual offences are done by white collor people but nobody cares because it is hidden. Our thinking level is so inferior that we are jealous and not tolerating a healthy expression of love between a young couple.
We need to purifiy our mentality.
with warm regards,
Vijay

maloy dhar Wrote:

Thanks for your free views. I feel reasonable and decent display of affection, including a smooch, is not illegal and uncouth. India should accept the changed situation and sentiments.

MANISH SHARMA Wrote:

Nice Dear

Karsan Antala Wrote:

Yes dear your are absolutely correct for we not having guts to discuss
any thing related to love/ emotions/ sex … you name anything… the
strength of the humans has at its bottom ever….

expressing love may have different ways… we don`t mind a lady expressing
her love by kissing her child at any place….. but be sure mind for a
couple expressing their feelings in public… no matter whatever the
way of ression may be…. we can not tolerate even a couple holding
their hands together and walking on a footh path…
you know why? because we are not having the strength even to look at
the TRUTH then accepting that truth out of question….

then what is the solution? people has to empower them selves and have
to be human.. you know we have seased to be humans any more….

i am what i am… so when i put my words… i don`t see any thing
except the TRUTH… spell mistakes are to be ignore… have a nice
day… regards..

kingshuk Basu Wrote:

Very good subject.
Rightly said, I totally agree to your view.

Thanks
Kingshuk

Subodh Srivastava Wrote:

yes friend u r absolutely right.

sam george Wrote:

Hi! We are mad Indians. People are from different places. Difference of culture are the obstrucles behind things.
With regards
Dr Sam George

dear in India there is no rule no human right,no freedom,no body is caering only jangle raaj

Chitirala Wrote:

Hi Prerna,

Nice to see ur blog with an interesting point. Both the arguements which u have gives seems to be right. Its left to the liberty of the couple, after all we cannot have control over our emotions at times. Whenever u feel like doing something u do it, its so simple. But it takes some time for us to do and accept this kind of public romance. As we are enjoying the globalization slowly people will accustom to this also.

I support limited expression in the public like having a warm hugging, kissing on the cheeks etc. But i dont know i always want to support ur arguement which i feel 100% reasonable.

VINOD VIJ Wrote:

THERE ARE MORE THINGS IN LIFE TO THINK INSPITE OF THIS BAKVAS, WHAT YOU THINK TALKING ABOUT THE TAKING GLASSES IN PUB, KISSING IN PUBLIC PLACES MAKING U SPECIAL OR IMPRESS S’ONE, NO DEAR THE COUNTRY NEEDS YOUR VALUEABLE VIEWS .

THANX

TUSHAR KAKDE Wrote:

ya yarr ur right in our country we dont have freddom to kiss our wife
also in public places.this is wrong

DINESH M AILANI Wrote:

Hi,

Who the hell you are decide about Indian Mentality.. It is every ones personal view .. U can give your views and opinions but it doesn’t matter that everyone accept it.

We are Indians, Not Americans, Who do all this non sense stuff in public places.. If a person want to love his wife, he can do in his bedroom why on Railway station.

I dont wanna argue on this issue.

Regards,
Dinesh M. Ailani

Nikhilesh Pradhan Wrote:

I fully agree with what you say.

Best regards

Nikhilesh

Suvrajyoti Sengupta Wrote:

Prerna
I am compelled to agree with what you have to say, but at the same time given our unwritten or for that matter unexplained societal norms I think a degree of restraint will not harm anybody. I am absolutely for what you have expressed but till the time mindsets change or people like us are able to do that, I feel restraint is better than being harassed by cops. Its your preogative to differ but I feel that at present thats the only solution as of now.
Suvra.

aatish randive Wrote:

I Totaly agree with Prerena regarding the same

Jay Sharma Wrote:

“your argument: kissing in public will ‘excite animal instincts’ of men.
my rebuttal: anywhere you go in india you will find the walls of dhabas and chai stands plastered with erotic bollywood posters.”

THis is also wrong.

“watching a bollywood movie is also a public affair.”

This is also wrong.

” bottom line, there is plenty of voluntary public consumption of soft-porn across india”

This is also wrong

“so i don’t think a loving kiss between two people is going to add much to the fray.
your argument: they can do whatever they want in private, but why must they do it in public?”

As all the first three items you listed contribute to making Delhi a rape capital of the world. Your last argument further contributes the same.

Criteria is that anything that’s addictive should be advertised to a bare min level as in society there are tough minded people and side by side emotional people unable to control their emotions and get trapped in to eddictive traits.

For example wine is not bad in its essence but if you visit rural India , millions of families are sufferimng due to drinking habbint of earning member of family. Please keep those weaker and vulnerable sections of society in mind before advocating something good for educated and richer class of society.
Sex is also addictive and hence its demonstration in open definitely causes problems.

Freedom for westernised Indians is agreeable. But You can not advise non westernised Indians to close their eyes if some kaale angrej in India strat perfroming sexual activities in wide opne like cats and dogs. Think about their freedom also please.

“my rebuttal: there are no parks or beaches or other such romantic places to enjoy love in private.”

Enjoy in your house so what? majority of Indians are not still westernsied. they do not want to see nakedness and sexual activitie being performed in opne like cats and dogs. majority of Indians still feel that they are vaaris of an 10,000 year old civilisation and have adopted certain values in this long course of time to alleviate the progeny above animal type behaviours. Why the westernised Indians forceing their besharmi on civilised people of India who prefer a disciplined sex life, disciplined eating habbits and disciplined drinking habbits.

“denying people the right to enjoy their love is a crime, in my opinion.” and biiger crime is to force majority of civilised Indians who do not want to watch humans behaving like cats and dogs perfroming sexual activities in opne.

Should we sacrifice the rights of Indian Indians for the lustful indisciplined vulgar activities of westernised Indians? I say NO.

Naddu
Three wrong assumptions
1: I am not a girl
2: You assume that I expect only girls to keep moral standards. I never said that. I Think both male and female should observe societal standards
3: Sexual freedom is not the same as PDA. And I have no problem with Sexual freedom, just that it shouldn’t be practiced in public (PDA), as your sexual freedom can offend someone.

I agree that sexual freedom giving HAPPINESS, SELF-CONFIDENCE, A FEELING OF POWER …AND MOST IMPORTANT….YOU HAVE THE POSSIBILITY TO CHOSE THE MAN OF YOUR LIKING!!!
PDA? I don’t know

@Ashu — i guess what i don’t understand is why public kissing offends people. would appreciate if you could explain.

@Jay — did you ever consider why Delhi would be the rape capital of the world if PDA is already prohibited? maybe it’s because so many people in Delhi are sexually repressed.

prerna,
read some of the content and i really appreciate your thinking.my question to all is… what are we talking about? does a social group.. some individual or anybody for that matter have the right to decide when you are aloowed to FEEL…what is immoral about a hug or a kiss or holding hands. just because someone else can not does not mean i dont have the right to. i believe that each one of us have the right to love and to express it with a hug or kiss is but natural… thats freedom for me.
gautam

@Ravi M — i believe very strongly that sex is divine, but i do not think that means it should be kept private or induce feelings of shame or offense. we don’t prohibit people from worshiping God in public do we?

Prerna, I support the way you expressed your feeling in a cogent manner. You are very correct that there are shortage of spaces in our country where couples can enjoy their valuable close moments without hindrances. In our country we still consider sex as taboo, hence, the question of earmarking places for such couples is remote. In this matter we are lagging way behind of some of the countries as you hinted in your write up. This ensues crimes involving sex, unhealthy exposure of sex through pornography, unhealthy sex practices and so on.

Kristen Tomaino Wrote:

First & foremost, the sanctity of marriage is meant to be kept private, thus is the same for PDA’s regardless if they’re a married couple or not. Secondly, if one sees these things, or things that are more gross than regular PDA’s, they should keep their eyes to the earth, or their attention will be spoiled. Third, an older man or woman should have nothing to do with a man or woman much younger than them. In the end, they’ll be troubling eachother (especially the younger one will be troubled) because of their immature behavior. No one needs to share their immorality & force it on another, especially if the other is much younger & has a better chance at leading a longer, happier life, & by that, I mean happiness that’s stronger because it comes from within.

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ Prerna – Yet again, the “India-basher” strikes!!! Prerna, on what basis do you say that so many people in Delhi are sexually repressed and thereby accord it a (self-made) title of “rape capital of the world”?!?! What makes you qualified to even make a statement like that, sitting 1,000s of miles away in the US of A!?!? Again, I repeat what I have been saying all along – Please stop taking unnecessary digs at India that are not true. If they are true and can be backed up by facts, no issues whatsoever. Another thing – What exactly do you mean when you say you don’t feel that sex should be kept private?!? Are you trying to say we should do it in public?!!? I hope not! And how can you even compare it to religion and worshipping God?!?! I think your “supposedly Stanford-educated mind” is beginning to deteriorate sharply, as your judgement is really pathetic. And one more thing, stop wasting your time on trying to have “A Day of Kissing in Public” or whatever, it will only create a nuisance value here and in many ways, the protests that I foresee will be widespread will eventually lead to us, the common citizens of India, suffering the most due to roadblocks, violence, etc. AN HONEST SUGGESTION – Prerna, just stop trying to waste time by making idiotic and unworkable suggestions from so far away – IF YOU REALLY ARE SO CONCERNED, COME TO INDIA AND DO SOMETHING INSTEAD! BUT I DOUBT IF U HAVE THE GUTS TO DO THAT!!!

@ Naddu – I can’t see from where the concept of arranged weddings even comes about and why on earth did you bother to mention it in your comment!!! Just because it may not work for you does not give you the right to speak for others!! I know several people who went for an arranged wedding and they are extremely happy in their lives today. You and I cannot judge for others whether it will work for them or not, so to each his/her own!!!

One last thing – my own view is that there is undoubtedly an element of hypocrisy in our country about such issues and I myself cringe when I hear our “leaders” (there has got to be another word, for they certainly don’t behave and act like leaders) talk such rubbish like they will oppose valentine’s day celebrations by attacking gift shops, etc. But honestly, our country is progressing, we are growing up as a nation, slowly but surely and like any democracy, there will be roadblocks along the way, but we are getting there! And as far as PDA is concerned, I myself have no problems with a couple kissing in public, but then they ought not to complain if they are being stared at by members of the public and become too conscious!

Interesting arguments all around.

A rebuttal to the vast unwashed masses:

1. Kissing and having sex are being equated by a lot of people. Come on, folk, get real! A kiss might be a prelude to a carnal activity, but the couple in Delhi were just smooching. Do you honestly believe that if the cops did not arrest them, they would have “gone to the floor”? Nuts!

2. Jay Sharma was mentionling that the 10,000 year-old Indian culture does not sanction PDA. Well, I have some news for you. You are vastly misinformed. The so-called “Indian Culture” which you are talking about – it had taken shape after the Muslim invasions (the Khiljis, Mughals, etc.), and further codified by the Victorian age British sensibilities. Even our archetypical laws (including the one about ‘obscenity’) is a legacy of the British Raj. So, when you go about persecuting people for PDA, you are actually aping the so-called “Western” influence (albeit a dated one, and well past its sell-by date).

3. A lot of wise people (seems to be all men) are equating people who smooch in public with our canine friends. How very predictable! Their morbid fear seems to be that if we accept PDA, the streets of India would be strewn with naked sweaty bodies entwined passionately in various sexual positions – in short, a tableux from ‘Kamasutra’. Wait, hold on a moment right there. Did I mention ‘Kamasutra’? Wasn’t that an Indian book? No, cannot be! It is all a vast American conspiracy! Prerna as the master conspirator!! Off with her head!!!

Dear Harit,

may I tell you something? I don´t have a little number of indian male friends. 2-3 of them recently (1-2 years ago) had this wonderful traditional thing of arranged wedding. I asked them if they are happy,they all tell me they have to adjust, they miss attraction, miss excitement and passion in their married life. I find them sitting in front of their computer trying to compensate their urge for passionate sex and adventure. They tell me they develope fantasies to sleep with another woman as they miss the physical and also emotional satisfaction in their married life.
Young couples are inhibited, as they firstly feel uneasy about sex, secondly, hardly gained any experience, they have either wrong ideas about it, nor do they really know how to practice. I have spoken with indians having been married for many years, they practice sex in the dark because they still feel ashamed to view the naked body of their spouse! The naked body of the partner you have lived with for so many years is an offence? It looks absurd in my eyes.
I understand that a kiss is associated with sex, how can you relate it to emotional affection when you don´t feel affected to your partner in a married life? The misinterpretation arises in this sense.

How does it happen?

Is it really so thrilling when you put 2 strangers together, when you decide about their future instead of leaving the choice to them? Why caring for love and emotions when the mainreason of wedding is a business deal among 2 families. A calculated marriage to keep the status, to increase wealth or to gain some beauty or any other advantage for a family? Is this the foundation of a married and a happy life of 2 people? Not the 2 people are the focus, they are put on the side line! This is pathetic!!!

Once a girl kisses a boy she´s emotionally attached, a kiss is an expression of an intense emotional attachment. I feel there is a relation and this is one reason why indians still try to ban affection and emotions, to keep their position by interference when it comes to a choice of their in the meantime grown up children
Love doesn´t grow, it deepens. Adjustment grows when there´s not given a better choice, but a great pressure and force!

Greetings,
Naddu

Harit Shah Wrote:

Dear Naddu,

You have precisely proved my point! Maybe you know some people who are not happy, I know a number of my friends who are very happy in their marriages, which were arranged. So again, my point is proved – You and I cannot judge for others whether it will work for them or not, so to each his/her own!!! Maybe for you and me it may not work, but for other people it will. As far as your comment about partners feeling ashamed to view their spouses’ naked bodies is concerned, well its unfair to generalise that it happens only to Indians. I don’t think we are even qualified to comment on these things, I mean, how do we know that these things do not happen in 100 other countries across the world?!?!? Let’s be a little humble here and admit that we may not be knowledgeable enough to comment about these things, rather than be arrogant and pig-headed and claim that we know all!

And another thing – when two people kiss, it does NOT mean they have to be emotionally attached! It could be pure lust as well, or just that typical “college love” that is not really serious and is more about just enjoying yourself without having a commitment thrown in. And by making idiotic comments like “this is one reason why indians still try to ban affection and emotions, to keep their position by interference when it comes to a choice of their in the meantime grown up children”, you’re really not serving any purpose here. You just CANNOT generalise! You’re probably still living in some dream world many decades back when such things used to happen. India has progressed, take it from me, things are changing, some for the better, some for the worse, but mostly for the better!!

And one last point – the US of A, that great proponent of the freedom of the individual and liberty, has among the highest divorce rates in the world!!! So by that logic, we can conclude that love marriages actually FAIL most of the time and that arranged marriages are actually BETTER!! We cannot conclude that now, can we?!? So, the point is that we simply CANNOT arrive at a judgement of what may be better, love or arranged marriages – we can only say what OUR preferences are and what may work for us!

Thanks,
Harit.

Harit Shah Wrote:

And Naddu, another thing – you say that “Adjustment grows when there´s not given a better choice, but a great pressure and force!” Well, I can assure you that even in a love marriage, adjustments have to be made!!! By its very design, whenever you love someone and marry that person (or get married the arranged way), both partners will have to adjust, as two people could be different in many ways, there could be many things that the girl or guy is used to and the other partner will need to accept that, I mean I could give any number of examples. Even in a love marriage where you know the person beforehand, there will STILL be adjustments to be made. I mean, after all, the spouse is himself/herself a separate individual with certain views, hopes, aspirations in life and is used to certain ways of living, etc. All this requires adjustments. So let’s stop kidding ourselves that you only have to make adjustments in a “loveless arranged marriage” – the most loving love marriage also requires adjusting to some extent!

Prerna — If you would answer my question then you will get answer to your question as well, “Why PDA can be offensive?”. And my question is “Would you be embarrassed, uncomfortable or offended, if you see someone having sex in public, or lets say on ur next seat in a flight.

If your answer is yes, then you should know the answer for why you would feel so, and the same goes for others as well.

I will wait for your response on this question, and see if there is more clarity required

And what is this? A Day of kissing in public. Explain what you people want to achieve by doing this. Everything needs to have an objective isn’t it? If there is a point to be proven, then atleast have a ‘point’

And then let me make a suggestion, if you really have an objective that you want to achieve then try having a ‘Day of sex in Public’. Whatever idiotic goals that you have, may be achieved even faster, when you make this quantum leap from no PDA to Sex…That will create a shock and not a ripple that a “Day if kisses in public” will create. Think big guys

TO RAHUL
dear rahul,
i apologize for my last entry. I didn’t mean that. But i was responding to the threatening tone of your open invitation. Nothing personal against u. But rahul u have to realize what do u mean by the public. Does the thing called public really exist.Or do u mean the majority by the public. If u mean the majority, is it a democracy where an individual has to conform to the patterns of the majority attitudes and behavior. And if people like u become supporters of Public display and join hands with me in kissing at khan markets, we too would become a majority. I am really sorry for the words of my last blog. Keep writing. Take care.love ankur.

DEAR HARIT SHAH,
You want figures. Well according to Delhi Police’s report a woman is raped every 24 hours in Delhi. About 50% of these cases go unreported because of the opprobrium attached to the act. So most delhi girls who get raped remain silent. Satisfied with numbers Mr Shah. Or do u want more numbers.
As far as ur dig that Prerna can do anything for India by only coming to India has no substance. In the past 15 years the NRIs have done the greatest good for India by sending remittances in dollars. This has swelled the forex reserves of India. And assured its import requirements for the future.
Also that Prerna is mostly successful in identifying the problems that people of middle class India actually face. So it doesn’t matter whether she lives in America or Bihar. u live in India. Still u dont know that delhi is the rape capital of India.
On arranged marriage. I think arranged marriage is the most reckless and biggest risk that a person takes. More so for a woman. It means that u r taking the risk of spending ur whole life with somebody whom u dont know. Any sensible person will never take such a risk. The fact that a few arranged marriages work out doesn’t eliminate the huge element of risk and recklessness involved in it.Take care.love ankur.

@Ashu
may you back off your expectations regarding your voyeuristic ideas?
Public display of affection, is an expression of affection and care, an emotional matter, has nothing to do with sex! Mothers kiss their children because they feel a pure love and care for them, it´creates a happiness when they kiss each other. A little child kisses another child when it tries to express a liking. Got it? It´s like giving someone your stamp of love, a sweet message.
Whenever there are more than 2 people in one area, I would call it already a public place, hence also in a house, where many people live and stay together, or in an extended family.
Each and every form of showing physical affection is a pleasant matter for a human and strengthens an emotional bond physically and chemically. The more frequent a couple kisses each other, the stronger the bond is growing, ever heard?
There´s a hormone called Oxytocin which is responsible for this bond.

Bonding. In the Prairie Vole, oxytocin released into the brain of the female during activity (during kissing or sexual activities) is important for forming a monogamous pair bond with her sexual partner. Vasopressin appears to have a similar effect in males. Oxytocin has a role in social behaviors in many species, and so it seems likely that it has similar roles in humans.
Oxytocin is increasing trust and reducing fear. In a risky investment game, experimental subjects given nasally administered oxytocin displayed “the highest level of trust” twice as often as the control group. Subjects who were told that they were interacting with a computer showed no such reaction, leading to the conclusion that oxytocin was not merely affecting risk-aversion. Nasally administered oxytocin has also been reported to reduce fear, possibly by inhibiting the amygdala (which is thought to be responsible for fear responses). There is no conclusive evidence for access of oxytocin to the brain through intranasal administration, however.

Frequent kisses cause a loyalty. So what the heck are you complaining about? Only strong emotions lead to stable and loyal relationships.
Ask young people what is most important to them in a relationship, they would not tell you it is sex, they would answer : TRUST – ISN´T IT A VALUE?

Would I be a voyeur or would need some sexual stimulation I would not mind viewing another couple having some fun.(there are far better places than a plane). Although I have grown up in Europe and travelled to many places in the world, I have never seen a couple copulating in public. Have I visited the wrong places?
Incase an aroused couple would start getting passionate next to me during a flight, I would suggest them to do it on cloud 9 or use the toilet where they could continue without hesitation, there´s even space to practice a handstand and change positions, some tissues, water and soap to care for hygiene… or I would request the hot couple to upgrade my ticket that I could continue my flight in the more comfortable and cool business class.

PDA isn´t offensive when people are able to sense how it feels, instead of trying to establish themselves by playing the role of being strange moralists.

Greetings,
Naddu

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ Ankur – I’m sure we’ve got better things to do than “joining hands with you in kissing at Khan markets”. Seriously man, let’s just move on in life! Do whatever it is u want to do, whether PDA or anything else. Its ok, really!

NADDU HONEY U R BRILLIANT ONCE AGAIN
oh honey ur piece on arranged marriage is stunning. That is absolutely the condition of 80% of arranged marriages. Indians have the worst marital life in the world. There is no sex, no intimacy, no harmony in Indian marriages. And people still live with their spouses for 50 years.Just because they dont want to take divorce. Because of the shame attached to diverse.
If u r once more brilliant you will have to screw me up.So beware of brilliance. Take care.keep writing.love and lust.ankur

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ Ankur – Please note, I am NOT taking a dig at Prerna. I’m giving my honest views about what I feel are her biased views about India, so there’s no need to get so hyper! And I’m sure “middle class India” knows what its problems are and can very well solve them. And regards your views on arranged marriages, well, they are YOUR views and you CANNOT impose them on anyone. Not everyone thinks like you – live with it!

@ Harit,
you may perceive that your friends are happy in public, but honestly, would they really admit they are unhappy if they were? Would they have a possibility to change anything in their life when I consider divorce and possible consequences? Divorced people lose a social satus and reputation in in India as far as I know. So anyone who dares to break married life lives a very lonely life. Going ahead in married life and compensation by having flings on the side isn´t a rare thing, it even seems to be a normality.
(no offence I know many many cases, it´s not a speculation)

You are right when you say that each relationship requires adjustment or is a compromise. Taking responsibility for someone doesn´t mean you can still do what you want. When you decide to live with someone, it´s a giving and taking, in an ideal case mutually.
It is just easier for a human when he/she has the feeling to volunteer to do so, when there´s a feeling of love from the very beginning, love is already a foundation not an expected condition or something that may evolve any time, if it comes ok…but if not…your pity? Or you were just not able to adjust appropriately or sacrifice enough to achieve it?

Greetings,
Naddu

@Naddu

A kiss is a sweet message of love: Wonderfully said. I agree 200% with you. We kiss kids, mum, get kisses from dad and definitely a kiss from a girl(lady) is always welcomed. They all are different and have different intention.

A kiss has no relation with SEX until it is passionate between two partner for the intention of making love.

Also I agree 200% with than frequent kisses is a stamp of trust. But one slight problem here: Most western world(including Australia) freedom of choosing partner and love is there:

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ Naddu – trust me, like I said, India is progressing. These days, the stigma that used to be attached to divorce is minimal. Yes, possibly in some villages, it is still there. Honestly, in the cities, things are evolving at a rapid pace and people have seriously progressed in their thinking. Regards my friends, I think I know them well enough to realise whether they are happy or not, so maybe its not for you to comment or speculate on that?

Naddu has proven her IQ is 210. Well done.

(I owe you a kiss)

TO ANKUR
Dear ankur
I accept your apology. I mean it what I wrote. You wrongly interpreted my tone as threatening, actually it was a plain and honest invitation to all you supporters of PDA(Public Display of Affection), including Prerna Gupta, who raised this topic, but I strongly doubt whether she herself follows what she preach.
Only way you or Prerna can prove me wrong is by demonstrating PDA on the busy city streets of India.
Public means People in general considered as a whole, and such Public really does exist in all countries. I do mean the majority by the public, because in nudist colony you and me become minority (I hope you don’t belong to nudist camp).
Evevn if I mean majority and even if there is a democracy, individual has to conform to the patterns of the majority attitudes and behavior, if he wants to stay among the majority people. I think you must have heard about mob psychology or public (majority) opinion, which defy all the rules of reasoning and logic, so there is no point in arguing in front of a people who has different ideologies than you.
In such situation you have only 2 options:
1. either follow there customs or rules. Or
2. quit that place and migrate to a place where majority of people are following your ideology.
3. no third option. Sorry.
And since I am a strong follower of Private Display of Affection, I can’t accept your proposal to join hands with you in kissing at khan markets.
So I am sorry to say that ankur you belong to minority part of public of India and I belong to majority, as far as PDA in India is concerned.
I will definitely keep writing. Take care.love Rahul

Dear Harit Shah

India is progressing exponential but social values are going down the gutter at same rate.

I love India’s progress but social downgrade is too fast.

PLEASE PROVE ME WRONG.

Dear Harit,

you may not judge for others but you may judge about others by rating the quality of their comments and opinions or blame them for their ideas. It´s always easier to call a matter idiotic instead of adding a constructive criticism.

Marriages only fail less when the the individual in this marriage is dependent on the counterpart in any way.
The disprove of arranged wedding lies in this dependence, Indian women haven´t been independent in the past, but now they are becoming independent, I understand why you are getting worried!!!
The more individual a society becomes, the more quality an individual developes, expects or demands even.
A happy relationship is a part of a happy life.

Be happy, relaxed, kiss your wife and enjoy your eve!
Naddu

Ankur

GO BACK TO INDIA AND DO SO SOMETHING FOR SOCIETY

@Naddu

And thats what you got from what I said- Voyeuristic? D’uh. If it is still not clear, I was being sarcastic.

And as far as Voyeuristic accusation goes, I have same accusation for you when you said lets have a “Kissing day in public”.

Lets move to your next point- What you say about PDA being an expression of love and care among related people is right. However, don’t generalise it all across. Between two unrelated boy and girl it has sexual meaning. And if you say that’s not the case, then let me test it for you – Do you see two friends smooching each other? Or Do you smooch all your female friends? If not, then let me ask why? The reason is that between two unrelated people it has sexual connotations. Got it?

About home being a public place- Do you call your home a public place? If govt bans smoking in public place, do you ban smoking at home as well because of it? If your answer is ‘no’, then let me define Public place for you from Wikipedia – A public space refers to an area or place that is open and accessible to all citizens, regardless of gender, race, ethnicity, age or socio-economic level. By this definition, if you consider your home a public place, then you must be living on the streets. My home is not a public place for sure

Hows Oxytocin and Vasopressin is relevant to this discussion and important for PDA? Please explain. I am sure they will produce all that you say – Trust, affection, love etc. I don’t deny their existence, neither am I a biological expert to have that authority. If you need them so much, then please produce your desired Quantity and by whichever means. No One will have problems with that. If you do it publicly, then there is generally another hormone produced in public- Testosterone, which is bound to create problem for Oxytocin and Vasopressin production….He he

BTW you also contradict yourself when you say ‘oxytocin released into the brain of the female during activity (during kissing or sexual activities)’ and on the other hand you say that kissing is not sexual. Try to be consistent, else you will only contribute to humorous value of this blog

About ur statement “Would I be a voyeur or would need some sexual stimulation I would not mind viewing another couple having some fun.(there are far better places than a plane).” – You are not getting it. Its not about voyeurism. It is about it being socially acceptable or not. Nobody wants to witness such an act and that’s where my point about people being uncomfortable, embarrassed and offended comes into play. Infact you prove exactly my point when you say that “Incase an aroused couple would start getting passionate next to me during a flight, I would suggest them to do it on cloud 9 or use the toilet where they could continue without hesitation”. You say this because you can’t accept it in a public place. And hows ur reaction different to another set of people saying the same thing to a couple kissing in public? Degree of act of couple might differ, your response is the same as what Indian public’s is. You are no different to the rest my friend. Just that you have decided a standard for yourself in terms of whats acceptable and want everyone to follow your standards, or else be criticised. All I have to say is – Don’t judge others, as you can be judged yourself

I absolutely agree with your thoughts. There is lot of hypocrisy in our society especially too many rules for women and men can get away with murder.Its high time that younger generation take the responsbility to change the mentality and backward culture of our society. If public display of affection is not the part of culture then rape, domestic violence and other crimes against women are also not the part of Indian Culture, in olden days women were considered to be “DEVI”

“STOP THE DISPLAY OF DOUBLE STANDARD”

@Naddu

Infact another funny but very logical thought came to my mind. If Kissing is not sexual as your claim, and it always has to do with only care and affection, then you must be kissing and smooching your male friends as well :-) ))

Sorry…Just couldn’t resist posting this :-) )))

@ Ashu,

I haven´t claimed a kiss is not related to sex, the subject “public display of affection” is the discussed subject. I believe you haven´t understood the word affection.
I will try to define AFFECTION: A FEELING OF FONDNESS OR LIKING, THE ACTION OR PROCESS OF AFFECTING OR BEING AFFECTED, A MENTAL STATE OR EMOTION.
Have I misunderstood the subject or have you?
A kiss or a touch in public is not related to sex, when you see couples passing by, kissing during a sunset or holding hands, that´s not sex, when you interpret it this way you seem to have a repressed desire, a great fantasy, or a wrong impression about sex and emotions.
Testosterone is a hormone you find in a male and a female body, I´m sure you know this already. You know what helps to ease up a body when you don´t get sex?
I suggest you to do some sports to gain a relief, it´ll help physically and mentally.
You focus too much on sexual issues dearest. You fail to understand that there are other ways to connect between different gender which are also pleasant but don´t lead to intercourse!

Kissing or hugging couples are a normality here, I don´t really miss nor would I see anything disturbing in it.

Do you find it sexy when Angela Merkel kisses Nicolas Sarkozy in public? It looks very cute! ha ha

You don´t need to worry, I kiss the man of my choice, one at a time! :P :) ))))))))))

Greetings,
Naddu

@ Aussie,

thank you for your kiss, I´ll treat it as confidential ;)

warm greetings,
Naddu

Dear Prerna,

thank you for your efforts. I hope humanity will succeed!

The pleasure is all mine,
Naddu

nazre ather syed ghulam Wrote:

dear pg

i agree with u

dr.ather

Franklin George Wrote:

Wow ….I agree

Mark Evans Wrote:

display of affection has been controversial, and in varying degrees, by all idiotic cultures.
display of murder, torture, brutality, intolerance, violence in general, is viewed as entertainment by almost all cultures.
murder in the name of god by some religeous orders is viewed as acceptable.
execution of murderers by the state is viewed by many as unreasonable.
money spent on drug wars that only serve to enrich the distributors and never result in a lessening of use is viewed as morally right
lack of money for health care for the elderly and for infrastructure for the general poplulation, resulting directly from the cost of the war on drugs (innefective enforcement, theft and conversion of personal property to buy the drugs, prison costs, welfare costs as convicted drug users seldom rejoin the work force, insurance costs, legislative costs, wear and tear on society including stress and depression from the hopelesness that drug dealers cause on inner city low income housing) is seen as a worthwhile expense. in a sense we trade job growth, billions of dollars that finds it way out of the country each day, murder and mayhem related to drug distribution…yes we trade our needs for a system that results in all this harm and then call this the ‘moral’ thing to do.

people are misdirected, misinformed, undereducated, disinterested, confused and lazy. we get what one would expect from a bunch of couch sitters.

when do-gooders finally figure out that drug wars don’t work, religeous orders ought to be banned worldwide, murders and abusers need to be put to death immediately upon conviction, and prisons need to be supervised by video cameras in every single inch to avoid crime that grows from within their walls we will then finally make some strides to being what we can be rather than what we are left with as a result of the less than moral majority.

in the meantime, let it suffice, people are both stupid and igonrant, by and large. get used to it.

SENTHIL NATHAN Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
Leave alone the kissing I would subscrbe my view even public fucking is not matter when the companion agrees. I never derived any pleasure in kissing on the open parts ( except the private parts)
I fully endorse your view
regards.
SS nathan

ratnesh verma Wrote:

It seems that India has reached to stage where people like Prerna believe in displaying affection in public like kissing. It really thrills you kissing, hugging. But one thing Prerna is it necessary to show anything which you have and nobody can fetch from ur inside like LOVE.Do think bcoz u have to advance intellectually not only outwardly.
Ratnesh

MANOJ HANS Wrote:

hi,

Prerna i like your story…….

br
Manoj

HIMANSHU R PATHAK Wrote:

I admired the views of Prerna Gupta.

Pl convey my compliments.

Himanshu pathak

H@Rî NADAR Wrote:

DEAR PRERNA
YOU ASK THE QUESTION IS RIGHT.IF PEOPLE SEE THE SEXY FILM,SEXY EMAIL.SEXY PHOTO PERSON GET AUTOMATIC SEXY.SEXY CANNOT BE CANTROL.BECAUSE WHEN LADY WEAR SAREES,MINI SCAT.THE SHOW THERE
CHEATH THEY DO MAKE IF MAN SEE SEXY WILL COMESEXY IS LOVE.LOVE IS SEXY,GIVE ME THE REPLY I AM WAIT FOR IT
YOUR SINERILY
HARI

Mamraj Tomar Wrote:

Dear Prerna Gupta,

I read your Blog thoroughly and came to know that you have done a hard word in this field. The articles written by you are really convincing. We should be so aware of the good and bad in accordance with the Indian culture. In Indian, we however, can not go beyond our “Hari – Bhari Culture”. I think that our culture is the one of the best culture in the World. Can you let me know your contact No so that I can give you some inspiration but it will not be right because I can’t do any thing in this regard. Though I really want your contact No BECAUSE I THINK I MAY BE OF SOME USE FOR……….

Many many thanks for the same.

Yours sincrely

Mamraj Tomar

ramana venkat Wrote:

i fully agree with your ideas

THOMAS KURIAN Wrote:

HI
THANKS
HERE IN INDIA, LOTS OF MORAL POLICE ARE THERE. IF WE GET AN OPPORTUNITY TO KNOW THEIR REAL LIFE, WE MAY BE SURPRISED.AS PER MY OPINION, EVEN PROSTITUTION MUST GET A JOB STATUS.
THANKS

Dear Prerna

Kissing is no obscene, but not is public place,

This act may attract others to follow but HOW, will every one will have their facny or wife or a prostitute or any other person who will allow and get pleased to take it,

hence it is advised to prevent, but cannot be prohibited,

What is needed is the SENSE

OK

inder baid Wrote:

Dear Prerna

First of all I should heartly thank you for your couragious raising such ECHOS in public, my short reply
1) our entire system of Constitution based on British Law maker and Judiciary too which according to our country History and culture does not at all suits day to day activities of public , this hs already put us all in sandwich- neither we can follow our own culture fully nor total becomes European style . The pain which new generation feels /faces will not be diminish until we change our entire Govt system as per today condtion prevailing in our country. So Try and Stand OUT with this SLOGAN

WAKE UP CALL TO ALL YOUNG INDIAN GENERATION- VOTE FOR SUITABLE QUALIFIED YOUNG CANDIDATE-THROWOUT ALL BUSTERED OLD GUYS – AND ELECT MAJORITY YOUNG PARLIAMENTIAN- MAKE CHANGES IN ENTIRE SYSTEM- TO MAKE OUR COUNTRY MAN TO LEAVE PEACEFUL RIGHTFUL LIFE

Good luck
Inder Baid

lokesh kapil Wrote:

i just want to ask you one question ……what can say about the type affection youth is showing now a days in the public places eg.college campus ….

iqbalshaikh ebrahim Wrote:

Dear Prerna,

In My opinion : If couples are comfortable in kissing each other in public than one should leave them alone, as it is their call after all, If they are married and doing in the public than it is wrong on their part, as I think married couple definately get privacy in the night, In todays scenario I can understant some couples dont get privacy even in the night due to poverty , joint family and maximum numbers of family members staying together, any thing is posible, the couples deficulty only they must be experiencing.

But they should also not cross the limit, Policemen istead of booking them and putting them in Jail, is totally uncalled for, Maximum they can do is warned them or even worst charged them but putting behind bars and court cases is some what like Talibanism.

Regards,

Iqbal Shaikh.

Manoj Singh Wrote:

Absolutely right. In these days, there r so many moral guard r roaming in street 2 create a scene. They r simply interested 2 be in news.
thnx n rgds,
mks

lovebird Wrote:

hallo prerna gupta
received ur blog on making love in public places,
the blog is just fabulous one.
i do agree with ur view on this subject.
thank u very much indeed 4 sharing ur blog with.
looking forward 4 more such interesting and mindblowing blogs from u.
hav a gud day
happy blogging.
tkcr/chao

Himanshu Chaudhari Wrote:

YOU R RIGHT

hardy.799 Wrote:

Kissing by married couple is not wrong.But why the hell they want to
do it in public?..They must be some kind of perverts!..There are
people of all age groups in a public place like Railway station..Why
should these married couple choose such a place?..They better keep it
confined to their bedrooms.

manoj patel Wrote:

Hi Prerna,

Your blog is too good.Keep it up and keep on writing.

Bye
Tc

keyur shah Wrote:

My argue is —–

Any person doing any kind of erotic action in physical mode it is nusance.

However you guys are compared it with posters. Poster and physical work are two different thing. If you still think it is not crime then do one thing…

Kiss any body infront of your child and than feel. IF still you feel relax than I am sure noe the time comes when the difference between HUMAN and ANIMALS are almost LOST.

Tell your story or anti argue.

Akhil Sarda Wrote:

enjoy kissing, please dont stop.

Dear Mis Prerana,
Realy it miss of police ,then also we care of the public &those things we should keep in our house .
best REGARDS
ARUN

pratiki bhatt Wrote:

Prena
you are right i agree with You
Pratik

LJ Mohan Wrote:

Insightful thinking. Way to go. well done.

damodar vinayak bale Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
We have to revive our cultural traditions of living.The inhabitants
in this part of the continent were followers of particular traditions.
Which are followed still in all the states.Only the language of these
traditions was kept away from the citizen.We worshiped NATURE.
The meaning of Satyameva Jayate,has to be made known to all.So we
have to revive the language of the words,SATYAMEVA JAYATE.
With best regards,
Shyam(Damodar)V.Bale.

hi prerna
i am really impressed by both your mails
after reading the first one i have stopped eating non-veg food
thanks 4 aweking me……

ramesh deshpande Wrote:

Dear Prerana

I read the containtes of u r paragragh and I realy agree to it.
if u do not allow the freedpm and pressurerise do or do not do this and that then the hidden things burst out.
The sexual crime comes out if the desire does not meet its expectations and satisfied the one and cool down.

The free atmospehere with limitation is always healthy.if the you see the sucessesfull
people`s biography in their parsonel life,they all have good free love and satisfaction .

Then only they reach to the top. at the same time one should not force and do the injustice with our sexual partner but must respect her.

The sexual posters in the dhabas and lavatory exposes the hidden feeling of the the people who are not getting chance to complete their desire.

I shilpa shetty`s embracing situation where she was not able to oppose to richird due to the
fame and repuatation of Richared Gare in hi fi function.

The media and our police laws and culture needs to be changed and updated as per the time.
the romantic situation and the atmospehere should allow to kiss in open like sea beach,
garden or loveble natural spots .

ramesh

Nishant Damani Wrote:

you are amazing, u are writing article which give us prerna just like your name.

Keep it up

@ Naddu

Here are two statements that you wrote
“Public display of affection, is an expression of affection and care, an emotional matter, has nothing to do with sex! Mothers kiss their children because they feel a pure love and care for them, it´creates a happiness when they kiss each other ”
AND
“I haven´t claimed a kiss is not related to sex, the subject “public display of affection” is the discussed subject.”

Your two statements are at odd with each other. One says PDA in public has nothing to do with Sex and then go on describing kiss of mother to kid etc, other says, you don’t claim so. Read my earlier advice – Be consistent. This is another example of contradiction in your statements.

Next thing about defining affection: Did I at anytime say, that affection is not what you describe? Or any statement to contrary? I don’t think so. So don’t waste your time on this definition. I am not in disagreement here. And you brought up the whole affection and kissing not related to sex topic (Check your posts)

Bottomline: I agree with you, one of us don’t understand the subject. And that person is you

About “A kiss or a touch in public is not related to sex, when you see couples passing by, kissing during a sunset or holding hands, that´s not sex, when you interpret it this way you seem to have a repressed desire, a great fantasy, or a wrong impression about sex and emotions.”
Who says so? Dr Naddu? Well like I said, test it out. Try kissing/smooching your female and male friends on a pass, while holding hands during sunset. If it doesn’t have to do with Sex and only care and affection, then your act should be perfectly acceptable to yourself, them. However, let me tell you most probable scenarios
With female friends: A slap OR a relationship
With male friends: A strange look and you will be branded gay OR you male friends will come out of their closets )
And That’s why kissing between unrelated people is about Sex. Be it public o private place. Hope you get it this time. I am getting tired of explaining

Your statement “Testosterone is a hormone you find in a male and a female body, I´m sure you know this already. You know what helps to ease up a body when you don´t get sex? I suggest you to do some sports to gain a relief, it´ll help physically and mentally. You focus too much on sexual issues dearest. You fail to understand that there are other ways to connect between different gender which are also pleasant but don´t lead to intercourse! “ – I agree with what you are saying. Did I say anything to contrary? Question at the end of above is, So what? How does it relate to the topic. Stop making random statements that don’t have anything to do with the topic. Topic is “ PDA being acceptable in Public place” …Naddu Naddu…What should I do with you? You digress so much

“Do you find it sexy when Angela Merkel kisses Nicolas Sarkozy in public? It looks very cute! ha ha” – No I don’t and probably most of the Europeans don’t. However, that’s not the topic. Topic is that it is not seen that way in India. Like I mentioned in earlier post. Don’t try putting your standards (European) on Indian public. Like I had put I back to you, you are no different yourself when faced with a more extreme situation like “Extreme PDA – Sex in public place”

@ Naddu

Lets stay focused and Leave all the other irrelevant pieces. I think the crux are two questions

1. Does PDA have to do with sexual attraction between couples? – Starting with Prerna’s quoted incident of couples charged for PDA. And I think we disagree here
2. Answering the above question will lead to answering the next. Is Indian public wrong in not accepting PDA?

And for the first point, I am still waiting for your response. Smooching being PDA, do you smooch all your male and female friends? If you can answer my question, 1st point gets resolved and we can move onto the next one

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ Naddu – thanks 4 the advice, dear! I did exactly that – kissed my wife, and that too it was PDA – PRIVATE DISPLAY OF AFFECTION – done in the privacy of our bedroom! Not a tamasha 4 others to watch! I wonder what ur husband will think if he reads ur comment that u kiss the men of your choice, one by one! Hehe! Couldn’t resist taking a crack at that one! Take it in good spirit, Naddu, just joking!
@ Aussie – I’d be interested to know on what basis you said that social values r going down the gutter in India. Yes, joint families are slowly breaking down, as people are getting more independent and less tolerant with economic liberalisation. Naddu rightfully pointed out that women are becoming more independent, free and ambitious and this is another (positive) change coming about. But we care for our families, unlike in many other countries, we do not leave our elders in old age homes, we are responsible enough to take care of them and more importantly, even as we are becoming more independent, the attachment to family remains very much an integral part of our lives. I can give you ANY number of examples, Aussie, but it would take up a whole page and more if I did! Thus, your comments about social values going down the gutter are totally baseless and without an iota of truth in them!

augustin Wrote:

hi….
i m not into blog…..
but after reading wat u hav in mind …i too thought of adding a few words to let u knw that i too am with u…so let this small drops make a better ocean…and bring abt changhe in the way people look the world…..
i too think that people hav their own rights of freedom to act….so wat they do is their own and dont think others should involve in it…
and i hav heard abt political parties like shiv sena also being against this…but wat do they have to do regarding these things if its not one of their family members ….and if they have attained their maturity….
so i like to denounce people like taht and parties as them…
i wish the wiorld do change and thses politicians do get deafeated by the strength of unity of the like minded who look into the better future.

@ Ashu,

I clearly answer to your 2 closeminded questions.

1. NOT ONLY
2. YES

Ashu, no I don´t smooch all my male friends because I have been married for 20 years. I´ve been smooching one and the same althrough the years, and guess what, not every smooch ended in sex. Sexual attraction hasn´t only be the reason for our smooches.
Before I met my husband, I had a great time and smooched a few boys of my choice. One at a time! I welcome the fact that I could gain experiences before marriage, hence I didn´t feel the need to experiment later, the feeling to make up anything I could have missed didn´t occur.

I regret you are unable to understand the difference between luck and love of caring and a sexual attraction. May be you haven´t ever experienced this difference. I know what I´m talking about.
I hope your parents love you enough and express it also physically, that you will be able to transport this feeling to your girl, this feeling that leads to confidence and emotional security.
Free yourself from the thought that interaction between a man and a woman is ONLY sex related. I don´t mind to hug a male friend of mine and kiss his face. It´s even common among friends in Europe, nobody would start having an idea that the people of opposite genders, hugging and kissing each other have a sexual affair!!!

I use to take my 17 year old daughter to her friends place at the weekend. I drop her at a meeting point, every time when she arrives or when I pick her up, 5-6 boys welcome her with a hug.
I´m witness of the ceremony of this greeting and bye, see how uncomplicated these matters can be. If I would want to, I could make a drama of it, would I be a moralist I could spoil the entire matter. I believe it´s better to observe and keep things under control, I support my daughter in her natural behaviour and development. I absolutely know, would I ask her why she hugs or kisses her friends in public, she would ask me Mama, is all well? this is common! Would I forbid, she would even feel more tempted. I also discuss sexual matters with her, becaues I don´t insist to become a young grandma. I know how things are, I was myself a teenager.

@HARIT
what do you know about care for parents in western world???
The entire social structure is different. We don´t leave the challenge to care for elder to their children or a few family members. There´s a social responsibility of all people in country to care for elder or disadvantaged humans. Everyone in our country has a pension plan by a law called SOCIAL LAW. It´s an institution which was introduced in 1889 in Germany. Wow… I don´t think we were socially corrupt that time, obviously we were socially very much ahead in ancient times -this law and responsibility is still valid.
What do childless couples do in India?
And tell me one thing, how would you practice to personally care for your mom and dad all day long when you yourself have a family life, your professional responsibilities…do you give up your job and care for your parents, or do you leave it to the women in the house???
When take all the responsibility yourself, I admire you absolutely, I hope you manage your life still financially. I do also hope that your parents don´t feel they are a burden for you.

The joint family model in India will also reduce due to the economic progress. The economy factor has been responsible for this concept. Economic reasons cause that people stay or stand together, that´s not a secret. When each member in a family is financially strong enough to have an own life, he/she would always try to live it, that´s the way it is.
It´s a dream of every individual and free human to build a house and a family.
There´s even a proverb that says:
“A man should achieve 3 things in life”:
Planting a tree,
building a house,
having a son.
I believe, the social change is just a matter of time, wait and see.
Ask women with professional qualifications if they are willing to give up their professional life and ambitions to care for their parents. I know they will all try to give their best and would manage to do both even, but it will cause tension.
There are enough women who look after their parents in need of care, believe me, it´s a tightrope walk, tough and exhausting. Sometimes it´s even better when you involve a professional help, for example when parents suffer from any disease, many old people suffer from anything.

When you claim WE CARE; WHY don´t you SAY WOMEN CARE???
In most of the cases WOMEN do this CARE!!!

Greetings,
Naddu

When you take the responsibility all by yourself* /Correction* (sorry slipped through..)

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ NADDU

Looks like you’ve got some sort of COMPLEX here – when I said “WE CARE” I was NEVER referring to any gender, so please stop making incorrect accusations here. And as regards your comment about my knowledge about parental care in the western world, fair enough, maybe it is unfair to generalise – but then I can also accuse you of generalising on so many things that we have discussed in earlier comments. I have a number of friends and relatives in the US and have some idea about the country. As regards taking responsibility to care for my parents, when I say that, I DO NOT MEAN that I need to be with them whole day – they are not immobile or do not have some mental problem or are not suffering from any debilitating and life-threatening disease that they need to be cared for 24 hours a day!!! And by the way, its all about finding time and allocating it properly – if there is a will, there is a way, as simple as that! And don’t worry, my parents will never feel they are a burden on me. Everyone cares, not just me – my wife, brother, his wife.etc. And I can’t see how the issue of childless couples is even relevant here!! Obviously, things would be different for them, or maybe they adopt. I have said that the joint family system is becoming rarer here due to economic liberalisation and in any case, I know a number of people and friends who do not stay with their parents even in India. You are right, even I expect this trend to continue with the increasing prominence of nuclear families. Now, whether this is bad or good is open to debate and I have my views on it, but maybe that can be left for another time…

And as far as your comments about “There´s a social responsibility of all people in country to care for elder or disadvantaged humans.” – I would presume you are talking about social security?!? Correct me if I am wrong. Anyways, whatever be the case, it seems to me that you are attempting to abdicate your responsibility by making this statement and transferring the responsibility to “all people in the country”!!! If you would simply say that “this is common” where you live that children separate from their parents later in life and stay independently and meet their parents once in a while, I can understand that! It seems that you people are too “independent-minded” to bother to find the time to look after your parents and just leave that responsibility to “all people in your country”!!!

You do NOT have to give up your professional life and ambitions to look after your parents. Yes, undoubtedly it may not be so easy, but then in this case, I’ll have to say to each his/her own. It is not worth discussing any more on this, as different people have different priorities and inclinations and it may not be possible for everyone to handle both profession and family life, that too not just husband/wife/children/friends but also parents. So to each his/her own.

Dear Harit,

when you say “we care” you mean the indian society or yourself. I have hard working indian male friends, they leave the house in the morning, and come back home in the evening, nobody of them has the time to care for parents during the day…and parents use to sleep in the night too. No doubt that the women mainly use to care for the older people, it´s a matter of fact in all countries. Men intervene when they have time, but time is not plenty when you have a full-time job.
I know families in India where both, wife and husband, work, nobody of them stays with their parents. Neither the wife in the in-laws home, nor the husband in any of the parental homes. Who cares for these people now? Who cares for the those indians who tried to achieve a better life for their children in the US, when they were sent to study and work there? I hardly know parents that followed their children to adjust to the american way of life, they stay back in India. I have a friend in Mumbai, both of his daughters have their life in the US. I asked him if he would call back his daughters to India incase he becomes invalid or ill. He told me he would not want to be a burden for them.

Now, I would also tell you another thing about families in the so called “western world”. Parents are not focused on their children althrough their life. They have some other timepass to do, they even want to remain mobile, healthy and take part in many activtities. They are glad with their independent life, it´s reasonable to afford a good time when being provided by a pension that pays. They are very active in their phase of retirement, that´s the way life is worth living…I would wish it for all elder people. Life doesn´t end when you are getting older.
Many social volunteer jobs are covered by the elder generation, they are happy to have this work and help other people without even earning a cent for it, without having expectations. Does it look careless? All our young men (age 18) who don´t join the national duty have to take part in a social year in an old age houses or other social institution. It´s a human duty. Young people care for old people.
Next point, every 2nd young man at the age of 24 lives still with his parents, because it is a comfortable thing, reasonable and practical.
There are infact families who live together in the same houses, when the relationship is good, there´s not point to ponder upon. The relationship between parents or different generations is not always happy, I think I don´t need to explain that differences or different expectations lead to conflict. Sometimes it´s better to lead a life on your own and materialize what you had in your life plans.
A parental responsibility ends with the independence and adulthood of a child. It´s a natural process that children leave the nest and become independent. And all children who got taught values won´t miss to care for their parents and visit them as often as possible.

Where does the west start for you? I ask you to not confuse Europe with the USA.

I don´t have a complex, but I do get furious when Indians try to give the West a negative spin. When developments are overbearing for your society you cannot blame other countries for them. You have still the choice to adapt what is good for you or not. The economic profits may be welcome, but independence and progresses are not welcome?
I would never blame another country for my own failings.

Thank you,
Naddu

Where are all the women in this girl talk???

@ Naddu

Lets dissect what you said “Ashu, no I don´t smooch all my male friends because I have been married for 20 years. I´ve been smooching one and the same althrough the years, and guess what, not every smooch ended in sex”

By bringing in your marriage, you have proven my point. Why did smooch/holding hands (Expression of PDA) lead to marriage discussion from your side (I didn’t start it)? If there is nothing sexual about PDA/smooch/holding hands that you are claiming, then how does it matter if you have been married for 20 yrs? You can smooch/hold hands with all your male friends as I am sure you have love and affection for them, and if at the same time you believe that there is nothing sexual about it. The fact that you don’t do it, prove that you don’t believe in your own claims. So, please save your regrets for yourself, because you don’t align in your thoughts and actions

And I agree some times PDA also has non sexual meaning (Example is your daughter hugging her friends). But when you say there is nothing sexual about it (Very sweeping statement), it is wrong as proven above. As far as close minded is concerned, I think u r same as me, not open to the possibility of “PDA being sexual” and worse for not being able to align your thoughts with your actions. The only way now you can probably counter is by saying that smooch and holding hands are not classified as PDA. And we can have another debate on it

After this, lot of the rest of the stuff that you have written is irrelevant, so I will not focus on it (Trying to cut the crap here)

When you said “I regret you are unable to understand the difference between luck and love of caring and a sexual attraction. May be you haven´t ever experienced this difference ……………….” You are again trying to judge me, as you have been judging Indian culture and public. I will again leave it as a gap from your side to fill.

And as PDA has sexual connotation (Now that you have already proven it by relating to marriage, please don’t ask it to be proven again), it can embarrass/ make uncomfortable and offend public. Just that tolerance limit of this behaviour in Europe is different to tolerance limit in India. And forcing your morals/ standards on Indian public is as wrong as anyone forcing their standards on you

@Naddu
Dear Naddu,
I must appreciate your precise way of thinking process, topic here which is being discussed is:
PDA-Public Display of Affection
and you are precisely discussing that with Harit
PDA-Parental Display of Affection
and somebody is saying that your IQ must be 210, may be, but IQ of that person saying so is surely below 40.
name of that culprit who is saying that IQ of Naddu is 210 is aussie.
Thank you,
Rahul

@ Naddu

And thats how a debate is won

Sorry. Couldn’t resist it again :-) ))

@Ashu,

PDA only offends intolerant people not open minded people. That´s what I think about it.
This is not a debate where you win a prize by making your comments, hence there aren´t losers or winners. If you think you are a winner, I congratulate you.
Our thinking processes vary in subtle ways, and I´m happy about it.
Would it be different, we all had a poorer life. Exchange of thoughts, debates are useful for a better understanding. We all have our pros and contras to justify our lives, may the be useful, rational or irrational. The perspective and relations matter.

@Rahul,
when I respond to another personal comment you don´t need to read it, just gloss over the next one ;)

The discussed subject isn´t me, it is PDA :P

Thank you for your care,
Naddu

Harit Shah Wrote:

Dear Naddu,

I’ve not tried to give the west any negative spin. In fact, its YOU who through your arguments are attempting to give INDIA a negaitve spin. So STOP acting so self-righteous and indignant!!! India is progressing and in many ways is becoming like the west in terms of greater economic freedom, greater opportunities, greater independence (good changes), a breakdown of the joint family system (a negative in my view – and please lets not start a debate on this issue, I have my views and a reasoning for them and you have your views, lets leave it at that), an increase in divorce rates (negative again), and so on and so forth. There is no question of “aping the west” here, it is the fact that economic liberalisation is leading to all these changes in our country and they have their good points and their negative implications. There is no question of “blaming other countries for our failings”.

Trust me Naddu, there are enough people who “care for the those Indians who tried to achieve a better life for their children in the US, when they were sent to study and work there”. Just because you may know some people who don’t, does not imply that this is the ultimate truth!!! I can counter you on these arguments by saying I know many people who do care for their parents who sent them to the US or wherever to study to enable them to achieve a better life, and it is the truth, because I do know a lot of such people. So I suggest let us not say arrogant things like “this is how it is” purely on the basis of our personal experiences.

Regards,
Harit

@ Ashu

PDA only offends intolerant people not open minded people????????? Aaahhhh…Can’t believe that you are again generalising and judging and branding people negatively (intolerant), who behave differently than yourself.

See the humour, when I said ‘debate won’

Sorry that was not @ Ashu—-It was meant to be @ Naddu

gloss over and read the next one* (hotfoot)

@Ashu,

see also the humor when I say “intolerant” ;)

touche’
:-) )

@ Ashu,
are you confused you? ha ha :P

Nope. I liked your comeback

Is that confused? I don’ think so

Incidentally, the way I name situations or matters are my point of view, there´s no generalising or branding! :P lol
Thoughts are free!

Where am I here?

Greetings,
Naddu

Ashu, do you believe I would give up so easily, you don´t seem to know me! Drat!

I guess not. However the same goes for you :-) )

@Ashu,

ever visited the Temples of Khajuraho? I would recommend them to you ;)
Inspiring erotic architecture, 11th Century!
We just give PDA a new meaning –
Public Display of Architecture! ;)

Good day to you, I´m on duty :)
Naddu

Not in person..In Pics yes

Have to admit, my interest level in architecture is not great.

Have a nice day

TO ASHU ,THE MASTER OF CRAP,
man u r really the master of bullshiting. What crap do u write. Boss even if PDA is related to sex, so what’s wrong in that. Do u think if something is associated with sex then it is wrong. Then u and me are also associated with sex. We both came out of sex of our parents. The Indian public is definitely wrong when it doesn’t accept PDA.
Dont hide beehind logic. See the truh. A public kiss in offices and other formal forums also acts as a great stress-buster.
Also we r not talking here about the kisses that mothers take of their kids. We r talking about real kisses between male and female .With lots of sx involved in it.
U SHOULD ALSO APPRECIATE NADDU FOR ALL THE DIVERSE INFORMATION AND RICHNESS THAT SHE ADDS ON THIS BLOG. so get out of ur ego and start seeing things in their true light.take care.love ankur.

KHUJRAHO,GANDHI AND TAGORE,
Since naddu has raised the topic. Khujraho ARE the most beautiful sculptures. There is such a serenity and godliness in the environment that one doesn’t find it in temples and churches. Divinity flowing out of sex. And it is also the Peak of Public Display Of Affection. Because intercourse is the peak of affection.
And Ashu it has nothing to do with architecture. It is pure godliness. So go and visit it. And u will be a transformed person.
The biggest idiot ever born in India, Mahatma Gandhi, wanted to demolish Khujraho because he was against PDA. So he said that Khujraho was against Indian culture. IT was Rabindra Nath Tagore, the great poet, who strongly opposed this idea of Gandhi. And therefore Khujraho is still safe . And bringing los of forex for india.love ankur.

@Naddu
Thanks for your valuable suggestion.
Next time I will gloss over the next one, just by reading your name Naddu.
Because to verify whether it’s another personal comment which I don’t need to read it……….i HAVE to read it, apply some logic.
By the way I was talking about discussed subject that’s PDA….not YOU.
Thanks and take care
Rahul

NADDU I WANT UR HEAD,
Honey how dare u say that? That having a son is an achievement. Do u support female infanticide. The proverb u have quoted is medieval and foolish. And reeks of misogyny. I want a public apology from u. On this forum. Else i m going to issue a fatwa for ur head. I think u r not interested in screwing me. that’s why u r talking such nonsense. take bake that proverb. u medieval misogynist. Daughters r more intelligent, caring for their parents.

Ankur…You seem to be pretty frustrated. Cool down, else you may blow ur tiny brains, which says “Don’t hide behind logic”: – )))))). People hide behind logic is a new joke that I have heard today. Thanks for making me laugh

Don’t blurt before understanding the issue. Read the posts that I have exchanged with Naddu. And you will know why we were discussing PDA being related to sex. If you don’t want to do that, then I don’t have time to waste on ur frustration and explain everything all over again.

If PDA is related to sex (Which you are fine with), then don’t have sexual activity in public. Do you kisses and get all its benefits, where nobody is embarrassed /uncomfortable /offended by your act. Is that so hard to comprehend? Maybe to you it is.

Ego. There is a fine line between ego and confidence. For an under confident person, I can be an egoist, as gap is too much to comprehend. To a confident person, I am just being confident. You can decide, who you are of the two….: – ))))))

MR HARIT SHAH,
How can a gujarati like u talk like a fool? Do u know economics? Do u know that even today after all the troubles of US, India is in a bigger shit than US. Just visit US once. And u will literally stagger seeing the civilization that they have built. Their achievements. The internet through which u r giving this holier than thou shit was invented by the Americans. And not Gujaratis.
Printing currency is one of the most important tool of monetary policy. Milton Freedman in 1950 made explicit the importance of monetary policy in beatting economic cycles. India and China too increase the printing of their currency to increase demand. Or do u believe that the rupee falls as a manna from the heaven It is a rule of the world that whatever goes up comes down.The present bust was due after such an extended boom. And since America lead the boom. It is also leading the bust. And will again lead the next boom.
Bollywood is the crappiest film industry in the world. I am a student of Cinema. So talk to me on that. When bollywood filmmaker Anurag Kashyap was asked that what is his opinion on piracy. He said that he supports piracy because 99% movies in bollywood r blatant copies of hollywood movies. Since Bollywood doesnt think of Intellectual property rights there, it has no right to talk against piracy. And yeah man, i m a very hyper person. Its better to be hyper than loving bollywood movies.take care.love ankur.

@Naddu

old architect are as important as ecology. Our history is there,our old ways of life and how civilisations eveolved is there. I even spent a week in Mexico and visited Mayan’s ruins. Amazing to see a mix of 13th century and religion and cultures.

@ANKUR

Mahatma Gandhi scrificed his fist grade life for the nation. HE IS FATHER OF WHOLE NATION.

Please go to India and try to do JUST ONE good thing for society. You will know what Matma Gandhi as a human being means.

“TODAY YOU TALK FREE, WRITE YOUR COMMENTS ON INTERNET, THIS FREEDOM CAME THROUGH “GANDHI JEEE”’s Scrifice.

Go and work in Zimbabve or in Somalia or in Iraq and you will know the meaning of Independence.

PLEASE DO NOT “DISRESPECT TO (1) Gandhi Jee, (2) Mother Teressa (3) Lincon
They are worshiped by Billions not Millions.

@Ankur

Respect is earned not learnt and Gandhi Jee earned it hard way.

WHO DO YOU RESPECT?.

Well said Aussie. I like you already. May be also worth pointing out that, he was Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King’s hero as well(MLK being the one of the most respected leaders of US). While its a pity that he is being pulled down by an Indian on this forum.

@Naddu

I admire your vision, I never have been to Kajuraho but heard a lots good thing about it.

YOU ARE BRILIANT.

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ ANKUR

I think you are a very frustrated man who seems to not have achieved anything in life so he is venting out his frustrations on this forum. I can GUARANTEE you that since you are talking about civilisation and culture, India’s is amongst THE RICHEST IN THE WORLD!!! So it is YOU who are talking like a FOOL and NOT ME!!! You obviously DO NOT UNDERSTAND ECONOMICS, DO YOU??!?! Becoz if you DID, you would UNDERSTAND the long-term implications of printing currency and that is high inflation in the future. Seems like your leaders want to destroy your currency, the $!!! Of course, I doubt if your tiny brain has the capability to think long-term, so maybe I should not even bother having this discussion with a pea-brain like you!

You have a right to your opinions, I have a right to mine. You say whatever you want about Bollywood or Hollywood, that is YOUR view and you CANNOT impose it on others. This is a free forum and we all have a right to air our views here. I hope your TINY PEA-BRAIN understands this!!! And by talking crap like “i m going to issue a fatwa for ur head. I think u r not interested in screwing me. that’s why u r talking such nonsense.” to Naddu, it shows your true colours!!!

Dear Ankur honey,

please calm down. :) I´m sorry, I missed to update the proverb in respect of equality of both genders.

Thank you for being so mindful, another cheers for your support. You are a gentleman! :)

A man should achieve 5 things in life:

- respect towards all women
- 1 son and 1 daughter
- time for work and play with wife and children/housework and cookings included
- a sense for romance and skills to make a woman physically happy
- the ability to discuss with a woman + the ability to read between the lines not –
only between legs

My head is mine Ankur! :P

With luv,
Naddu

@Harit,

the wealth of a a country isn´t defined by the cultural heritage. It is defined be the average living standard, health system, infrastructure and school system and the status of the heritage.

What does india invest to keep all the lovely buildings? I visited many and recognised how they have fallen into ruin. I wish it had been different.

Greetings,
Naddu

@Harit,

divorce rate in India doesn´t increase because of western influence. The reason of increasing divorces grows proportionally with education of women and the rise of their independence.
Women finally have the possibility to free themselves from their emotionless married lives.
A man would not end a marriage, women are more bold, if you want to hear it or not!

Naddu

Harit…Not sure if this Ankur fella is a frustrated ‘Man’. Tough to classify him as human for the insult that he throws at people, leaders and personalities.

Ye ankur aa kar Kud kud karta hai- goes with him name as well. And like u mentioned, kafi pervert variety ka non human hai

:-) ))

BTW, I have particular interest in Economics as well and I agree with you. To elaborate on your point

Printing currency increases money supply. Some inflation is healthy for growth. Too much inflation, devalues currency and so people’s wealth in real terms goes down. That pushes down millions under poverty as the lower income groups don’t invest/increase their wealth. So printing money is not always good, specifically the way US is printing. Typically every year as much money is printed, as is needed to pay the interest on the debt that govt has taken. US economy debt compounded over a long period of time has started going on an exponential curve (Very dangerous). This is seen as very risky by all. Now countries are debating if they want a new reserve currency- China. Also they are worried if their investment in US Try is safe or not given the debt that US is carrying. In fact now lot of Oil trading is being done in Euro due to Dollar risk and instability.

By the way, I support India´s progress with my tax, Germany still pays 64 million Euros development aid per anno.

I benefit disadvantaged children there. I have visited the Subcontinent for many times @ Harish. How often have you been to America or Europe? May I know? What do you do for your country?

I love India :)
Naddu

sorry I meant “Harit*”

Stimulus packages never worked in the past. They can only retard a process. When you print more money the value reduces, it´s logical. Anybody has to pay for the debts plus interest in the end.
If the stimulus packages fail, you pay even twice.

With 739,6 billion Dollars, China is the greatest creditor in the US. The USA China´s best trading partner. The interest to keep the business running is mutual.
It´s obvious, by being the most potent investor, China claims a right to say and to power, together with its neighbour Russia.

Japan did same:Printed and printed more money in 1991 to 1995 to getout of recession.

IT NEVER WORKED.

Well,a coin is completed only when two of is opposite sides are brought together.Similarly whatever be the matter or subject,we can always have different opinions about it (often more than two).Similarly in the case of PDA, it basically depends upon the point of view of the viewer.I believe PDA in itself is not an obscene act and has nothing to do with stirring up emotion of the viewers to a level which can cause any (sexually) rash act. (I think,that’s what the “traditional fundamentalists” are really worried about.)

In this present era of globalization, when the boundaries of the world are being virtually wiped out, with nearly everything from food to clothes and tourism to cuisines going global, I think the time has arrived that the Indians’ open up their mind and look at the bigger picture.

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ Naddu

I agree that the living standards, educational infrastructure, hard and soft infrastructure, the strength of a country’s institutions etc are what defines a country’s “wealth”. Our institutions are creaky, but we are somehow creaking along as a democracy but India still works! In spite of all the colossal problems that we face, problems that most other countries across the world would never even dream of being able to cope with, we are still progressing. Our problems are very complex and while the government is doing a lot, it still needs to do a lot more, I would be the first to agree with that. But the bottomline is, depsite whatever problems and roadblocks we face, we are progressing!!!!

You are the first to defend whatever the west stands for, isn’t it, even if it is wrong?!?!?! You guys are honestly shameless, the way your “so-called institutions” like Lehman Brothers, AIG, etc collapsed!!! THAT HASN’T HAPPENED IN INDIA, NONE OF OUR BANKS HAS FAILED OR COLLAPSED AND OUR COUNTRY IS WITHSTANDING THIS GLOBAL TURMOIL VERY WELL!!! Your country’s greed and unsustainable ways of living on credit was always going to come home to roost one day and see the consequences!?!??! Bail out after bail out, tax payer money going waste, people losing jobs and their entire savings – WHERE ARE YOUR SO-CALLED INSTITUTIONS?!!??! This goes for you too, ANKUR – you kept commenting about the great civilisation, etc – well, I don’t see anything great in the way your economy is on the brink!!! And by the way, on what basis are you saying India is in bigger shit than the US!!?!? We are in a much healthier position, yes we have our own issues, but nothing like what the US and Europe (particularly the UK) are facing.

Naddu, I never said diveroce rate is rising becoz of “western influences” – it has all to do with economic liberalisation, so stop misunderstanding my comments!! And while I agree that more opportunities for women do give them greater choices, including the choice of not getting married or doing so late, I can’t see why you say “Women finally have the possibility to free themselves from their emotionless married lives. A man would not end a marriage, women are more bold, if you want to hear it or not!” A marriage is emotionless ONLY if the partners make a wrong decision to marry someone they may not be compatible with!!! That means it is the fault of BOTH – man AND woman!!! So STOP being such a blatant feminist and look at things more objectively, it will be much appreciated, Naddu! As reagrds whether who ends a marriage, again as usual you are GENERALISING – what gives you the authority to even make a statement like that!?!?! Again, I say stop generalising and making such statements.

Naddu, I don’t feel the need to justify to YOU what I do for my country, but nonetheless, if you are so interested, I also help disadvantaged children, I have “adopted” an underprivileged child for whom I pay her school fees and keep track of her progress to ensure she gets a good education, which her parents are too poor to afford. I also pay my taxes and I pay quite a hefty tax annually…really, maybe we should stop getting so personal here and stick to the discussion at hand. Amazing, we start with PDA and move on to such diverse subjects – it is a good thing!

And to end – I hope and pray that the US gets out of the hole it has dug for itself. It will indirectly affect me as well, and I would say all of us in different ways, direct or indirect. Hope we get out of this global slowdown soon enough.

Hi Prerna,
It has been really nice to receive your updates on the issues that are of social concern… I really appreciate your initiative.. The topic : Are Indians afraid of public display of affection… is quite of the hotest thing in the market now. I would say People of India are of really sick mentality that they dont appreciate the emotions of others but they stick with their orthodox rules that kissing in public is so awful. If somebody does that you would see a mob around staring at them. Whatz up??? if the legal system is so concerned about public display of affection.. they must first of all destroy the caves of Ajanta and Ellora and many such ancient architecture including Taj mahal as they all introduce you to the same concept of love. They must put a ban on printing Kam sutra… and also on sex… no sex should not be allowed in India… If somebody wants a child they must go abroad and do what ever they want and then deliver a baby in India… i would say first they must control on these things and then ask for people to behave in public places. You know now a days many of the people are protesting against social websites that they distract youth.. Wow as if films dont do it… its really irritating to know that people of India have shrinked to the level of thinking… Once a country known for its Thoughtful richness has now become a country of Cowards. I liked Rehmans album “Jiya se Jiya jale”… he has shown something that everyone needs in this era… A display of affection to everybody….

Dear Harit,

I´m not an American, Germany isn´t responsible for the globale crisis. But we are a responsible that for a part of the progress in YOUR country. Without the peaceful German Union the openening of the border, the access to markets to the East had never happened. The fall of the wall was the start of a better life for many people in the EAST and the whole world. I´m proud of this great achievement of our politicians in this matter.
You shouldn´t blame innocent people for perverse behaviour of greedy managers and bankers, or grasshoppers that are thirsting for quick profits without thinking of the effects for the involved people, without having a moral or ethical behaviour. Stop to generalize by blaming a part of the world for failures and greed of a few!!! This is pure generilisation!!!
You don´t seem to know anything about European Culture and its achievements. Europe was a battlefield 60 years ago and look how peacefully and good people live together, what people have gained.
Your reproach misses qualification here.
People who lose their jobs here gain from the welfare state, it ´s again different from the system in the US. In my country all people gain from a shared risk pool financed by tax.

I´m not a feminist but a woman with a heart, mind and emotions. When I call a marriage emotionless I do it with qualification, because 80 per cent of my indian friends are unhappy in their married life.
I can sense how it feels.

IT IS A SHAME WHEN YOU DENY PEOPLE THE RIGHT TO BEHAVE LIKE A HUMAN, WHEN YOU FORCE THEM TO IGNORE FEELINGS AND EMOTIONS.
THIS IS ANIMAL AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HUMANITY AND A HAPPY LIFE!
HOW CAN ANYONE FEEL OFFENDED BY VIEWING PEOPLE BEING IN LOVE; KISSING AND CARESSING IN THE PUBLIC???
IN MY EYES PEOPLE ARE EMOTIONALLY MALADJUSTED WHEN THEY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.
THIS IS REAL POVERTY, EMOTIONAL POVERTY!

*no offence, that´s my sincere view*

I appreciate your personal dedication to help disadvantaged children and would hope that more people follow your good example.
Thank you for your justification Harit.
I understand you are a patriot.
I´m also one.

HUMILIATION AND MENTAL OPPRESSION BY IGNORANT AND SELFISH TEACHERS WREAK HAVOC IN THE YOUTHFUL MIND THAT CAN NEVER BE UNDONE AND OFTEN EXERT A BALEFUL INFLUENCE IN LATER LIFE.

Naddu

@ Naddu

IT IS A SHAME WHEN YOU DENY PEOPLE THE RIGHT TO BEHAVE LIKE A HUMAN, WHEN YOU FORCE THEM TO IGNORE FEELINGS AND EMOTIONS – Who says that emotions have to be ignored. People are free to feel what they feel. PDA is public display of that feeling. Again I will always test it and say, if it is right to publicly practise what you feel, you will have copulating couples on streets

THIS IS ANIMAL AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HUMANITY AND A HAPPY LIFE! – NO it is not. Your logic is baffling. Animal is what dogs do on the street, when they go at each other. Humans don’t have sex on the street and that’s the reason that they are “not Animals”. You expect people to behave closer to animals and if people object to it, it is inhuman????? Remember humans have much more decency and that’s one of thing that separate animals from humans.

HOW CAN ANYONE FEEL OFFENDED BY VIEWING PEOPLE BEING IN LOVE; KISSING AND CARESSING IN THE PUBLIC??? They way you are offended to see some one have sex on the next seat in your plane. You said that you will ask them to take it to a more private place. Right?? It’s the same feeling for others. Like I mentioned, the degree of act differ. However, your reaction is the same as Indian public and so you are not different. Hope you get it this time. And I hope you don’t say that PDA is not related t sex. If you do, then read our previous posts

IN MY EYES PEOPLE ARE EMOTIONALLY MALADJUSTED WHEN THEY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT. THIS IS REAL POVERTY, EMOTIONAL POVERTY! Then it applies to you as well and the European and American public, because you also scoff at people copulating in public. Say it for yourself as well

Cheers

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ NADDU

I NEVER said Germany was responsible for the current global crisis and I NEVER “blamed innocent people for perverse behaviour of greedy managers and bankers, or grasshoppers that are thirsting for quick profits without thinking of the effects for the involved people, without having a moral or ethical behaviour”. The truth is that it is indeed the US that is mostly responsible for what we are seeing today – the greed of those hedge fund managers, of bankers, investment banks, etc tha has led to this rot in the system. And to a large extent US consumers are also responsible – by living a highly extravagant lifestyle through having everything on credit, they were setting themselves up for this!! It is just unsustainable!!! It is like a shopkeeper (China, in this case, by and large) sells his goods to a consumer (in this case, the US) by giving the consumer his own money to buy his own goods!!! By buying hundreds of billions of US $ in treasury bills (739.6 billion $ as mentioned by you, Naddu), they effectively financed the US to enbale their consumers to buy Chinese goods! That is why they are so dependent on the US! It is in their interests to ensure that nothing happens to that country, or else!

To be brutally honest, in truth, we are ALL responsible to some extent – bankers, lenders who gave money to “sub-prime” customers, borrowers who kept flipping houses to the next “fool” in line at a higher price, the credit rating agencies for certifying such junk bonds as “investment grade” (it is apparent that they themselves are not “investment grade”! I find it amazing and shocking that we STILL take the views of S&P, Moody’s etc seriously!!! ), the regulators for sleeping at the wheel and not keeping such greedy practices in check, people like Gordon Brown, who now asks for the Swiss Banks to remove their secrecy laws (where the hell was he when the whole world was enjoying the huge asset bubbles being built up and everyone was enjoying their notional wealth created through property price appreciation and stock price appreciation?!?!?! How come at THAT time he did not ask the Swiss to knock off their banking serecy laws and bring the tax havens across the world to book??!?!) and finally, US – OURSELVES – for “going with the flow” and getting more and more greedy!!!

Like I have mentioned before, I personally have no problems if people show affection and hug and kiss in “public”, but there has to be a line drawn somewhere. That “line” differs from country to country – in many countries, such things are forbidden and you will be put into prison/fined, etc, whereas in other countries, people don’t give a damn. I personally feel kissing/smooching in public is acceptable and people ought not to be made to feel guilty for doing it by being arrested or whatever, but going beyond that would be crossing the limits. Anything more ought to be reserved for the bedroom. And if people do choose to smooch in public, if their affections for each other come to the fore and they choose to display their deep love for each other in full public view, then they ought not to complain if they are being stared at by members of the public. While I myself have no problems if a couple gets cozy next to me, I myself would prefer to reserve it for the bedroom.

Zeeni Thomas Wrote:

Prernagupta’s comment on the subjec of romance in public space is something our young generation to volenteer and to be supported by matured Indian citizens.
My personal opinion is, any form of Love, romance, kiss, marriage, having children all are commitment between two individuals. As responsibility towards community, it should be promoted within the society rather oppressed by authorities. Other than nudity everything should be allowed in public to all Indians and it should be the part of the right. The meaning of obscene in the Indian society should be rewritten. Couple those who were taken to the court, because of oppression prevailing and the man who took couples to court could never do it in the public.

My oh my ASHU,

when do you finally comprehend that exchange of endearments is not SEX!
Everybody should have at least the choice to do this in the public !!!
We don´t discuss having sexual intercourse on the streets, you make a sexual act of a kiss!!!

Come over to Germany and show me streets and places where people copulate…I have never seen them!!! I´ve been living here for 42 years.
Proof what you claim!!!!

Naddu

@ Naddu
Dear Naddu
I have already invited you all supporters of PDA to India and show live demonstration of your PDA, on busy city streets of India.
Let me tell you exactly what will happen to your PDA:
1. people around you will start to look at you with disgust irrespective of your educational qualifications, professional position or marital status.
2. people will hoot you out from there, if possible.
3. some members of public will start passing lewd and sexually indecent remarks towards you.
4. on the complaint of some alert citizen, police will come and forcibly take you away from that “public place”, if you don’t move away voluntarily after their warning.
5. you will become topic for gossiping and example to show, how not to behave in Public Places.
6. and all these things will not be done by Ram Sene or any fundamental activists but by the Public at large consisting of different religious, educational and other backgrounds.
So if you are a real supporter of PDA……..please come to India and do the needful that is demonstration of PDA.
Thanks and take care
Rahul

P.S.-please don’t misinterpret my above post as a threatening call……..it’s a plain fact in MY INDIA.

@ Naddu

Now you are throwing in another term (Exchange of Endearment), which will only confuse the issue. Exchange of endearment is not equal to PDA. I hope you can comprehend that. So, don’t use “Exchange of endearment” as a term and confuse the issue more. In India Endearment display is a “Yes”, Some forms of PDA is a “Not acceptable”, specially where there is sexual connotation.

I would like all forms of PDA to be acceptable, but I can see why it is not and thus am tolerant to that perspective. Problem is that your and Prerna’s understanding of another society and tolerance towards a different perspective is very low. You are just closing yourself to another point of view, and how most people in India feel. You just want your levels/standards/feeling to be adopted by all. Very self righteous and holier than thou approach.

As far a copulating on streets on Germany is concerned. You are not reading carefully. Please pay attention. I didn’t say that it happens. Infact I said it mostly doesn’t happen – so I don’t need to prove anything. Did I not point out your and German and American intolerance to it? And this is because that degree of sexual act is “NOT ACCEPTABLE” in Germany. Which means German society is also intolerant to that degree of sexual act. Indian society is not tolerant to a lower degree of sexual act, like smooching etc.

So, if the two society’s (Western and Indian) response is the same to something like this (The difference is the degree of act and not the act itself), then the question is why do you want to force your degree of acceptability / tolerance down the throat of a society which is not ready for it? It just shows your intolerance. Specially when you scoff at a higher degree of same act yourself and feel that it is right. If you and western society would have said that “We are ok with people copulating on street”, then we would have said that this is an absolute difference of perspective and then there is a point on debating. Now I don’t see much difference in perspective, just that acceptability standards are at different levels and one set of people forcing their standards on others (Read yourself, Ankur and Prerna)

Hope you get it this time

Indians respect other culture and standard. They don’t go and try to change the PDA acceptability standards and force it down on a society

Infact even Foreigners don’t try to force standards in India

The problem is with NRIs like yourself, who try out different societal standards across the world and after liking those standards, don’t stop at it. But move a step ahead and force it on Indian society. Like I said pretty self rightous and holier than thou attitude. BTW, I am an NRI myself and have experienced different standards and like them as well, however it has not made me intolerant to Indian society.

Dear Rahul,

first of all, a single action of a guest won´t cause a change in a country. A demonstration in public makes only sense when a greater number of people with the same goal take part in it.
I would have to drag my husband to India for this mission. He never joined me till now, he feels India is too crowded. My indian lawyer friend offered already to commit the “crime” with me. Other friends of mind offered the same. So… incase the action happens I may have to consider what to do, whom to kiss. (joke apart, I would come, I don´t have to lose a reputation in India, when they blame me, I will be blamed as a guest and will leave again…I hope I don´t lose the right to visit India as a tourist)

I have gained the experience how it feels when indian people stare at you. I travelled alone within India, at times I was accompanied by indian friends. I was scared to walk alone on Delhi roads, I hardly saw women on the streets but many man with staring eyes although I kept a decent dresscode according to local moral standards.

A single action won´t have an effect, but if people find it due and want to reach this goal, they should actively work for it. A demonstration held by many couples might cause a different scene.
It would be good to figure out voices or thoughts of young people before organising a stunt.
The more people join in, the more successful it may become. When 50 couples do the same thing at the same time, people don´t know where to stare at first. Police would also not know where to start first. And who would dare to hinder a big group doing what they are doing? Do you really believe an observing crowd would become violent by viewing people hugging and giving pecks to each other?
I would involve journalists and lawyers to observe reactions and intervene appropriately.

Rahul, may I ask you something? Would you welcome PDA for yourself for people in your India?
I have asked so many of my friends, they would wish it but don´t have the courage to express it being scared of the reactions of other people.

Thank you for your pointing out the scruples.
Naddu
Naddu

TO HARIT SHAH, WITH LOVE,
Sorry boss. u r not updated . The present crisis that the world is dealing with is deflation. Deflation means fall in prices. If deflation is not countered immediately it will lead to Great Depression 2. It was deflation that brought the Great Depression 1 in 1930. U r right that printing currency will lead to inflation in future. But that is a problem of the future. First the present crisis of deflation has to be dealt with. Which is worse than inflation.
Your economic analysis may be wrong.But u r right when u say that i m a frustrated man. Who has not achieved much in life.

TO HARIT SHAH AND ASHU, LOTS OF KUD-KUD,
The per capita income of US is today also much higher than India.India has the highest no of people living under the poverty line today. While for US this is negligible even today. Had the Americans not lived beyond their means on credit, developing countries like India and China wouldn’t have experienced such a boom. It was to satiate the huge demand of American consumers that India showed enormous export growth. Thus millions of Indians were lifted from below the poverty line. The present economic crisis is because of foolish financial innovation of Wall-Street and the tendency of non-saving of US consumers.
Indian banks didn’t fail but at what cost. Only 40% of Indians have bank accounts. The government is not giving Indian banks the latitude to act. So the question of their failing doesn’t arise. Still i would concede that the Indian banks are in a healthy position when compared to their Icelandic counterparts.
Harit only a rich country can have a rich culture. Actually culture is a function of prosperity. India is the poorest country in the world. So there is no question of it having a rich culture. Though pockets of India like Gujrat and Rajasthan do have a rich culture.
Ashu i would advise u to read my earlier comment to Harit. Ur concept about the economic crisis will clear. And only Iran traded its oil in Euro. Because it wanted to challenge the hegemony of dollar. Actually presently the Euro has depreciated much more than the dollar. It is worth much less than the dollar. Go and check it. Countries that had reserves of Euro have lost much more.
And Harit i m an Indian. And i dont pay taxes because i dont earn that much. take care .love kudkud

Dear Naddu
Let me answer your queries or arguments point by point, in order to avoid ending our discussion to global economy.
1. “Only Numbers” will not be sufficient to convince people, e.g. if large number of people come on the streets and start rioting, it will not justify their act in the court of law just because they outnumbered the victims.
2. you have already gained the experience how it feels when indian people stare at you, so it’s self explanatory, how you feel by such staring.
3. people in India don’t find it due so collective action of PDA is out of question.
4. 50 is very less number considering the population of more than 1 crores each in big metros like Mumbai and Delhi, now don’t expect that 80 lakhs people will come on the streets to support PDA in India, it will be a unreasonable expectation.
5. don’t worry about the people, they will simultaneously stare at all the 50 scapegoat couples and do all the things which I have mentioned earlier( refer points 1-6 in my above post).
6. police force is capable of hooting out couples involving in PDA whether they are 5 , 50 or 500.
7. I am not sure whether observing crowd would become violent by viewing people hugging and giving pecks to each other, it depends upon that particular mob’s psychology, but they will do all the 6 points mentioned earlier, that’s for sure.
8. No. journalists and lawyers can’t do anything in front of mob, if they try and reason with the mob, they (journalists and lawyers) will be bashed by that mob.
9. last point Naddu, I would not welcome PDA for myself for people in my India.
Otherwise I will prove myself a hypocrite as I am a supporter of Private Display of Affection.
Your friends are wise enough to take that decision because they want to live peacefully in India, so don’t brand them as cowards.
So bottom line is that come to India as a guest observe the customs and cultures of places you visit, and go back happily without a scratch, to your country of residence.

Thanks and take care
Rahul

Dear Rahul,

you are just one voice in a billion, never forget.
When you think all is good as it is in your country, I wonder what you are doing here.
Why are you interested in controversial discusssions when you have made all your decisions for yourself and obviously for many in your country?

I regret, that India hasn´t yet managed to care for security of their inhabitants. When a mob is able to insult people when the do harmless things I ask myself what´s going on in your country.
May be you have adjusted to that circumstance already and believe it´s a normality.
Then you should close your door, close your eyes….and dream of a better world…with tolerant people.

Obviously it´s not necessary to talk about emotional matters when a person kills another one for an i-pod on indian roads. When a different thought causes harasment and emotional outbursts like I face them here.

When I come to India I don´t need your order. I´m welcomed by my friends and know how to behave.
I wonder why you feel threatened?
Why should I go to a place as such? There are better places where I can move around without being scared of crime and murder.
How the police was able to control a few I came to know when the terrorism attack happened in Mumbai. It was a total disaster.
A great life you have… living in fear of a mob!!!!

Enjoy your life, don´t forget to close the door tonite.

Naddu

It would be better to develope a love and not a fear for your country!

@Naddu
Dear Naddu
First decide which is YOUR country, then we will discuss rest of the things.
If india is not YOUR country then don’t take tension about people of india and don’t try to enforce your ideas of PDA on us.
and fear is in YOUR mind not in my mind, that’s why you are expecting protection from journalists and lawyers before your possible PDA demonstration in india.
i am indeed enjoying my life in india as a indian citizen rather than become a second class citizen of some other country.
regarding terrorism i won’t discuss it with you, because this is not the topic here, and yes like you have not forgot terror attack in Mumbai, we have also still remember 9/11 of U.S.A.
So, dear terrorism is altogether different subject. please don’t mix it with trivial PDA.
Thanks and take care
Rahul

@Rahul,

PDA is not my idea, it´s an ordinary expression of an emotional matter. It has been even there in your country…look back to your ancient times, eroticism and Kamasutra are a topic that is very much associated with YOUR country not with mine.
I wonder why you deny and ignore this part of your tradition.
When I´m worried about my indian friends I have reasons for my worries, they are not created they have been a part of experience and confident reports.
A number of your citizens had already the idea of PDA, otherwise it wouldn´t have caused a great debate.
Don´t name me a thread for a matter that is already present at your place. I feel you lose perception in this discussion. PDA hasn´t been invented by people from western countries, it´s a human gesture widespread all over the world since many centuries.
The relation terrorism occured when you told that your intelligence is able to control a kissing couple, no doubt about it, may be they should better focus on crime, not on harmless kissing and caressing each other loving people, these people won´t attack your country, they just try to live a happy life.

I ask you to get rid of your class thinking, this won´t make a better nor worse person of you.

Happy weekend,take care
Naddu

@RAHUL

I am delighted to meet some who is proud to be Indian. Great. But what about north Indian treated as second rated citizen in Maharastra and bashed to death while being watched by media and police or Bihari’s treatment in Delhi and North Indian’s in Tamil Nadu or Tamil in North India.

“CLEAN YOUR OWN HOUSE FIRST BUDDY. STOP TALKING BIG AS “SECOND RATED CITIZEN”.

IF YOU CANT COMPLETE DON”T BLAME AS SECOND RATED CITIZENSHIP AS EXCUSE.(LIVING IN SO CALLED COMFORT ZONE IS EASY PATH MOST PEOPLE CHOOSE)

@Naddu
Few big misconceptions people in India have (at large)

(1) Sex is free in west, I have never ever seen any one sleeping with tom dick and harry each day. Most of friends(Male or Female) have single partner or husband and that is the end of their sex (private life)
(2) Second misconception is People in west are Lazy and hence immigration is the way to keep system going: Wrong again: All my friends who migrated realised from day one that they need to work at least three to four time harder in Australia just to survive against chineese competition. where is laziness. I HAVE NOT SEEN IT.

(3) FAT people YES I accept there are more fat people in west: But wait: IT IS BY PRODUCT OF MODERN LIFE. SAME IS TRUE IN GURGAON OR DELHI. TOO MANY FAT PUBJABI LADIES( Sorry ladies no offence, Punjabi’e are RICH and hence fat too)

Ankur

Read the posts carefully. Because if you do, then you would realise that I am not contesting that US in material terms is richer than India. You are wasting your time, trying to prove it to me. Misdirected comments.
On the Indian banks being healthier than US. Good that you accept that it is the case, and that’s the bottom-line. Now you can justify why, with thousand different reasons. Statement that Indian banks are healthier still hold good. Anyway, that’s not my point of debate or focus

My concepts on economics are much clearer than your buddy. I work of an investment bank, if that puts some perspective here. I do it for a living.

About Euro currently only being used by Iran for Oil rading- Iran is 4th largest producer of oil. And Venezuala is the second country. OPEC is considering it as well. Google for “Iran’s New Oil Trade System Challenges U.S. Currency” and “OPEC chief muses about gradually switching oil pricing to euros” and update yourself. There is a propensity to make this change given the unstable nature and risks with USD. Go do some research, you need the knowledge to stop making ignorant comments.

Also, Russia is considering shifting to another currency. Reason for it? Because USD is a debt backed currency, and the US govt debt has gone up exponentially, with a Trillion worth of debt between July and Oct, and faster after it. So much so, that the National debt clock design couldn’t accommodate the numbers. Do you know the impact of that in the long term? (Emphasis being on ”long term” while you keep quoting the current rise of dollar, which is short term and Myopic at best) I guess not and that’s why you are hoping that USD will do well and US will stay the economic super power that it is, in the long term. And it is hope rather than confidence that it will happen for real. Hope is a good thing, so keep hoping.

And inspite of what you hope for, China is asking for a new reserve currency already. An unprecedented development, which is expected to become norm as well.

First time ever China (USA’s biggest creditor) is also casting doubts on US Try notes. Google for ”china worried for US investments” and you will find news items. Do you even know what that means? That means US losing credibility. Debt being related to USD’s value, what does that mean? Figure out for yourself. If your tiny brains can’t comprehend it, then let me know. I will explain. And learn to live with it and not defend it. Pranab Mukherjee said something on living in denial to Pakistan – You are living in denial as well. Hope it is temporary, for your own sake.

Keep up the Kud Kud

@Naddu
I know PDA is not your idea, but you are trying to impose it on us(indians). I do know about eroticism and Kamasutra are a topic that is very much associated with MY country not with yours. I am not ignoring or denying this part of our tradition.
Having said that, i don’t see any reason why WE(Indians) should practice PDA against OUR wish.
Do you expect Indians to show you all the sex positions depicted in Kamasutra or Khajoorao……………….on the streets of India?
Sorry you won’t get any volunteer for that in India, not even prostitutes, they will also refuse to do so, let alone other people.
If PDA hasn´t been invented by people from western countries, and if it´s a human gesture widespread all over the world since many centuries, let the “human beings” of india decide whether they want it or not, you don’t take decisions on OUR behalf.
Dear Naddu why only harmless kissing and caressing and why not harmless sexual intercourse and other sexual activities among loving couple?
Otherwise also as you said these people won´t attack my country, so why are you depriving these loving couples from achieving “orgasms” in “Public”?
after all according to you they just try to live a happy life, so let them be “completely satisfied” with their act.
Don’t ask me to get rid of my class thinking and i won’t ask you to get rid of your pseudo modern thinking. It’s a deal.
I LOVE MY INDIA……..WATAN MERA INDIA.
Happy weekend,take care
Rahul

@Ashu — i am not trying to force my perspectives down anyone’s throat. i am giving voice to opinions that i believe need to be heard. when a well-meaning couple is arrested in the world’s largest democracy for something harmless like kissing, it is a sign of a serious problem. it’s a matter of freedom, plain and simple. you can boil almost any moral debate down to “having a different degree of tolerance”. take violence, for example. most countries consider civilian violence to be illegal, yet violence in warfare is funded by the government. and then there are some countries who choose not to fund an army at all and think war is wrong. these are all different degrees of tolerance towards violence, but that doesn’t make all the levels equal. almost anyone would agree that tolerance for civilian violence is worse than tolerance for warfare. in the same way, although only a few people believe that copulation should be allowed in public, majority of people in the world would tolerate public kissing. the degree of something can make all the difference.

@aussie
I completely agree on points you raised, but these are our internal problems, like “black and white” problems of western countries.
Every country in the world has it’s own internal problems, no country is perfect.
“SECOND RATED CITIZEN” is not BIG for me because I AM NOT ONE OF THEM.
and dear aussie SECOND RATED CITIZENSHIP is not an excuse, it’s fact faced by millions of NRI’s all over the world.
yeah, you are right, i am indeed living in a comfort zone of my country………..that’s INDIA.

@Rahul — again there is this recurrent objection that we NRIs are trying to force our corrupt westernized morals on you pure Indians. First, I hope everyone can recognize that we too are Indians and, for better or worse, we NRIs and you Indians influence each others beliefs and aspirations continuously. Second, no one is forcing anyone to do anything. you don’t have to kiss in public if you don’t want to. this is about restricting people’s freedoms. by not tolerating PDA (and putting people in jail for it), you are restricting freedoms of INDIANS IN INDIA who want to kiss in public. get it? you are forcing your ideals on other Indians.

@Prerna,

you are absolutely right!!! He´s infact trying to make up his mind for others and claims to belong to a majority. Fact is, that the so called majority lives in fear and not in freedom.
Why would he call my indian friends cowards when they prefer to not express their feelings in public being scared of facing trouble? Actually he´s very conscious about the problem.

@ Rahul,
I´m not Indian! I´m a western woman without any relations or familiar connections to India.
When you don´t have the wish to practice PDA you cannot conclude that all indians have the same attitude. Obviously there are others too. Scroll back and check their comments.
Are you the spokesperson of India??? I doubt! I think you overestimate yourself.

Naddu

@prerna
freedom: The condition of being free; the power to act or speak or think without externally imposed restraints
This is a dictionary meaning of “freedom”
But in every society there are “restraints” imposed externally either by the government of majority public.
prerna, in the 100 crores population of India, there may be some number of people who want to roam around “naked” observing “freedom from cloths”
Should we allow them to do so?
If no, then they will cry for restrictions on their “freedom”.
my point is freedom comes with responsibility and legal acts are biggest evidence to prove my point.
Just think, what these legal acts do, they just “restrict” your “freedom” to act or speak or think by drawing the line of acceptance according to the opinions of legal experts (external power) who drafts the act.
in short “Freedom also comes with Restrictions”.
and who am i to force my ideas on other indians, they have got their own brain and thinking power, like you and me.
Regards
Rahul

One very Blunt Statement: I am sure it will ignite some fire.

If some one is looking for a decent girl, Please look abroad. I have first hand experience how bad situation is in India(MODERN WESTERN CITIES IN INDIA).

@ Naddu

You are giving voice to opinions? US used the same guise + WMD to attack Iraq. Pakistan used the same to attack Indian Kashmir territory time and again. You are doing the same sitting in Germany. Just that your mode of aggression is different.

“Harmless”. Do you think, only harm is physical harm? Can’t some one attack another person’s senses? Make him squirm and uncomfortable and claim it is harmless because there is no physical harm? Gimme a break. A person can make fun of another person, and it is harmless on the face of it. But it is not. Your or anyone’s freedom is not objectionable, if it is not a reason for anyone to squirm. There is a respect to culture and surroundings that has to be observed. Companies teach their expats how to deal with another culture and not hurt people’s sensibilities. What you are saying is that, as hurting sensibilities is not same as hurting physically, so it is ok. Then I guess organisational wisdom and efforts to culturally sensitise people have always gone waste, as it is not physical harm. Right?

Abut Violance example: Violance is physical hurt. There is physical pain and blood and death. It is totally a different debate. There are not ambiguities around it, unlike in this case. So, not comparable with PDA. Sorry, wrong example. Try something more relevant

And on “although only a few people believe that copulation should be allowed in public, majority of people in the world would tolerate public kissing.” You are generalising and forcing common world opinion on small pockets like India. What majority of world thinks is irrelevant, majority of people in India are free and democratic and should be allowed to decide their own standards, not world’s majority. In world majority think kissing is ok. In India ‘Majority’ don’t. You have to customise your recommendations for an area. Or else we will have people saying that “Most people think capitalism is the right way to go forward, so communist should become capitalist”. That’s not a logical line of reasoning.

Like you think that you have right to express your emotions freely. Public in India also has right to not squirm and be offended, when they go out in public place with their family and children. And you recommendation of freedom is in violation of other’s freedom.

Liberty has never come from the government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of it. The history of liberty is a history of resistance.
Many politicians are in the habit of laying it down as a self-evident proposition that no people ought to be free till they are fit to use their freedom. The maxim is worthy of the fool in the old story who resolved not to go into the water till he had learned to swim.

Who speaks of liberty while the human mind is in chains?

The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.

Naddu

Sorry this was for Prerna

You are giving voice to opinions? US used the same guise + WMD to attack Iraq. Pakistan used the same to attack Indian Kashmir territory time and again. You are doing the same sitting in Germany with the same excuse. Just that your mode of aggression is different.

“Harmless”. Do you think, only harm is physical harm? Can’t some one attack another person’s senses? Make him squirm and uncomfortable and claim it is harmless because there is no physical harm? Gimme a break. A person can make fun of another person, and it is harmless on the face of it. But it is not. Your or anyone’s freedom is not objectionable, if it is not a reason for anyone to squirm. There is a respect to culture and surroundings that has to be observed. Companies teach their expats how to deal with another culture and not hurt people’s sensibilities. What you are saying is that, as hurting sensibilities is not same as hurting physically, so it is ok. Then I guess organisational wisdom and efforts to culturally sensitise people have always gone waste, as it is not physical harm. Right?

Abut Violance example: Violance is physical hurt. There is physical pain and blood and death. It is totally a different debate. There are not ambiguities around it, unlike in this case. So, not comparable with PDA. Sorry, wrong example. Try something more relevant

And on “although only a few people believe that copulation should be allowed in public, majority of people in the world would tolerate public kissing.” You are generalising and forcing common world opinion on small pockets like India. What majority of world thinks is irrelevant, majority of people in India are free and democratic and should be allowed to decide their own standards, not world’s majority. In world majority think kissing is ok. In India ‘Majority’ don’t. You have to customise your recommendations for an area. Or else we will have people saying that “Most people think capitalism is the right way to go forward, so communist should become capitalist”. That’s not a logical line of reasoning.

Like you think that you have right to express your emotions freely. Public in India also has right to not squirm and be offended, when they go out in public place with their family and children. And you recommendation of freedom is in violation of other’s freedom.

Dear Ashu,

have you been offended by introduction of internet, tv, car, motorbike, mp3 player, teabag, jeans trousers, aspirin, x-rays, freezer, Mc. Donalds, mobile phone, bicycle?

These western inventions had a great impact on your daily life and still have, they improved your life quality! Or am I wrong?

Why don´t you stop using them, when you use your mobile phone I´m sure you hurt somebody else who doesn´t want to see it, because he hasn´t got the money to purchase it.
See how small definition of freedom can be. When you smoke and another one is sitting next to you…how is that? When somebody is having a phonetalk in a restaurant and you feel disturbed by it, do you raise your voice? These are all private matters the public has to bear. Every raised your voice because of it?
How can a kiss in public cause a mental pain? That´s something I don´t and will never be able to understand.
Ashu, have you ever been abroad? How will you broaden your mind when you sit in a country without experiencing any difference? I grant you your limited way of thinking.

Don´t use your mobile phone in public, you may provoke a poor one that much that he´s going to kill you because you have the freedom to own one and he doesn´t it!

Are you aware???

Stop to insinuate free thinking people that they want to see copulating people in the public!
You attempt to polarize!

Greetings,
Naddu

Sorry Naddu…I guess that I have done too much debating with you and the reason that I involuntarily wrote your name instead of Prerna in last post :-) )) and even mentioned germany in the post :-) )) Not intentional

Naddu
Firstly its not me. We are talking about Indian public sentiments. And answer is “No” Indian public is not offended by X ray, freezer and what not, because they are not odds with Indian culture. You just try to fit in any example to prove your point. Ain’t it? Don’t u check for relevance?
Any thing is acceptable, as long as it doesn’t create a conflict with current sentiments/rule. These things don’t create conflict, so they are fine. And Indian public decides what creates their conflict and thus not acceptable/not acceptable. You can’t say that they should accept freezer along with PDA or don’t accept freezer at all. Else going by the same logic, next demand can be ”British like curry, so they should adopt PDA standards of India”. Right logical reasoning? Nope
By saying that smoking and loud talk on phone is same as PDA and creates problem/pain, you are accepting that it does create problems/uncomfort. Thanks for accepting it. Now next thing is, accepting the pain. Indian public mostly decide to not bear it. And you are saying that they should bear it. So, is that a choice that they have ? or you are going to make it for them? Back to my point of forcing stuff on people.
“How can a kiss in public cause a mental pain? That´s something I don´t and will never be able to understand” – That’s the problem. You don’t understand. You don’t understand a different perspective. To you only ur perspective is supreme
To answer your question – You are not reading properly. I am an NRI, I have travelled across Europe, APAC and North America. I have broadened my perspective, liked what other cultures have to offer. Didn’t scoff at PDA in other countries, however also not narrowed my perspective to India. You have broadened and then narrowed it to believe that Western way is the only way. I throw the same accusation back at you, ‘limited way of thinking’. You say that – My freedom is the only freedom, I don’t care about anyone else’s freedom to feel comfortable or make a choice. Yo ant to make choice for other people
Mobile phone example- Example of violence. Not relevant. My freedom to own phone is no at odds with a poor person’s freedom to own it. He has freedom, and not the money. It is a not a freedom discussion. Get it?
You said “Stop to insinuate free thinking people that they want to see copulating people in the public! You attempt to polarize!” – You still don’t get it. Do you? I am testing all the theories that you are throwing around. Which when tested in extreme situation, don’t hold good. And that’s true to not just Indian public, but yourself as well. Your actions and thoughts are misaligned

Dear Ashu,

thank you for your apology.
pleasure has been mine though :) )

I hope you don´t mind my response. :) )))

Have a nice sunday!
Naddu

ah and I have responded back to yours. Hope you don’t mind my response

Naddu

I think we agree to disagree, while not losing respect to each other.

I can leave it at it. If thats ok with you

Dear Ashu,

what actions of mine do you mean, till now it´s been all a theory or thought process?
Elaborate please? You tend to interpret.
Why do you need to test theories that have already been prooved?

Please elaborate what exactly hurts your sentiment when you see a happy couple expressing this love in public? You defend the so called common sentiment of Indians.
You are inconsistent when you say it doesn´t disturb yourself but it disturbs Indians, at the same time you are referring to common indian sentiments, are you indian or not?
I understand that you identify yourself with your country, you are emotionally involved.

What is your point? Which of indian sentiment is getting disturbed by PDA?
Is it immoral to kiss someone in public? Is it dirty to kiss in public? Who dares to define this moral?
I still don´t see a certain reason.
I understand that you may be worried of moral degeneracy, which special moral do you mean?

Moral degeneracy happens when people act careless. An expression of love and affection won´t lead to this in my eyes. There are other factors responsible for careless behaviour, like, present extreme social differences, the feeling of unfair treatment, exclusion/isolation of certain groups in a society. What about the muslims in your country. I´m sure they would start a revolt would you liberate affection in public, are you maybe afraid of them???

The law says, obscenity in public isn´t permitted. In my perception I feel it´s more obscene when people have to do their daily hygiene on the roads, it´s a very private, intimate matter. Would you wash yourself and shave in public? You would certainly not, you had he chance to develope another moral in this matter!
Good that his freedom is there, by our western moral standards it wouldn´t be accepted.
This would affect the general impression of a neat and clean, structured and safely ordered country
where moral values and special standards are a part of the Code of Law.
I´m very conscious that the accepted standards of morality differ extremely in different countries.

I don´t think the western way is the only way. But I know I live in one of the safest countries in the world, not because we are morally degenerated, we have developed and defined a moral in our freedom, our law and order works there, where it´s necessary and required.

We had different views about obscenity in the 60ies, 70ies, 80ies, 90ies, and nowadays, the degree of obscenity is also subjected to changes.
When you live in a global system, you won´t manage to escape from multiple changes, apart from economic changes.
Due to the speed of this drastic changes nowadays, I understand that a majority in India is sceptical and worried. The change happens faster than people manage to cope with, mentally.

Nevertheless – anyone should have the freedom to decide for himself what to adapt, what to deny. Leave it to the individual, don´t try to force them to do things they aren´t convinced about, they´ll do it in secret or will throw a bomb to achieve it with violence. (greetings to the Taliban)

The other way: A few courageous people just try it over and over again, until the mainstream has realized, that a kiss doesn´t affect the personal freedom of others or the entire moral of a country.

Naddu

Dear Ashu,

why should I disregard someone who has another opinion? I appreciate different views, they add excitement to life and ought to be inspiring.

:)
Naddu

@PRERNA

VIRUS ALERT: I was at Adelaide Airport yesterday while my Laptop picked VIRUS W32.SPYBOT.WORM from Airport Server.(Wireless Network Auto Selection).

I VIRTUALLY WENT THROUGH HELL TO REMOVE IT. I HAVE SYMANTEC INTERNET SECURITY. IT NEVER REMOVED IT.(Software said it is removed and ask computer to restart but it never get removed. It keep corrupting system and system32 and windows files).

IT IS WORST WORM I HAVE EVER CAME ACROSS. I ENDED UP LOOSING MY SOLIDWORK SOFTWARE AND LOTS MORE.

“AVOID “THIS DIRTY WORM”.

@Rahul and Ashu

Naddu is a Doctor and I have enormous respect for Naddu. Naddu contributes after very thoughtful process. Yes we both live in western world and do have different point of view for life. But I can assure you Naddu have good intentions.

Naddu will never and has never shown any disrespect for any one here.

TO PRERNA, NADDU AND ALL THE SUPPORTERS OF PDA
please read this piece of news carefully:
MUMBAI: The Vakola police registered an FIR against actor Akshay Kumar, his wife Twinkle Khanna and the organisers of Lakme Fashion Week late on
Saturday. Akshay, the brand ambassador of Levi’s jeans, unveiled its Unbuttoned brand at the Lakme Fashion Week on Tuesday at the Grand Hyatt, Santa Cruz. A social worker, Anil Nair, then submitted a written application to the police, urging them to book the actor and show organisers for indecent, vulgar and obscene behaviour.

“We saw newspaper clippings and video footage of the show before registering an FIR under Section 294 of the IPC. A public prosecutor was also consulted,” senior inspector S Neklikar said. The offence is bailable. “We will now record statements of people in the audience. Arrests won’t take place immediately.”

Section 294 refers to doing any obscene act in public or singing or reciting any obscene song in public. If convicted, the accused can face imprisonment that may extend to three months, or a fine, or both. “We want to ensure that the case stands in court. We will examine related material and take the opinion of several legal experts,” an officer said.

Akshay, who’s in South Africa at present, was not available for comment despite repeated attempts. Those present at the fashion show said Akshay had walked half the ramp at which point a model went up to the actor and tried to unbutton his jeans. The actor refused and moved towards his wife Twinkle, seated in the audience, and asked her to unbutton it.

“Akshay has been bestowed with an honour like the Padma Shri and should not be doing what he did in public. He should give a public apology,” Nair had told TOI on Thursday.
NOW PLEASE CARRY ON YOUR DEBATE
Thanks and regards
Rahul

@aussie
Dear aussie,
There is no need to say that Naddu is a Doctor or Prerna is a CEO of this site.
Being a doctor or CEO does not validate their point automatically.
If you really think so, then please consider me as a President of USA and accept all my points blindly.
Thanks aussie in advance for considering me as President of USA.
Regards
Rahul

Rahul

Akshay Kumar contributes Millions in Taxes which helps the nation and I congratulate him for what he has achieved in life. He is a family man. A boy from a Dish Cleaning Job in Hong Kong to the top of the world(and he is not Khan or Kapoor), I admire his achievements.

By the who who is Anil Nair?.

TO ASHU,
i think u will remain a fool. That u work in an investment bank doesn’t require knowledge of economics. And i wonder which petty litte investment bank u r working in. As any investment back worth its name has already gone under. U r an egoist ,ude nd arrogant fool.let me put some sense in u.
What is this bullshit u r giving about US being a debt
economy. And China being tthe biggest credior of US. That countries like India and China buy US treasury bonds from their excess dollars because it is still considered to be the safest investment. That makes US technically a debtor. And nothing else.
Cant u accep that u were acting like a fool when yesterday u said that the OPEC is thinking of swittching over to Euro. U fool Ahmedinejad the Irani president mooted this proposal in 2007 in the OPEC meeting that OPEC should consider switching over to Euro. All countries, including Venezuela opposed this suggestion of Iran. So the OPEC PRESIDENT said it is too early to switch over to a new currency like Euro. So this proposal was deferred for consideration at a future date. That futture date has still no come.
Also dont give this bullshit on Iran being the 4th largest producer. For their income OPEC is much more dependent on the oil demand from US. After the slack in the US demand Hugo Chavez and Venenzuela r already falling into deep shit.
I dont need ur foolish outdated links tto keep myself updated.
Also the talk for reserve currency is not new. It first started in 1970. There r technical problems associated with like formation of a central bank to issue that global currency.
And u idiot , if u dont sit in the exams, there is no question of failing. That is the condiion of the Indian banks. Mr idiot u r justifying the cost at which that has been achieved.60% of Indians dont have access to bank accounts. That means 60% of the population of India has no access to formal finance. U r the only fool, besides Sonia Gandhi that is praising the indian banking system. Don say these things in ur office about indian banks. They will throw u out of the office. And i m still waiting for ur remedy for the present deflation. Which u so cunningly dodged. I hope u understand that deflation is the falling in prices. When prices fall economic activities like manufacturing stop. This brings unemployment. This further decreases the demand and results in depression.
I think i have insulted u enough. Nothing personal against u. But i m noticing thaT u r pretending to be very knowledgeable and brilliant. Which u r actuallty not. U r more interested in belittiling people through taking positions. Rather than enhancing ur awareness nd understanding by interacting with people more experiencedand intelligent than u. Which is the purpose of YAARI. I think after reading this u wont have the guts to reply. so take care. become humble. And drop this know-it-all attitude.take care.love ankur.

aussie

Your information about Akshay Kumar is perfect.
But dear if he booked under Section 294 of the IPC, then in the court of law, judge will not give the judgment depending on whether he contributes Millions in Taxes or risen from dish cleaning man to stardom.
Judgment will be passed based purely on the case in point i.e. charge of indecent, vulgar and obscene behaviour.
I also don’t know who is this Anil Nair, but he has put the Akshay Kumar in a tight spot, that’s for sure.
Don’t worry now Akshay Kumar will also know who is Anil Nair, but in a hard way.

TO NADDU,
Thanks honey for ur apology. I was actually never interested in ur head. U know what i m interested in. But u r denying me that. That’s no protestant chariy.
I dont know why all woman find me such a gentleman. I cant help it. And isn’t reading between the legs as important as reading between the lines.take care. ankur.

TO RAHUL ,.
iN section 294 of the IPC which u r quoting, what constitues indecent’vulgur and obscene behavior has not been defined. That has been left to the subjective judgement. So most complaints filed under this section have been quashed by the judges of various courts in India. Because the judge has refused to interpret an act as an obscene which the complainanit [some fool like Anil Nayar in this case] found obscene. Also most of these complainants r rogues who want publicity. Courts therefore also fined some of the complainaints in the past for wasting the time of the court .
So u see there is no objective definition of indecency and vulgarity. U found Akshay’s act indecent while i found it beautiful nd divine. The Victorians earlier used to cover the legs of the chairs. Because they thought that uncovered legs of chairs was obscene. i dont think that u would find the same obscene. take care.love ankur

Since you asked I will refer you again to our previous discussion.
My reference was to Theory (Maybe more a thought process- Wrong use of terminology from me) that you/western and German society is tolerant. Which was proven wrong. Please read earlier posts. Higher degree of same act is not tolerable to German society. Difference is just the standards.
You say – Theories/Thought process which are proved? Which of your thought processes are proven? Has anyone checked your tolerance to certain limits? Nope. So, I am testing you against your own thought process and finding inconsistencies. You say you are tolerant, when tested you are not tolerant. Just refer to my post for you , which has the answer
“Ashu Wrote:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:26 am “
Don’t ask me again “What hurts common sentiment”. The question is getting repetitive, and so is the answer. You don’t counter the answer, however Just keep asking the question again. To keep it short – It’s the same as your sentiment and comfort with space and people around you that gets violated, when you see people copulating in public. You need to look deep within you for this answer.

About “You are inconsistent when you say it doesn´t disturb yourself but it disturbs Indians, at the same time you are referring to common indian sentiments, are you indian or not?” Sometimes my acceptability is not same as common public sentiment. Do I have to always be in line with majority? No. But can I still understand their perspective and be tolerant towards it? Yes. So I am not being inconsistent. I am being understanding and tolerant to common sentiment, even though my acceptability standards on the issue are different. I am not inconsistent, you are being presumptuous that I should have the same thought process as Indian public, if I am defending people’s right to decide themselves, as to what is acceptable to them

ON “What is your point? Which of indian sentiment is getting disturbed by PDA?
Is it immoral to kiss someone in public? Is it dirty to kiss in public? Who dares to define this moral?” – Its not morals we are talking about. Please don’t confuse the issue again. It’s the standards. Who defines standards? Majority does, as in any democracy. And that’s happening in India as well as in other countries like Germany. Problem is NRIs (Read yourself) who disregard the majority opinion of a country like India and force the majority opinion of another country (Germany) on India.

“I understand that you may be worried of moral degeneracy, which special moral do you mean?” No I don’t mean any morals and that’s not the topic. You are making huge assumptions here and writing a long irrelevant essay, which I am ignoring. My point is about freedom of majority to take their own decision. Like the minority ‘sexually aggressive’ public don’t define Germany’s standard. So does it not happen in India. Its about “FREEDOM OF MAJORITY TO DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES” and not being forced by others. That’s what I am fighting for in this forum. Just because you identify with minority in Indian public, doesn’t mean you can force your standards on majority or pass your judgement on them

Daily heigene on road: Its not a freedom, its lack of options. How can you even compare them? And are you saying one thing which should be done in private can be done in public (where there are multiple options) because another similar act happens (Which is about lack of options and not freedom)?

Safety/ law and order of a country: You are digressing again. Its not PDA discussion

“We had different views about obscenity in the 60ies, 70ies, 80ies, 90ies, and nowadays, the degree of obscenity is also subjected to changes.” – So you are saying that Indian society is changing and is not resistant to change. Right? So, why not give it that credit and let it change at its own pace, why do you want it to change at pace that will make it at par with western society? Why do you want to compare and make Indian society run a race, which it doesn’t ant to be part of? Why are you forcing a pace, while the society has a pace of is own?

A few courageous people just try it over and over again, until the mainstream has realized, that a kiss doesn´t affect the personal freedom of others or the entire moral of a country – By that definition the sex on the streets and sex of business man with his g/f in plane is an act by courageous people as well. Hopefully it will convert intolerant people like you in Germany as well. They will be justifying it as well by saying that “Sex doesn’t affect the personal freedom of others or the entire moral of a country”. Well done! Now you have someone challenging your own standards. Love the way this debate keeps going on and proving you intolerant, which is an accusation that you have for Indian public

TO AUSSIE ON MOTHER FUCKER MAHATMA ,THE FRAUD MOTHER AND THE BEAUTIFUL LINCON,
How r u dear? Whom do i respect? Well i respect u for ur goodness and knowledge. I respect everybody around. But i definitely dont respect the Mahatma. India didn’t get independence because of the sacrifices and speeches of Mahatma. India got independence because Churchill lost and Clement Attlee became the British prime minister. Had Churchill won ,the British would not have left india in 1947.
That i talk freely and comment my posts on Yaari didn’t come because of Gandhi’s sacrifice. It came firstly, because the British came to india and introduced the English language,. Secondly because the Americans invented Internet. And thirdly a very rich girl of indian origin called Prerna started Yaari. U tell me where does Gandhi come in this.
A debate has already started on the actual work that Mother Teresa did. Most Scholars on Teresa have concluded that Mother Teresa didn’t do that great a work. She was more of a publicity hound,. Even Ram Krishna Mission has done more work in Calcutta THAN Teresa’s missionaries of charity. aN year before her death she wrote a letter to a cardinal of Vatican who was her friend. She agonized that she had wasted her life in pretending and posing for the Western media.
Lincoln was truly a gem of a man. So i agree with u. And i live in New Delhi. And i have only an Indian passport. Whenever u r delhi inform me. It would be a pleasure o meet u nd host u.take care.love ankur.

TO NADDU, AUSSIE ,ASHU AND ALL OPPONENTS OF PRINTING CURRENCY,
iN any economic crisis there r three levels of action. To avert a crisis coordinated action at all these three levels is needed. The first level is the government and the central bank. The second level is the banks. And the third nd most important level r the citizens. In case of recession the government and the Central bank have the only option to increase money supply. This increased supply is passed on to banks. The scheme will fail if the banks hold on to this increased supply.And dont pass the money in the form of credit to corporations nd consumers. Thirdly if banks too pass the money, consumers may hold on to the increased money and save it. Instead of spending it. As Keynes famously said that when u save five shillings in a day, u put one man out of work.
Japan failed because the consumers hoarded on to the increased supply of yen instead of spending it. And not because of Japan printing more yen. Balancing between consumption nd saving is a kind of social responsibility of the citizens of an economy. This will come only after increased monetary and economic literacy. Which is dismal even in developed countries. take care. god bless. love ankur.

TO ANKUR
please read this latest development of akshay kumar case:
courtesy IBNLive.com
The Santacruz based social activist Anil Nair, Thursday, filed a written complaint at the Vakola police station against the actor, his wife Twinkle Khanna and the event organisers for obscenity in public.
Akshay Kumar apologised for the same soon after. “If I have hurt anyone’s sentiments with my actions, I am sorry because I did not mean to,” he said.
According to Nair, Akshay Kumar being an idol for the youth today has shamed the nation with his behaviour. He should not only apologise but also return the Padma Shri award he was honoured with on March 31.
“Many mothers complained to me about the indecent behaviour at the show and asked me to take up the matter with the police,” said Nair.

take care. love Rahul

To An kud kud.

There were two statements: ‘I work for an inv bank’ and ‘I do it for a living’. So its not about just the 1st statement you moron. It’s the job inside the bank that I do. Get it? I guess not.

Which petty inv bank? Life is good in this bank dude. They still haven’t taken govt help and pay well. Though you give a feel of dead end/ laid off person, hoping for US economy to recover.

Egoist/ arrogant fool/fool- These comments shows more frustration and immaturity from your side. I did get it right the first time – You are frustrated in life. Your expletives doesn’t offend me. Its humorous to see ur brat/clown reaction.

US being safest investment? There are opinions galore on this topic. I am not interested in your opinion. You are not an expert. I have access to professionals in this area for opinion. So stop giving opinions and explain the facts – Explain Premier Hu’s comments that china is worried for US investments. If people have to pick between opinions of Hu and yourself (Its not me vs urs opinion). Who do you think they will pick? If you think ur word will over ride Hu’s , then you have some grossly misplaced hopes …He he

You said “That makes US technically a debtor” – Ofcourse, I was saying the same thing and to add to that “US is a debtor in big shit”. So whats ur point? Please clear your thought process. You are confused

Euro and Iran debate. Till 5-6 yrs back, no one was thinking to have Euro. Now there are proposals. If you read properly I said ”Propensity of change” not that change has happened already. While as usual you are assuming and writing some crap proving something that doesn’t need to be proved. Tu bilcul dedh hoshiyar hai. Change happens in small pockets and spread. Iran and OPEC discussions are those small pockets. It’s the trend of things that matter. Snapshot for taking decisions is immature (Which is what you are doing by the Iran 2007 discussion) Get the point? As usual, I guess still not. And I expect again to hear irrelevant stuff trying to prove nothing

Also the talk for reserve currency is not new. It first started in 1970……- Your point being? It still remains a fact that there is more demand for it than earlier. Try proving it otherwise

For both the above Euro and reserve currency discussion is proof of people challenging US hegemony more and more. And economic landscape doesn’t change in a single day/ month and year. It takes time. Just that you can see more and more people asking for change. Try denying that

Indian Banks discussion: If you have an exam analogy, then atleast define it properly. Else you end up making these stupid comments. US banks took higher standard exam and failed. Indian banks took lower standard exam and passed. So, If question is about capability, then US banks might be more capable but they couldn’t manage the level of difficulty that their economy had to offer. Indian banks managed the level of difficulty that was thrown at them. Bottomline they are successful. US banks are not.

You are in serious denial. It is sad for sure.

Deflation: I didn’t dodge anything. I agree with you on that point. Deflation is bad for system. So is excess inflation. If you have a different opinion then lets debate it out. If you just want to debate for the sake of debating (Which seems to be ur point here), then I wouldn’t waste my time anyway on your childish attitude.

I will ignore your last para about “what you think about me” and your childish gibrish. If you expect a comeback here, then you will be disappointed. I have no time to waste on it. BTW it is you, who is belittling yourself. I am just sitting back and relaxing and having fun watching you at it.

Naddu

My comment
April 5th, 2009 at 10:05 am was for you

An kud kud

Its interesting that a person whose brain can’t handle the complexity of putting together two statement ‘I work for an inv bank’ and ‘I do it for a living’ is claiming intelligence. I love your confidence and stupidity that goes together. Very rare combination

Ashu,

if you will forgive me saying so, I find you are an arrogant intolerant bum. :) ) Who tries to “force” any standard or moral in India by discussing it here? Are you in possession of your senses? Where´s your logic here? That´s an absolute nonsens statement.
I articulate myself and when you have a problem with it, I can´t help it. When you feel threatened by a women or standards coming from the west, I feel you are nothing but a coward.

You seem to live in a very adventureous world there. I hope you don´t suffer from delusion of persecution.
You yourself are inconsistency personified, naming others intolerant by not tolerating their views, by trying to detect any failure or inconsistency line by line…I even think you suffer from an inferiorty complex.
If you need an appointment… come over! :P

Naddu

Naddu

Don’t think, I can forgive you. You are getting personal and stooping to new levels by making personal attacks – Delusional, inferiority complex etc. It has nothing to do with the topic. I guess you are having rub off effect from certain people – You know who

Since you are making some unsubstantiated statemenst like

> Me not being in senses
> When did I leave logic?
> When was I inconsistent?
> What makes you think that I have inferiority complex?
Etc etc

Maybe it will do your credibility good, if you can prove them. I could sense frustration from you of not being able to force your views on me. However, really I never expected such below the belt response. As usual, you have the same judgmental attitude (Yet again)
I am not hurt, as it is not easy to do that. I am just disgusted at this response. Ankur saying so is fine, he comes here to insult people. And I have little regard for his statements. Response like this from you is only pitiful.

Since this is nothing about the topic or debate anymore, but an effort to pull down people, I just signoff for good from this forum.

Naddu…. you disgust me

Hi Ashu,

When I ask for reasons and ask which sentiment is hurt, why don´t you just tell me the sentiment of your parents is hurt (for example), I respect them and want to follow their steps, their tradition, I try to live according to their expectations? You´ve been evading this issue by referring to general morality or standards, acceptance, adjustment to existing standards, but the logic in this special standard has still not yet been clear.
When you are so tolerant, why aren´t you tolerant enough to understand that other indians try or even want to express their affection in public??? They do also have their sentiments and feel hurt by being repressed, blamed or dragged to court without reason. Is it the right of a government to intrude in personal, simple emotional matters of their citizens, or the right of a mob to disturb them? Why are people so intolerant when it comes to expression of love? (once again I stress that sex is also an offence in western countries and not a standard)
In my understanding this is a restricion of a basic personality right.
There are enough young indians who have a different sentiment. Why don´t you just analyse it? Ask them in a survey…this is a democratic way to figure out opinions and majorities.

People who work in investment sector have their own logic. Profit oriented… you cannot afford to develope another view. The mob won´t deal with you anymore, isn´t it? :P Finally I got it! ;)
Would you tolerate or support the ones who try to achieve this not yet accepted freedom you wouldn´t be tolerated as a banker in India anymore…your motive and sentiment is business… lol that´s also a sentiment.

Hi Ankur sweetie,

I love the rebel in you. At least you have the guts to be different. I suppose your brother, this investment banker, that pseudo moralist in pin-striped trousers will not have to dirt his hands to achieve a change. He goes ahead, tries to explain and justify double standards, because he lives from this business. He will earn the profits of those who have to struggle, and then he will say…India is great, I´m proud to be an indian.

Hope you had a good day! :)

Carry on with your different views, I appreciate them a lot. :) )
Sending a hug,
Naddu

Sorry Ashu,

I got fed up with your ways. :)

Didn´t mean it really. I felt you too missed to keep a certain form of respect by your personal responses to me.
Take it with humour.

Naddu

After going through the comments, I feel that people have identity problems. Either the moderator is unable to stop persons from using other identities or allowing others to have misconceptions about their ideas. Why are the information like name and mail id asked before entering the comments?

“A public display of affection (sometimes abbreviated PDA) is the physical demonstration of affection for another person while in the view of others. Holding hands or kissing in public are commonly considered to be unobjectionable forms of public displays of affection. But what is considered objectionable depends on the context. For example, in places such as bars, nightclubs, and strip clubs more extreme forms of public displays of affection are rarely considered to be objectionable. In these places, acts such as grinding and french kissing are common.[citation needed] It is traditional at the conclusion of a Western wedding for the couple to kiss.

While generally considered to be an American term, every culture has written and/or unwritten rules governing the display of affection in public. Individual and societal views on the public display of affection vary significantly. Such displays may sometimes be considered to be in bad taste, while in some jurisdictions such displays may even be criminal. Depending on the social values and context, extreme forms of public displays of intimacy may be considered indecent exposure.

If the partners enjoy being seen affectionate towards each other in public, it may be considered a mild form of exhibitionism. Alternatively, the partners may be indifferent that others see them, and therefore are not inhibited by it. Finally, the partners may prefer more privacy, but may simply tolerate being seen by others. Some may find it pleasant to view others public displays of affection, which may be considered a form of voyeurism.

In many societies, public displays of affection may be tolerated even less among minority couples. For example, gay couples could be at risk of encountering aggression from disapproving onlookers. While such public displays of affection could trigger hate violence, some gay rights advocates have used public displays of affection as a means of defiance, treating them as political acts. For example, at McGill University, the Queer McGill organization stages “kiss-ins” in which gay couples kiss in public areas on the university’s campus. In many places around the world, couples of differing race, religion, or tribe may be subject to similar intolerance.”

In India PDA is not common.

For more, visit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_display_of_affection

@Ashu — i think there is a very important point here about democracy that is being missed. in a democracy, the minority opinion must be protected. in other words, you cannot let the mob infringe on minority rights. in india, one (growing) minority that needs protection is young couples who want to be able to kiss in public. do you understand the basic concept of freedom? why should a Muslim be allowed to worship Allah in public? I’m sure there are plenty of Hindus that would get offended / feel squirmish / uncomfortable when this is happening. Why do we allow it then? Because we believe religious freedom — and the ability to express one’s religious beliefs in public — is a fundamental right that should be afforded to all. Well I am saying that expression of love is a fundamental right also.

…i’m sure you’ll say this is an irrelevant example and I should come up with a new one. Great rebuttal to my arguments.

Btw, there is quite a lot of ambiguity around violence, which I already mentioned — do you think violence in war is right? I guess most people think it is, but you may be surprised to hear that there are people who think violence in any context is wrong. So even the question of violence is not cut and dry.

jbs negi Wrote:

wonderful Prem, you have done a good job.
Rgdrs-JBS Negi

irene njoki Wrote:

hi,

Very interesting views but with time people tend to get used to this things and they take it in their strike though kissing is abit too much if its a peck thats fine.

I live in Iran and as you know these days we have
more problems with this stupid government and stupid public beliefs
which conform such behaves. However I think we should protest and
try to change the situation. I conform your approach strongly and I hope
your invitation to respect human rights including public display of affection
, which is in my opinion a kind of “freedom of speech”, would be heard by
all people.

Stan Lobo Wrote:

Hi you say that you were embarrassed by Shilpa Shetty kiss, which is actually an Indian response to all things physical and sexual , just because the way we are brought up. Nothing right or wrong in it actually- according to me. The difference is THE WAY WE PERCIEVE IT- experience it and interpret it. By itself its nothing !! Really nothing. Why should it bother you if someone kisses someone else ? How does it make you different ?

So if you feel affected………that’s what we are. Period.

SHASTRI NIRANJAN Wrote:

dear prerna,

the kiss is physical transaction of two x 2 lips is it?
when these situation arise ?
out of kiss, what is forward path?
do you justify the forward path or you will retrict the justifying till kiss in public.

off cource , i fully agree that in want of such social out lets and day by day condensation of social transaction imotional outlets are not only getting restrcted but are bcloked..

nas

VIRENDER BHATI Wrote:

GOOD KNOWLEDGE

Balagopal Wrote:

i fully share your views. excellent writeup!

kuldip mishra Wrote:

i am agree what u have said.this incident shows that how much backward we are in 21th century.one side govt. advocate to have a course about sex and one side they create a nonsence chip publicity.everyone has right to express their love and emotion whether u are in public place or somewhere else.so,i don,t see any vulgarity to express u love and affection and it is permittable all over world whydon,t india.

hi,

wat wil u say to fathers who are raping their daughters, any laws for them????

jeegar raol Wrote:

Dear friend

I agree with u .

Mahesh Hegde Wrote:

“country’s continued backwardness regarding all things sexual.” – what is ‘backwardness’ related to sexual things? Can’t you think different countries have different ways? I do not understand why it should be considered ‘backward’ if you do anything other than what western countries do. Instead of presenting anything to assert your point that kissing / sexual activity in public is good you just say ‘backwardness’ Can you tell why kissing / sexual activity in public is good?
Where do you draw the line to ’show bit of affection’ and why can not you go by the norm?
My question is how do you decide what kind of sexual activity in public is good?
How do you set the example for public behaviour? Based on pictures on the walls?
“parks or beaches or other such romantic places” – VOW!! you find the railway station / bus stand ‘romantic place’ to make love?
If that is the case why do you need beach / park?
Do you want to have beach / park or since you do not find them you want to have sex in public?
Do you have kids?
Don’t you think teen agers have love / affection?

Sadasivan N Wrote:

Hi Prerna,
A hearty Good Morning to you from Trivandrum!
How right you are!
Well,I served abroad and find your writing transparent and honest.these are plus traits in any man or woman.I admire them too since these are lacking in many persons we find today.Indian IS MOST CERTAINLY BACKWARD in more than a hundred respects.Emotional ejaculations are not enough.Reasoning is needed.How many people like you can use their reasoning faculty in this sentimental country where we don’t appreciate our women for simply being what they are!!
You can know more about me by asking ALL Yaari members to visit my blogs at http://www.xanga.com/sadaboy

Govind Karunakar Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
Very well written. I endorse your views absolutely. Nothing but a social revolution will bring about a welcome change in our “moral” values.
Will you kindly read my blog: http://snoopysinquiries@blogspot.com/
Regards,
Govind

sushin namram Wrote:

What is your problem. think good. if silpa is happy why u r jelous of it. becouse rechard is not you. stupid fellow

NILESH SHAH Wrote:

gr8 totally agree with u

gopal singh Wrote:

Dear prerna,

ur r just doing a fantastics work by sending this mail. kissing any body with love and affection any where any time is not a crime by any lawor religious. this is barter where people show their love and affection to each other whom they like.
really headsup to you for this work.
m.k. singh
hyderabad

Shahid Mallick Wrote:

Dear Prama,

Yes in few occusion I am agree with you but in other word is it possible to make it happen waht you immagine. And I think this is the contrast of life. Society shoul have some guide line and abide by soem roule of law and its the community who will decide waht will be their law or guide line. Ofcourse same story is not appliocable for every societ as I am in Bangladesh. There are difernts in rural and urban and for global context. But problem is our mind set

Shahid

acharya pathik Wrote:

Dear friend,

I am agree with your thinking and suggestions when two inocent person whethere in love or not but because of affection done something which also permissible under the law and as per our constitution under article 12 and 14.

thanks

pathik

Gopal Krishna Sonwani Wrote:

Hi Prerna
Greetings!
I am very much agree with your opinion. Its good that you have taken initiative to stand against such a false ideology of life and prohibition of personal freedom. There are alot of issues that we should stand agaist.
We are with you.

Gopal Krishna Sonwani
Dehradun

nidhi sikka Wrote:

Very nice write-up….Truly agree with you Prerna…..good job!!!

ashutosh maheshwari Wrote:

thanks Prerna, i think kissing is not allowed at public places but married couple are allowed at not public places but if they are alone in garden or other romentic places they can kiss.

arijay chaudhry Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
Way to go. We are with you on this.
regards,
arijay

satish kkkk Wrote:

in my opinion, there should be no objection if a couple show affection in a decent manner.
after all love is a natural thing.

Pramod Mishra Wrote:

felt good .ur thoughts are honouring and i m withu
pramod

rohit bakshi Wrote:

I agree with you. I think its perfectly alright to kiss in Public.

See you soon.

Alright. So democracy means taking care of minority? I agree. What happens in case of a conflict between minority and Majority? Majority prevails. And that’s acceptable, even in US- Example nudism not allowed in public place. Is that repressive of US govt? Hope that answers democracy questions.

Religious discussion. Relevant, but with assumptions : U r assuming that Hindus are squirmish when Muslims worship in public place. Majority Hindus are not and they decide the rules (Key being majority hindus). If you think otherwise, Please prove with data

Violence example is very cut and dry. If you want to take violence example: Closest example can be “Violence in public place”. Is that acceptable? I don’t know of any society which encourages and accept violence in public place and here as well majority prevails as it is illegal

Prerna

April 5th, 2009 at 9:10 pm (Above post), is for you

@Ashu — actually some people in the US do believe that restriction of nudity is oppressive! but i guess they are too small of a minority to matter. there are other growing minorities, like homosexuals, whose rights are starting to be defended by the general public. the recognition of a new minority’s rights is always a slow process. there was a time when violence in the streets was the norm, and perhaps in the future there will be a time when warfare is also illegal.

@Ashu — no I do not believe that Hindus are, in this day and age, squirmish about Muslims worshiping publicly. but i do know that public worship of a minority religion was illegal in many countries in years past (including india). but slowly people realized that religious freedom is important, and so they began to tolerate different religions. it is because religious freedom is protected by law that Hindus do not feel squirmish when Muslims worship publicly. in the same way, i’m sure if we allow kissing in public, the next generation of Indians will not feel squirmish about it.

@Ashu — another example is racial segregation. when racial segregation was made illegal in America, nearly half the country was opposed to it. Americans in the South felt “squirmish” about having to share bathrooms, schools and buses with blacks. yet the other half of the country, and powerful lawmakers, realized that the freedom of African Americans should be protected by law. and so they changed the law to give them equal freedoms. even today there are Americans who feel squirmish when they are around blacks, but blacks continue to have equal freedom in America. what i am trying to say is that a government should not restrict the freedoms of a minority just because a majority, or almost majority, “feel squirmish” when the minority express themselves.

Naddu

Yes, I missed to keep certain form of respect. And who did I take the lead from? Yourself
Please read your post ” Naddu Wrote: April 2nd, 2009 at 10:11 am” I was not going down the path till you started saying words like “Got it?” , “Ever heard”, backing off on Voyeuristic ideas” etc.
After that post I got down to the same level as you

However, after your post yesterday, which was couple of notches down more, I had a choice to go down at that level, or leave it at that. And I decide to not compete on this front of insulting people. I don’t want to play this game. Period.

Ankur and yourself can play that game. I will just not respond to any such comments.

Prerna and I Agree about change being a slow process (Homosexuality, nudity and war) Thats what I think is also happening in India. There is no point in forcing a pace on a society and this is exactly my point. Even the change in western society was at the certain pace that it was comfortable with. When PDA in all forms will become acceptable, then practice it. If you practice it before its time, censure is expected and thats the case with nudity etc in western countries as well. And the pace can’t be dictated by whats happening/acceptable in US or western nations. With many people, it has colonial connotations as well, and thus you will get more resistance then acceptance, if you go down that route.

Racial segregation/bias is not a thing of majority. Atleast thats what my belief is. I would like to say, if there is any evidence to the contrary.

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ NADDU

I find it amazing, shocking and disappointing that you are actually telling Mr. “AN-KUD-KUD” (Ankur for the uninitiated), who is quite obviously a frustrated pervert who has, IN HIS OWN WORDS, not achieved anything substantial in his life and who does not pay tax becoz he does not earn that much to have to pay tax (hopefully he will soon earn enough to pay taxes, he has my good wishes), and of course, who abuses like there is no tomorrow and who has not the slightest decency and manners to talk like a civilised person in a public forum, that you “love the rebel in him” and that “he has the guts to be different”!!! If u consider abusing endlessly and profanity as “being different”, then I am afraid you really need to change your entire concepts of what constitutes “being different”, Naddu! And to think that you are “supposedly” a doctor!!! I honestly suggest you check yourself first and get your thinking straight and THEN come back to this forum and comment.

And another thing, don’t bother giving any “hugs” to this Ankur fellow – he has stated UNEQUIVOCALLY what he wants from you – he wants to “read between your legs”. Now YOU figure out what that means – you’re “supposedly” a doctor, I’m sure you know EXACTLY what that means!! This Ankur guy is nothing but a pervert!!! I honestly suggest Prerna to get this forum moderated for such abusive comments, otherwise it will become like a free-for-all! I’d like a response from you on this, PRERNA – you respond to many other comments, I think this one needs to be addressed on an urgent basis!

And ANKUR, please moderate your comments, whatever it is you want to say, you can say it but in a CIVILISED MANNER!!! Please do not prove yourself to be an animal and an uncivilised and uncouth person! I could not give a damn what you think about our investment banker friend, Ashu, that is your problem, but by using abusive language, you’re not getting yourself anywhere and only bringing yourself down in other people’s eyes. At least Ashu says whatever he wants to in a decent way without having to resort to profanity! And another thing, your comments about “girls considering you a gentleman” are laughable! Even if by come miracle they do, the day they read your profanity-filled comments on this website, they will drop you like a hot potato (if you have one in the first place, that is!). Stop showing your insecurities here and please start behaving like a mature human being.

Sincerely,

Harit.

Dear Harit,

thank you for your concern.
it´s a great pleasure to learn that you are worried about me. Ankurs comments may be different from others, he´s radical in his views and doesn´t know etiquette. He openly speaks his mind without hiding anything, even not his frustrations or status. In my eyes he´s authentic. Authentic people are easier to deal with than people who try to keep a facade and pretend anything to meet certain expectations. I know his level of maturity, hence I´m able to deal with it and forgive him his “perversions”. He´s a passionate, straight guy and these are attributes that may help to succeed professionally. I wish him to be successful in his further life to be able to relativise his drastic views. There´s always a reason for behaviour or misbehaviour of people, it´s good that when he may find compensation here and doesn´t turn radical elsewhere.

His intent to read between my legs is a surreal insinuation, I don´t feel it´s a provokation, it´s just too irrelevant to be mentioned at all. I believe he sometimes tries to provoke to figure out reactions or gain some attention. He´s a human that needs to evolve. He never missed to apologize for his misbehaviour, this shows he´s not unscrupulous. Don´t believe he would act the same way would he face anyone of us. The internet is a platform for people to get rid of their tensions.
Nobody is perfect.
That´s what I think about it.

@Ankur,

see what you cause. Other people are worried of you and me. Please consider Mom and Dad, they want to be proud of you Anku. Try to be a good man, you can stress your words by using appropriate expressions, your vocabulary is wide and rich. I trust you will manage.
Don´t mistake my hug. It was meant to console you in your frustration.

Harit,
everything is fine,
thank you for your statement.
Have a good day!
Naddu

@prerna
as you said the recognition of a new minority’s rights is always a slow process.
our next generation may follow PDA.
but right now…………..nah.
and please raise your voice for those under privileged westerners who wants to follow nudity in Public places.
otherwise also you yourself is not a follower of either PDA or nudity in public.
now “preach” what you are not going to “follow”……..yeah that’s right……..nudity in public place.

warm regards
Rahul

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ NADDU

Maybe you are right to an extent, maybe we are misunderstanding Ankur here. But I am sorry to say that he himself is responsible for that. We are ALL “authentic people”, Naddu, at least I do not hide behind any facade and do not live up to “expectations” (whatever THAT means?!?). There is nothing wrong in speaking one’s mind, but ideally one must do so in a manner that does not offend other people and at the same time, gets the point across:)!!! I know it is a tough call, but a productive one, nonetheless! And, needless to add, profanity and abusive language has NO PLACE in civil society and should not be tolerated AT ANY COST!!! Being honest and straightforward – well to be brutally honest, it is a “double-edged sword”, Naddu, it can get you into trouble as well and lead to people misunderstanding you. So you need to think about the situation where you are and then take a call. Sometimes, a little bit of diplomacy won’t do anyone any harm! Take it from me, I know from experience!

@ ANKUR

I sincerely hope you do well in your life and achieve something good someday and get your frustrations out, channelise them in a good and constructive manner, I am sure you will do it! Nothing is impossible, Ankur, just go for it man! You have my best wishes for sure, and for that matter, everyone on this blog has my best wishes! An honest word of (unasked-for!) advice – please do not use profanity in whatever you do or whenever you speak, whether face-to-face or on the internet – it just does not reflect well on you! Hope you consider it seriously! As our dear “Doctor Naddu” has herself rightfully said in the comment posted at 2:45 AM on April 6, 2009, please consider Mom and Dad, they should be proud of you, as you should be proud of yourself.

Another final point – please show some humility and respect for other people’s comments – they may know more than you and I do. There are a number of comments you have made about the economic situation in India, the US, printing money, Indian and US banks, etc that are debatable and a lot of the comments made by our investment banker friend, Ashu are logical and insightful, but I would not like to waste time by pin-pointing them to you or anyone else. All I want to say is that do not say things like “u will remain a fool” and stuff like that and at the same time in the same breath, tell others to “be humble”!!! You see what I’m getting at here, Ankur? Just a friendly word of advice that could raise your stature in other people’s eyes – humility is a virtue and it will really elevate your status! I come to Delhi off and on for work, if you want we can meet up whenever I come there. I am always open to making new friends.

Regards,

Harit.

TO NADDU MY LOVE U BETRAY ME,
That first u hold me in the warmth of ur hug. And then two scraps down u chuck me off at the behest of Mr Harit Shah. The moment of reckoning has come. U have to choose between Mr Harit Shah and me.
And there is only one way u can console my frustration. You know that way .So do that way….love ankur

NADDU BY THE WAYS , THANKS FOR UR SUPPORT AND EVERYTHING ELSE

TO MR HARIT SHAH AND ASHU,
Dear mr shah it would be my honour nd pleasure to host u when u r in delhi. So please do inform me when u r in delhi. Thanks for ur wishes about my future. I would also clarify that calling the Mahatma a mother-fucker is no profanity. To speak the truth is no profanity. Also u have to understand like u too i m an Indian. And i m part of that tiny group of Indians that aspires to transform India from its present decay into a beautiful society. Where there is full freedom of expression. Where there is prosperity and diversity. Where millions of unique individuals celebrate there unique lifestyles. Where freedom of the individual is more important than any culture and any religion. And for me the word “fucker” is as divine as the word “Ram”
Ashu u have accepted. That u say that Indian banks r in a lower grade than US banks. So why r u comparing them. You cannot compare somebody studying in standard 1 with somebody in high school. One thing i can assure u Ashu is that i m more brilliant than Premier Hu. And it doesn’t matter whether majority of public agrees with him. When Galileo claimed that the earth goes around the sun ,contrary to the Bible the public killed him.
The same China till 2008 was building its reserves madly in US dollars. That now dollar has taken a beating China is crying for a reserve currency.
The point Ashu is that throw away this socialist and outdated mindset of urs. Of America vs. India. It is the age where we have realized that we r co-inhabitants of this beautiful planet. Cooperation nd not conflict is the way to fulfill the needs of the 5 billion population of this planet. So its now America with India. Or more correctly it is IndiaAmerica.The two have merged.
Lastly i am sorry if i hurt u. I didn’t mean anything personal. To tell u the truth i found ur comments on economics highly intelligent and well informed. Not many investment bankers r so well-informed. They r limited to the knowledge of their trading desk. And know little beyond options nd futures. More so for the Indian investment bankers. So keep up the good work. But if u dont leave ur ego, that will block the flow of ur intelligence. So take care.love ankur.

TO MR. HARIT SHAH, ASHU AND ANKUR
Can you please tell me how to know that Balance Sheet, and Profit and Loss Account of any Company or financial institution is DOCTORED?
waiting for your intelligent reply.

Regards
Rahul

kameswara rao gandru Wrote:

as per india has great culture

@Rahul — you have a very strange concept of freedom. as i have said before, just bc i think PDA should be allowed does not mean that i think EVERYONE should engage in PDA, bc i am not trying to impose any action on others, rather i am asking for freedom of action. in other words, people should be free to PDA, not forced to PDA.

Dear Ankur,

I thank you for your love, you are a delightful toolbox poet and a man that is able to raise his voice for a woman to help and defend her. Keep this great attitude and sensitivity.
Please don´t misunderstand when I fail to decide between Mr. Harit and you, I don´t insist to hurt anyone of you, Isn´t this the preferrable diplomatic way?

Of course, I know what you want, I wish I could fulfill your dreams, but please explain, how will I be able to screw you when I don´t have that required screwdriver? :P

Take care cheri´
Naddu

Sanam Timsina Wrote:

First of all stop it to show on film, news paper etc.

Don’t listen bad, don’t see bad, don’t speak bad.

Dear Prerna,

I have recognised that conservatives in India have a strange and blooming fantasy regarding PDA.
Sex education is probably not a well known subject in India. Intelligent people confuse a kiss with sex, a hug with petting, and PDA with copulation on the streets, or PDA with nudity.
That´s a very interesting and intellectually stimulating association.

How is it there in the US, is sexual education a subject at schools?

Greetings,
Naddu
It may make sense to introduce this important education at indian schools.

Kissing in public can excite the animal instincts of those who can not differentiate between love and sex or in other words r animals themselves..because the only difference between us n animals is our developed n complex mind..the people who can not differentiate between such simple things show n express their undeveloped minds..we r different from animals because we have thoughts, feelings, emotions which we like to express..sometimes in positive n sometimes in negative ways.. positive ways of expressing may also include kissing n hugging..

People dont mind watching friends hugging each other ..a mohther kissing her children n stuff the only thing i can’t understand is that why is there no respect for the relation between a couple..they can’t hugg or kiss in public..now it does not necessarily have to be obsene..when people keep saying that sex should not be practised in public it is hard to understand what’s their point..because first of all a little kiss or hugg is not sex..secondly ofcourse if a couple plans on having sex they themselves would like to do it in private ..no one is stupid enough to start having it in public places..have u ever seen a couple having sex in public..? I guess not..it’s just a human relation like other relations..? it is a bit different from other relations but so what ..? is being different a crime..?

TO NADDU
Refer following definitions of different terms used by you in your comment.
Kiss : Touch with the lips or press the lips (against someone’s mouth or other body part) as an expression of love, greeting, etc.
Hug : Squeeze (someone) tightly in your arms, usually with fondness
Petting : Affectionate play (or foreplay without contact with the genital organs)
Sex : All of the feelings resulting from the urge to gratify sexual impulses

Okay, now regarding PDA in USA
Many junior and senior high schools in the United States prohibit displays of affection, in an effort that many school administrators believe allows students to focus on learning. Such efforts may also be geared towards promoting abstinence among students. Another reason is the potential for liability as PDAs can, in extreme cases, be considered sexual harassment. Also, in the United States Armed Forces, PDA is strongly discouraged and looked down upon, especially in uniform.

Dear Naddu, all the above things have been said by the “intelligent” people, not me.
Now go and try to change the attitude of US government and then talk about India, of course……..My India.

Regards
Rahul

Dear Rahul,

thank you for your endeavours, I asked Prerna not you!
You don´t need to recite my lines, I remember what I have already written or other people have added.
Prerna has grown up in the US or have you?
When you never lived there it´s needless to comment, I`m not interested in any theories, I´m interested in the reality.

May I ask you respect private questions in a public discussions!

Thank you for your understanding,
Naddu

To Rahul,

I have not asked for PDA in the US, I asked if there´s something like SEXUAL EDUCATION taught at school.

First read a question, transport this question to your brain, develope a rational thought and then comment, incase your comment was asked for! That´s the usual way of a thought process!

Thank you,
Naddu

*May I ask you to respect private questions in a public discussion? (correction, sorry for my tpying errors, too early in the morning)

with reference to one of my latest comments
April 7th, 2009 at 1:33am

TO HARIT, ASHU ,RAHUL ND OPPONENTS OF PDA,
my question to u all:
Q) Where would u prefer to send ur daughters, girlfriends, wives alone? In a country where there r lot of young couples kissing each other on the streets. And woman moving around without any restriction. Or to a country where there is no culture of Public Display of affection and where there r lots of lonely men on the streets with few women concealing themselves in unnecessary clothing.
Which of the above two countries would u think it is safer to send ur daughters or girlfriends or wives alone. Answer that and u will get ur answer.take care.love ankur.

To Naddu
No, you may not ask me to to respect private questions in a public discussion?
in public discussion anybody is “free” to comment on anybody’s post, you can’t stop them.
If you really want to discuss anything private with anybody then resort to email communication or telephonic conversation.
And who are you to ask for PDA in the US or India?
Has either of these governments approach you for your recommendations?
As far as thought process is concerned i know your thought process and how you contradict your own statements.
But i won’t say that “don’t teach me that”, as you are free to teach me, and i am free not to listen to you.
Thanks
Rahul

TO ANKUR
Out of your two options i will definitely prefer second one.
That is to a country where there is no culture of Public Display of affection and where there r lots of lonely men on the streets with few women concealing themselves in unnecessary clothing.
Honest and straight forward answer.
take care.love Rahul

To Naddu
……..in continuation…
Prerna has grown up in the US or have you?
When you never lived there it´s needless to comment, I`m not interested in any theories, I´m interested in the reality.
-Naddu
and this is my version for you, Naddu.
I have grown up in the INDIA or have you?
When you never lived here it´s needless to comment, I`m not interested in any theories, I´m interested in the reality.
-Rahul

Rahul

“I appreciate your love for Indian Culture & Values. I am sure you will do good service for the “less fortunate” cummunities and people.

As far as Akshay Kumar is concerned, don’t worry about him. He has risen from dust to stardom. He knows how to handle his public and private life.
As far as Anil Nair is concerned, 15 Minutes fame does not make any one “Social Worker”.

Mother Teressa was social worker. Steve Waugh is social worker(He spend months in India). I am not suure if ever Anil Nair touched hand of any poor and helped him.

THOSE WHO PAY TAX(ES) AND HUGE TAX ARE “ASSET” TO THE NATION.

THOSE WHO ASK “GOVT” TO DO SOME THING FOR THEM ARE LIABILITIES.

Harit
Thanks for the connecting perspectives. I think you contributed greatly to bring order to this forum. And achieving that is awesome :- ) feat
Ankur
Since it has got down to sharing perspective, I will share mine and there are two questions that you raised. US vs India debate and ur concerns about my ego (Thanks for focusing on my personal development- My boss takes less interest than that  ). This may be long, as explaining perspectives need more work. Right and wrong discussions are smaller, however less healthy

First the easy one ‘US vs India’: To start with, I was not comparing US and India or their banks for that matter. If you look at my first comments, I am saying US banks are in trouble and Indian Banks are not (Which is a fact, not a comparison and it had US and India reference as previous discussion involved the two). I am not saying Indian banks are better than US, which I have clarified as well. Somehow that comparison was assumed in my statements and questions in that regard thrown at me. And you will see answers to questions and not comparison on my posts. Hope that puts my perspective on the issue.

And you might be more brilliant than premier Hu. I don’t know you well enough to deny you that credit, and at the same time I don’t know you well enough to accept it. However, on your statement vs Premier Hu’s, you are competing with the combined wisdom of economists that Chinese govt employs. And I don’t know of any one person, who can outshine a brilliant bunch. I will be happy for you, if you will be able to outshine this bunch, it will break this myth in my mind as well. Like you point out, there are exception to the rule (Galileo) and lets hope that you are an exception. Finally, it does boil down to how you define intelligence. IQ is easy to beat, but Hu is great at EQ as well to lead the only political party in China. And I don’t intend to be offensive while I say this, but I believe that your statement of being brilliant than HU is more on arrogant side.

On China building reserves and casting doubts later. Yes, and that’s China’s response to the changing environment. Did US not change its response/policies when Economic meltdown happened? They did. So, why Change in direction is held against China? Infact it is foolish for a govt to have same policies while world economy goes from Peak to pits

As you would understand, I am an investment banker and IB don’t have many socialists and it’s the same for me. So, I am not sure what you are asking me to do when you say, throw socialist mindset away. However, I have to accept, I am not decided as to which Economic model works. Largely Communist and Socialist have failed and now capitalist model is under big question. And while saying this, I also point that China is as capitalist as it comes under the communist guise.
I would like US India to work together, or for that matter China India, or whatever can make life better for Indians and world as a whole. However, I don’t think it is wise to assume that a US will remain the economic, military and cultural centre of world. History has proven that super powers in various eras rise and fall and that “Change is the only constant”. So, I am not wedded to US India idea only and I think that we need that flexibility attitude as economic landscape is changing.
Later on Ego. This discussion is taking way too much of my time. Also ego thing is not that pressing and not important as well in wider scheme of things
And Don’t worry, you didn’t offend me. When I come across that kind of language, it just gets discounted in my mind. You were immediately taken less seriously owing to it. An advice on a lighter note, if you want to offend someone, you got to make it subtle and not show your intentions of offending. Else it doesn’t impact ;-) )))

US originated Joke (Not Indian joke)

Why the US is in crisis – Something I couldn’t resist sharing.

An Israeli doctor says ‘Medicine in my country is so advanced that we can take a kidney out of one man, put it in another, and have him looking for work in six weeks.’

A German doctor says ‘That is nothing; we can take a lung out of one person, put it in another, and have him looking for work in four weeks.

The Russian doctor says ‘In my country, medicine is so advanced that we can take half a heart out of one person, put it in another, and have them both looking for work in two weeks..’

An American Texas doctor, not to be outdone, says ‘You guys are way behind, we recently took a man with no brains out of Texas, put him in the White House for eight years, and now half the country is looking for work.’

————————

And a take on the greedy Inv bankers. This is brilliant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-oIMJMGd1Q

Ankur

Short response to your question about where I would like to have my daughter

First thing is that you are offering to chose between two extremes. There are ‘in between’ choices as well that people have. And remember, the extremes on either side of a spectrum are generally bad. Refer deflation and excessive inflation discussion

Second you are assuming that PDA not acceptability will always be accompanied by covered girls culture. It is not the case. Example: India

Rahul,

On the P&L question – I am a bit tired of typing and would like to type less (Though my next post might be very controversial -I have to find time for it though)

If you can provide me your phone contact at the mail address ashu_sharmaa@yahoo.com, I can call you to discuss. In my mind, it is not a straight forward answer unfortunately

Ashu,
This is my question:
Q. how to know that Balance Sheet, and Profit and Loss Account of any Company or financial institution is DOCTORED?
and this is my answer:
A. one and only way to know that Balance Sheet, and Profit and Loss Account of any Company or financial institution is DOCTORED……is to become an “Auditor” of that Company or financial institution.
Of course this is MY answer you may prefer to defer.
:-)
Regards
Rahul

Definitely Rahul,

If your question was about “who can”. Auditors have best chances of discovering corp gov breaches. And I am assuming that CFO is hand in glove. If he is not, then he has best chances of finding it at org level.

How is th more complicated one and there can be thousand different ways and thus no straight forward answer

I meant “How to find doctored B/S and P&L” is the more complicated question and there can be thousand different ways and thus no one answer

Rahul,

when you are unable to respect personal addressed comments and you feel you have the right to answer instead of the person who was asked, you haven´t understood the simple and common standards of communication and etiquette. You ask others to force not anything on you, and you force your unwanted replies on people who don´t want to hear them.
Leave it. I remind you of your recent sentence that you want to skip my comments, keep your word or you appear to be inconsisten!!!
I will not feel tempted to respond to any of your comments anymore. It´s a waste of time.
Period!

regards,
Naddu

Naddu,
thanks Naddu, after all you have realised that you don’t “own” my freedom of expression.
don’t talk rubbish like i haven’t understood the simple and common standards of communication and etiquette.
and dear who told you that your replies are “wanted” here by everybody?
don’t remind me of my own sentences and don’t talk about consistency and inconsistency, your comments are most inconsistent on this forum.
and what do you think “india basher Naddu”?
you will make all sorts of rubbish statements about india and indians and i will quietly accept it with folded hands?
just forget it.
you will get blow for blow treatment from me for your every india or indian bashing statement, and i don’t need any invitation or permission for that.
please carry on your activity. i will carry one mine.
regards
Rahul

P.S.-RESPECT IS NOT TO BE DEMANDED IT IS TO BE EARNED………NADDU.

Ashu,
you are absolutely right.
100 out of 100 marks for that, indeed there can be thousand different ways and thus no one answer.

Regards
Rahul

Thanks for the vote of confidence Rahul :-)

Sexual repression is nothing new. Many societies around the world place restrictions on the sex lives of their citizens, often with heavy consequences should an individual deviate from what is considered acceptable in that society. Adulterers, unwed lovers, homosexuals, and even people caught in the act of masturbating have been institutionalized, tortured, mutilated, or even executed for committing acts of sexual gratification.

While we no longer hang people for having sex out of wedlock or clamp spiked rings over the penises of masturbators, we can still hear the harpies of morality screeching their anti-sex agendas from pulpits and campaign platforms across the country. Concerned citizens boycott stores that carry literature about certain forms of sexual activity and lobby to squash anything remotely resembling sexual education in our schools. Television and radio producers are fined and chastised if their programming is deemed to be too racy for those moral-minded, sensitive American audiences. Adult-oriented establishments are greatly restricted in their activities, watched like hawks, and heavily fined or shut down completely for whatever whimsical reason the vice squads can dream up.

Even in the privacy of their own homes, citizens are strongly discouraged against practicing any type of sexual activity outside of mundane and marital pairings. And while some bold groups of open-minded individuals may stand up and claim their right to have sex with whomever and however they’d like, they quickly find themselves being held up as the poster children for everything that is wrong in America. Oh, how a much better place the USA would be if we didn’t have all those pesky homosexuals, masturbators, swingers, fetishists, and fornicators around, they say.

I say rubbish.

Some of the side effects of sexual repression as observed in human beings include lack of self-confidence, low self-esteem, depression, suicidal tendencies, and higher aggressive behavior. A child who has been taught to believe that sex is dirty and bad will often mature to become an adult who is self-conscious about his body and overwhelmed with guilt when the natural desire to breed arouses him. Adults who are restricted in their sexual inclinations will often experience frustration that can result in either suicidal actions or violence towards others.

It should come as a surprise to no one that societies that have more relaxed legislature over sexual matters enjoy a lower violent crime rate and are not often seen butting heads with other societies on the war field. This phenomenon was best documented in a study of one of our closest relatives, the Bonobo ape.

Bonobos, closely related to chimpanzees and also sharing more than 98 percent of the human genetic profile, are a species of primate which uses sexual activity not only for reproduction but also for social bonding. Bonobos have been observed to be indiscriminate in their sexual relations in regards to age or gender, and also are considered to be one of the more peaceful groupings of animals on the planet. Unlike chimpanzees and other animals that have a dominant-male or a strictly monogamous structure, the Bonobos are not often observed being aggressive towards one another over food, mates, or territory.

Even in human studies, sexual relief has been proven an effective remedy for anxiety, stress, and even some forms of depression. The personal vibrator itself was originally designed as a medical tool for doctors to use on their female patients to “relieve hysteria.” (Strangely enough, masturbating was considered to be an extremely unhealthy activity at the time, but it was OK if a physician did it for you.)

Numerous medical professionals, psychologists, philosophers, and other champions of sexual liberation and its benefits to society have been defamed and their work bastardized by political and religious leaders on the platform of morality and wholesome family values. Citizens of such societies are therefore instructed to deeply repress many of their strong natural urges and desires, resulting in an increase of frustration, stress, and emotional instability that is disguised with the mask of being “the right thing to do.”

Often this opens the door wide for religion, particularly the brands that demand their followers forsake earthly delights and suppress all natural inclinations as proof of being a good and worthy person. Never has the idea of how sexual repression can result in aggressive behavior been better demonstrated than with the history of the followers of such religions butchering and torturing other peoples whose attitudes on such subjects differed from their own. Nor is it a coincidence that the punishments dealt to such people often involved the mutilation of their sexual organs.

Even in modern times, we find an astounding number of violent sex crimes committed by perpetrators who speak of sexual repression and insecurity when interrogated. While the moral-minded platform speakers would have us believe that such criminal behavior is a model example of what people would be like if we were free to do as we pleased sexually, they fail to acknowledge that such crimes are often committed as the result of intense and long-term suppression of sexual desires.

One observation that counters the idea that sex crimes are the result of being exposed to an environment with relaxed moral codes is the fact that when some countries legalized pornography or other forms of sexual gratification, the rate of such crimes decreased dramatically, even by as much as 50 percent.

Just as an animal will either sink into an unhealthy, lethargic depression or go violently mad when confined to a small cage and denied freedom to abide by its nature, so will humans who are restricted by cages of sexual morality.

Rahul,

my latest article proofs your reactions right. Thank you for the demonstration.

Greetings,
Naddu

Naddu,
First of all i must congratulate you for not dragging india and indians in it.
Secondly, i completely agree with you on each and every word written in this article.
But Naddu don’t you think people will conveniently interpret it as advocacy for “free sex”?
Actually this is a complex issue and dealt with carefully otherwise it’s sanctity will go and we will revert back to animal kingdom.
All the philosophers, sociologists, psychologist and even scientist are worried about this catastrophic effect.
It is easier said than done.
I hope you will agree with me.
Thanks and regards
Rahul

And Rahul,

this is not a forum where you have the right to offend or degrade women who have their own piece of mind!

That´s called mobbing!

@Harit, what do you think about Rahul´s behaviour?

Regards,
Naddu

And Naddu,

where did i offend or degrade women who have their own piece of mind, on this forum?
if i did so then it’s definitely qualify to call as mobbing!

Regards
Rahul

@Rahul,

I don´t insist to harm anyone, and so does Prerna.
I love India and spent a great time there with my indian friends. I have spent nearly 3 months in your beautiful country.
If there´s anything I will never agree to, then it is unfair treatment of people who are different or think different.
When there are already movements in India, it´s a proof that the situation has to change.
India will not lose its identity by keeping or accepting basic personality rights.
It´ll only accelerate the process to progress further. A social as much as an economic progress is only good for a country, this doesn´t automatically mean that values will get lost.
We still have our moral standards, and I´m sure young indians will also develope their own.
An update of social standards are a part of a modernisation. People will demand it, I´m convinced about it.

Greetings,
please try to remain fair in your responses,
Naddu

@Naddu
Thanks again for calling my country india, “a beautiful country”.
I can’t describe you in words how i feel, when i see our national flag tricolour (Tiranga)or when i see our soldiers in uniform.
If there is a reincarnation i will prefer India again as my birth place.
I know there are problems in my country, it’s not perfect, but still i really love my country India.
I hope you understand my feelings, nothing personal, but if anybody says anything against india (and especially NRIs), i can’t tolerate it, i take it as abuse.

Warm Regards
Rahul

Becoming and being are the yin and yang of our lives. One inner one outer. Today, we value becoming to the exclusion of being; we applaud human becomings. The secret is balance.

TOLERANCE:
Tolerance implies no lack of commitment to one’s own beliefs. Rather it condemns the oppression or persecution of others.

Ankur
On the ego thingy: I will open my cards here and I know by saying below, I am opening myself to attacks and more debate.

Same as you (Referring to your response to me), my ego was also a response to the other people’s ego that I felt on this forum on PDA topic. And I did what I felt was needed to burst couple of them. I wanted to come across that way. And going by your posts, I was successful.

And here is where I felt the ego of people (specifically Indian origin and NRIs), as they came with below perspective (It is not about PDA, but the attitude and approach to change and people they are trying to change)

o Attitude # 1 : We know whats good for Indians, so we will show it to them by “Kissing in public place” – Underlying assumption is that Indian public is a fool to be shown the best way. If they don’t like it, they will be forced to watch it anyway. The best way to make any change is interaction, understanding and exchanging of learning to bring more tolerance to an act, and could have been proposed. However, the approach used was a blatant case of ‘Showing whats best for you” – Very offensive approach.
o Attitude # 2 : Indian public is “backward” (And said in so many words)- Sign of ego and offensive to people they are trying to change.
o There was time and again a sighting of western standards, and that India should meet western standards – It is like saying to a person to run a race and compete with his western counterpart. The person is saying that ‘I will move at my own pace, as I am not interested in winning this race’. However, the race is forced on to that person – Do Indians have the right to chose if they want to run a race or walk along comfortably at their own pace? Or should they be forced to participate and compete with western world on all fronts? I am fighting for Indian society’s FREEDOM to make the choice of pace that it wants to move at. And not get dictated by any one- Dictated is close to dictatorship. If the concern would have been that change is not happening it was very valid. This is not the case if we look at Indian society. In fact the change has accelerated to say the least. The question boils down to the pace, where Indian public should have the freedom to decide. If western societies can decide that pace for themselves, why is Indian society facing this external pressure? It also has colonial connotations?
You are a rebel. Right? You know how it feels like being ‘told’. Indian society and people here feel the same. I can imagine that there might be a difference in ‘intent’ and ‘impact’ of what was being said. And if that’s the case, then people on this forum need to work on how they should communicate and deliver a message to create positive engagement
None of the changes/ progress can get acceptability, if the underlying assumption is ‘People are fool, backward and need to run a race that I want them to run. And need be taught, as we know the best’. Why should anyone listen to a person who has this perspective and ego? And bursting of ego was required
Question in your mind might be: Is this guy talking for real? Or feigning that he is not egoist? You make that choice.
This was specific to your ego question. I know the above may start a new wave of attack. I am tired of typing though, so will only answer selectively to messages where I feel logic and reasoning is the driver and not misdirected emotions

Ganapathy Jaikishan Wrote:

Dear,
I think there Nothing Obscene or Bad about sex. These categories are developed by modernization. As per my view just think for a while. If any body kisses his/her partner or shows his/her private things, what is bad about it..we all knows the anatomy and what is under the skirt or under the pant ? right ! then why we categarise and why society & all made it as a punishable act. When we shows are hands, legs, even open back, its not obscene ? then why for sex parts ?

Every body can see a child without cloth ? then why showing the grown body is wrong ? though parts are same only SIZE is different ?

So. I think these subjects are just making life commertialism..And we can only wait to see things to change with time …

kirit k kadakia Wrote:

After reading your e-mail I gave a big hug and a kiss to my wife of 41 years.

Dear Ganapathy
You are great.
Now just do one thing to prove your point beyond doubt.
Go to any busy street of India or railway or bus station, where there are number of people present.
Then open the zip of your pant remove it and remove your underwear also.
and taking your penis in hand masturbate and don’t stop till ejaculation.
don’t worry about the public everybody in the public especially men have same part which you have but may be sizes are different, and women are also know about male masturbation.
So Ganapathy, don’t wait, quick go and act………..public is waiting for you.
All the best.

Harit Shah Wrote:

@ GANAPATHY

I suggest do EXACTLY as Rahul says!!! Come on dude, stop talking trash and writing nonesense just for the sake of it. Frankly speaking, what you have said is not worth even discussing here – I consider it below my dignity to even comment on what you have said. So I’ll leave it at that!

Sincerely,

Harit.

When facing a change, most people invariably feel insecure, lost and overwhelmed.

Still, do you agree with me that life without any form of changes would not only be monotonous but also inconceivable?

Afterall, one aspect of why we all love living, is the excitement and anticipation of the unexpected in our lives!

Here is a thought for you. What do you say to yourself after having had a really bad day?

If you’re like the majority of people, you’ll probably be happy it is over when you go to bed. Maybe saying something like this to yourself: “Phew I’m darn glad, this day is over… wonder what tomorrow will bring!” In expectation of a change.

Do you see what I mean? Every single day brings certain form of changes into our lives. In fact these small changes, are crucial. For they offer new opportunity and create room for adjustments.

So why are many people afraid of facing changes, if these are there to help us?

In psychology there are a number of reasons that can render a person fearful of a change. But I am not about to launch into a psycho-debate on the dysfunctionality of the mind here.

What I want to do, is to show you how you can quickly and easily banish those fears and enjoy a sense of freedom and inner security.

Fact 1. : People who are passionate about growing are never afraid of a change. To them change is simply another way of taking charge and living fully.

Irrelevant of their positions in life, they know that it is of utmost importance to keep an open mind and be alert in spirit. For nothing in life ever stays the same.

Fact 2. You can’t wish a change away. Your life would become more engaging and bountiful, when you can let go of your fear.

So without any further ado.

Build a strong relationship with your fear.

When a new change comes your way, tell yourself, what it is that you’re afraid of and look at the fear. You may even want to write it down. There’s something magical about writing things down.

Feel like you’re confiding in someone else, even if it’s only on paper. Once you face your fear, you’ll find that it begins to lose its power over you. Instead of you becoming enslaved, you now have the upper hand.

Play the devil’s advocate.

One reason for our fear of change is often because we feel inadequate. We feel that we are incapable of handling a new situation.

Should this be the case with you, simply see yourself in the worst case scenario.

Make yourself comfortable and allow your mind to re-live the various stages of what you fear at least twice. The third time around let the fear fade away like a smoke.

See yourself emerging from it wholesome, peaceful and invincible. Feel the joy of being in charge and the triumph of knowing the fear is only a shadow.

Reclaim your inborn power.

I know how frustrating it can be, if you’re trying to move forward and find yourself being held back by fear.

Once you’ve re-emerged feeling invincible, you want to use that momentum to turn things around.

To do this, ask yourself this question: “what simple action can I take here and now to start moving toward my new direction?”.

Wait for the answer to surface. Then do it without stalling. Should you get multiple ideas, just apply the one you feel comes easiest to you first. Moving later on to other ideas after you’ve completed the previous ones.

Test the waters for lurking “gremlins”.

To be certain that you’re now embarking on a steady path to overcoming your fear of change, do the following.

Subject yourself knowingly to your uncomfortable feel-ings around changes from time to time. This is to help you recognize the lurking fear i.e.the “gremlins”

Observe how you react: Do you immediately shut down or do you find yourself trying to be creative with the feelings?

The more constructive you can deal with your uneasy feelings about change, the quicker you’ll be able to move past your fear of change.

I firmly believe in asking for inner guidance. So if you find yourself still struggling with fear, don’t feel dejected, pray for help. It works wonder!
Laugh a lot, be joyful and give yourself to others. A heart full of joy and trust has no room for fear.

Take the time to integrate these steps into your life. Before long, you’ll find yourself getting more and more excited about new possibilities. The more you’re able to connect with and activate your innate power, the less susceptible you’ll be to fear of change.

@ Naddu

I agree with you on all what you wrote about “Change”.
I hope you are talking about “Positive” change and not “Negative” change.
Here are some examples of “negative changes”:
1. terrorism
2. domestic violence
3. nudity in public
4. free sex society
5. incest sex
6. child sexual abuse
7. polygamy
8. lawless society where anybody can do anything to harm other people.
etc., etc.
I myself is ready to accept any “Positive” change, but as far as “Negative” changes are concerned, i am not ready to accept it.
It will be nice of you Naddu if you educate me on this dilemma.
Please make your concept more clear.

Thanks and Regards
Rahul

@Rahul,

I think positive and also refer to positive changes, who would want a change to the worse ever?
Goes without a saying!

Greetings,
Naddu

Incase you are interested Rahul, I´d like to introduce you into the constitutional rights of my country. Figure out the page. It´s interesting even for me. lol
:)
http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutes/GG.htm

@ Naddu

Thanks Naddu for clarification.
Don’t assume that no one would want a change to the worse ever.
There are sections of society who not only want but already practicing these changes, like terrorism, domestic violence, incest, child abuse, etc.
Back home on this forum only, refer the comments of “Ganapathy Jaikishan” and look, what he wants.

Regards
Rahul

@ Naddu

I visited that site and gone through constitutional rights of your country.
Dear just mask the heading “Federal Republic of Germany” and put “India” there.
You will get almost same constitutional rights of my country.
Amazing.
Isn’t it?
:-)
Warm Regards
Rahul

@Rahul,

I found another interesting page that may