Pages

Archive for the ‘morality’ Category

Public Display of Affection

Saturday, March 28th, 2009

You can tell a lot about a culture by its tolerance for PDA. Last September, a married couple was arrested in Delhi for kissing near a train station and were put on trial for obscenity, a sentence which could have put them both in jail for 3 months (in separate cells of course). There was some controversy over the accuracy of the police reports, with the couple denying that they were in fact kissing while snapping pics of themselves with their mobile. Fortunately, the presiding Judge S Muralidhar had some sense and dismissed the sentence, saying that even if police reports were accurate “it is inconceivable how… an expression of love by a young married couple would attract an offence of obscenity and trigger the coercive process of law”. Of course if they had been unmarried, it would have been a different story entirely.

I was personally quite embarrassed by the Richard Gere – Shilpa Shetty incident a couple of years ago. It was not the kiss that embarrassed me, although it looked quite strange (Shilpa really didn’t seem to enjoy being kissed by an old man). Rather, what bothered me was the Indian response, which betrayed our country’s continued backwardness regarding all things sexual. I just don’t get it. Why are we so afraid of sex that we won’t even allow two people to enjoy their time together by showing a bit of affection? I think it’s sick that we are still so repressed that we restrict freedom in this manner. I can already anticipate two of the comments that some of you will give, so here are my arguments against them:

  1. your argument: kissing in public will ‘excite animal instincts’ of men.
    • my rebuttal: anywhere you go in india you will find the walls of dhabas and chai stands plastered with erotic bollywood posters. watching a bollywood movie is also a public affair. bottom line, there is plenty of voluntary public consumption of soft-porn across india, so i don’t think a loving kiss between two people is going to add much to the fray.
  2. your argument: they can do whatever they want in private, but why must they do it in public?
    • my rebuttal: there are no parks or beaches or other such romantic places to enjoy love in private. denying people the right to enjoy their love is a crime, in my opinion.

Just for fun, I collected a few photos of “public displays of affection” from around the world. Can you guess which couple is from which country? Here are a few options (not all will be used): Brazil, France, Italy, India, Morocco, Russia, Sweden, US

italy1

nj_gay

mumbai

paris

brazil

sweden

follow Prerna on twitter at twitter.com/prernagupta

The Morality of Vegetarianism

Sunday, March 15th, 2009

I have eaten a lot of meat in my life. Although my mom is vegetarian, she allowed us to eat meat and even bring it into the home. I’m not sure why she was so flexible on something that she felt so strongly about for herself. Perhaps she didn’t want to create yet another reason for us to feel different from our American friends, or perhaps it’s because the morality of vegetarianism is such a complex issue.

Even as I ate meat almost every day of my teenage life, I thought often about the question of whether eating meat is wrong. There were many aspects of meat that were unappealing to me. Meat preparation was unbearably morbid, and the more hardcore forms like steak and ribs were just plain gross. Yet somehow I was always able to convince myself that there was nothing immoral about eating meat. We are omnivores. We have evolved to eat meat. Killing animals for food is part of the natural cycle of life.

During my third year at Stanford, I was introduced to the ideas of Eric Schlosser, who wrote a book called Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. Schlosser’s book sheds light on the disgusting practices of the meat industry in America, with vivid imagery of the torture inflicted on America’s factory farm animals. These ideas presented the most compelling argument I had heard against eating mass-produced meat. Animals raised in factory farms are not only killed, they are tortured. Yet I still ignored my gut feeling about the matter and continued consuming meat daily.

In the spring of my senior year at Stanford I took a trip to India, which was accompanied by a two-week vegetarian fast. Although I had done this many times before in my life (i never eat meat when i am in India), something about this trip changed me. When I returned to Stanford, meat suddenly started smelling and tasting like “flesh”. It became increasingly unappetizing to me. I had already stopped eating beef a few years earlier for health reasons, but now even chicken and fish seemed gross. Somehow, after years of justifying my meat-eating habits to myself, I realized that my body was not meant to consume flesh. And so I became a vegetarian. Not exactly for moral reasons. Perhaps it was for health reasons. But more than anything, it was just a feeling I had about what was right for me. I could no longer eat animals.

I have now been a strict vegetarian for nearly five years and have since developed a pretty strong moral feeling about it — i believe eating meat as it is produced today is wrong. My reasoning is based on my own moral beliefs, combined with some hard facts:

Beliefs

Belief #1:  inflicting pain and suffering on any conscious being is wrong. The greater the level of consciousness, the more wrong it is.

Belief #2: prematurely ending the life of any conscious being is wrong. The greater the level of consciousness, the more wrong it is.

Belief #3: humans who have the basic necessities of life (food, shelter, etc), should minimize their negative impact on the environment.

Belief #4: humans who do not have the basic necessities of life should be free to kill animals for food, but they should try to minimize the suffering of the animals they kill and treat the animals with respect while they are alive.

Facts

Fact #1: in order to eat meat, we must prematurely end the life of the animals we eat.

Fact #2: conventional meat production in modern society inflicts severe pain and suffering on animals throughout their lives.

Fact #3: conventional meat production causes severe strain on the environment by emitting massive amounts of methane.

Fact #4: conventional meat production creates “superbugs”, which are resistant to all existing forms of antibiotics, thereby endangering the lives of other humans.

And so, I do not eat meat, and I am encouraged by the growing interest in vegetarianism around the world. However, I still believe the morality of vegetarianism is a complex issue. First, there are a few nuances that raise questions about the beliefs I have stated above.

Nuances

Nuance #1: Professor and Author Michael Pollan raises an interesting question in his book, The Omnivore’s Dilemna: if you remove all the negative stuff that comes along with mass-production of meat (say, for example, by raising and killing meat yourself on a small family farm), then you are bringing animals into this world (i.e., giving them a life that they would not have had otherwise), giving them a luxurious existence (plenty of food and shelther), and killing them without any suffering. Is it still wrong to eat meat in this scenario?

Nuance #2: According to neuroscientist Joseph Ledoux, human awareness of emotion is a bi-product of our having such a large prefrontal cortex. In other words, we are aware of emotions like pain, suffering and anxiety because we have a large prefrontal cortex. So it is possible that animals without a comprable prefrontal cortex, such as cows, pigs and fish, do not experience such emotions at all.

The first nuance is not really relevant for most of us, who do not have easy access to “humane” meat. The second nuance is interesting, but highly speculative. Since science cannot tell us definitively whether or not animals are aware of emotions, I believe it makes sense for us to act based on our intuition. And my intuition tells me that animals can suffer.

My Own Moral Shortcomings

All this said, I must admit to a couple of my own moral shortcomings.

Shortcoming #1: although I have minimized my leather purchases considerably since I became vegetarian, I do still buy shoes that contain leather.

Shortcoming #2: according to everything I have said above, I also really should not consume conventionally produced dairy. While I try to buy organic dairy, I am definitely not strict about this, and dairy is a majory part of my diet.

Why do I continue to buy leather shoes and eat dairy? Because these are part of a happy life that I am not willing to give up. I like to wear leather shoes to my business meetings, and I like to eat low-fat dairy as part of a balanced diet. Each of us has our own limit for self-sacrifice. For most, that limit allows for eating meat. But I hope that every person is made aware of the facts and makes a conscious choice about the amount of pain and suffering they are willing to inflict on others.

follow Prerna on twitter at twitter.com/prernagupta