Pages

The Morality of Vegetarianism

I have eaten a lot of meat in my life. Although my mom is vegetarian, she allowed us to eat meat and even bring it into the home. I’m not sure why she was so flexible on something that she felt so strongly about for herself. Perhaps she didn’t want to create yet another reason for us to feel different from our American friends, or perhaps it’s because the morality of vegetarianism is such a complex issue.

Even as I ate meat almost every day of my teenage life, I thought often about the question of whether eating meat is wrong. There were many aspects of meat that were unappealing to me. Meat preparation was unbearably morbid, and the more hardcore forms like steak and ribs were just plain gross. Yet somehow I was always able to convince myself that there was nothing immoral about eating meat. We are omnivores. We have evolved to eat meat. Killing animals for food is part of the natural cycle of life.

During my third year at Stanford, I was introduced to the ideas of Eric Schlosser, who wrote a book called Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. Schlosser’s book sheds light on the disgusting practices of the meat industry in America, with vivid imagery of the torture inflicted on America’s factory farm animals. These ideas presented the most compelling argument I had heard against eating mass-produced meat. Animals raised in factory farms are not only killed, they are tortured. Yet I still ignored my gut feeling about the matter and continued consuming meat daily.

In the spring of my senior year at Stanford I took a trip to India, which was accompanied by a two-week vegetarian fast. Although I had done this many times before in my life (i never eat meat when i am in India), something about this trip changed me. When I returned to Stanford, meat suddenly started smelling and tasting like “flesh”. It became increasingly unappetizing to me. I had already stopped eating beef a few years earlier for health reasons, but now even chicken and fish seemed gross. Somehow, after years of justifying my meat-eating habits to myself, I realized that my body was not meant to consume flesh. And so I became a vegetarian. Not exactly for moral reasons. Perhaps it was for health reasons. But more than anything, it was just a feeling I had about what was right for me. I could no longer eat animals.

I have now been a strict vegetarian for nearly five years and have since developed a pretty strong moral feeling about it — i believe eating meat as it is produced today is wrong. My reasoning is based on my own moral beliefs, combined with some hard facts:

Beliefs

Belief #1:  inflicting pain and suffering on any conscious being is wrong. The greater the level of consciousness, the more wrong it is.

Belief #2: prematurely ending the life of any conscious being is wrong. The greater the level of consciousness, the more wrong it is.

Belief #3: humans who have the basic necessities of life (food, shelter, etc), should minimize their negative impact on the environment.

Belief #4: humans who do not have the basic necessities of life should be free to kill animals for food, but they should try to minimize the suffering of the animals they kill and treat the animals with respect while they are alive.

Facts

Fact #1: in order to eat meat, we must prematurely end the life of the animals we eat.

Fact #2: conventional meat production in modern society inflicts severe pain and suffering on animals throughout their lives.

Fact #3: conventional meat production causes severe strain on the environment by emitting massive amounts of methane.

Fact #4: conventional meat production creates “superbugs”, which are resistant to all existing forms of antibiotics, thereby endangering the lives of other humans.

And so, I do not eat meat, and I am encouraged by the growing interest in vegetarianism around the world. However, I still believe the morality of vegetarianism is a complex issue. First, there are a few nuances that raise questions about the beliefs I have stated above.

Nuances

Nuance #1: Professor and Author Michael Pollan raises an interesting question in his book, The Omnivore’s Dilemna: if you remove all the negative stuff that comes along with mass-production of meat (say, for example, by raising and killing meat yourself on a small family farm), then you are bringing animals into this world (i.e., giving them a life that they would not have had otherwise), giving them a luxurious existence (plenty of food and shelther), and killing them without any suffering. Is it still wrong to eat meat in this scenario?

Nuance #2: According to neuroscientist Joseph Ledoux, human awareness of emotion is a bi-product of our having such a large prefrontal cortex. In other words, we are aware of emotions like pain, suffering and anxiety because we have a large prefrontal cortex. So it is possible that animals without a comprable prefrontal cortex, such as cows, pigs and fish, do not experience such emotions at all.

The first nuance is not really relevant for most of us, who do not have easy access to “humane” meat. The second nuance is interesting, but highly speculative. Since science cannot tell us definitively whether or not animals are aware of emotions, I believe it makes sense for us to act based on our intuition. And my intuition tells me that animals can suffer.

My Own Moral Shortcomings

All this said, I must admit to a couple of my own moral shortcomings.

Shortcoming #1: although I have minimized my leather purchases considerably since I became vegetarian, I do still buy shoes that contain leather.

Shortcoming #2: according to everything I have said above, I also really should not consume conventionally produced dairy. While I try to buy organic dairy, I am definitely not strict about this, and dairy is a majory part of my diet.

Why do I continue to buy leather shoes and eat dairy? Because these are part of a happy life that I am not willing to give up. I like to wear leather shoes to my business meetings, and I like to eat low-fat dairy as part of a balanced diet. Each of us has our own limit for self-sacrifice. For most, that limit allows for eating meat. But I hope that every person is made aware of the facts and makes a conscious choice about the amount of pain and suffering they are willing to inflict on others.

follow Prerna on twitter at twitter.com/prernagupta

This entry was posted on Sunday, March 15th, 2009 at 5:48 pm and is filed under Social Issues, morality, yaari, yaari.com. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

302 Responses to “The Morality of Vegetarianism”

Thanks Prerna

During Uni days in Canada, I did more or less same you did. I was eating 4 to 6 eggs a day to continue health building and excercising hobby on. I am those guys who runs 4 to 6 Km early in the morning before any one is off the bed.
One day: my best mate(also Indian) developed heavy body rashes(white one). His body had blisters every where. We went to doctor immediately. My mate was ADVISED not to touch egg for some time else he may even die(situtation was that bad)

That was Last day I ever touched even eggs(I got scared). I AM VEGETARIAN AND HAVE LIVED AND WORKED IN USA, CANADA, INDIA AND NOW IN AUSTRALIA.

Interesting, I had few British friends(White one) and they all are 100% vegetarian. Slowly slowly I came to know that almost every 3rd British is 100% vegetarian. (ALSO I HAVE LOTS OF MUSLIM FRIENDS WHO ONLY EAT HALAL MEAT. Interesting I have few Brahmin(Pundit Jee) Friends too who can’t go to bed without eating meat and hard liquor.

Moral of story is: Do what your religious faith and body feel comfortable.
(I am Hindu, Vegetarian but those love all religions).

Diversity of people makes the world beautiful.

dear prerna
read ur blogs on tan n meat eating quite an eye opener the country which propagates democracy and at the root of it still believe in racial very sad as far as meat eating i firmly believe that animals do have emotions n when people kill them the amount of suffering they go thru after seeing the chicken cut in front of me i couldnot eat chicken
thanks
gaurang

prerna … u did very good analysis about the vegetarianism …. but as of me i am a brahmin and i started to eat meat from my childhood days …at that time we exchange our lunch boxes (sometimes) ..so the first taste noticed by me without knowledge of my family traditional values …after that it converted whats the wrong ??? till i am taking occassionally monthly once or twice ..its healthy i think so to take beyond the limits …. i think if this universe is 100% vegetarian there is no place to live for human beings … logically illogical …. our mindset i mean to say our thinking should be vegetarian its healthy ……

Prashant Kulkarni Wrote:

Hi Prerna,
This topic took me 20 years back when I had just fnished my Engineering & joined a company. Three more fresh Engineers had joined with me. Chief Engineer gave all officers party to welcome us. We had drinks. It was a garden restaurant. A fellow came with 2-3 cocks in his hand & menu was getting discussed. I was sitting close to chief engineer. He asked me my choice. I said today I will have only drinks & not food. He asked me why? I said I am vegetarian & I didn’t like Idea of getting cocks to table. I have no problem if you eat nonveg beside me, but after seeing live animal in front of me, I just can’t enjoy my dinner.
Chief Engineer never expected this from probably a fresh guy but respecting my feelings he changed the venue & everyone had to celebrate with vegetarian food after drinks. My friends were very unhappy for what has happened. After all, my feelings are my own & I do respect my feelings.

I don’t have religious feelings for not eating non-vegetarian. Most of my friends are non-vegetarian.
My family is full vegetarian. When I was in Birmingham for 6 weeks …….I was on Bread/ Butter/ omelet/ fruits & Juices…..I gained 2 kg in 6 weeks. Fortunately I could start egg there. I really don’t enjoy egg but can eat if there is no choice.

Food is a personal choice. As long as vegetarian things are abundant, I have no problem who is consuming what. Vultures will see dead animals & butterflies flowers. It depends on what you are looking for. Being omnivorous, we have got choice.

Thanks. Your topics force me to write.
Prashant

Dear Prerna,

different geographical biospheres cause various ways of nutrition.

I agree that mass production of meat is beyond ethical behaviour and irrational; turbo- meat contains hormons and antibiotics. Since meat has become reasonable for many people it´s on their daily menue card, although experts suggest to not enjoy it more often than 1-2 times per week. The consumption has been related to falling prices caused by massproduction, infact, farming is a huge economy sector. Meat isn´t required for a healthy nutrition, but it is suggested to eat faunal and vegetable proteins. All you consume in high doses, anything biased is unhealthy. I´m feeling sick when I get to read that a human eats 6 eggs in a day.
Overweight, diseases of civilisation exist among vegetarians and non-vegetarians.
Beef, pork, lamb, chicken, turkey to be considered, are sustainable products, however fish stock is more and more shrinking initiated by suggestions for a healthy nutrition, fishfood lovers, by development of different food habits caused by a changing life style in a growing population.
Quantities in the USA used to be always bigger than in any other country in the world. I don´t recognise any kind of good food culture that arises from America. A steak has x-large size, the same x-large size like its eater who stuffs his stomage with a ginormous 500g steak.
Would everybody have to slaughter the animal he relishes later, we had certainly 95% vegetarians in the world. Many people don´t even realize what they eat, a filet doesn´t look like like a living creature, hence hardly one feels a kind of loathing for it – reservations don´t occur.
Most of the cultures in world have enjoyed meat from the very beginning of their existence, it´s been a part of nature and our food chain. In Italy, Greece, Spain, Scandinavian countries, people enjoy meat and fish. Mediterranian nutrition is one of the most healthy, as a consequence thereof a low rate of cardiovascular diseases or diabetes. (oiliv oil, wine, fish, fresh vegetables, fruits, pasta, rice, dairy products, cereal products)
I admit, I love to enjoy a delicious piece of meat (turkey or chicken) but it would not cover more than 25 % of my plate, side dishes like vegetables or salad, carbohydrates are also a part of a complete and balanced menue.
There´s another factor we have to consider when thinking about cows and bulls. In some countries Cows/bulls cause 1/5 of the greenhouse gas emission.
1 kg methane effects 23 times stronger a warming of the atmosphere than the same amount of Carbon dioxide. Methane concentration has increased sixfold past 50 years.
If you want to do something good for your health and a good climate, reduce beef!

Enjoy your meal!
Naddu

Methane Concentration::
Dear Naddu There are lots of misgivings about Methane, CO2 and NOX in Media. Mostly linked to companies or organizations who wish to profit from Govt Rebates or Financial gains otherwise.
FACT: Self destructions of forrest are and were part of ecological systems. It happens each years some or other part of each country. The CO2, NOx generated from these disasters. But that’s how forrest regrowth takes place. Unwantted weed are burnt and new “Native Growth takes place”.

FACT: Methane’s largest contribution to atmosphere comes from Mining Sites, Natural Gas from Oil Wells(Natural gas is 92% Methane), Waste Dump Yards etc. Methane coming out of animal dungs is part of natural process and has no ecological link. Dung is natural fertiliser for millions of years and is part of natural process for growth of tress which removes CO2 from atmosphere.

Methane gas gone SIX fold because our METAL & ENERGY CONSUMPTION HAS INCREASES 60 FOLD, Hence mining has increased 60 fold and hence methane.

“OVERSIZE HOUSES IS MAIN CULPRIT”. TWO STORY MENSIONS BUT “A SINGLE BEAUTIFUL WORKING LADY(OR MALE) LIVES THERE ALONE”.

Dear Aussie :)

do you know the power of the agriculture lobby? Who would want a research on this at all in Australia or USA? The food industry?
To me it looks plausible when I read that “emission from burping cow is higher than family car”
Methane is a relatively potent greenhouse gas with a high global warming potential of 72 (averaged over 20 years) or 25 (averaged over 100 years). Methane in the atmosphere is eventually oxidized, producing carbon dioxide and water. As a result, methane in the atmosphere has a half life of seven years (if no methane were added, then every seven years, the amount of methane would halve).
The abundance of methane in the Earth’s atmosphere in 1998 was 1745 parts per billion, up from 700 ppb in 1750. In the same time period, CO2 increased from 278 to 365 parts per million. The radiative forcing effect due to this increase in methane abundance is about one-third of that of the CO2 increase. In addition, there is a large, but unknown, amount of methane in methane clathrates in the ocean floors. The Earth’s crust contains huge amounts of methane. Large amounts of methane are produced anaerobically by methanogenesis. Other sources include mud volcanoes, which are connected with deep geological faults, and livestock, primarily cows.
There´s hardly a natural process of growth in modern agriculture. Ever heard anything about overfertilization?
An oversized house that uses intelligent heating systems to warm up water or the rooms causes less emission.
Aussie, when you use your heating system you cause co2 emission, when you use your computer, tv set, fridge, or a light you do the same. The energy balance can be improved by conscious usage and economic electronics…or by jogging ;) lol
The size of a house isn´t related to the carelessness of the owner regarding environment.
The inhabitant´s attitude and consciousness matters!
Only today, when I drove back home from work, an elder female driver in front of me threw her tissue and a plastic foil out of the window of her car, infact, I felt forced to honk, believe me, I normally don´t do it, I couldn´t hold back myself and signaled protest!
Would all people behave this way, we couldn´t find our roads anymore.

Have a great day ahead and enjoy your jogging!
I managed my 6 kms either today.
Warm greetings,
Naddu

Dear Naddu

I worked(Researched) for non stop three years on Methane Projects. Better we have a personal talk on Scientific Discussions. Please give me your email address

Aussie

Naddu wrote: “An oversized house that uses intelligent heating systems to warm up water or the rooms causes less emission”.
(Oversize houses is basic trend around the world).

1. How many people get Thermal Modeling done for their house before or during constructions. Energy Saving to be made are HUGE by doing so. but none of us do that.

2) Intelligent heating is a relative word. I love numbers(% of energy change or actual . Otherwise, Intelligent, Efficient, Very Powerful are have no meaning).

3. Methane(Natural Gas) Should we thank using it. Till 1970 We burning buring it in AIR(Most refineries). At least now we are using it. IT IS A CLEAN FUEL.(It emits lowest level of NOx. and CO2).

3. TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS ARE THE ANSWER. WORLD IS A BEAUTIFUL PLACE. WE JUST NEEED TO KEEP TRYING TO MAKE IT BETTER & SAFER AND GREENER.

Dear Aussie :)

are you trying to provoke me? :P
Hello, oversized house isn´t basic trend around the world? Who defines how much space is required or permitted for the individual? 2, 20, 50 or 100 square meters???
Where do you find oversized houses in all those metropolis, arent´they most densely populated??? What are you talking about? Aren´t you talking about exceptions?

10 years ago, we already thought about using rainwater to water plants or flush the toilets. We thought about solar panels to heat up the water, about insulation of the house and economic usage of gas for the heating system. What happened? 10 years ago gas was promoted to be environment friendly and efficient, I have recognised you agree on this. Now ,prices have been increasing past 5 years 70 per cent. Conclusion: We are thinking about using terrestrial heat to get independent from the monopoly of gas providers and their exorbitant rates.
Not to forget the fabulous zero emission.
To satisfy your scientific hunger for numbers, facts and figures, I suggest you following page about intelligent house building:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passive_house
Apart from this, there are several ways to improve the energy balance of your house at any time, you just need to think about it.
When you have to pay amounts for consumption of your energy, you will automatically try to escape from this exploitation, pleasant side-effect, you reduce exploitation of nature. Some governments force their inhabitants by inceasing tax which is energy consumption related, by introducing norms and standards, it´s sure a pain but helps a lot.
Infact, it´ll redeem sooner or later.

AUSSIE, YOU DON`T CHANGE ANYTHING BY TALKING, BUT YOU CAN CHANGE SOMETHING BY DOING!
WHERE THERE`S A WILL, THERE`S A WAY.
WOULD NATURE BE A BANK, THE GOVERNMENT WOULD RESCUE IT!

If you really insist to have a personal talk on scientific discussions, you are anytime welcome to inform me about your email ID. The pleasure will be mine to respond.

Have a great day!
Naddu

I never PROVOKED anyone. You can NEVER EVER MAKE ME ANGRY, NO ONE.

(I work on Solar Thermal Power Project in Remote Part of Australia, so all these figures which are talking, I probably I learnt few. Still got long way to go)

RESPONSE TO ATTACKS ON MY NON-VEGETARIANISM

It is difficult to respond with calmness and dignity to comments that unjustly attack one’s moral character. We are indeed two worlds, and the vegetarian world seems to be the larger. Perhaps blogging on these topics is o.k, as all of you have hunger and eat, but I still feel that I must try. If even I cannot sustain the heart and courage to fight back, then who will?

So, let me respond, point by point, to the major themes of the attacks directed towards in the post:

ATTACK 1: I am not fit to be a human

This line of attack smacks of the same mentality that drives animals in the animal kingdom to commit acts of violence against preys. If the animal preys, it is considered a hunt.. No questions asked. Doesn’t matter what the animals are doing, of course, because animals can hunt whatever the preys they want. But humans must uphold our backwards ideals of vegetarianism and morality. And these archaic ideals of morality are tied to religion, so that is ALL the justification we need. And, in the name of RELIGION? Well, we can do whatever we god damn please. We can even kill chicken forced to be vegetarian and drink its soup with the vegetarian…sound familiar to you? Sounds a lot like religious terrorism to me.

ATTACK 2: I am harming my body and brain by drinking non-vegetarian soup

Of course no one bothered to ask how often / much do I drink. People just assume that if I drink I must be abusing vegetarianism like a dirty old vegetarian who gets drunk every night and comes home and beats his non-vegetarian wife. For your information, I drink non-vegetarian soup very moderately and quite infrequently (much less than the recommended amount of one glass not even per day).

Maybe you haven’t heard the news, but studies have repeatedly shown that drinking moderate amounts of non-vegetarian soup is GOOD for your health. So, sorry to disappoint, but the ‘not good for you’ argument is just plain wrong.

Note that I haven’t said to you, “you are harming your health by not drinking the soup, so please start drinking.”

ATTACK 3: Non-vegetarians should not eat provocatively, because it will incite vegetarians’ animal instincts

How many of the people who made this comment have seen a Bollywood movie in the past year? My guess is the answer is 100%. When you watch a non-vegetarian cine star relishing chicken or mutton, do you not feel your so-called animal instincts being stimulated? If you don’t, then you certainly wouldn’t be stimulated by me doing the same thing, because I am not eating more attractive pieces than the ones shown. And, if you do, then why do you voluntarily go watch? No one is forcing you. Or, is it the cine star’s fault for doing it? Yes, that must be it. Cine star is a manipulative super animal who forces all humans to be “stimulated” against their will.

You might be wondering why, if I myself eat better than cine star, did I make my comment about Bollywood below? The reason is that I think Bollywood is an outgrowth of our non-vegetarianism repression. Humans like you will excoriate me for tasting a revealing chicken piece, but will go in hoards to watch cine star do it. Moreover, many of you won’t appreciate a movie that does show a cine star relishing not-cooked meat. It is the hypocracy that bothers me, not cine star’s meal.

Note that only a small fraction of Hollywood movies show the same level of soft non-veg foods that 99% of Bollywood movies do. Why? I thought American culture is non-vegetarian and Indian culture is vegetarian.

ATTACK 4: Killing and eating are not human

Read, my friends. Read the tales from our ancient texts. You are deluding yourselves. Eating non-vegetarian is CELEBRATED in our traditions. I pity the repressed who think non-vegetarian is not human. You will also find references to neanderthals killing and eating animals.

ATTACK 5: Raw meats are vulgar

You mean, raw meats make you feel uncomfortable? Yes, that’s because you are taste wise repressed. And I’m sure some countries took that into account when they planned the dish with ingenious mix of raw meat. Making the supporter feel comfortable is the point of a thoughtful composition.

ATTACK 6: I must be a vegetarian in disguise

This is actually not an attack in response to my call for unity. I am assuming by now you are all sufficiently convinced that I do not have any hidden religious agendas, as I do not imagine any vegetarian fundamentalist would stop a non-vegetarian drinking water and eating vegetarian food (please correct me if I am wrong, and I will be happy to provide further proof of my secularism).

p.s. for those who were wondering, the attacks mentioned herein are not mine. They were inspirations from previous post.

DISCLAIMER: The above contents are meant for thoughtful fun reading only. The author does not take responsibility if anybody is hurt seriously.
To those of you who do not agree with non-vegetarianism but give graciously tolerant remarks in support of vegetarianism, this post is all directed towards you. I appreciate your tolerance and respect your views.

I have spent some time thinking about this issue (i.e. the morality of meat-eating).
Some observations:
1. This is by far the most lucid blog/article I have read on the subject. Good job :-) . I liked the clean separation of beliefs and facts, its a sign of clear thinking.
2. A point that may be potentially added in the belief section is the following: the method of killing matters because some forms of killing are more painful than others. For this reason, I think it okay to eat fish, but not okay to eat Lobster (I have a no-crustacean policy, since they are boiled alive).
3. Potential addition to the Facts section: Eating meat has many health advantages (I grew up a vegetarian, yet started eating meat for this reason, more than any other. When I started eating meat, I remember the sensation of tasting “flesh” very clearly.) The main advantage is the high protein content. It is questionable at worst and unclear at best whether vegetarian alternatives adequately compensate this requirement.

Bravissimo @ laughter!

thank you for this fabulous inspiration!
I do absolutely agree, statements given on belief are completely unfounded, they cause confusion.
It´s better to trust knowledge and science rather than referring to religion, tradition or assumptions.
A human is nothing but a predator with a brain. If all vegetarians would be conscious about biotopes, you wouldn´t find trash in their cities, and why overpopulation? Where´s the morality in this matter? When respecting an animal, why not caring for environment and living space for all of us including our animals? I´m not sure if eating rubbish on streets is healthy for a holi cow. Who cares for its dignity or species appropriate feeding here? Who cares for strolling dogs/cats on the streets?

To me it´s a clear case of double standards… but this is human.

Warm regards,
Naddu

Is overpopulation related to vegetarianism?
Is sex a way to compensate an instinctive lust for flesh?

Please no offence, it´s a humorous thought only… stimulated by “laughter” lol

Diversity is useful and helps to survive!

Naddu

Narayana Rajasekhar Wrote:

Wonderful. Liked it a lot.

I am a non-veg alike the old you who always doubted whether I am doing this right.
At times I hate it also.
Sometimes I like them as well.
But I admire the way you have wrote it, without any bias or hard stance.
Now really I think I also can give up non-veg food. Only problem is that I am in Europe where getting non-veg food is kind of luxury.
So now I cook food. Non-veg is like once in a month or so.
And I am cutting short of milk as well.

Real nice article Prerna.
It is really good to now you are now vegetarian and your beliefs are in such a way that you are not forced to be vegetarian rather you choose it.
In India we have a great religious belief against non vegetarianism and i think in one way it is good to have some type of religious belief attached to such cause which force people to go in some good direction or we can say direct them in right direction.
About dairy, According to me something which animal is giving away by wish is not considered to be a non-vegetarian. If the dairy products are prepared by forcing animals then they are not vegetarian and not be consumed. If you see in small town and villages in India we still give cows very high place of worship and people allow cattle to have his share first and then normal people allowed to have there share.

Dear Naddu

I LIKED WHAT YOU WROTE. It ,made me laugh and I think I needed that.

Why do vegetarians consider ‘poor animals’ when it comes to eating? It must be the Brahmin community which buys the most silk sarees. they kill 50,000 silk worms to produce 1 yard of silk or something like that. Only recently, there is talk of ‘ahimsa’ silk Here at least 4 guys eat 1 chicken. And what about the leather bags, slippers, shoes? don’t vegetarians use leather? what is mridangam, tabla made of? Its goat skin leather.. this is just hypocrisy or just wanting to be on a higher moral ground.. Please tell me you don’t have anything in silk or leather..

Hi,

We are killing animals prematurely. Yes. But, we are killing plants prematurely. Plants got life too!
We make the animals suffer when we kill them. How do you plants do not suffer when we cut them and eat it?
So, maybe we should eat only those things that are dropped off plants…!!!

Anything taken in moderation is fine… Do not go to extremes!!

Dear Prerna,
I have a soft corner for you. And most times i agree with you dear. But here i would beg to differ.My disagreements:
1) Trees are the most beautiful thing of our beloved planet. Humanity and the planet would die without them. Deforestation first started because of cultivation. A larger population of the world today is still non-vegetarian. If the whole population switches over to vegetarianism, the remaining forest cover would have to be cut down. That would be an ecological havoc.
The state of Punjab in India is the granary of India. You have to visit it to feel the ecological loss that has taken place due to excessive cutting down of trees. For giving way to land for cultivation of grains. It has resulted in draughts ,low rainfall and depletion of soil.
Just because that trees cannot locomate doesn’t mean that they are dead or unconscious. Actually they are more conscious than animals.
The problem is over-population. Whatever we do we would be in trouble . So to sustain we have to drastically cut down population. Else whatever our economists say on the advancements of productivity, Malthus would have the last laugh.
It is a question of trade-off. A completely vegetarian population would spell havoc for the globe. Its better that a large part is still non-vegetarian. Till then lets not touch the subject of morality.Take care.love ankur.

Dear Naddu,
Sex is a not a way to compenste for an instinctive lust for flesh. Sex is the purest form of love between man and woman. It is the beginning of love between them. Also there is no instinctive lust for flesh that humans feel.
It is just that man started eating meat because cultivation was discovered later.. Also the yummiest and most popular non-vegetarian food is the non-fleshy sea-food. Like Oysters. Oh just the taste of the ocean bursting into the mouth.Take Care.love ankur

Dear Laughter,
You are a big fool. How do u expect to make a difference if you make fun of everything. Kudos to Prerna for raising such pregnant conflicts of the humanity. Though I appreciate your point about vegetarian policing.

Dear Ankur,

Oysters? The yummiest and most popular non-vegetarian food among students?
Are you the son of a sheikh or do you help out at the fishmarket? Have I missed a development? Do students need their daily aphrodesiac nowadays? ha ha a good one!
A fresh oyster is a living organism, in an ideal case it has a taste of the sea, but what´s so yummy in savouring a wobbly fishy something? If you cherrish, enjoy it!

Sex is not the begin of love between a man and a woman. Do you sleep with anybody to get loved, or do you sleep with somebody because you love him/her?
In my eyes sex is a way of physical communication between a man and a woman.
A physical language, an expression of of love, closeness and commitment.
Ankur, may I ask you something?
When sex is the purest form of love ,why is prostitution such a big market?

Greetings, enjoy your studies!
Naddu

Dear Aussie!

Thank you for your response. :-)
A laughter in a day keeps the doctor also away!
Three cheers on freedom!

Viele Grüße aus Heidelberg,
Naddu

A very nice post on vegetarianism. I like the facts and beliefs that you’ve pointed.

A person’s preference for certain types of food is his personal choice. I don’t care whether a person is a veg, a non-veg or a vegan; whether he is led by religious rules or mere personal choice. But I do hate people criticizing others’ food preferences.

I’m a non-vegetarian, but my meat intake is quite less. In my family, meat is a “Sunday” dish, or mostly reserved for special occasions. I can’t handle eating meat every other day like most meat lovers. Moreover the concept of non-veg in India means mainly chicken, goat’s meat, fish & eggs (now that lies on the borderline actually). I eat beef only because they make kebabs from beef. Secondly, meat is always a complementary dish. People eat meat along with rice/roti, dal and/or vegetables; unlike just eating a hamburger for dinner or lunch.

Thirdly, the Indian poultry industry is not as mechanized as the US ones. True that poultry are kept and transported in terrible conditions. But the locally bred poultry (i.e. chickens bred by locals) are brought up in more humane conditions. We mostly buy those chickens because they’re tastier & healthier (commercially bred “Broiler” chickens are often given medications to increase meat & egg production whereas the locally bred poultry grow on natural food. A concept similar to chemical fertilizers & organic manure in case of crops).

Next, while I’m against poaching & killing of animals like tigers, lions etc; even rabbits & foxes for fur; I don’t feel the same sympathy for chickens & goats. One can say, while tigers & elephants face extinction, chickens will never become extinct. They’re not beauties and seem to be made solely as a source of food for humans. Same goes for fish & goats. While I’m against the killing of whales for blubber, I don’t mind eating a Hilsa or a Pomfret.

In the end, as for pain & suffering, I know the animal I’m eating grew up on natural food, lived a good, healthy life & was killed instantly so didn’t feel much pain. So I relish my occasional dish of meat without any guilty conscience. The occasional meat diet is only because I prefer eating vegetables more often, they’re healthy and better suited to the body in a hot tropical Indian climate. But meat is also healthy and nutritious.

Dearest Ankur,

I found a lovely quiz for you, I think it is appropriate as I recognised you are not yet married.

Q: Why do men ask for a woman´s hand in marriage?
A: Because they are tired of using their own…

Enjoy yourself, have fun, relax!
Naddu

Dear Ankur,

there are a few reasons for terrorism. Let me try to elaborate what I know about it.
A personal poverty isn´t primarily a motive for terrorists in the Near East. Much more decisive than a critical economical situation or lacking education level of the violent culprits are political framework conditions and an over many years experienced feeling of humiliation and frustration.
This theory is a result of an analysis about relations between education, poverty, political violence and Terrorism published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
The authors of the trial, Professor Alan Krueger and Jitka Maleckova, analysed data of 129 Lebanese Hisbollah militias who died in paramilitary actions against Israel in the years 1982 to 1994.
The research showed, that there´s isn´t a significant relation between low education, poverty and the possibility to become a matyr of the Hezbollah. Iliterates are not really capable of planning, but they are instruments of the suspected masterminds.
To keep a facade of integrated and reputative humans, to stay alive, these masterminds prefer to send their rank and file.
Poverty can be a cause for a national terrorism, incase a minority of better situated tries to improve the economical situation for the inhabitants by terrorism. Of course, this doesn´t proof the activities of terrorists in richer countries like Spain and Ireland.
The quintessence is that the feeling of humiliation, indignity is accountable for the tendence to organise terroristic coalescences.
(”Education, Poverty, Political Violence and Terrorism: Is there a Causal Connecton?” published in the Working Paper (w9074) of the National Bureau of Economic Reasearch)

greetings,
Naddu

Sorry to all, my latest response regarding Ankur´s attack was meant to be posted in order to his comment in the blog “Tan and lovely”

Terrorism and vegetarianism aren´t related in any way. Thank God!

:-) Thank you for your understanding

greetings,
Naddu

girish vashishth Wrote:

Excellent Blog

muddu pettala Wrote:

hai prerna
thats was such a beauty and heart touching thing

Harold Dean Wrote:

do animals have souls and will go to heaven, how about the vegetables they also are living things, is it written in the bible not to eat meat, i guess god created all of these to provide us from our everyday living….

Prashant Dange Wrote:

Hi Prerna….its nice intiative…thanks for that….

jacob john Wrote:

hai prerna,
i read u.but where will d animals gow come about ,if they r not killed.agter all 2 balance d ecosystem.v have 2 dosome thing.here in india,people starve for their own food.how come about the animals then???.it may be ur personal opinion

achukuttan menon Wrote:

Hi Prerana,

Prerana(encouragement) to spend 30 mts a day to do self analysys of our own actions
will make substantial change in the attitude of every one. All of us claim we are good,
but, is it so? Both Ravanas and Ramas are there in each one of us.

Regards,
Achukuttan menon

harish abraham Wrote:

this is the most ridiculous thing i have ever heard. i am a meat eater and nothing is going to stop me. i wonder why id it that nobody gets mails from meat eater urging vegs to quit their life style. eating meat or vegetables is a personal choice nothing to do with morality.

SP Sharma Wrote:

thnx dear
i m pure vegitarian, do not like eggs even
thnx
spsharma

Dr.Dhirendra Mehta Wrote:

Respected,
Pink of health is expected before the Almighty.
I have gone through the article and tempted to write only that you should approach some JAIN monk-some time but within this human life to understand more deeply what you already have understood !
By the way, Jainism is a only religeon which pray, practise, promote and protect the fundamental principals and rules of mother nature that is non violence and universal forgivness.
“Do Good, BeGood & Keep Samata”
Life is a GAme of Chance & Choice ”
Dr.D.C.Mehta from India
Always-”YouRsmE”-In, Around & Beyond !

minesh modi Wrote:

Appreciated

Mohammed Riaz Wrote:

Hello Prena Gupta
Thank u for e. mail
I am sorry that i can not speak or write English very well, because I have been in Norway since 1971. Language of Norway is Norwegian. I am journalist of Urdu(chief editor of NGO Times NORWAY),Så I can write in urdu but i am sure that you can not read it. I am travelling to Pakistan on Saturda 21 March.
About to eat meat is that there is no enoug meat in world,that every body can eat meat, så it is nice of then who do not eat meat,we must have respect for those. But one who will eat meat the others must not iturupt it. I appreciate your mother tha she allowed you to eat meat. It is best that we have respect of each other. Hindus must not be angry when the muslims slaughter their own cow, and muslims and hinus shuld not hurt feelings of each other.
With Best best wishes and regard.
Mohammed Riaz Gondal

Jyoti Jani Wrote:

hi ! congratulations for such an awesome article on getting veg… u may quote

jitendra jitanshu Wrote:

prernaji
i read whole matter can u focus some practices which r used in this industry
plz try to write and send
urs
jjitanshu

Jyoti Jani Wrote:

hi ! congratulations for such an awesome article on getting veg… u may quote …

my stomoch is not a graveyard for the dead animals:
how can u eat anything that has eyes like us
i gave up eating non veg not for my health but for the health of animals…

Asoke Chattopadhyay Wrote:

Interesting, as always.

My (faulty) rememberance of Shaw’ “An Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism ….” contains a pertinent observation that the rich people must work hard to exercise and shed all the excess fat etc. and become as fit as the poor, who have to work hard for a living anyway and so don’t accumulate fat.

Moral: What is all our posturing about vegetarianism (or vegan, a stronger variety) worth before say, the poor Masai who only eat meat and drink the blood of animals they kill ? Mahendra Nath Dutta (Swami Vivekananda’s brother) saw people in Siberia killing horses and drinking their blood from the jugular veins in winter to keep warm.

Don;t forget Mark Twain’s observations in An Innocent Abroad about Jagadish Bose’s experiments on plant feelings: “…or even the inanimate is alive”. There is a way some yogis avoided this dilemma by recommending that such a person (yogi for example) who is desirous of not causing pain to any living being, should collect only the produce from unsown plants (i.e. seeds, fruits which are scattered on the ground in the jungle, fallow land etc.) and eat them. Acharanga Sutra, a prime text of the Jains, has detailed instructions about what a Jain man and a woman should eat, how they should beg even and so on. They were very concerned about Ahimsa. Makes for compelling reading but I wonder how far it can be practised today.

So ? The dilemma remains. That is why life is so interesting — it is full of dilemmas. As long as you realise that “we are all in the same boat, brother” we feel one with all humanity, indeed with all living beings.

Regards,

Asoke

Hi,

Its a well written article.

AK

shandia gardiner Wrote:

interesting enough as I too practice living a vegetarian life. But please if you are going to commit to this life style you must and should quit with the dairy and purchasing of leather, its in some since makes you a hypocrite if you know what i mean. take care, feel free to reply.

Rajasree Ramesh Wrote:

Prerna I salute your frank style and I agree with u totally for ive been a lacto vegan througout my life and I dont know or want to know how meat tastes.

Kumar Rao Wrote:

Nice topics. On the topic of Vegetarianism we should have a chat somtime.
What is your take on – some parts of the world – where the animal is consumed alive -
i think that is the worst.

Dear Prerna,

sorry to say so, but millions of people don´t even have the choice between vegetarianism and non-vegetariarism nutrition. Isn´t it decadent to discuss morality regarding nutrition when so many have to hunger?

Share your food, you have the moral responsibility to care for the disadvantaged!

We all are privileged here!

I support the organisation Plan International, they care for disadvantaged children!

greetings,
Naddu

correction*
millions of people don´t even have the choice between vegetarian and non-vegetarian nutrition*

I´m concerned about the disadvantaged, not about the food on my plate!

I´m happy to enjoy my daily food whatsoever I´m able to afford, I´m aware it is much more than others would ever dream of.

regards,
Naddu

“Nuance #1: Professor and Author Michael Pollan raises an interesting question in his book, The Omnivore’s Dilemna…………….”

ur nuance #1 is the funniest argument i have ever heard abt eating meat. i cant believe someone who calls himself professor says such things without thinking twice.

applying the same logic as the professors said, then every mother in this world has the right to take away the lives of their own children because without them they wouldn’t have existed anyways. does this sound right?

talking abt emotions for animals, they do feel emotions. those who have or had a pet in their lives would understand the emotional aspect of an animal.

sandeep bajwan Wrote:

hi prerna,

It was nice to receive your messages
all are very nice and informatic and touches the heart

thanks for sending

hv a good day
and tk cr

IBTIHAL ISMAIL Wrote:

Reply to Prerna:
Hello,I’ve read everything about your culture on the basis of meat.Well,I insist that you stopped eating meat because of various reasons,and one of them was because killing animals is very wrong.And as a result you became vegeterian.But I apologize.Because as u said that killing animals is wrong,in the same way even killing Plants and eating them is wrong!.even they are living beings!!.So can’t you even stop eating Plants?,even when they are killed they also feel Pain and sorrow.Why don’t you stop eating Plants aswell?.

Dear Jyoti

“I don’t agree even 1% what you have written”. I am vegetarian my self. But I have suffered badly once when working in Hill Area. Only thing available there was Chicken.(Veg takes weeks to reach there). My performance suffered badly as I was getting too much tired without proper food.

“I WILL SAY: EAT AS PER LOCAL SITUATION AND YOUR OWN RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, BUT THERE IS NOTHING WRONG IN EATING MEAT”. THERE IS NO MORALITY IS BEING VEG OR NON_VEG.

(Helping some one in need is High Moral).

FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS HUMAN BEINGS HAVE CONSUMED MEAT.

Dear Ankur,
Sorry for fooling you. Don’t get disappointed. You can still try harder. You may also get it :)

I am not ankur. There are many false comments under ankur. Please don’t reply to them.

Dearest naddu,

I found your quiz lovely, I thank for the correct answer. I have a quiz for you too.
Q: Will you give your hand in marriage?

Ramanujam Wrote:

Well said IBTIHAL ISMAIL ……………….
I was about to write what you have written………… These people wont understand that the creator created this universe and made man to take care of it and he made man above everything. They think only animals get pain when they are slaughtered they don’t know that even plants and trees bleed when they are chopped. If man doesn’t eat some of the animals which the creator has permitted, than there will be imbalance in this world. For instance Rajasthan in India were people don’t eat meat hasn’t got the worlds highest life expectancy. I think its obvious its some other meat eating nations like Australia, Arab or Europe but for sure its not India. Look at the animals that rely on vegetables like cow, elephant, buffalo and bla bla… do you think they look as healthy as Cheetah, Tiger or Lion which eat meat:-).
Tell these idiots who emphasize to eat veggies to eat stones and crushed rocks because they don’t have life and neither do they feel pain, where as veggies and animals are living beings..
What happens is bad company corrupts good…. So stay away from those idiots who believe non sense like worshiping cows and monkeys.
May be they visit these hare Rama hare Krishna where they drink cows milk and eat veggies which has life and come and try to brainwash westerners who are vulnerable to all these eastern beliefs because of their higher education which has made them to go away from the truth and follow some grandmas myths and theology.

Yes, prerna it was interesting reading. Keep posting. Best wishes

Menon

@IBTIHAL ISMAIL — I don’t stop eating plants because I don’t believe plants are conscious beings.

@Ramanujam — I am not going to get into an idiotic debate, but i will say that I am personally much stronger and healthier since i have stopped eating meat, and my mind is also clearer.

@Naddu — yes I agree with you, as I have clearly stated in Belief #4. i certainly don’t think it’s wrong for those who do not have enough to eat meat. obviously they should eat whatever they can. but i also don’t think it’s “decadent” to be discussing issues of morality for the rest of us. morality is really only relevant for people who have the basic necessities of life. any discussion of morality for people who are fighting to survive is misguided IMO.

Prerna

You nailed it down to the point. “Morality & advices are and comes from those who have enough to feed themselves and other dependents or have the luxuries of life.”

A common person is busy in “Daily Struggle of Life”. He(she) have hardly any chance of being immoral or preaching morality.

(Most immoral acts now a days are condcuted by spoiled head(Filty Rich) or spoiled people. Better known BRATS.

(One of the gentleman here on this forum it self has used F*** and M**F** words for others, has talked and used all short of dirty language). However he continue to PREACH OTHERS ON DAILY BASIS HERE.

(Where is morality when one use F * & M** F** words for others in public forum and preach morality to others at the same time:).

Syed Mohammad Husain Wrote:

I haven’t given much thought on this topic but the sight of the entrails lying around after Eid ul Azha would give anybody goosepimples. So much waste and nothing to be done about it as it is ordained. But to coming to the topic, we are all part of nature and the cycle has to continue otherwise there would be a glut of one commodity.
Meat eaters have usually demonstrated hot headedness and a shorter life span whereas coolness of the mind and longetivity is associated with vegetarianism.

Surendra Kaul Wrote:

I am a Brahmin and as against general brahmin religious belief eat nonveg, not a regular but a couple of days per week kind of eater. In my childhood I asked this question to my father (a very pious man in the traditional sense and also philosophically analytical in modern ways) that we are brahmins and yet we are nonveg? We are allowed to was his response and the reason being that it is cold in Kashmir and during the winter time no vegetation can be cultivated and hence the nonveg scenario. But he also added that we, Kashmiri Brahmins, are allowed only goat meat (mutton) and that only. In the strict sense, we are not supposed to eat even onions, tomatoes etc. And the reason being that these and the other kind of flesh makes you TAMSIC (agressive, hot tempered etc) and according to our knowledgeable books we are supposed to shun those bad traits. YOU ARE WHAT YOU EAT, they say and I believe that.

Now comes my points as to my response to you blog Prerna (it means inpiration and not encouragement as somebody wrote, there is a difference between the two although a little nuanced one, granted)

1. Through times the human beings have adapted to circumstances in order to survive e.g. as the Kashnmiris did in Kashmir. But in modern times where everything is available everywhere (more or less) we have the choice to eat whatever we feel like. The same rule applies for the people living in the northern hemisphere much above India. They get vegetables (imported) all year round despite the subzero temperatures in the winter time. So they have a choice too.

2. The matter of the fact is that our bodies need many different kinds of nutrients and we get all that in our food. Nonveg food is a excellent protein supplier. One has to eat a lot of paneer (Indian cottage cheese) and or drink lot of Daal in order to compensate for the loss of moderate helpings of nonveg yummies. So make your choice. And the choice comes from your inner voice which again, I believe comes from that fact of our bodys needs.

3. As I say >you can have opinions in religion and politics but the logic is a never ending truth seeking endevour<. Fortunately or unfortunately the modern science has made available so much of literature on health that we can be proactive in taking care of our health. If we are able to supply the right amount of Macro as well as micro nutrients to our bodies then we can lead a healthy life. And that is the reason that the experts predict that the next generation will see maximum number of centurions. So that was the logic part. The religious part is to be decided by everybody for themselves and I have no comments on that.

Sorry, kind of became a long response. I have some other thoughts and facts to add to if you want.

Dear Prerna, this blog about vegetarianism is very intersting to read. You have told in clearly about your personal choice, you have said this is one’s choice. I appreciate every word said and without insulting or attacking people who are meat eaters. Recently most people in this world have ‘adopted’ to be vegetarians. The reasons are many, first due to heatlh reasons, second the movements and associations propagating against killings of living animals.
But still there are many school of thoughts who say even plants and trees are living thing.
It is again left to individuals to choose what to eat and what not to eat.
Regards.
Mohamed.

A longer life for vegetarians?
The battle has long been waged, and will certainly continue in spite of this study. Are humans designed/evolved to eat everything and at risk of malnutrition as vegetarians? Or is vegetarianism the healthy and ethical choice? The most impressive data arises from a study of 1904 vegetarians over 21 years by the German Cancer Research Center (Deutsche Krebsforschungszentrum). The study’s shocking results: vegetarian men reduced their risk of early death by 50%! Women vegetarians benefit from a 30% reduction in mortality.

Long-term Study of Vegetarians
The participants of the the German Cancer Research Center study included 60 vegans (no animal products consumed), 1165 vegetarians (eating eggs, milk but no meat) with the remainder described as “moderate” vegetarians who occasionally ate fish or meat. The health of these study participants was compared with the average German population. Living longer seems not to be exclusively related to eating meat, though, as the results for moderate vegetarians was not statistically different from those for vegan or strict vegetarian diets.

To the argument that it is not vegetarianism but a general interest in a healthier lifestyle which leads to such notable results, scientists reply with evidence that the majority of vegetarians do not cite health reasons for their lifestyle, but make their choice based on ethical commitment, environmental concerns or simply personal taste.

Vegetarians and Malnutrition
Research by a team led by Professor Ibrahim Elmadfa at the University of Vienna found a much better than average intake of Vitamin C, Carotinoides, Folic acid, fiber and unsaturated fats. Where shortcomings may arise is for Vitamin B12, calcium und Vitamin D in a vegan diet. Astoundingly, however, study participants did not suffer from diseases, such as osteoporosis, typically related to inadequate intakes of these micro-nutrients.

Dear Ankur,

@ your Q: “Would you give your hand in marriage? NO, I wouldn´t give my hand in marriage, I would give my heart and mind!

greetings,
Naddu

Dear Prerna,

you find conscious and unconcious human beings in all fields in life, in all countries.
Basically, we all know what is good, what is bad in a life. In my belief it is human to respect and tolerate each other. Different environmental, cultural life-circumstances lead to different behaviour, taste and favor of humans.
Only the one who has the choice to think about morality will be able to operate double standards.

greetings,
Naddu

i am safe i stop eating meat in 1998 and since then eggitarian geetings from lalit

Kamran Khatri Wrote:

Islamic Way of Slaughtering Animals looks Cruel

Dr. Zakir Naik

Q: Why do Muslims slaughter the animal in a cruel manner by torturing it and slowly and painfully killing it?

A: The Islamic method of slaughtering animals, known as ‘Zabiha’ has been the object of much criticism from a large number of people.

One may consider the following points, which prove that the Islamic method of ‘Zabiha’ is not only humane but also scientifically the best:

1. Islamic method of slaughtering animal

‘Zakkaytum’ is a verb derived from the root word ‘Zakaah’ (to purify). Its infinitive is ‘Tazkiyah’, which means purification. The Islamic mode of slaughtering an animal requires the following conditions to be met:

a. The animal should be slaughtered with a sharp object (knife)

The animal has to be slaughtered with a sharp object (knife) and in a fast way so that the pain of slaughter is minimised.

b. Cut wind pipe, throat and vessels of neck

‘Zabiha’ is an Arabic word which means ‘slaughtered’. The ‘slaughtering’ is to be done by cutting the throat, windpipe and the blood vessels in the neck causing the animal’s death, but without cutting the spinal cord.

c. Blood should be drained

The blood has to be drained completely before the head is removed. The purpose is to drain out most of the blood, which would otherwise serve as a good culture medium for micro organisms. Hence, for this purpose, the spinal cord must not be cut, otherwise the nerve fibers to the heart would be damaged during the process causing cardiac arrest, resulting in stagnation of the blood in the blood vessels.

2. Blood is a good medium for germs and bacteria

Blood is a good medium for germs, bacteria, toxins, etc. Therefore the Muslim way of slaughtering is more hygienic as most of the blood containing germs, bacteria, toxins, etc. that are the cause of several diseases are eliminated.

3. Meat remains fresh for a longer time

Meat slaughtered by Islamic way remains fresh for a longer time due to deficiency of blood in the meat as compared to other methods of slaughtering.

4. Animal does not feel pain

The swift cutting of vessels of the neck disconnects the flow of blood to the nerve of the brain responsible for pain. Thus the animal does not feel pain. While dying, the animal appears to struggle, writhe, shake and kick, not due to pain, but due to the contraction and relaxation of the muscles deficient in blood and due to the flow of blood out of the body.
Top

Non-Vegetarian Food makes Muslim Violent !

Q: Science tells us that whatever one eats has an effect on one’s behaviour. Why does then Islam allow Muslims to eat non-vegetarian food, since eating of animals could make a person violent?

A: 1. Only eating of herbivorous animals is allowed by Islam. I agree that, what a person eats has an effect on his behaviour. This is one of the reasons why Islam prohibits the eating of carnivorous animals like lions, tigers, leopards, etc. who are violent and ferocious. The consumption of the meat of such animals would probably make a person violent and ferocious. Islam only allows the eating of herbivorous animals like goats, cattle, sheep, etc. that are peaceful and docile. We Muslims eat peaceful and docile animals because we are peace loving and non-violent people.

2. The Qur’an says Prophet prohibits what is bad

The Qur’an says: “The Prophet commands them what is just and prohibits what is evil. He allows them as lawful what is good (and pure) and prohibits them what is bad (and impure),” [Al-A’raf 7: 157]

“So take what the Messenger assigns to you and deny yourselves that which he withholds from you.” [Al-Hashr 59: 7]

For a Muslim, the Prophet’s statement is sufficient to convince him that Allah does not wish humans to eat some kinds of meat while allowing some other kinds.

3. Hadith prohibiting eating of carnivorous animals

According to various authentic Ahaadith narrated in Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim including hadith narrated by Ibn Abbas in Sahih Muslim, Book of hunting and slaughter, Hadith No. 4752 and Sunan Ibn-i-Majah chapter 13 Hadith no. 3232 to 3234, the Holy Prophet (Pbuh) prohibited the eating of:

(i) Wild animals with canine teeth, i.e. meat eating carnivorous animals. These are animals belonging to the cat families such as lions, tigers, cats, dogs, wolfs, hyenas, etc.

(ii) Certain rodents like mice, rats, rabbits with claws, etc.

(iii) Certain reptiles like snakes, alligators, etc.

(iv) Birds of prey with talons or claws, like vultures, eagle, crows, owl, etc.

( The author heads Islamic Research Foundation, Mumbai. Email: islam@irf.net, http://www.irf.net)

Dear Prerna,

I don´t understand the objection concerning your morality, on one hand you are wearing a part of a dead animal on your foot as a high heel or beautiful shoe ,over your shoulder in shape of a trendy handbag, on the other hand you feel guilty to consume a part of the same, this time it just would land up in your stomach.
Where´s your compassion regarding suffering animals in terms of fashion and life-style?
If you appeal to morality regarding nutrition, try to remain authentic by keeping this straight attitude all over. Morality with respect to fashion and lifestyle doesn´t obviously appeal to your taste and favor?
This way you proof that a personal morality can transmute to an immoral act.

Kind regards, thank you for giving food for thought,
Naddu

Kind regards,
Naddu

@ your A: Then when will you give your body and become my soul mate ? :)

nagendra kumar pathak Wrote:

Prerna,

If leather shoes and eating dairy can be a part of your happiness, eating meat can also be a measure of happiness for others. Therefore, no point preaching or lecturing for not eating meat. It is a way of life and part of our curriculum.

N.K. Pathak

Shahid Mahmood Wrote:

Oh!
What I concluded is that your observation is premature. Plants are also living thing, because they breath and grow and reproduce.

With best regards

Shahid Mahmood

syed nishath rahmuthullah Wrote:

dear prerna,
God has created dis animals 2 b eaten by us…

they r meant fr us…
EAT WELL…all non-veg
SLEEP WELL..
TINK ONLY ME>>>

ravi yoga Wrote:

Very good thinking Prema. Congrats on turning Vegetarian. Your analysis is definitely well thought out.

Regards,

K.RAVISHANKAR

chethan m.v Wrote:

Hai Prerna,

Iam so impressed by your article ,actually more than an article i found a lesson for our NETHAs .You have a great vision.
Regard CHETHAN

Muzaffar Yunus Wrote:

u talk sense…kp it up…

Good article

Praful oza Wrote:

Thanks

Think over universe balancing

With love
Praful oza

vinay kumar Wrote:

thanks
prerna that is the very good practice & good knowledge to convey the message

Saleem Mohd Wrote:

Sorry, you are mistook. If need proper answer go thro’ the dvd of Dr. Zakir Naik topic about non-vegetarian food permited or prohibited.

Thanks & Regards

rahul jaiswal Wrote:

Dear MS. PRERNA GUPTA

I LOVE YOUR IDEA TO TURN VEGITARIAN

U WANT SCINTIFIC PROOF THAT ANIMAL HAVE EMOTION OR NOT

HAVE U NAVER SEEN ANIMAL WEEPING ?

IF THEY HAVE NO EMOTION WHY THEY R SHEADING TEARS?

IF U WANT ANSER OF YOUR QUESTION < THEN ATTAND ISKON TEMPLE CLOSE TO U , FROM THEiR BOOK U WILL B MORE SATISFIED ABOUT YOUR ENQURY .

IF POSSIBLE READ BHAGWAT GITA THERE IS NO PHILOSHPHY ABOVE THIS .

FROM YOUR NAME U SEEMS TO ME INDIAN,I THINK U KNOW ABOUT GITA .

HARE KRISHNA

Arpit vohra Wrote:

You must thnx to god that he forgave you but eventually you left to eat.

but I am pure veg from the ‘0′ day of ma life.

thnx

hariharan moorthy Wrote:

GOOD ARTICLE PRERNA. KEEP SUCH ONES POSTING.

REGARDS

HARI

Amit Mondal Wrote:

Thanks for a good lesson.
AMIT

Farhan Yousaf Wrote:

Hey Prerna,

I have red your all mails i think that you are good writer and have good thinking for your friends. no doubt you are look like queen.

your farhan

Hi Prerna,

Good write-up but I dont think i will stop eating chicken because i love making it and that’s the only thing i know to cook well…. so….

muhammadshoaib rahman Wrote:

Dear Prerna Gupta,
i am belonging from Muslim & off corse not a vegetarian,
I am not a Scholor but I have a logic about it,
have u ever seen the teeth of Vegetarian Animals, They cant eat meals coz of their teeth, While Loin can do coz his teeth are different from the vegetarian( Not only Loin all other flesh eating animals teeth are different from the Vegetarian Animal) While Human being teeth are matchable with Vegetarian & as well as Flesh eaten animals. It means Allah make human able to eat Vegetables as well as Flesh.

katpally gajanan Wrote:

hi,miss prerna gupta,,
this artical bout vegetarian thingy was really good,me really enjoyed it,,
cheers,
god bless,
gazz

ashish aggarwal Wrote:

a very nice and indeed the truth. i am a vegeterian too. i used to eat non -veg before but have stopped as of date but not for reasons like yours. i too feel the same way as written in your article that animals must be equally treated. but the other truth is if all humans on earth stop eating fish for eg. humans will start eating humans because of shortage of food.

Regards
Ashish

lewisraj surendranath Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
Greetings from Malaysia. I read your article which was sent to me with interest. Hhmm…your writing on the vegetarianism is good but there are few thoughts that has run into my mind.

You wrote about killing and feelings about morality etc… You see, the understanding on killing and morality is relative.

I am working in hospitality industry for more than 20 years. F&B is my bread and butter. I feed an average of 90,000 people per annum. Just multiple for 20 years and see. So, I think I’m qualified to give some comments on the vegetarian people that I’ve experienced.

In my experience, the most difficult people to feed are the teachers and vegetarian. Teachers, because they participate in passive communication. They only teach and instruct what they think is best and never will they allow any comments from the students. We can make all kind of presentation about the food. They will not acknowledge and only expect us to deliver what they want even though they are not form the hospitality industry. They are really passive and less rational.

Vegetarian people are another set of people who are very difficult. They will get upset, angry and even use abusive language when they realise that a non-vegetarian food is placed next to the vegetatian food. In Malaysia, most Indian vegetarian people feel that they are saint when they are vegetarian. They make us feel as though they are 1st class and that the meat eater are 3rd class. The vegetarian people will always look down on the non-vegetarian. This is my experience. I experienced it from almost everyone that I have served. Where does the killing and morality stands?

When you ask a vegetarian person on why he/she is vegetarian. Their answer will be that vegetarian is good, can live a healthy life etc… The answers are for question that you ask when it begins with WHAT. They cannot simply give an answer. For me, vegetarianism is sacrifice and nothing more than that; abstinence! This is where killing and morality will give meaning!

Lewis Raaj
Malaysia

Ganesh Parameswaran Wrote:

I couldn’t have agreed more with the views on The Morality of Vegetarianism. Sober and not shrill but strong nevertheless.

I wonder why the ID has to be abuse @yaari.com. I would suggest change it right away. Those who want to speak what they think is truth should not overtly be conscious of abuses. That would distract from or even wreck the work.

Regards.

Joe Menezes Wrote:

Dear Prerna the crusader

What makes you think that plants dont feel pain when you cut them down for your vegetarian meals. Is it just beacause they are mute and dont bleed.

It was our own great scientist Prof. CV Raman who proved that the pulse rate of a tree or plant goes up when any one or anything goes near them. Just because they dont cry or call out for help and can not move or thrash around, dont think they are non living things.

And your great vegeterian miracle food, curd or Yogurt, ever looked at it through a microscope??? The teeming single cell organisms called bacteria. Or when you jump around in a puddle of rain water, the millions of amoeba which die. The dont feel pain too.

So please keep your sanctimonious beliefs to yourself and survive and let others live at thier terms and beliefs. Or else one will live only on love and air ( that too teeming with millions of single cell organisms.

Cheers ………..

ChandraMohan Gupta Wrote:

Hey Prerna,

I read your blog on yaari also. Quite interesting but not completely right. jus c where u have put the wrong things unknowingly.

C.M.GUPTA.

Rajesh Jalota Wrote:

Prerna ji
I have come an article in Science (can send you the refernce) in that non vegetarianism and vegetarianism were compared in terms of climtae change issues or more correctly carbon emissions. It is an interesting article. I am also a vegetarian whoc was raised (almost) a vegetarian but it was not an inhibition not to eat meat, so i must have eaten lots of meat but 14 years back i turned vegetarian and have survived quite well as that. May be i shall write a bit more this later.
I still have to read your blog again.
Cheers!
Rajesh

harish premjee Wrote:

AUM SRI SAI RAM,

I read your experience on teh morality of vegetarianism.

Here are more reasons why we humans are so created by our Lord not to
be carnivores.

1) Our teeth are not for meat chewing. Compare them with Tiger’s
Lion’s or any other carnivore.
2) Digestive juices in our stomach also are not strong enough to
digest meat. Human meat eaters have to augment the strength of
digestive juices by adding Vinegar to their intake of salads and also
have to drink vine.
3) Our intestines are much more longer than those of carnivores where
the meat has to stay longer to pass which is one of the causes of many
diseases.
4) Our nails are not meant to tear the animal’s skin and meat,
therefore they are not sharp talons.
5) Vegetarian species drink water by sucking through the lips whereas
carnivores lick water with their tongue. Compare a cow as against a
dog or cat.

Thanks for ur mail

It makes me to think lot about eating meat.

But torturing animals are not even acceptable

It we are not taking meat, how the ecology will balance ?

regards

nandhu.

mani jeram Wrote:

Hi
I have lived in Canada for a long time and I am a vegetarian by birth. Initially it was difficult when I first came to Canada to explain to people about not eating meat. They did not understand the rationale behind giving up the most healthy food availalbe.
Anyhow, things have changed since then. It is considered fashionable to tell people that you are a vegetarian. People look at you with new respect because being vegetarian is now considered healthy. I no longer feel like at outcast at a business dinner and eat vegetarian food.

Life is good.

Mani Jeram

Sushil Gupta Wrote:

Hi,

It was really great message. Will try to become vegetarian.

Regards,
Sushil

S. K. Prasad Wrote:

Hi Prerna,

This is Subramanya Prasad. I like this topic very much.

As you have rightly alluded, your upbringing has a lot to do with your choices of being a vegetarian vs non vegetarian.

I was raised in a South Indian with strict vegetarian foods at home and outside. Even when I went through medical school, though many of my friends ate meat in front of me, I never felt the necessity to eat it.

After coming to the USA and seeing on PBS, Discovery and TLC channels as to how they feed Cows to cows, pigs to pigs, it is sheer atrocity and I dont think anybody in their right mind would want to contribute towards propagating such a barbarian act. It is indeed true that Man is the worst creation of GOD! A Lion or Tiger that is not hungry will not even look at a deer walking by! Humans feed themselves in such unlimited ways.

I believe that only God has the right to give and take life. So who are we to kill somebody else to eat?

S K Prasad

Verica Kocevska Wrote:

i love meat. especially chicken and pork…..

avishek sanghvi Wrote:

hi prerna,

this was nice one. really impressed.

rgds
abhi

Kilambi Preetham Wrote:

Dear Prerna Gupta,

This is very interesting and good change in your life.

I am also a pure vegetarian. Keep it up.

bye,
Raghunandan Preetham.K

Zeeshan Hassan Wrote:

Dear Sender,
I have some reservations on your below mentioned article. I hope this will be an addition in the topic and help the reader to understand the core sense of theme.

I would like to comment on your first “Beliefs”.

“inflicting pain and suffering on any conscious being is wrong. The greater the level of consciousness, the more wrong it is”.

The most repeated and meaningful word in your Belief No. 1 is “Consiousness”, so first we need to understand the meaning of it.

Consciousness is a difficult term to define, because the word is used and understood in a wide variety of ways, so that it frequently happens that what one person sees as a definition of consciousness is seen by others as about something else altogether. Consciousness may involve thoughts, sensations, perceptions, moods, emotions, dreams, and self-awareness. It is variously seen as a type of mental state, a way of perceiving, or a relationship between self and other. It has been described as a point of view, an I, or what Thomas Nagel called the existence of “something that it is like” to be something.
Many philosophers have seen consciousness as the most important thing in the universe.
On the other hand, many scientists have seen the word as too nebulous in meaning to be useful.
The issue of what consciousness is, and to what extent and in what sense it exists, is the subject of much research in philosophy of mind, psychology, neuroscience, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence. Issues of practical concern include how the presence of consciousness can be assessed in severely ill or comotose people whether non-human consciousness exists and if so how it can be measured; at what point in fetal development consciousness begins; and whether computers can achieve conscious states.
In common parlance, consciousness sometimes also denotes being awake and responsive to the environment, in contrast to being asleep or in a coma.

In context of above mentioned definition getting from wikipedia, do you think animals comes under the category of consious being, if yes, then why they are carnivore and eat each other?

Regards,

Syed Zeeshan Hassan
M. Phil (Management)

Shyam Sunder Bhambhani Wrote:

TKS PRERNA GUPTA FOR YOUR LOVELY MSG.

SHYAM

Tapas Baidya Wrote:

Gud , I liked it.

Rajendran pookkat Wrote:

Thanks for this Great Article
I too have a more or less same experience and turned to be strict vegiterian since 2004

Gulzar Ahmed Wrote:

Dear Prerna Gupta,

I have my reservations and observation as follows:

1. To keep the balance in the environmental echo system which is natural to control the population specifically the grass eating animals with the exception of pig.

2. Scientific studies conducted in Germany has proved that the slaughtering of animals in a Islamic way or Jewish way causes minimal suffering to the slaughtered animals.

3. Vegetables are the best proposition and provide the necessary Protein intake needed as daily requirements and keeps the mind and body healthy from hypertension, heart attacks etc;

With the above observations I am a supporter of vegetarian diet along with moderate usage of Meat.

Best regards,

Gulzar Ahmed

taj alam Wrote:

Dear Prerna,

Let me first welcome you to the fold of ‘yaari friedship’. I am happy to have you as one of my friends and would love to interact with you on various issues. I trust our interactions would be quite interesting and educational for each other.

Well, as regard to your personal views and decision to revert to vegetarianism, I fully respect your individual reasons for that. But, at the same time I firmly believe that God has made humans OMNIVOROUS and that’s why he has given us a set of ‘canine teeth’ to be carnivorous as well as herbivorous as and when we want, unlike certain animals, such as goat and cow which are totally ‘herbivorous’ or lion & dog which are carnivorous. In nutshell they do not have the alternate options of diet. Hence, on this belief and scientific evidence I am still a omnivorous and would like to continue like that during rest of my life, unless I am medically advised not to consume meat due to any specific reason which might endanger my health.

This earth and every thing in it has been laid down by Almighty for the benefit of mankind. But, it is to be properly and sensibly used. There is a certain age of animals before which they should not be slaughtered. So, if that rule is followed in letter and spirit then you are letting that animal live till that specific age. Moreover, if the animals (whose meat is being consumed) are not timely slaughtered then their population would outgrow to a level which might become a grave problem in feeding them.

I hope you would agree with me upto some extent if not fully.

Look after your self and be happy.
Regards,
TAJ

ishiv deep singh Wrote:

Hi Prerna,

It good to here you tht u left eating NoN- VEG. B’coz its not good to have it everyay but one in month for a change u can take it, but me being in Gulf most of the time forced to eat Non – Veg so still living, and nice to hear tht some thing INDIA changed it for you otherwise also INDIA and INDIAN can lot many things if required. Proud to be an INDIAN

Ravi Mahalingam Wrote:

I have just read ‘The Morality of Vegetarianism’ and I am pretty happy to know that you had become a pure vegetarian, for whatever reasons.

You had tried to analyse the need for Vegetarianism or Non-Vegetarianism, on the basis of certain beliefs that you had listed along with certain facts referred by you to justify the beliefs.

You had also raised a question, if Flesh could be eaten, incase the beliefs that you had mentioned get eliminated.

You had mentioned about your desire to continue using leather products apart from consuming Dairy products, the first one for status and the second one for health.

I am pretty happy that you had practised Vegetarianism, whenever you had visited India. India is considered to be the Spiritual Head Quarters of the World. Though there are more non vegetarians in India, you could think of being a vegetarian whenever you visited India, a real compliment to the INDIAN Culture.

As I HAD MENTIONED AT THE BEGINING OF MY REPLY, I am personally very happy to know that a Non-Vegetarian like you could change your food habits to become a Vegetarian.

My desire is that almost the entire human population should avide taking flesh for food, in the interest of granting the right to live, not only to the human race, but to all livingbeings. This gesture would justify the speciality of the Humanbeings as not only an intelligent but also a fair livingbeing.

With Warm Regards,
M.RavichandraN.

ashutosh maheshwari Wrote:

thanks for ‘THE MORALITY OF VEGETARIANISM’ . appna stories ka silsila jaari rakhna ,OK
bye

v chembra Wrote:

Dear prerna,

Thanks a lot for this message.
Especially because Just recenly only I stopped eating all types of meat even egg and trying to be a pure vegetarian.Thanks to the ISCON association that helped me change my mind.I knew the benifits of being a vegitarian plus the high morality behind this.In fact my english is not very good as you see, so I am not able to explain how much useful your write up is and I forward this to all my net friends with a heading ”worth reading to change attitude”. if any one could change their mind,we have reason to be happy about it.
Thanks prerna.
keep sending something useful like this always.

Regards,

Vasudevan Chembra,
AbuDhabi.

rajesha ramdas Wrote:

I went through ur blog, I am also non vegetarian at 11 year old. but now I am vegetarian completely.

Hi Prerna,

I have been reading your mails and really appreciate and enjoys them

How could you express your view in such a wonderful and thought process.

I really envy ut, since even if i want to express like this, the vocalubary should be that commanding. I would oblized if you could guide me how to learn this.

Regards,

Avinash

Upendra Chandrashankar Shukla Wrote:

Dear Prerna

Thanks. I am glad atleast you have understood the fact.
Human being is actually a vegetarina animal but because of smart brain he started eating meat.

What is laking is that the parents themselves do not understand the grand reality or they fail in explaining their children. You do not make the same mistake. Read max books on literature written by great authors like Swami Vivekanand and Kanaiyalal Munshi. If possible try to reduce seeing movies and TV shows like Sasbahu.
Best Regards
UC SHUKLA

zameer hussain Wrote:

dear MR Gupta,
I think UR HINDU religion has some problems.
1-setting on fire the living muslims and christians and other minorities in india is not sin and not immortal for u.its shame .
2-u do pray in front of hand made stones by cutting them and shaping them by ur own hands.a foolish thing that s.one pray in front of their own creation.in this way u people also destroy environment by digging the stones for ur to shape ur gods .
3-u do people kill the kashmiris daily and yet feel no annoyance.cz it limits ur said wills and some odd mentation.
4-u do eat fruits and vegetables that has been made for animals and in this way omit their rights to live.u moms even lay milk to nourish u people to get old an din this way decompose her body to further live a healthy life.
there are so many things to say in counter.
bye,
zameer

Bhaskar Ghosh Wrote:

It appears that you are in a dilemma. You have become vegetarian but
taking dairy products and using leather shoes. Human beings are
omnivores by nature. I think we should not eat meat every day as you
did earlier. But a mixture of vegetarian and non-veg food which suits
the body and is a balanced diet is the best. You get complete protein
from animals only.

i will like to say only this —live and let everybody live

The Morality of Hinduism, Vegetarianism and the killing of Christians !!!

Living life with some convictions is fine and living life with a particular style is still very acceptable to me. But when I examine the morality of vegetarianism as against the morality of life, then vegetatarianism is objectionable to me and grossly unacceptable even though I strictly abstain from meat. In those cultures that practice strict vegetarianism and fighting for the life of animals but can readily expend the life of a fellow citizen because he or she practices a different way of faith or lead a different life-style is an oxymoron. Vegetarianism like Hinduism is a combination of contradictory or incongruous ideas expressed often in words and actions (as cruel kindness; animal rights advocate and anti-conversion to another faith.) Vegetarianism is broadly a movement (as a concept) that is made up of contradictory or incongruous elements. The morality of vegetarianism is not such a complex issue but rather an ambiguous issue – a philosophical idea not clear to meaning or means something different to different people.

At Columbia University, I was introduced also to the ideas of Eric Schlosser though late for me as a Graduate Student. Eric Schlosser you would recollect wrote the book called Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. Even thought Schlosser’s book sheds light on the disgusting practices of the meat industry in America, it fails to show that Eric Schlosser is not a vegetarian. He was someone at that time still addicted to the eating of steaks and all kinds of poultry. All those portrayed vivid imagery he did present of the torture inflicted on America’s factory farm animals must be understood from the light of his political leaning. These ideas presented in that book are not the most compelling arguments against eating mass-produced meat. Animals are farmed for food in a free country like the United States of America where people have the right to grow trees (including plants) and animals (all of them living or cellular organisms) for food and sustainance of life. Until someone proves that animals raised in factory farms undergo a process of torture – the intentional infliction of severe physical or mental pain or suffering in order to intimidate, coerce, obtain information or a confession, or punish. In international law, the term is usually further restricted to actions committed by persons acting in an official capacity, then we have no argument and we would accept hook and sink the arguments of Eric Schlosser and those of extreme vegetarianism. Compare the humane or quick process of the preparation of animal farms for food with the torture given to Christians in countries like India, Pakistan and Iran or the plight of prisoners in these nations and others like them around the world. These are the rights we ought to fight for. These are human beings like us that we have proven evidence that are undergoing physical and mental pain or suffering.

I have come to realized that my body was not meant to consume meat for health reasons. The fact is that the reasoning based on one’s own (personal) moral beliefs cannot constitute any leaning for others on vegetarianism. It just like asking someone to become a Christian because I am one. Such is not the fact needed to become a Christian. I have to be convinced of its relevance in my life here and now and in my life here-after. Then again the facts of severe pain and suffering on animals has never been proven to be the case with animal farms in the USA. If we can truly concerned with the pollution of the environment, are we plainly hypocritical going after the meat production business of the USA rather the gross antiquated factories in India, China and the former Communist nations.
I would prefer to revisit the Nuances already raised and they are:

1. Professor Michael Pollan stance – killing the animal purely for food without any suffering. Is it still wrong to eat meat in this scenario?

2. Neuroscientist Joseph Ledoux stance – we are aware of emotions like pain, suffering and anxiety because we have a large prefrontal cortex. So it is possible that animals without a comparable prefrontal cortex, such as cows, pigs and fish, do not experience such emotions at all.

The second nuance is really interesting because nobody has proven that these animals do experience emotions like human being. So we rather ought to argue that those on animal rights side that argue about emotional suffering on these animals ought to back up their arguments with hard data and facts. Since science has told us that it is possible that animals without a comparable prefrontal cortex like human being do not experience emotions of pains and suffering at all like humans. I will always take the same position as Neuroscientist Joseph Ledoux and I will always fight to the rights of humanbeings anywhere in the World to practice freely his or her faith (including to eat meat or not to eat meat) and live according to his or her conscience. I will never condemn or castigate anyone at variance with my world-view, socio-political view and religious view.

Shriniwas M Katti Wrote:

Hi Prerana,

It is good to be a vegetarian. My grand children in US always ask me and mymy daughte (their mother) why it is good to be vegetarian. I am forwarding ur mail to my little grand daughter of 8 years. You have written very logically.

SM Katti
Belgaum
Karnataka, INDIA.

Habibullah pathan Wrote:

Dear Prerna Gupta,
It was good to read your assumptions on eating meat and your justification why you quit eating meat. However, I would suggest, for once listen to Dr Zakir (hit the following link).

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=dr+zakir+naik+vegetarian&aq=0&oq=Dr+zakir+naik+ve

Regards,

Habibullah Pathan

United Kingdom.

o hello mahatma gandhi of modern world.wats d explanation of you eating hell amount of non veg n now returning to veg world n doing all this shit kinda lecture stuff.do u knw the population of chicken is more than human beings in world.if animals are left all alone then where will be the space left to live on earth.n tell me if every1 turns veg, wat will you eat.keep ur shit idelogy with yours.u turned veg ok then dance go n have party.stop mailing n posting such shit stuff n why d hell r u mailing me.dnt send such crappy material to me.if u r a proud US citizen then first ask ur government to show some mercy to the people from middle east n then think of animals.cant treat humans as humans n thinking of animals.

Srikanth Desikachar Wrote:

Interest analogy Prerna. Its so true that we all have become fascinated with our life style and have a level of complacency beyond which it starts hurting. I still remember my elderly relatives who preach, scold, advocate vegetarianism, yet wouldnt give up wearing leather sandles and shoes, for them i guess the thinking is it came from a dead cow so why bother. But NO NO NO to those who eat meat or egg. I even can add many highly priveleged priests from our temples to this list who also of the same cadre.

To me vegetarianism is an approach to my diet. It is easier to eat, digest and get off the system, this perhaps is why i find Non Veg gross like you felt post India visit.

Good write up. Thanks for sharing it.

Srikanth

BALAKRISHNAN MN Wrote:

Hi Prema Gupta,
Thanks for sharing your practical thought with others. Best wishes!!
You will agree that everyone is in the process of evolution and your transition of principles is strongly founded and is and will be good for you and the society at large. Best wishes. Human beings are not designed as meat eaters as is clear fropm their physical structure. The premitive human beings would have tried it in perversion and would have become a part of the civilization. Intellectuals conciously change for good. Ahimsa is a virtue and it also averts harmful elements entering the system. May I tell you , I am pure vegitarian for past over 35 years and managing with a single meal and just tea twice a day besides fruits as and when available. It is very comfortable and I work hard every day though not necessary for my livelihood. I am living alone unmarried and all household jobs are carried out on my own. Difficulties are there as there is no body to share life with! Spiritual orientation keeps me almost fit and disciplined in life.
I would advice you to practice meditation if not in. Brahmakumaris is a testified path for quick results; follow them.
With love,

PKM Raja Wrote:

Hi Prerna,
I read your article with interest and I tend to agree with your observations on vegetarianism. I have also been in your kind of situation and have now become a pure vegetarian and I don’t think that I am missing anything in my present diet. At the same time I feel greatly relieved that I am not willfully causing harm or injury to other animals and living organisms. I am feeling extremely fit and healthy with a vegetarian diet and certainly do not miss non-vegetarian dishes these days.
Regards,
Col PK Muralidharan Raja
Secretary General
Indian Boxing Federation

Amit Misra Wrote:

Dear Prerna,

I don’t know how my address was included in your distribution list, but your logic has certainly been a prerna for me to think of becoming a vegetarian. Great stuff !

Amit

@ankur: my body and soul are a part of my whole, I´m unable to divide myself!:P

CAPT.ASHOK JAIN Wrote:

It’s very good to read your email.

You may also like to add following:

When one dies, what do we do.??

We normally incinerate or bury a dead body.

When we eat meat one of the things to think off

Is that we are using our stomach to put the dead body in form of

Meat and creating a burial ground within our stomach.

Thanking You

Best Regards

Ashok Jain

Rajesh Bhatia Wrote:

This is the first time, you have talked sense.

Rupesh Chavan Wrote:

Hi Prerana,
My name is Rupesh. I am a Msc Student. Even i am a strict Vegetarian.
I really like your this blog. Good One……

Ratnakar Misra Wrote:

Thanks Prerna. I am veg. Dont forget the concept of Maha Karuna of Mahavir. He became naked when his dhoti got entangled in a thorn and he could not hurt it!
Enclosed a simple article of mine published in National HRD Network, Newsletter.
Rgds
Ratnakar

Hari Kumar.N Wrote:

Dear friend,

Good article. I also have the same experience in life. Please continue writing.

Regards
Harikumar.N

Gani noa Wrote:

Dear Prerna

I have gone through your complete mail, it was really very interesting and very inspiring mail for me. I am hard core NON veg guy. After reading your mail, I want to become a pure vegetarian. Kindly guide me further.

Chakravarthy K Wrote:

HI Prerna,

Your experiences and views about being a Non-vegetarian and then converting into a pure Vegetarian was very interesting. Even I have taken the similar path.. Initially being a hardcore Non-vegetarian and now understanding that we humans are born as vegetarians only. I totally agree to you. Please provide many more such interesting experience

Regards
Chakra

saqib ali Wrote:

Hello, I am Saquib Muhammad a muslim who follows the religion of Islam and a proud Indian too.

All I want to tell you is, we can decide what is good or bad for us, but sometimes we may be wrong but the creator(God) of us can only decide what is good for us. Allah(God) says in his book(Quran)

“Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than Allah. that which hath been killed by strangling, or by a violent blow, or by a headlong fall, or by being gored to death; that which hath been (partly) eaten by a wild animal; unless ye are able to slaughter it (in due form); that which is sacrificed on stone (altars); (forbidden) also is the division (of meat) by raffling with arrows: that is impiety. This day have those who reject faith given up all hope of your religion: yet fear them not but fear Me. This day have I perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islam as your religion. But if any is forced by hunger, with no inclination to transgression, Allah is indeed Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

pradeep gupta Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
Thanks for raising again a contemporary issue. This argument is not going to be over like another argument which continues between coffee and toffee……..! Eating meat is not the issue only related to the other living organisms’ great sufferings and humiliation throughout their lives but also is the concern of emission of green house gas, which has brought the whole world at the verge of its extinction causing global warming. You might be aware of the Mayan Community and their calender which bears no date beyond 21 December, 2012. What does it signify? Is the day going to be the last day of our world? If it is so then we will ourselves be responsible for our extinction. Let me make it clear. You are by birth a US citizen. Ok so you might be knowing that when USA was asked to sign the Kyoto protocol (regarding carbon emission), the erstwhile US administration refused doing so. Recently I have written an article on “Future of Dollar Hegemony”, in which I have quoted a few experts and economists saying that this present recession, which popped up on the surface during the last quarter of 2008 in USA because of the unproductive and excessive exploitation and consumption of resources, has put a big question mark on its future. It is so because the nature itself has mounted a suffocative control over the consumption of US society. I hope you are getting my wave length. So its nature which keeps control over the extremes. Even consuming meat has also put a massive threat on the extinction of a number of species and as a result has severly hit the ecological balance worldwide. Kahne ki jaroorat nahin “agar hum marenge to tum bhi nahin bachoge.” Let me quote some statistics here in support of this argument:
1. An estimated 30% of the earth’s ice-free land is directly or indirectly involved in the production of livestock for meat, generating 18% of green house gas emissions- more than the means of transport around the world. That is why researchers at Chiago University suggest that going vegan is one of the most effectine ways to combat global warming.
2. The study of medical science has suggested that eating meat increases the risk of carciogenic growth of tissues, as human body is not meant for animal protein to stay healthy.
3. All carnivores you might have noticed that they drink water by licking it (example of all felids) while herbivores drink water by sicking it. and further needless to add how do you drink water-by licking or by sucking.
Finishing my argument here by your kind permission and waiting for the next post to share.
Bye till then.
Yours
Pradeep

Mangesh Baxi Wrote:

Dear Prerana,
For this one time I completely agree with you.Vegetarianism is a noble idea & it also makes immense sense as well.Earlier I used to dislike non veg food because the cruelity inflicted upon animals which I somehow could not agree.But with further more inputs from your blog I couldn’t agree more.Those who can should resort to vegetarianism.May your tribe grow. God bless you.
Regards
Mangesh.

RASNIDHI DESAI Wrote:

Hi

I would like to add to your ‘Vegeterianism’

I refer to your Nuance #2.
The more the sense organs an animal has, the more pain/joy the animal can have – Naturally

Our ’shastras’ classify animals from ‘ek-indriya’ to ‘panch-indriya’
It means those who have 5 sense organs they feel more. Hence we do eat Vegetation -which is a living thing. But does not have 5 sense organs.

Raising of such food grains is for killing eventually. But we have to do it to live.

As human being we try to ‘economize’ on pain given to others for our food.

Dairy is not killing but is cruelty. we snatch away food of baby cow/buffalow.

Again we tie them onto a place for rest of their life. use them and kill them when they are not good for milk

Rasnidhi Desai

Hi Naddu

I am vegetarian(I don’t even eat eggs) but I am enble to understand the argument in favor or against it. Human beings have consumed meat for millions of years.

MORALITY AND BEING VEG OR NON_VEG HAVE NO LINK AT ALL.

Also I liked your comment:why man asked woman hand. Talk with sense of humor.

Dear Obiagwu

PLEASE DON”T TURN THIS FORUM AGAINST ANY RELIGIONS. PLEASE. CHRISTIANITY IS A GREAT RELIGION SO IS OTHER RELIGIONS.

PLEASE REFRAIN MAKING “DISTORTED” STATEMENTS.

jayraj bhadranwala Wrote:

Dear Prerna
Good on you girl !!
I am convinced that you can convince many
Jayraj

lamaj mustafa Wrote:

Dear Prerna,

I find such philosophy very hypocrite. Something like American style who make bomb to kill hundred, drop bomb to kill thousands but try to prove that they care for a single life of a bird. This is hypocrisy at highest order.

You care for animal but you (most probably you are an Indian) don’t care for Muslims. When Muslims were killed & raped & tortured in Gujarat, what you did? Muslims are lower grade creation than your animals? What about the low cast people in India? Are not they human being in any standard? Why they live so miserable life in there? Is life of an animal worth more than a human being?

Better be kind to human being without trying to separate them in terms of race, age, gender etc. Then you think for other animals. Do care the basic first, then the ornamentation.

Rgds
Jamal

Brian Cohen Wrote:

Hi,

I have been a vegetarian for the past 18 years or so

But check out eat right for your blood type I am a+ and should be a vegetarian but for some they cannot process vegetable protein and not eating meat would be very bad. So giving blanket advice may hurt the general public. Get real and out of the clouds and figure out what is good for each person not your emotional interpretation that you play out here.

Thank you,

doug feinstein Wrote:

i hate vegetables

Hi Prerna!

Thousands of years of preaching has done only so much for Human morality!

Tell the Poor man who lives by the Sea or the Jungle to be a vegetarian! He will certainly find something to knock you on your Head and hopefully bring some sense.

Good old Shaw put it very succinctly, “My stomach is not a graveyard for dead animals”.
And what are you trying to say here in your blog?? It is a personal choice, live with it.

Choice of food is a luxury of few, so let us not marginalize others who are forced to eat only what they can afford. Do Americans get fresh food like us in India?? You know why they eat what they eat. Stop riling about USA as if it is Heaven on Earth. I can write volumes on it and get a couple of Doctorates for it from the Junk Old USA. Fast food nation is just a page in the whole write up.

If you are really aching to do something to our fellow nationals, pick up issues of bridging the gap at various levels practically.

Whether one is from Stanford or the by-lanes of a town without water supply it does not matter. Are you civil enough not to honk when you see a kid riding a bi-cycle on the road? Picture that! I have seen it in less educated communities in some places of the World, where everyone talks to each other instead of erecting barriers of misconstrued Class-concepts et al!

As long as we subscribe to Award-Reward culture, we will never get to be a genuine Human being. I hope my message is clear here. I do not wish to partake in the clashes borne out of minds seeded by conditioned reflexes and cultivated response systems, far less the misunderstood blueprint of our Society at large.

You are yearning for some publicity and in the process you have chosen criticism of the Society and it’s values, let it be known that there are no Monuments erected in memory of Critics! What are you doing for betterment of the immediate world around you?
We are not even nice to people who serve us well because we are insecure!

Best regards,

Nagesh H

Satish Desai Wrote:

Prerna

Vegetarianism is fine as a choice but no one should claim its supeiority on moral grounds. One may also choose to avoid meat on health grounds. I believe in the principle “Jeevo Jeevasya Jeevanam” (One life has to end to provides sustenance to another life.) I would like to make a few points:

1: You destroy life if you cut out a plant. You are also killing many organisms very time you breathe in and out.

2. All bodies contain living micro-organisms that die and make way for new ones.Bodyin order to eat meat, we must prematurely end the life of the animals we eat.

Regards,

Dr Satish Desai OBE

@Prashant Kulkarni — thank you for such a lovely anecdote. i am impressed that your boss was so flexible, and also that you were so courageous :) i also have mostly non-vegetarian friends and agree with spirit of tolerance. diet is a very personal choice. my post on vegetarianism was meant only to raise awareness.

let me ask you one simple question, What happens to all the animals if we all become vegetarian.
Regards
Richard

there are a couple of recurrent objections i’d like to address:

“why don’t you stop killing plants too” — please see my Belief #1 above. plants are not conscious beings (given the widely accepted definition of consciousness)

“if we stop eating meat, we will disrupt balance in nature” — this is a very shocking statement to me. i’m assuming you all are unaware that meat comes from farmed animals? we breed animals for meat consumption. thus eating meat is disrupting balance (severely) in nature, rather than the opposite.

@Satish

Yes I agree with you Morality has no link with being vegetarian.

@pradeep gupta — thank you for sharing more information about the environmental impact of meat production.

tina singh Wrote:

God gave humanity permission to eat meat after the Flood (Genesis 9:3). In the Old Testament law, the nation of Israel was commanded to not eat certain foods (Leviticus 11:1-47), but never commanded against eating meat. Jesus declared all foods, including all kinds of meat, to be clean (Mark 7:19). As with anything, each Christian should pray for guidance as to what God would have them eat. Whatever a person decides to eat is acceptable to God as long as we thank Him for providing it (1 Thessalonians 5:18). 1 Corinthians 10:31 declares, “So whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God.”

sethu raman Wrote:

Hi Ms. Prerna Gupta,

Read your article on vegetarianism and I must say that this article completelty reflected my views and belief. I am a vegetarian from birth ( so do my parents) because of the religious customs. I also have it as a principle that I would never eat meat in my life mostly for the reasons told by you.

But I feel there is one more important reason for my belief. That is love. I tend to love any living being that I see in my life. So when I love something I cannot imagine it being killed and I don’t want to be a reason for that. But I never push this principle to others as it is upto everyone’s choice and also majority in this world is not vegetarian.

Though some times I have got tempted to eat meat (because of friends) but so far I have resisted that. After reading this article I would continue to be as I was earlier with more conviction.

Thanks for a wonderful article.

Regards,
Sethuraman.G

@Richard
Answer to your question of what happens to all animals if we all become vegetarian

1. One snake eat other snake(Small one) as food. I am sure you agree with me

2. Most fish eat fish themsleves, I am sure you agree with me.

3. When a animal dies, thousands of living being eat his/her meat(Dogs, Birds all).

4. In self sustained ecological system, in one way or another, animals survive either eating grass or meat or each others.

I AM VEG AND SEE NO LINK BETWEEN MORALITY AND BEING VEG. SAME WAY I SEE NO LINK BETWEEN BEING RELIGIOUS AND MORALITY.

Hi Aussie,

the pleasure is all mine ;)
To add something,in my eyes, a self sustained ecological system isn´t possible when people invade nature and make demands.
I absolutely agree that there´s no link between morality and vegetarian diet.
Incase anyone tries to draw a morality regarding different nutrition concepts I think he/she is more an ideologist than a tolerant human being. As long as food consumption isn´t harmful to other humans and keeps us alive we should follow our needs and use our domestic sources.

Can anyone tell why children deny vegetables when they have the choice between a chicken-drumstick and prepared vegetables? Do they chose by instinct? Is a favor for vegetarian or non-vegetarian food in the genes, a part of heir?
Human beings were hunter-gatherers in all times…

take care,
Naddu

Naddu

I wish to share some of Methane Related Reserach with you. Send me an email at

sircorp@hotmail.com

I know the secrets to divide parts to make a healthier, happier, enjoying and fulfilling newer whole. Are you willing dear ?…..:) ;)

Dear Naddu,
For the last three days i have been unable to access yaari. so all the comments after the reply to ur instinctive flesh one are not mine. Though those fake responses are true to my feelings. I do ask u for ur hand(and body and soul) in marriage. Though it would do with me if u just give ur body.And ur joke was a really good one.ha ha ha. I would remember that. I agree it may be one of the reasons. Before giving ur answer, i do once again remind u of my credentials. 5′8”, unemployed, more than often penniless, and still eats at the most expensive of places whenever he has a penny or two. You have to pick my bills after marriage. But i can assure u all the pleasure in life. Physiological as well as psyhological.Take care love ankur

VEGETARIANISM WITH A CAUTION:
The protein that is responsible for the growth of the brain cells is almost absent in vegetarian food. It is no incident therefore that till now not a single pure vegetarian has won the noble prize. In all other aspects vegetarian food is more conducive to health. So my advise to all u vegetarians. Start taking eggs in ur meal. The white of the egg has the protein responsible for the formation of brain cells. Give them to ur children too. If u want them to win noble prize.The white unfertilized egg is scientifically vegetarian too.
And if from being a vegetarian u move to becoming a vegan, god save u. therefore vegetarianism with a caution. Take care.love ankur.

TO NADDU ON TERRORISM, SEX, LOVE ETC…..
This week in the eonomist Danny Rodrick has written the most foolish piece on regulation in international finance. He is one of the more famous professors of the Harvard. So names dont guarantee wisdom. You have to see for yourself that is the report right in its conclusions and inferences. Regardless of who has written it. I also dont have a good image of Alan Kruger. His reports are more of a gimmick to attract attention. One of his earlier studies said that when the state of Florida increased the minimum wage levels substantially from Fedral levels, fast food joints in Florida actually increased their hiring!!!
Naddu terrorism is a direct consequence of fanaticism. Suppose Prerna becomes a vegetarian fanatic, she too will turn a terrorist. Most terrorists nowadays are religious fanatics. .
The leaders of terrorist groups almost always come from educated, prosperous bakgrounds. They hire mercenaries from poor background to execute their planning for money. This is the kind of terrorism that u see in Kashmir.But suicide bombers are not driven by money. Obviously their incentive is not money. I hope u can see that point for yourself even if Allan Kruger writes otherwise. Islamic terrorism uses suicide attackers. Who are driven by fanaticsm and not money. They know that after death they would leave the money behind.
Please Naddu there is not a single terrorist organisation that has risen as a result of poverty You have to realize that running a terrorist organization is a very expensive business. You need expensive machine guns.Poverty definitely cannot do that.
Humiliation also cannot explain terrorism . Except in case of Palestine militant outfits like Hezbollah.
Naddu i have realized that u dont understand sex and sexuality. You are intelligent and well read. But u cannot reach the peak of intelligence if u dont understand sex. Because it is the source from which everything comes. Marriage where sexual loyalty is an implicit condition , is the biggest form of sexual repression, That a muslim sheikh fucks his wife 100 times or fucks his ten wifes 1000 times doesn’t mean he is sexually fulfilled. Sexual expression comes from an attitude of deep acceptance about sex. When sex has no guilt feeling attached to it. When it is no longer a sin that has to be repent later by a holy trip to Mecca or Kashi. Only then can one become sexually expressed. Then one doesn’t have to fuck 10000 times. A few hard fucks like those in American triple X movies is more than enough. So its better that we show our children those movies than teaching them foolish moral science.
You can start by reading Nancy Friday’s Women On Top. Highly educative and highly enjoyable. Or u can marry me and foot my bills .And i will teach u all about sex and sexuality.
Fanaticism is inversely proportional to sexual expression.
Lastly i think that we fuck first then we fall in love. I would sleep with anybody to get loved than to love somebody to take her to bed. Take care. With love and lust.ankur.

TO PRERNA MY APOLOGIES, RESPONSE ETC…
i am sorry .For the last two days i couldn’t access yaari. Everytime i got the message that you r not authorised to visit this page. Since i have started enjoying yaari so much i almost got mad with irritation. I thought u have barred me. And therefore sent that mail to u. Doubting your commitment to freedom of expression…I retract on that, i was wron nd i apologize.
Ofcourse i am aware that large amount of farmland is required to rear animals for wheat consumptions. But if we convert all that land into cultivated land for vegetables and grain, i doubt that we would fulfill the food needs of more than 5 billion vegetarian population of the world.take care .love ankur.

TO KAMRAN KHATRI AND DR. ZAKIR NAIK,
Kamran tell me. If were to die how would you prefer. Would u prefer that somebody first cuts your hand, then the veins of your neck and then your blood vessels and let all the blood flow out. And let u die u a slow death. Or would you prefer a quick death in one cut so that u die immediately….think about it and dont ask Dr. Naik his opinion on that. The Islamic way of halaal is definitely more cruel.
Dr Zakar Naik is a parrot who repeats and remembers the dead words of Koran pretty well. He is illiogical and anti-woman. He propogates the Wahabi interpretation of Islam. That Taliban and the likes support. He is dangerous for the modern society.take care.love ankur.

Rajesh Mehta Wrote:

Hi Prerna,

Quite a complex topic this is.

A lot of people confuse that Hinduism preaches “absolute vegetaniarism”. Though Hinduism and (most of) the rituals promote vegetaniarism, there is NO explicit promotion of it.

Once I confronted someone (who was of course, almost, omnivorous) and he suggested what makes you think that the trees and plants do not feel the asme pain, just because they can not protest. He actually compared eating fruits/ leaves to eating a limb of a LIVING animal.

I won’t go that far but the bottomline is we all fit somewhere in the continuum of “fruitarians” (can’t think of anyone to their left – any suggestions anyone?) to “cannibals”.

Dear Ankur,

thank you for your proposal, I´m feeling flattered. Thank you also for offering lessons regarding sex and sexuality, I believe I can´t learn anything from you in this field when considering our age difference, 20 years higher experience, and my pretty liberal and free upbringing.
I also have the feeling you confuse love and lust. The main reason of sexuality is to implant and keep our DNA, our genes, this helps the human race to reproduce and sustain. By nature we decide for an appropriate match that looks promisingm and similar in many ways. You cannot endlessly do that, because you have a responsibility to feed and grow what you self-seed.
Further I don´t believe that a financially impotent, but physically temporarily (male gender is infact disadvantaged in this case) potent alpha-male (you) could impress a financially potent and sexually endlessly potent (advantage of the female gender) alpha-female. (me)
Unlike Madonna, I don´t need to adopt or keep a Jesus or any other naughty brat to maintain my sexlife. And what would my highly developed community, husband,daughters and my lover think of me would ask them for permission to sponsor an intelligent, witty, horny Pakistani?;-) lol
Love and trust is priceless my dearest, you can´t buy it.
Strange, what´s going wrong in your country? We people in the west first fall for each other before we share the same bed. Falling for each other doesn´t mean falling into the same bed! I think you have mistaken the sense of the word “falling”! lol

Have a nice Sunday!
greetings,
Naddu

Explanatory remark: Jewish kosher slaughter, Muslim halal slaughter is illegalized in Germany.
By animal protection act law the animals need to be anaesthesized before the process, the slaughter has to happen in a slaughterhouse. Veterinarian intervention and presence to check the neatness, cleanliness of the meat is a part of the law.

@ankur — i apologize that we had to take yaari down temporarily, but we are working on launching a new and improved design :) so hopefully you will enjoy it better now! regarding your point about converting animal farms to agricultural farms — meat production actually requires more farming than vegetable production does, and is much more damaging to the environment, because of all the grain, water, etc that is required to feed the livestock. here’s a wikipedia article for more info on this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_vegetarianism

still im not convinced with the idea that eating meat is wrong, though you argued this idea supported with your OWN moral beliefs and those you called hard facts. It’s premature to conclude that eating meat is wrong simply because of such reasons that you have proved it with your own moral beliefs and some facts. Eating meat and killing animal are two diferent things. Killing animal in a such brutal manner is definitely wrong. But to say eating meat is wrong is absurd. The culture of a particular country prohibits eating meat for religious reasons. BUT It should not be argued that eating meat is wrong since the culture prohibits to practice it. To conclude, it’s not definitely wrong to eat meat.

Jaswanti Patel Wrote:

Having dairy products does not involve the ending of the creature’s life. It is not in the scale of sacrifice. Many human mothers wet-nurse another baby.

So stop beating yourself about ‘dairy’.

Kailashchandra Wrote:

Hi Prena,

Nice thoughts….. I agree with most of your points…. interesting reasons…. I have my own reasons to be a vegetarian. First I believe in Reincarnation. Now, according to reincarnation when one dies, one’s body decomposes, but something of oneself is reborn in another body.

It is the belief that one has lived before and will live again in another body after death. The bodies one passes in and out of need not be human. One may have been a Doberman in a past life, and one may be a mite or a carrot in a future life. SO, if you observe animals, you will find that they have made the choice to be in that body. When you get a human body, and you do not use the faculty of mind, and you just want to indulge in sense pleasures, Nature will give you that particular body through which you can enjoy your senses without mind….. After death nature will put man in that womb of animals which will give him or her desired pleasures for longe time. Mind you, its not a punishment…. In nature there is nothing called punishment…. its all about choice…. You pick the food and you pay the bill…. So its all about Karma…… If you will observe many human beings, you will find that they are not human, they are animals in man’s garb….. They have characteristics of animals…. They may be cunning like fox or innocent like deer….. SO its all about Karma… And I literally believe that all the animals must be related to us in our past lives…
THey might be our forefathers, whose photo we put in our walls, and when they get animals body, we relish their taste….. What a pity!!!!
It might be possible that the souls of our ancestors dwell in those animals.

The other reason is I believe in Justice…. Suppose if a more powerful beings/race come into existance than humans, how will man feel if they will just pick small children and start eating them…. They wont be able to understand the pain of humans, just like we do not understand the pains of animals…….

Well there are many points we can make…… However the bottomline is be aware….. even if you like to eate non-veg foods, be aware that what you are doing….. Awareness is most important thing…… Karma is working…….

stéphane ADHIN Wrote:

Meat does not matched you because you were born with fresh vegetables and Roti .Your parents are vegeterians.And at least in India, people adore cows and beef.It is forbidden for Indian to eat meat.If you come in Europe ,you can vegetables ; you are not obliged to eat meat.That is my point of view.Bye

Saleem Qureshi Wrote:

hello Parena Gupta, nice article, but you have stoped short, hunting animals for fun, animals use for tranportation, animals displayed & used to show funs, vegeterian doctors using animals for medical gain, like rabit, mice, snakes & etc, peogens are used by nato & American forces on their vehicles for any chemical attacks, dolphins used by Israel to secure thier water front, list will grow bigger & bigger, as you must be awared that India is the capital of Diabetice, where majority is vegeterian, God has gifted humans with numereous treasures. Thanks

Amir Ali Wrote:

Vegitable and plants also have life, the only difference between an animal and veggie is that animal looks like us, vegitables does not. when veggie cries, we do not listen, our ears are half deaf. When we enhail air we kill millions of tiny becteria, that also have life. When we walk we kill thousands of ants and animals we can not see, but their voice is unheard.

Think about it and pass.

Sanjay Kuruvadi Wrote:

Hi Prerna! I am really proud of your accomplishment, but unfortunately more and more Indians are sold the idea of eating meat is same as eating any other vegetable.They do not understand or want to understand the idea of real justice and do not see animals as another soul trapped in that particular body as we are!

Just wanted to share some ideas, as lot of people go into debate with me about eating meat and they just do not want to understand, but at the end everybody will have to pay for it soon or later. Anyways, here are some arguments I use to defend and hopefully you can also use that:

WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND…ALWAYS BE VEGETARIAN!

I am writing this article as recently I see and I am getting very concerned about Indians who are getting converted into non-vegetarians, as a habit where people just imitate the Westerners and forget to see what their heart’s saying…I have seen even hypocrite Indians who come to the Hare Krishna Temple or other temple for years and still haven’t understood the basic rule of non-violence, compassion and keep on eating meat. How can you go to God and ask for mercy if we are merciless?

PEOPLE KILL, KILL, KILL…ISN’T MAN AN AMAZING ANIMAL??

He kills birds, kangaroos, deer, all kinds of
cats, coyotes, beavers, and groundhogs, mice, foxes by the millions in order
to protect his domestic animals and their feed. Then he kills his domestic
animals by the BILLIONS and eats them. This in turn kills man by the
MILLIONS, because eating all those animals leads to degenerative and
fatal-health conditions like heart disease, kidney disease and CANCER. So
then man tortures and kills more animals to look for cures for these
diseases. Elsewhere, millions of other human beings are killed by hunger and
malnutrition because food they could have eaten is being used to fatten
domestic animals. Meanwhile, some people are dying of sad laughter at the
absurdity of man, who kills so easily and so violently, and once a year sends
out cards calling for PEACE AND PROSPERITY ON EARTH (Ha, ha! Ya sure with this killing attitude it’s going to happen!)

People regularly ask me the following questions after long debate and in a
sense accepting the vegetarian life is the best for the heart, mind and soul…

Q: In nature animals kill and eat other animals. So how can it be wrong for
people to eat animals too?

A: In nature, animals often eat other animals while they are still alive.
Animals sometimes rape each other, steal each other’s food and homes and kill
each other’s children. Do you really base your ethics on what animals do? The
animals that we choose to eat are not carnivores anyway. We tend to pick up
peaceful, gentle domesticated animals like cows, lambs and rabbits to kill
for food, partly because they are more easily controlled. In addition, modern
factory farming doesn’t just slaughter the animals. It involves their
absolute enslavement from birth, the removal of their children at tender
young ages and the total denial of each being’s physical, social and
psychological needs. They are usually chained up in a dark solitary pen in
the interest of creating the most meat in the shortest time as cheaply as
possible. This lifelong torture, for purposes of profit, culminates in an
impersonal assembly-line death handled by machines. The animals are not just
simply killed as by predators.

Q: If you don’t eat meat, fish or poultry, then you have to kill and eat
plants. Isn’t that just as bad as killing animals? (As if they cared for
plants! The person asking this question in not really interested in the
welfare of plants. It is a trick question meant to catch you off guard.)

A: Plants do not have the complex nervous systems of animals. For that
reason, as well as common observation, there is little evidence that plants
suffer or experience pain or anxiety. Animals, on the other hand, feel pain
every bit as much as the human beings and may even suffer more because they
can’t understand what is happening to them. Also the food (vegetarian) is
supposed to be offered to God so all the bad Karma is removed when plants are
eaten, and we should eat Prasadam; in Bhagavad-Gita Krishna only wants
vegetarian food to be offered to him (Chapter 9) and he will not accept
non-veg. If truly this person who asks this question is concerned about
saving plants, than they should eat still vegetarian. To create meat, an
animal must consume many times his own weight in plants. It has been
estimated that the inefficiencies of meat production are such that each pound
of meat results in the destruction of at least 10 pounds of plants.
Therefore, a human will kill many less plants by eating them directly than by
eating animals raised on plants.

Benjamin Franklin said: “Flesh eating is unprovoked murder.”

Every two seconds in our planet a poor child starves to death.

People make ally kind of excuses thought time immemorial to do something evil like for example they used to say that Women do not have soul (this excuse is used for abusing women in the past) or that Blacks do not have Soul (this is to make slavery acceptable to their minds.) Same sort of this question was asked to Srila Prabhupada:

Srila Prabhupada: Some people say, “We believe that animals have no soul.”
That is not correct. They believe animals have no soul because they want to
eat the animals, but actually animals do have a soul.

Reporter: “How do you know that the animal has a soul?”

Srila Prabhupada: “You can know, also. Here is the scientific proof. The
animal is eating, you are eating; the animal is sleeping, you are sleeping;
the animal is defending, you are defending; the animal is having sex, you are
having sex; the animals have children, you have children; you have a living
place, they have a living place. If the animal’s body is cut, there is blood;
if your body is cut, there is blood. So all these similarities are there. Now
why do you deny this one similarity, the presence of the soul? That is not
logical. You have studied logic? In logic there is something called analogy.
Analogy means drawing a conclusion by finding many points of similarity. If
there are so many points of similarity between human beings and animals, why
deny one similarity? That is not logic. That is not science.”

The Code of Law

In the Manu-samhita the concept of a life for a life is sanctioned, and it is
actually observed throughout the world. Similarly, there are other laws, which
state that one cannot even kill an ant without being responsible. Since we
cannot create, we have no right to kill any living entity, and therefore
man-made laws that distinguish between killing a man and killing an animal
are imperfect. According to the laws of God, killing an animal is as
punishable as killing a man. Those who draw distinctions between the two are
concocting their own laws. Even in the Ten Commandments, it is prescribed,
“Thou shalt not kill”. This is a perfect law, but by discriminating and
speculating men distort it”. “I shall not kill man, but I shall kill animal.”
In this way people CHEAT themselves and inflict suffering on them-selves and
others. Everyone is God’s creature, although in different bodies or dresses.
God is considered the one Supreme Father. A father may have many children,
and some may be intelligent and others not very intelligent, but if an
intelligent son tells his father, “My brother is not very intelligent; let me
kill him and eat him,” will the father agree? . Similarly, if God is the Supreme Father, why should He sanction the killing of animals that are also His sons?

The Oldest Teachings, Mahabharata tells us: ” He who desires to increase the
flesh of his own body by eating the flesh of other creatures lives in misery
in whatever species he may take his birth.”

The Law of Karma

“He who does not seek to cause the suffering of bonds and death to living
creatures, but desires the good of all beings, obtains endless bliss. He who
does not injure any creature, attains without any effort what he thinks of,
what he undertakes, and what he fixes his mind on. Meat can never be obtained
without injury to living creatures, and injury to sentient beings is
detrimental to the attainment of heavenly bliss; let him therefore shun the
use of meat. Having well considered the disgusting origin of flesh and the
cruelty of fettering and slaying of corporeal beings let him entirely
abstain from eating flesh. He who does not eat meat becomes dear to men, and
will not be tormented by diseases. He who permits the slaughter of an animal,
he who cuts it up, he who kills it, he who buys or sells meat, he who cooks
it, he who serves it up, and he who eats it — all must be considered as the
slayers of the animal. There is no greater sinner than that man who seeks to
increase his own flesh by the flesh of other beings.” — The Law of Manu
5:46-52

Srila Prabhupada quotes” Nonetheless, giving all kinds of excuses, even the
heads of religion indulge in killing animals and at the same time try to pass
as saintly persons. This mockery and hypocrisy in human society brings about
unlimited calamities such as great wars, where masses of people go out onto
the battlefields and kill each other.”

Eating habits can affect our next incarnation:

“All men tremble at punishment, all men fear death: remember that you are
like unto them, and do not kill, nor cause slaughter. All men tremble at
punishment, all men love life; remember that thou art like unto them, and do
not kill, nor cause slaughter. He who, seeking his own happiness, punishes or
kills beings who also long for happiness, will not find happiness after
death.” — Dhammapada 10:129

“To avoid causing terror to living beings, let the disciple refrain from
eating meat. The food of the wise is that which is consumed by the sadhus
(holy men); it does not consist of meat. There may be some foolish people in
the future who will say that I permitted meat-eating and that I partook of
meat myself, but..meat-eating I have not permitted to anyone, I do not
permit, I will not permit meat-eating in any form, in any manner or in any
place; it is unconditionally prohibited for all.” — Buddha, from the
Dhammapada

“For I tell you truly, he who kills, kills himself, and whosoever eats the
flesh of slain beasts eats the body of death.” Jesus Christ, The Essene
Gospel of Peace.

Q: What should I do if everybody around me is eating meat, what to do?

A: Remember the Bible! “Do not follow the majority when they do evil.”
–Exodus23:2

To everybody I please request you in the most humble way, that you put stop to meat-eating as the Karmic reaction for sure show up this life-time or next! This law or justice made by Krishna is infallible!

Keep up the good work Prerna…

Dr. Sanjay Kuruvadi

Shabri Fatha Wrote:

excuse me even plants do hv a life.they cn move.grow.n even they die.so ppl who r vegetarian shuold bs punish severly.coz they eat the weaker ones.[plants compared with animals].coz when u kill a dum or a deaf one the punishment will be mre coz u killed a innocent one ok.do u get it.so think wisely n do eat meat for certain extend.bt dont eat every animal coz u get d characteristic of them in u so select d best one n eat.

thanks if u read this

pruthviraj shinde Wrote:

Dear Sister,

I have very less to say in comparison to your study. What I want to say is that even plants have got life. Recent studies related to plants have also proved that even plants can scream. Only the difference is that their scream is not in our audible range and the second thing their blood is not Red in colour.

If you prove that plants have less senses than animals that doesn’t mean that killing plants is less sinful act.

If I am having a brother who has less senses like- he ma not be able to hear, may be dumb, also may be a patient of paralysis,etc If some one kills this brother, Shall i request the judge to give him less punishment because he has killed one who has less senses than a normal senses.

So why kill the life on the earth? Let us not kill anyone on the earth & let us starve to death…..

mahendran krish Wrote:

Hi gupta,

since last month I became a vegetarian please forward this kind of mails to me

Thanks
mahen

monjit kumar shil Wrote:

Dear Prema

Same case in my life. Now I am a vegetarian. In earlier i don’t eat all fish. I eat fishes which color is white. I don’t like to eat meat because I have created sympathy about their life. I don’t support one’s satisfaction destroy by another life. For this reason when my family member told me that cut the animal for eating, I told him that it is not possible for me. Form very beginning I belief God. When I read in high school then I start to read Gita, before take breakfast every morning pray & read Gita. Without read Gita I don’t take a single piece of food. From my childhood I don’t pray any Dev/Devi. Even I don’t take any Prasad of prayers. Time pass in this way. But my mind in not stay one things. I want to serve the people who are not able to do any thing or who are not able to send her child in school or who are not able to treatment. In this time I have made several questions. Like –What is life? Why we live? What is my duty?

I didn’t have answer at that time. So I take decision-

What is life?-serve for helpless people.

Why we live?–For real love.

What is my duty?-Do the work with six sense. Do not similar work which is harmful to you or your society.

Tomorrow will talk to u——-

mon

Pawan Losalka Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
I am an pure vegetarian Indian and I also strongly support vegetarianism. It is glad to know that one more number is increased towards vegetarianism. There is a saying ” jaisa khaye Anna waisa hoye Mann ” that means your character will built according to your food habit.
Thanks and Good Day.

avinash takte Wrote:

Dear prerna ,

This is first time we are having dam same opinion

Avinash

Dear Prerna Gupta,

I’m vegetarianism but now we not enough foods for supply with us due to economy dropped and we now don’t have jobs now,hope you can give a little support me or donate some money to help us.Thanks.

Regard,
Tan Kean Boon

jayakumarsarma jayasarma Wrote:

Dear Prema Gupta,

it is interesting to know the transformation non vegetarianism to vegetarianism.
I am a vegetarian and sometime i use to have eggs.
thats good and keep it up,
I wish all success for your mission.

JAY

arun kumar Wrote:

good

Venkatesh Seshan Wrote:

Dear Prerna Gupta,
I read your Blog and what I you have written and thought about meat eating is very much the same what I think. Earlier I also used to eat chicken but when I saw the way they were killed it changed my life and now for past ten years I have been a pure vegetarian. I would further say that my mom was against eating chicken and did not allow it to be brought to kitchen and we do the cooking. Later I realized that eating chicken or meat is not good for my health and after my sacred thread ceremony I stoped all this.That was 10years back. During my school days one of teacher who was a south Indian changed my life and thus I followed his advice and became a vegetarian. So What you have written we should be vegetarian is correct. I end up saying that I would also try to persuade my friends and my dad to have vegetarian diet. Yours Venkatesh Seshan

anoop kohli Wrote:

You could have even avoided the question of morality. There is a basic difference between animal fats and vegetable fats as well as proteins. One of the reasons of increased Alzheimer’s in the West is a suspicion of what animal fats do in the long run to the brain microcirculation. the same for proteins, that constitute neurotransmitters in the brain. It may finally contribute to the extent and programming of this supercomputer.

Kohli

Aashish Patel Wrote:

Thank you mr.gupta.i am pure vegetarian and for last 15 years i am with iscon (hare krishna ) temple.Nothing to do with religion but respect animals , birds and mammals since childhood.I was born in India always love nature and clean environment.Thanks and good comments.Hari bol..

kapil mehta Wrote:

a very gud thought of being vegetarian
keep it up

Sailajandan Parida Wrote:

I am adding another point to your deliberation
Just think of a day when one of our dear ones has gone out for a walk or to his place of work and some one more powerful or intelligent than we human beings get them and kill them for their food , and we wait and wait in vain for their return.Why cant we visualise the same scenario for farm animals when some members of the herd go missing permanently and killed by us for food.because we are more intelligent and powerful than them.

Sadasivan N Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
Thank you a million times for that blog on veggie culture,which is becoming more and more popular by the day.I belong to a community of vegetarians and so I do not take it.the non veggies eat it possibly because they think it will make them strong!
Not true in reality.look at the elephant for a classic instance!
Congratulations dear for being a well educated woman!.
If you are interested to know more about how I and my community mmebers live ,please wit till my first English novel titled LEST… comes out!
Love,Dr Sadasivan.

balendra K Wrote:

I am a vegetarian from my infancy.My parents, grand parents and most of our ancestors have been vegetarian.may be due to their religious beliefs, My sons are also vegetarians. I don’t have much difficulty in being vegetarian.Srilanka,India ,Malasia,Singapore,Uk Canada
Dubai- the places I have visited have vegetarian restaurants , hence I did not experience any difficulties. I am not a vegetarian due to any religious beliefs. As stated by you killing animals is not human.No animals kill human for their food. Most of the animals killed for food are vegetarians. I understand that animals have to eat 10 lbs vegetable protein to provide one lb of animal protein.
K.BALENDRA

Denzel Moodley Wrote:

thankyou for sharing your moral dillemma
it is without doubt the most self persuasive argument raised.

the morality you so aptly describe ia an illusary consruct
like many other nature nurture debates but not well written.

Ratanjyoti Bhikkhu Wrote:

Dear Prerna,

It’s an nice experienced in your life.

World should develop, but it should be without harming the animals and nature.

We need more compassion and it would come with Loving kindness towards animals.

You will feel much better being a vegetarian.

Dal is the best curry than the meat.

Best wishes,
Ratan Jyoti

adil palia Wrote:

Thanks for ur blog,
The idea expressed are quite honest and pracically acceptable. U must be aware of the saying One mans’food is other man’s poison, secondly if people turn more towards veg, would there not be unbalanced and abrupt demand for vegitables? Shortages would lead to increase in prices of vegitbales n dairy products, on the other hand population of animals like goat, sheep, ox, buffaloes, etc would increase manifold thereby managing them would lead to space shortages and to keep them alive they are to be fed with grass and fodder and water, So extra increase in demand for their food and what not.

so this is a natural cycle of self balancing provided by our nature.
lets not disturb it.
Adil Palia.
surat.

shailendra goel Wrote:

i offer u a truck load of congratulations for analysing 7 then deciding 2 b vegetarian.
I am a pure veg. -no egg, no meat, no smoking; of course- I take lot of milk & milk products.

All animals /or for that matter all that is living has some sort of neurological system & therefore, ‘emotions’. Dr. Jagdish Jhander Bose proved it in early 20th century that all plants respond to human behaviour, and their growth is affected by the way we treat them.

Mother nature has created all in sucha away that one needs/eats other in order to survive, the big question is – where to draw the line?

I’m happy, u have drawn the line.

dr. S goel

Yogesh Patil Wrote:

Its Good!!!! at least you realize. I am happy you are Veg.

William Draper Wrote:

Since science cannot tell us definitively whether or not animals are aware of emotions, I believe it makes sense for us to act based on our intuition. And my intuition tells me that animals can suffer.

Question: Have science told us “definitively” that plants are not aware of emotions???

Just curious as I have seen shows on TV that suggest that plants have emotional responses????

Laxmi P singhania Wrote:

Dear Prerana,
My experience in the matter should be like that of parents. The place and time, I grew up, it was unthikable to have non-veg and alcohol for any so called high cast person.During my enginnering days, I tried hard to start non-veg food.
Everytime, I felt like vomitting and stopped after a few attempts.
( Fortunately, I faced no such problems for the other item)
When my sons were growing–now 34 and 32, My wife and me took special care that they start eating everything since childhood. Apart from restaurants (which were not upto the mark in the area), we used to get friends to prepare their likings during common dinners.
Now, they are quite at home for any type of food and can relish most of it and take care to remove their fritzes if we are around for a few days.
I see the issues as–
1.there can not be enough food if all becomes veggies. I think there will not be more than 5% vegs around.
2.Most of the health and infection problems are imaginary as there is hardly any pocket in the world where all are veg. Life expectancy and general health standards are far better in the world where people are not aware of vegetariansim.
3.the whole world of animals is surviving on predator concept and we can not change it.
But inspite of beleiving it, I have a problem.
I can see one vast tract of marshy land from my bed room. There are lot of pigs breeding there and look beautiful playing and roaming ( from the distance and height at least)
Once in a while some lads come and trap a pig or two to take them away.
I feel bad and think them as thugs as illogical as it sounds.
Laxmi P Singhania

We don´t need science to be aware of humanity or to sense if a living orgasm feels pain or not!
We just need to open our eyes!
Which life is preferable, the life of a human or the life of an animal? When I travelled on indian roads I could recognise that there´s a difference between an animal and human life!
The treatment and life conditions of millions of poor indians, mothers and their babies, disabled people, who live an in my eyes animal life on roads are worse than the conditions for an animal at a farm.
If there´s an animal on the road a car stops, but if there´s a beggar, or disadvantaged he/she gets ignored or expelled by a horn of a car or a wave of ones hand.
Such impressions decide about a reputation of people in a country.

Prerna, why don´t you raise your voice here?
Which god do you worship, Ganesha the elephant god, a rat god or a monkey god?

I support all authentic humans, vegetarians or non-vegetarians.
A human life or better karma isn´t only related to food habits.

Greetings,
Naddu

living organism*

Abhishek SInha Wrote:

2 start with…i am myself a non-veggie(in oll senses)..I have hd frnds who are oderwise VEGGIES but dont refrain frm hving non-veg “OUTSIDE” deir house or PREMISES!! i mean…i don get dis idiosyncracy…
Non-veg is considered 2 b IMPuRE by certain strict families….However, at times the “NORMS” are “RELAXED”….like u can consume “it”,but re-gain PIOusness..

Now wait , derz more…Now dere r CATEGORIEZ of non-veg ITEMZ…”EGGS” get “lucky” at times…Now even in “EGGS”, I am told deir is a “SPECIAL-VEG” egg…i am told it is green in color(correct me in case i made a BOO-BOO)…comon guys…the animal is getting KILLED anyway u “PROCESS” it…so y dis bizzare LOGIC??..I have found dis amazing “CHALTA HAIN” attitude averywhere(in me too)..just wen we feel like doing something, we come up with such amazing CONTRADICTING logic many a times…just becoz we wont to do it..we will do it anthow and den say”chalta hain boss”..
Just want to say that, in case we want to follow some traditions..we shd try to be STRICT abt it..else be FLEXIBLE..simple..:)

TO NADDU,PLEASE I AM AN INDIAN AND NOT PAKISTANI,
naddu i am an indian and not pakistani….i always fantasize about doing with older woman..Cougars excite me….Sex in humans is not for reproduction only. In animals it is so. Thats why animals unlike humans feel the sexual urge only for a few days in the year. This is known as the rut. Humans don’t have anything like the rut. They feel the secual urge for the whole year. Sex also has the larger purpose. It serves as a vehicle to enlightenment. Sex with awareness does the same thing that meditation does..The same thing Lord Shiva told Parvati in the Vigyan Bhairav tantra of Shiv Purana…Think about it..20 years is not a big difference for me…Since u r financially well-off and i am financially ruined off the package suits me even more..Think about it…And you are absolutely right that a human life or better karma isn’t only related to food habits….I dont belong to any religion….But you beware…
You are a muslim .But that doesn’t give u the right to hurt the feelings of the hindus by calling their gods monkey gods…And what about Prophet Mohammede. His ascending the heaven on his horse..Any comments on him or his horse ..take care..love ankur.

TO PRERNA
thanks for your reply.Its good that you are upgrading. If one posts comments on your photograph, the response comes ,”waiting for the approval of the moderator”.I feel that needs to be rectified…No intervention and no censureship is my advice..
Prerna i have just read the article on wilkipedia..The question is will it be ecologically sustainable to support the 6 billion strong vegetarian population on cultivation alone..how much non-forest land will it require..the last part of the same article says that cultivation of grains too depends on fossil fuels..So it wont make that big a difference ..You also need to take into account the deficiency of various kinds of protein in the vegetarian diet needed for the physical and mental growth…Lastly where do we need to draw the line..take care..love ankur

@Naddu
What you wrote is 100% true. Most disheartening about India is: Exponential Progress and Expoenetial Social Down Grading. I have worked recently for few years there. It is shocking.

1. Depression and hence sexual activty among young people has crossed all limits. Anti depresant consumption is highest in India among working class. Also Exploitation of poor and needy girls(including ladies) has become a way of life.

2. If some one is dieing in the middle of road, no one comes to help.

3. Arragancy is way of life. Try to drive by rule, you get abused by almost all drivers.

4. Me First and my family is last. All benefits must start with me and end with my family. THIS IS THE BASIC ATTITUDE.

IT IS DISGUSTING. REALLY DIGUSTING.

@ANKUR

Be a man and earn big to provide comfort of life & financially secure future for your self & your future wife.

Parasites have no place in any one heart.

@Denzel

Morality and Philosophy’s are for those who have spare time, a common person is busy making his/her living.

@ankur ha ha thank you for your response, very curious!
Sorry Ankur, I thought you´d be a Pakistani, the way you sometimes attack people induced the idea you could be a terrorist coming from Pakistan. (no offence to all nice Pakistanis)
What makes you believe I´d be a muslim? And hello! compared to a 60 year old woman I feel still young. When you are 18 you think a 30 year old is old, when you are 30, you may consider a 50 year old person as an old one, age is a relative size Ankur. The felt age, spirit and energy matters.
Regarding religion, I got taught the religion of the reformer Martin Luther, hence I´m protestant (and rebel). Though, I need to confess, my religion has been to believe in the good in a human. God is the good in us humans. Happiness is something to be achieved by your own actions. Faith and belief help a lot when people seek explanantions for mysterious matters or events they don´t understand.
I agree, sex isn´t for reproduction only, but the primary sense is reproduction.
Sex is a happiness factor (beside many others like children, friends, good food or physical activities, sports) It is even against nature that the libido curve of a woman raises by ageing, whereas the curve of a man is going down from age 25 on, diametrically opposed. I understand that sex has a priority at your young, hillarious age.
Ankur, there´s an indian god called Hanuman, he looks like a monkey, I doubt you are Indian?
There´s an enormous number of gods or animal gods being worshiped in India dearest. I don´t insist to offend anyone or any peaceful religion, but I needed to drastically express that a human has a top priority regarding care and appreciation. I`m an animal- and naturelover, and still think that a moderate consumption of meat doesn´t cause any disease nor would it be harmful or cause a disbalanced nature. Overpopulation is the worst danger at all. 5000 children die every day, because they don´t have access to clean water. You need 4000 liters of water to produce 1 t-shirt.
Why are especially those animals threatened with extinction a human would hardly eat ????
It makes more sense when we try to protect populations by keeping their natural environment instead of questioning food habits of conscious people who breed animals for nutrition.
By the way, by reading the number of great comments I have the feeling vegetarians think a non-vegetarian would consume and eat raw meat or would behave like a Barbarian or Cannibal. Vegetarians prepare meat carefully, with appreciation, joy and respect, a piece of beef, pork, chicken goes without a saying, can be soft like butter on your tongue…does not mean you need to have it daily, it´s infact a yummy addition, causes satisfaction and happiness. Anything that improves satisfaction and happiness is a life quality. I´m happy I don´t need to restrict myself for any belief or some other reason. I understand how to control myself, I´m aware about healthy nutrition and also comprehend, that the nutrition is just 1 factor for a wellbeing and good health. Stress/hectic, physical laziness, too less sleep, smoke, alchohol, unhappiness in whatever personal matter are risks for a body. An addition of a number of these factors increases the risk for diseases.

Ankur, I don´t have doubts you´ll manage your life with your brain and determination, and with your great fantasy. Infact, you are your own architect in life. Visions about sexual adventureous or dreams about a female provider aren´t a solution to rescue you …lol

Take care,
have a nice eve!
Naddu

*visions about sexual adventures… (blunder blunder, sorry lol )

nirmalakc 15 Wrote:

Hi Prerna, the mail about veg was really good, but many of my friends consumes nonveg, many times I have tried to realise that what they are doing is wrong, but they are not ready to accept that……..is there is any good idea to realise them? if there is can you let me know, please……, and also I proud to be an veggi.

Thank you Prerna for given this information and also my mail is always open to this type of good mails.

Thank you

Nirmala

Pujesh Londhe Wrote:

thanx prerna 4 superb message

Arun singh Wrote:

Hello,
Received your nice blog. Really it is a most observing topic and we youngers must to do something else on this Topic. we must sincere about it.

Prerna, Life have different beautiful colours, it our choice to choose right one for our good and healthy future. So why not you write something about it.

Take Care
Keep smiling

Mr Rajeev Patil Wrote:

Dear
is it really that complex issue??
U eat veg or non veg ,it creates a wholly non veg body [ made of ani,mal cells].Whether u like it or not ,
u harbour so many living bodies ; inside or outside it; which either suck ur blood or live on ur efforts ,
anyway ur body supports nonvegetarian living beings in a way practises nonvegtarianism .Ur ignorance about it
no justification of its practice.Some of them kill u slowly or symbiotically ,but die u must for them.

Basically vegetarianism was born out of Indian Protestant [Bihari Buddhists or jains to start with] religion as a reaction
to indian catholicism [Aryanism / brahmanism ] from north west hence it’s less of moral issue than political !!

Consciousness–R u sure what it is?
Its nothing more than large symbolic processor with eqally large memory .How much large depends on further lab experiments
In fact that background of so called awareness is a brain dopamine [neurotransmitter] availability status indicator .Less avalibilty means less feeling of awareness. U r just a chemical being apart from above definition !!

SOMETHING SHOULD BE FOR NEXT MEETING IF U WISH
SINCERELY

aNSGYNABTECH

aspathak pathak Wrote:

I APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS TO MENTION REALITY.

REGARDS
A.S.PATHAK

TO NADDU,
honey i never said that u r old. I am 23 and you are 20 years older than me. That means you are 43. And women in the age group of 40-50 have been found to be sexually most active. In comparison to younger woman. Also woman as they grow older bloom completely.
On what basis can you say that sex is primarily for reproduction. Its your assumption. And honey assumption is the mother of all screwups.
Sorry , I thought u were a muslim. But the way you justify terrorism and your anti-sex attitude made me think that u were from the Taliban heartland.
I agree with your comments on eating meat. i too enjoy beef, pork and salami besides potatoes and lady-finger.
I am sure that with my brain and determination i would manage my life. If not u then i would find some other financially well-off older woman to take care of me. But the offer is still open for you. Take care. With my love and lust. ankur.

THANKS AUSSIE,
I will pay heed to your advice. And will try to be a man.take care.love ankur

Dear Ankur,

to remind you to your Biology lessons, though I assume a sexual education doesn´t happen at all at schools in India. The first thing that was registered as sex ever happened between fungis. A fungus has neither brain nor emotions, nor would it be able to make a move at all, it just grows and reproduces. The official definition of sex: either of the two main categories (male and female) into which humans and most other living things are divided on the basis of their reproductive functions.>the fact of belonging to one of these categories >the group of all members of either sex. 2 sexual activity, specifically intercourse.
Your interpretation of the word sex is just a possibility, hence, as you can see, my interpretation is based on another one. I suppose you have been thinking about various derivatives. Could it be possible that you were assuming, not me? :P
I don´t justify terrorism and never will. Terrorism isn´t meant to be, will never be justified at all. I don´t follow an anti -sex attidue, it is a pro-sex attitude, but as I stressed, I do also have some other hobbies and pleasures in my life, sex is just one of them.
May I give you an advice? When you are in a dilemma, don´t wait for others to resolve it for you.
To be successful and achieve something in life, you don´t only need a brain, you also need the will to reach a goal. But this won´t happen by sitting in front of a computer, thinking about your destiny or any solution. Why don´t you start using your hands otherwise, beside bothering a keybord or apart from activating your family jewels? :P lol
Ever thought about jobbing? That´s the way life works dearest!
Thank you for your kind offer, I´m content with my life. :-)

Have a sexy day! ;)
Naddu

Dear Aussie,

thank you for your agreement! :)

Have a wonderful day!
Naddu

Dear Mr Rajeev Patil,

thank you for your fantastic elaboration. A human body is a buildup kept or destroyed by various living microorganisms.
You are correct, when a human confuses religion with politics it only harms humanity.

Thank you for your clear comment, I enjoyed it.

Kind regards,
Naddu

DEAR ALL,

THE TRUTH OF MORALITY TO RESCUE THE PLANET AND OUR CHILDREN LIES IN OURSELVES. WE SHOULD RESOLVE THE PROBLEM BY CURING THE CAUSE NOT THE SYMPTOMS! WHEN DO GOVERNMENTS CARE FOR BIRTH CONTROL? THE HUMANKIND NEEDS OBVIOUSLY TO BE FORCED TO BEHAVE RESPONSIBLE. ALL COUPLES THAT HAVE MORE THAN 2 CHILDREN ACT IRRESPONSIBLE REGARDING OUR RESOURCES AND A NATURAL BALANCE! WITHOUT OVERPOPULATION WE ALL WILL HAVE A GOOD LIFE!
IT MAY SOUND CRUEL, BUT IT IS THE RESOLUTION!

mickey kalra Wrote:

Great article

minesh modi Wrote:

Hi…
Its really a good one.

What i feel that, you being a educated has easily understood the consequences by eating meat. But what about the lacs & crores of people who are illiterate & uneducated in all over the world. They don’t know what will be impact in long run. Hence our saints & older who are experienced, has linked with emotions & beliefs. Their ultimate aim was to save people from dieseases.

However due to some selfish people has mis-represented the facts & tried to expose the saints & older person as they are against the meat eating people.

It is up to us how we look at the things. Either you can say Half of glass is filled with water or Half glass is vacant?.

Rest all is well. Have a nice time.
Regards,
Minesh

azizul hakim Wrote:

Dear Prerna,

I think you are a learned STUPID!! Before thinking about killing the ANIMALS for FOOD, you shuld be thinking about thousand of African-Middle Eastern-Asian HUMAN BEING,slaughtered/killed by the so-called “First-World” white people, in order to continue their dominence, comfort and luxury.

A very popular comment among the worst effected african region is ” before they send Foods and Peace-kepping Force, they sold us Arms & ammunitions and spread hatered among our tribes, just to get our Dimonds, minerals or Oil”

So, Please dont FOOL yourself by how an Animal is killed (in order to supply nutritions to those Human-Killers), but concentrate on the Human Being it self, which may present you a beautiful world with peace and harmony.

Thanx,
Aziz

arshad meo Wrote:

Dear!

I have read the detailed comments on being vegitarion or non vegitarians. I wont go into the philosophy of what all you mentioned, but I will add some of my logical and natural reasonings as under.

1. Earth in part of the universe. Human being has been declared the representatvie of the creator “Allah – The only one”. Every thing on this earth is for the humen being and humen being is there just live the life as per the teachings of the creator. (Though the human being does not live according to His teachings)
2. All animals & living creatures are there to for the man kind. there is no accountability of the animals after thier death. the aim of thier life is over after they perish. but there will be a day of judgement for the muhan being, to sort out for thier deed. Humen being must be very resonable, considerate and kind to the animal. ruthlessness and merciless deaalings are contrary to the teachings of any religion.
3. Becoming a vegitarian only for the reason of being kind & due to the feeling of inflicting torture is wrong. killing of anilam for the purpose of eating, irrespective of being rich or poor is allowed. killing just for the hack of it is criminal and not justified. accesss of everything is bad. Beef has maximum amont of “Uric Acid” if not consumed, is depositted in the joints, In 40s this depositted matter results in “Gout”. To counter Doctors advise to stopp all red meat and restict to white meat, chicken and fish. So the quantity and usage is wrong, the stuff is not bad.
4. All the animals must be slaughtered proprly with sharp knife. all the blood must be drained out. Animals not sloughtered and thier neck is just “struck off” through the sharp blade does not meet the logical and health requiremtns. this slaughtering is mandatory for all animals, starting from Hen to Camel.
5. As far as using of animals skin is concerned, it is 100 % justified. its all for you(humen being) and you)humen being) is not for the animals. evry by product made ode of anilmal fat, bones and skin is ment for the humen consumtion, in any form, starting from dress, bags or shoes. Humen being should not feel guilty in using that in any form. You must thank the creator “Allah” who has made you a humen being. I hope the reservations for the usage of anilmasl by product will be justified now.

Take care of yourself!

With Best Wishes,

Your Sincerely!

Arshad Meo

M R Gupta Wrote:

Dear Prerna

It is very nice to hear that you are now vegetarian.

Vegetarian food is very good for health, yoga and spiritual development.

Thanks

CA M. R. Gupta

sahil amar Wrote:

Attention:

As per the logical information you have given, they all seem to be very good? But deep down in your heart just ask your self.. our creator Almighty ALLAH has given us permission to have meat and allowed several others EXCEPT for the flesh of swine ( PIG ). i just want to ask you if really you know there is only one GOD whom all human and Jinns and all that exist in this universe belongs to. I DO NOT KNOW OF ANY LOGICAL THINKING OF ANY HUMAN BEING THAT WILL GO BEYOND OUR OWN CREATOR.

So to me all the reasons given are just logical reason and NOT fact from our CREATOR.

Regard’s

pravat sancharr Wrote:

Dear Friend,
Zindabad.
Thanks for your blog which is very useful.
Yours sincerely,
Pravat Kumar Sahoo

Muhammad Mubeen Wrote:

Sory Brother V R Muslims and v eat every thing that is allowed by Allah Taalah

bhaskarmudam vbr Wrote:

morality of eating is to serve the community who are producing it. Think of them if you don’t eat. They no longer have faith in your capability and they no longer want to employ you. The govt. no longer can amend law that can benefit those communities.
Everything is going down and down. U r angry and suffer drastic fall in the per capita income and the world is devoid of greenness because of excessive veggies.

I can’t imagine a world without people.

NAGARAJ RAMALINGAM Wrote:

Hi

Very good stuff. Defenetly makes peoples to thing once more before consuming

Thanks & Regards

PR Nagaraj

muhammad Al-Mamun Wrote:

Thanks.

Dipankar Haldar Wrote:

It is a very interesting subject. I have also thought a lot about it. I am also a omnivore. I have my relatives who are staunch vege. If you really want to discuss on this subject, mind you the subject canot be taken lightly.

Before I discuss on the subject, I would like to know a little more about you – your lineage, wher you were born and brought up,your age, your educational background etc.

From your name, it is clear that you are of Indian origin. That is why I am interested to discuss this with you. Had you been an American, I would not have bothered to reply to this mail, because I feel that is not worth.

The subject raised by you has scientific, moral, religious and spiritual aspects which are beyond conception of Yanks.

Hope to receive your reply soon.

Dipankar Haldar

mohammed naqi wasif Wrote:

Dear Prerna
Animals can be classified as carnivores, omnivores or herbivores on some basic biological facts.
1. Carnivores have generally a single stomach and cannot digest cellulose which is a basic part of vegetable matter (herbivores have upto four stomachs to digest cellulose and enzymes to digest it
2. The eyes of carnivores are basically binocular i.e. set in the front of the face so as to give a 3d view in order to hunt prey. Vegetarians have bulging eyes on both sides of the head so as to mantain 360 vision for protection from carnivores
3. The food cycle would be severely disturebed in case of non consumption of herbovores and lead to overgrazing and disruption of the food chain.
Please apply your brains and not some airy-fairy farts peddled by some eggheads in yale or stanford to come to a conclusion-they simply dont wash just like laissez faire capitalism
regards
Wasif

Abhay Jain Wrote:

Thanks. Good Article on vegetarianism

navin nenawati Wrote:

It is very nice .
I was always searhing this type of material to convince my friends

Dipesh Chauhan Wrote:

Thanks for your email Prerna… I’m a pure vegetarian – don’t even eat eggs. Didn’t got enough time to get in touch on Yaari.com, didn’t read your email thoroughly though. But I like your approach about being non-vegetarians. I know animals are brutally killed for the food of selfish human kind.

- Dipesh Chauhan

ian gardner Wrote:

You are right.

I agree with you and would like to only eat vegetables.

Thanks,

ian

lal kanoujia Wrote:

very,,,……very thanks

atul khanna Wrote:

Hey Prerna
Once again enjoyed reading your mail. Only thing that makes sense in this article is your belief. Once you are possesed by a belief you don’t need scientific rationale. These facts merely help strengthen or weaken the belief.

Well keep enjoying the low fat dairy milk and protect your feet with leather shoes….until your belief changes.

Atul

vishal Bannoo Wrote:

Welcome her to this world of vegetarians (lacto vegetarians)

Thank you prena

wireless network Wrote:

keep it up sweaty i already start comparing u wid tolstroy

jai kapadia Wrote:

Good article Prerna – Keep it up

Jai

Arvind Kumar Wrote:

Thank u

rajat sharma Wrote:

i like the your blog (The morality of vegetarianism).i myself a vegetarian.this is our culture or our religion whch tells the the importance of vagetarian.as talk about leather goods mostly this type of leather made by the dead animals.so dont be hesitate about thir uses.

Ankur Agrawal Wrote:

Really a good one Prerna.

chandra sekaran Wrote:

Dear Prerna,
:) woh! Really its very nice. Keep me posting of this kind of very useful info’s. Definetly i will share it with my friend of this facts.

With love,
Chandru.

good work……

SHARMA, D.K. Wrote:

Thanks prerna for sharing a very good experience (fact) of life .

Bob Dzere Wrote:

Thank you so much for the info

JAWAID WAQAR Wrote:

No one on this earth can survive without killing others. Plants are also living things, it’s different that we cant hear their growls and cry. Liking and disliking is totally a different question, but if you say I don’t eat because we are just killing a life then forget it without killing you can’t survive. Killing a one eyed or a lame man than a healthier man doesn’t reduce the crime, but here we are not at all doing a crime as the Lord Almighty has created us like that only. Nowadays being a vegetarian has become a fashion, the one who converts and starts saying to people wants to prove that how humble I have become now. “I don’t kill ANIMAL nowadays. Like a person who remains in A/C just stars starts saying it’s too hot in other’s place, why keeping shut would have been the best example but he or she wants to hear everyone that he or she has an A.C at his place.

Jawaid Waqar

jamil akhtar Wrote:

I m a muslim guy , so naturaly I will prefer to take nonveg rather than veg because in all our parties we used to take nonveg.It was so tasty.but taking veg is healtier than nonveg that I m accepting to pandit people other wise there is nothing to take nonveg in food

@Sahil Amir

Regarding PIG Meat. Jewish also don;t eat PIG meat. It is religious and does not need any clarification. Same goes with Beef and Horse Meat.

Have you ever seen any Christian eating Horse Meat ?.

So eating and not eating one type of meat(PIG, BEEF or HORSE MEAT) is pure religious mater and does not need any discussion. RELIGION IS A PURE PRIVATE MATER.

Vaishali Parekh Wrote:

YES I TOTALLY AGREE TO THIS AND ALSO FEEL ONE SHOULD MAKE A CONCIOUS EFFORT TO MINIMISE DAIRY CONSUMPTION

Anil Joshi Wrote:

I am a vegetarian, have been all my life. I ate meat once and that was more than enough. My children eat meat, not red meat. But they also have their vegetarian food.

Once, while living in Switzerland (I do live outside of India), I went for initiation into Kriya Yoga. Great grand nephew of Parmahansa Yogananda was holding the classes.

My wife and I met him the evening before. We got into a discussion on vegetarianism. Both my wife and I are vegetarians, the swamiji is not, eats fish only – that is one of the things that came out in our discussion.

Next day the classes started and some introduction after each session. The swamiji said, being vegetarian is simply not about the act of not eating meat. It is also about how you control your mind, how clean are your thoughts and how you conduct yourself with other human beings.

While saying, all of this, he did not once look at me but the meassage was understood. He had said all that is so relevant and so apt.

Mahatma Buddh ate meat , and yet he was a self realised soul within 6 years of having started yoga.

I still do not like eating meat.

Yes, there is cruelty in killing animals. And it is important to look after animals. Yet we have humans killing humans all the time. We have had slavery and we still have slavery.
50% of the population on this planet is lucky to get one full meal a day, yet there is enough to feed 3 times the population at present. 10% of the world’s population consumes 86% of the planet’s resources (of course they are in the west).

Yes, so we get a few books to tell us how bad things are for the animals. Things are a not much better for 3000 million people. And another 2000 million live on US $2 dollars a day. All in the developing world. Meat is out of their reach. Most meat is eaten in the west, and they can write their books to ease their guilt, absolutely, they can. But there is a lot more to be feeling guilty about.

So, Ms Prerna, I take your point. But there is a lot worse going on in the world. Please put it in perspective.

If you are going to publish my piece on your blog, publish the whole lot or not at all. (I remeber you edited and published excerpts from my response on your drinking piece).

Best Regards

@Naddu

You are the best.

@Aussie

You are the bestest.

@Aussie

Du bist der Beste :-)

Carpe diem!
Naddu

TO NADDU,
hi honey, how r u. dear i read in my biology that there are two types of production. Sexual and asexual. And fungi reproduces asexually. I think u should recheck it in ur biology books.
But if u dont believe in the ecstasy of human sex give me a chance to take u on those ecstatic planes.
One of the reasons i write is to raise the consciousness of my fellow human beings. To stir them out of their sleeps. But u would not wake up from your sleep.And look from ur own eyes. Or like ur friend Aussie. Who still cannot see a plain simple thing. That all organised religions r a threat to unity. He would continue repeating like parrot that all religions are beautiful. Inspite of all the bloodshed.
Honey go and buy Nancy Friday’s Women on Top. And also ”From Sex to Superconsciousness” by Osho, my master.
And i am asking for ur hand so that i can put my hand to some productive work. So reconsider my offer. You can reply at my personal ids chandraaa@rediffmail.com or achandraaa@gmail.com. Take care. love ankur.

Dear Naddu

I always believed everybody around me far more smarter than me. SO I am not the best test. I mean you do fair bit of research before writting any comment(Out of brain, not emotions).

PLEASE EXPLAIN “Du Bist Der Beste” What does it mean.

Dear Laxmi Singhania

Well, thanks for the wonderful contribution. However, when I last checked the definition of Morality: It has no link with being Veg or Non Veg.

Dear Naddu

I have worked out what does “Du bist der Beste”. I have sent you an private email for that.

Dear Ankur,

may I suggest you this book?
Sex in Fungi: Molecular Determination and Evolutionary Implications

Author: Editors: Joseph Heitman, Duke University Medical Center; James W. Kronstad, Michael Smith Laboratories; John W. Taylor, University of California, Berkeley; Lorna A Casselton, University of Oxford

About the book:
Sexual reproduction is ubiquitous in nature. As the engine that drives genetic diversity, sex accelerates adaptation and removes deleterious mutations. As such, it plays a central role in the origin and success of species. Studies on the major groups within the fungal kingdom have provided significant and wide-ranging contributions on the molecular bases by which sexual identity and reproduction are defined and controlled. Sex in Fungi: Molecular Determination and Evolutionary Implications not only encompasses the current state of knowledge, but also serves as an invaluable resource that will guide new research on these systems and organisms.
Since John Raper’s pioneering studies with the basidiomycetes in the 1960s, and the elegant work of Ira Herskowitz with Saccharomyces, genetic, molecular, and genomic analyses of fungal sexual reproduction have helped to illuminate how sexual cycles function in, as well as drive, evolution. The biological principles involved are profound and can serve as general paradigms for how cell identity is established and maintained, how cells sense and respond to extracellular cues, the role of genetic rearrangements in generating changes in cell identity and fate, and how genomic regions governing sexual identity are organized and evolved.

Drawing on the great advances made over the past 10 years, this volume provides illuminating insights into the molecular details of cell-type specification, mating-type switching, pheromone perception and signaling, and cellular and nuclear fusion. The tremendous impact of comparative genomics on the analysis of mating is evident in many of the chapters in this book. This volume includes chapters on both model and pathogenic fungi as well as a section that looks forward to what we hope to learn in other fungal lineages. The book concludes with a selection of chapters on the implications of sex, and studies of experimental evolution, in a broader evolutionary context.

Key Features

Offers a comprehensive examination of sexual determination and reproduction in an entire kingdom of life
Encompasses the current state of knowledge and also serves as a resource for the next several decades of research on these fascinating systems
Examines model organisms that are particularly amenable to genetic, molecular, and genomic analysis
Ties current knowledge to broader questions about sexual reproduction and evolution
Provides a paradigm to guide research into the mechanisms of mating in all of the fungi

Ankur, honey, I have the feeling you confuse sex with eroticism, a human ecstasy isn´t related to sex in biological sense!

I´m all awake :P
Naddu

TO ERIC,
Dear i read ur compliments just now. Thankyou once again. I have told u the secret, if there is one, in my response there.
I agree with u that there is no question of morality involved in eating meat. i have also noticed that people who are heavy non-vegetarians sometimes get jaded with the food. They then turn to vegetarianism. And attach a moral high ground and holier-than-thou attitude to it. I clarify that i dont mean this for Prerna. As far as i know her i think she is completely honest. And writes whatever she believes in. take care.love ankur.keep complimenting me.

NADDU, BRILLIANT HONEY U R BRILLIANT,
First i was ignorant when i said that reproduction in fungi is asexual. U r right. Its sexual. So sorry for that. That u can turn up such an informed response in such a short time. u r absolutely brilliant.
Naddu human beings are 99% animal and 1% consciousness. The different between u and a cat is that u know that u r a woman and a cat doesn’t know that she is a cat. Sex is the bridge between our animal being and our consciousness. Eroticism happens when we have a prayerful consciousness towards sex. A prayerful attitude towards sex.
And when we accept sex we also accept our animal being. In that acceptance we are transformed from dog to god.
I also think that sex in humans is unique. Unlike in animals or fungi it is not limited to reproduction only. So u can say that sex in humans extends far beyond sex in fungi. It has far reaching implications than reproduction. Biology is at fault when it classifies sex in humans along with sex in other organisms.It is the bridge from material to divine. From dog to god.
Hey honey i think we r diverting from the main subject. I want the answer to my offer. take care.my love and lust.

TO LAKSHMI P SINGHANIA,
Sir ur name makes me curious. R u some relation of Raghupath Singhania. The raymonds people. If so then i feel honoured to respond to u. Secondly i have raised this point before that it wont be possible for our planet to sustain a 5 billion plus vegetarian population. I actually think it wont be possible to sustain more than 20%. Take care.love ankur

jahanzaib ali Wrote:

see doctor zakir naik’s dailog with an indian( i have forgotton his name) on the topic ” is non-veg is permited or prohibited” may be it will help u out of removing this misconception abt not to eat meat.
bye
takecare

AZEEZ AHAMED Wrote:

Dear Prerna ,
i agree with u that we take the life of other living beings. i also take only less of non veg mostly fried chicken. i will try to become fully vegetarian
regard
azeez

santosh gupta Wrote:

I am started to eating meat after 10 years.

TO MY MUSLIM FRIENDS,
A lot of my muslim friends on this blog say that allah has said this meat to eat and that not to eat. My simple question to them. Have they personally met Allah or God?Have they really.
IF they have not met Allah personally how can they say that allah has said this or that. R they relying on the words of Koran. Koran r the words of Prophet Mohammed. We all know that he was a man like us. So his words cannot be taken as the words of Allah or God. Say today i ankur declare myself a prophet. Nd start saying that my words r the words of God or Allah. Two thousand years afterwards some fools will start taking my words as that of Allah or God. And will stp using their minds. I want ur answers. take care.love ankur

DR.HITESH SOLANKI Wrote:

dear prerna.
good job.i m a jain i.e by birth veggy.but apart i m a doctor.medically now adays we have come across many diseases directly or indirectly caused by the non veg food (piles, obesity, cancer, etc).the only harm being pure veggy is u go deficient with vit b 12 but it can be simply taken care by having vit b12 (methylcobalamine)oral tab or injections once a month.being veggy gives u calm body calm mind and healthy life .PHILOSOPHICALLY SPEAKING if have a look across the region where maximum meat is eaten u will find some or the other natural disaster or social instability or cruelty of thought/ mind etc always.similarly u have alook at people or community or region who consume only veg u will surely find them good at brain,bussiness and socialy very sound and peaceful.

This ws a really good piece of work prerna n i specially appreciate the way this concept is put upon … basically the concept of hw CONCIOUS the ‘living thing’ is ….. this also resolves the arguments of some people who say that according to science even PLANTS are living things so humans must not eat them bt they dont understand that the “conciousness” in plants is much lesser than animals so the “suffering” caused is much “lesser” comparatively.
I expect people will understand this n it will surely cause some good to the world.
Thanx … Kanak

Hi, i read your article. i like it how you write and you make an analise. But i am not a vegetarian and maybe i will not be. i like very much vegetables and i eat very much but some times i feel desire to eat some chiken or some shaorma or some hamburger. I dont eat very often all this but i think my body need it some times and then i have desire. yeah maybe you have all time enogh money to buy just vegetables who are bio maybe you are right but i cant have all time just fresh vegetables and bio and good things. In my country this is a very expensive diet.

people go and ea

…. In my country this is a very expensive diet and a lot of people go to doctors to make for them a diet but here and juice from cruel fruits but more fruits and exotic are expensive. And i dont like idea to dont eat some meat because of religion.
Yeah you dont eat because you dont like or it is not health but … a lot of people not taste because of religion … so in India cow it is holy but if some people from India come in Romania and maybe they eat and dont know what it is and like it … you know here are a lot of students and at us is a kind of food from emat and it is some combinated pig with beef and anothers … and we put aat roast and are called “smalles”and are very good

so if eat an indian student here what happend here maybe few people can explain he cannot eat because it is kind of meat he dont have allowed to eat. And i think human body needs some meat not exagerate or what make all and waste a lot and who killed animals just think at business and like all chiken has taste of fish because all give some proteins and some of fish bones to increase and become good for sell.
and another aspect it is health and yeah just look at women who are vegetarian if they not have more days hemorogy when are in special days of month like menstrual time than woman who dont have a vegetarian diet and this because need some from meat.

sudhakar choudary Wrote:

good writeup.u can add One more dimension-Religion.

Islam sacrifices Goat on the Bakrid Festival.

Jainism is the only religion Which prohibits harming any life

Do u know The Eskimos live only on meat.They will not survive
converting into veg as they dont have farming on ice

regards

sudhakar choudary

uttam lorha Wrote:

IT IS VERY TRUE THAT WE HAVE NO RIGHT TO KILL ANIMAL .THEY HAVE THERE OWN LIFE.

UTTAM LORHA

Shreyas Zinjarde Wrote:

dear Prerna
I believe in one thing… if you are hungry as a human you have a advanced brain that can surely lead you to good quality food. Veg is abundently available. It is a fallacy that by consuming non-veg the biological cycle is kept on check. we are basically veggie. Areas where veg was and is not readily available have a reason to be predominantly non-veg.
Being veg has advantages but the argument is unending. AS regards shoes/footwear is concerned, haven’t heard about good and lasting alternative than leather apart from “Khadau”

Keep walking

Tarique Mahmood Wrote:

Hello Prema,

only one question in mind, that is do you think plants are not living matter? if no then your theory might be understand able, but I think plans are living, because they grow they multiply and they need oxygen etc etc.
Because they do not make any noises and they can not show their feeling it does not mean we can eat them, thinking that they are not living, what do you think,
TXS
Tarique Mahmood

Tarique Mahmood Wrote:

@Tarique — i’ve already responded to this strange line of reasoning at least a couple of times…my argument was not about living vs. non-living. it was about consciousness. i do not believe plants are conscious beings. do you?

Buddha Kewat Wrote:

Hi Prerna,

I want to respect you intectuality. You have deep knowledge in various issues. Thank you a lot.

Buddha

Dear Tarique

Who is PREMA ? I believe it is Prerna.

Dear Muhammad Mubeen

Muhammad this is what you wrote “Sory Brother V R Muslims and v eat every thing that is allowed by Allah Taalah”

Islam is a great religion but Please don;t use Allah Taalah’s name for your Taste and Pleasure.

rabindran israel Wrote:

Very good, compelling argument. Enjoyed the article.
Rabi.

Human beings are basically omnivores, if you take it from the biological perspective. Every human being has the ability to digest meat, simple enough reason to understand that we are all non-vegetarians by nature. And that is how we started our race in evolution. That said, vegetarianism is only a constraint brought about by further morality in effect of sixth sense.

I am vegetarian myself, like you, but only by principle. I do not have problems in eating meat and in fact, I believe humans play an important role in the food chain balance by eating meat!

And when it comes to inflicting pain and environmental issues, what doesn’t cause them, save alone non-vegetarianism? Having a dog chained to our house, and exposing it to noise waves from TV (that we can’t hear, dogs can) causes much pain to a dog, how much ever we cuddle it. Every bird craves for freedom and caging them is scientifically proved to bring about depression in them. Non-vegetarianism only gives us a feeling of causing more pain by killing animals, but the fact is that we do a lot of worse things unknowingly!

Atleast eating meat is justified by the biological phenomena, unlike other injustices to animals.

ISLAM IS A GREAT RELIGION
A few lines from holy koran, the holy book of islam,”A true believer of Allah can only indulge in sexual intercourse with his wives or his slavegirls. ” Gosh! the great religion encourages its followers to keep sex-slaves. Great!!!!!!!!!

Dear ankur..I’m quite busy these days n am unable to access yaari that often but I’ve got a question for u..do u hate every religion that much or is it Islam only..? I have sensed that u strongly resent islam and muslims…
it is not good for just anyone to trust on one’s abilities to judge everything so quickly that much..

you have probably got a copy of holy quran..u read it n u think that u dont need any explanation of the verses which even moderate muslims like us need n r unable to understand because things have changed a lot with the passage of time..u read it, make ur own interpretation n feel as confident as u’ve written the book urself..the style of ur writings always show ur unneeded confidence..

As u’d once mentioned urself its an ancient book..things in those times were different..this verse doesn’t imply that u r allowed to have intercourse with every female servent u’ve got..ofcourse it is prohibited in islam to have sex with ur femals servants or any other women except ur own wife..
it has been said about the female war prisoners who used to b left alone after the battle..to support them, males of the society were asked to take care of those ladies n perhaps that’s why were also allowed to have sex with them n have kids with them..because they had no future otherwise..n lets admit who would like to give war prisoners back when ur own men,women n children r in the imprisonment of the opposite side..those kids were equal in every sense to the kids of their own wife..atleast it is a lot better to give a woman a home or any such status rather then killing them as the other barbarians of that time used to do..
I’m just trying to disseminate the information I had on this topic nothing else..

Slavery was very common in that time especially in saudi arabia untill islam emerged n ended the tradition..no sex slaves or any such thing is allowed in this religion..as I’d already mentioned talibans have altered n distorted the impression of islam very much by pretending that whatever they do is on the basis of islam not on the basis of their violent nature.. no wonder that a lot people misjudge islam beause of the modern impression of it created by extremists like talibans..

one could have insisted on giving the women back n not even trying to have sex with them, to their families when the other party of the battle would also have agreed on giving the families of the earlier party back too..but ofcourse neither of them ever did that…n so horrible as this fact is i wonder who knows if the other party would have treated the women of the earlier party even worse..?
take care..love..
madeeha

MADEEHA I THINK THIS TIME UR EXPLANATION IS RIGHT
How r u? I find ur explaination plausible. Quite plausible. Therefore i think i may be wrong in the interpretation of these line from Koran. I m sorry for that. But there r many other lines in Koran that need to be explained.
Dear i m sorry . But u r right.My experience with muslims in my life has not been good. I have found that most muslims r religious bullies, agressive,orthodox, hypocrite nd voilent. Though i have also been fortunate to have met few very beautiful muslims like u. But on most accounts i agree with Salman Rushdie that:”Muslims of the world need to introspect that why whereever they are there r conflicts.” May be u can prove him wrong. Take care .love ankur

According to me it does not matter what goes in your mouth, what matters the most is what comes out of your mouth, your thoughts and actions should be right.

We all are creation of God and we should look beyond religion and eating habits.

hi prerna
i am really impressed by both your mails
after reading the first one i have stopped eating non-veg food
thanks 4 aweking me…….

Pt.S.SuchindranathAiyer Wrote:

I love kissing. In public or out of it. So, I simply can’t be objective about this. I am biased and as a person with a personal agenda in this matter, excused.

Dr.P.J. Ranganath Wrote:

This refers to your ‘The Morality of Vegetarianism’. I wish to state
my views on certain points:
Before this, I should enlighten you about my Profession. I am a
Siddha Medical Practitioner practising in herbal treatment. I must
appreciate that you have become a vegetarian.

In your Belief No.4, you mentioned about minimizing the suffering of
the animals when they are called for food. It is really strange as to
how you can minimise the suffering as inflicting injury itsel is
wrong. How can you know as to what amount of pain the animal suffers
whether it is minimum or otherwise! You should come to a definite
belief that inflicting injury and cause suffer or even kill anything
for one’s food is sinful and cruel. In the stone age, man was
illiterate and hence went on to kill animals for food in forests (in
that age forest area was more due to less population). But today
Science is so advanced and even many have found out that nonveg food
damages liver and intestine. As a Doctor in alterate medicines, just
because Science has not found out the intensity of a animal when
killed for meat does not mean that you can go on killing them for your
selfish crave for food while alterate food which are good health are
very much available. I wrote a article a few years ago and I used to
tell all my patients that God created nature first with food for man
and animals first. Even herbs were ready for the man (yet to be
borne) for his diseases. One more: Can you take a child or even
present yourself at the site where the animals are killed for meat.
It is like seeing a person killed in front of you in a accident after
prolonged agony and cry. Imagine this and you can understand that
every living creature suffers if they are injured.

In your Nuances (2), you mentioned that animals do not have a
comparable prefontal cortex, as found out by Science and hence do not
have emotions. Look at the animals and birds and their behaviour.
They are fond of their newly born pets. They show utmost care. I
have seen cows nourished at home weeping when their master dies. Even
elephants cry when they suffer due to pain. Many think that man alone
has the Sixth Sense and in my experience, I have seen a lot of people
behaving like animals while the latter are better. Man has become
selfish while animals mostly are not.

Interestingly, you should know that there are certain rare herbal
plants which shed water (like crying!) and there are some plants whose
branches closes towards us when we go near them and departs when we go
away from them. These are interesting things to note that even plants
have life. I heard from my Guru (now no more) that one rare type of
“Thulasi” a popular herb in the world (which is used to treat Asthma
and Bronchitis) presently available in high hills of Himalayas have
life like us, because, if you cut the the tiny branch of this rare
type of plant, the blood like water oozes (which means we are killing
them also!). Though it is inevitable to use plants for our food.
Killing any living thing is a greatest sin, we no one can create a
life even you cannot create a ant with life! Since I am treating a
lot of Cancer, Anemia, Heamophilia and other chronic patients, I start
my treatment after I get a assurance that they do not go back to non
veg food after becoming normal since from my experience, patients who
got a complete cure got a relapse of the disease within three hours
after taking any non veg food even iif it is after ten years!
Experience also shows that non veg food along damages mostly the liver
and spleen for which we are yet to find medicines except in systems
like our Siddha and Ayurvedic but not in Allopathy. Treating a
vegetarian is easier and he or she responds to treatment well and fast
even. From the other side, if you start eating non veg food, your
feelings and emotions are greater. You get irritated and emotionally
upset often. All religions definitely are against committing sins.
If you need any clarification, you may ask me. DR.P.J.RANGANATH

saurabh agrawal Wrote:

Hi prerna,

As i had read your blog, i too find it uncomfortable to have nonvegetarian food since last 2-3 months.
Even i am now having vary odd feeling for these kinda foods and drinks too.

fasahat husain Wrote:

MIS PRERNA GUPTA
I’M really thankful to u to send such a nice articles.just keep it up
fasahat

Amit Kumar Wrote:

I like the way your explanation on being a vegetarian now i will also try.
Thanking you.

Kishore Sukthanker Wrote:

I am impressed about the thought. I am a nonvegiterian but agree to your scool of thought some how!

rajesh talwar Wrote:

dear prerna,
i was a meatlover till i read this message , you helped me to change my mind.
thanks a lot.

best wishes and regards
Rajesh Talwar

Hearing your views on vegetarism was least expected from you. perhaps this is the real part of you and other is just posturing to bring -upfront u’r tough side. The points raised are pertinent and very true. Infact i feel that being veg – you become more sensitive to other life forms including human. So promoting veg is promoting non-violence.

to all the persons who is reading this,
can anyone tells what is the difference between animal and plant,i think no difference because they both have cells in them and which are living cells.
Eating a plant is also like the same as eating the animal. The difference is only the
plants they dont move but still they too are living.
Think of this.

Hey,

Good writeup. I totally agree.

Dear Prerna,

Yours is one of the well-written articles about the merits of vegetarianism. You have made your points very cogently. There will always be many schools of thought on a subject such as this. Yet it is important for us to state our views with clarity so that like-minded people can benefit. This you have done commendably. Congrats.

One can argue for or against vegetarianism or for or against flesh-eating by quoting from health sources, or religion, lives of Mahatmas, or what have you. Yet it is important to remember that it is our own life that we are talking about after all. It is important to think for oneself and feel the sensitivity. It is important to make the right choices and not be misled by the force of arguments.

ur essay on vegetarian is so interesting,every man in the world has right to choose what he or she think better for him/herself.
GOD ALMIGHTY created world,animals,human beings,plants and whole the universe.
u say it is harmful act to eat meat,so good but u think if we don’t eat particularly cattle,the number of cattle increase becuase the production of cattle in large,then everywhere u see animals and animals.
second we remain good human being without eating meat,it is not essential to eat meat to live but GOD ALMIGHTY created for us.

Leave a Reply